Energy cost of walking with and without hand weights while performing rhythmic arm movements
File(s)
Date
1985-06-19Author
Cigala, Kenneth Jr.
Advisor(s)
Kensinger, Keith
Wood, Kimberly
Butts, N.K.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the energy cost of walking while performing hand-weighted exercises. Ss, 15 active healthy males (x=48.9 yrs), walked at 3.0 performing the following: normal walk (NW), and rhythmic arm movements to the shoulder level of excursion (SLE) and head level of excursion (HLE), with no weight (0-), 1 lb (1-), and 2 lb (2-) hand weights. The 7 exercises were NW, O-SLE, 1-SLE, 2-SLE, O-HLE, 1-HLE, and 2-HLE. Following a practice session, the Ss participated in 3 test sessions where the exercises were randomly performed on 3 different days, with no more than 3 exercises per session. Variables measured were HR, VE, VO2, METS, RER, RPE general, and RPE arms. A 1 and 2 way ANOVA with a Scheffe post hoc analysis revealed several significant differences. The average energy cost for the 6 arm exercises were 3.8, 4.1, 4.5, 4.1, 4.8, and 5.1 METS, respectively. These and the and the other energy cost values were significantly higher than NW energy cost, except for O-SLE. HLE produced significantly higher energy cost and HR values than SLE. A significantly greater energy cost was noted for adding 1 and 2 lb weights to the no weight exercise, and signicant increase for adding 1 1 lb to the 1 1 lb exercise. HR significantly increased with the addition of 2 Ib to the no weight exercise. The RPE values were not greatly different from each other and accurately reflected increases in exercise intensity at the relatively higher workloads. These findings suggest hand-weighted exercises evaluated would assist in reducing body weight because of the increased energy cost when compared to NW. The intensity level of the hand-weighted exercises could not produce a training effect for the subjects tested, however, the MET level was appropriate for persons with a maximal MET capacity below 10 METS.
Subject
Walking -- Physiological aspects