00:00:00Kathryn Clarenbach #466 Transcript
MA: [first part of the introduction is cut off] Clarenbach.
KC: 1987, you might add.
MA: 1987. Thank you Kay.
MA: Well, let's begin by looking at these
KC: Okay. I'll explain first what the photograph album is and why I have it.
This actually is the album of my brother David. And um, he was killed during
World War II in a plane crash; he was an aviation cadet. After he died my mother
put together this album with pictures mainly of him. And by the time she
finished it she thought wouldn't it be nice if she pawed through all the other
old snapshots and put together one for each of us, which she did. Mine is buried
someplace in the basement, but I am in enough of these so that it will refresh
my memory. I thought it was such a good idea that I started doing it with my
kids. And as soon as I had two and three I would have triplicates made of any
00:01:00photograph and started books for all of them. By the time they moved out I told
them they were on their own.
MA: It was up to them to continue it, huh?
KC: Right, uh-huh.
MA: That's a wonderful-
KC: Well, I'm trying to...well, they're all labeled. Thank goodness. This is my
mother's family, all except her youngest sister; so the two year old is my mother.
MA: Where was your mother born, Wisconsin?
KC: Yes, in Sparta. The same town I was born in. And her brother and two older sisters.
MA: That's wonderful.
KC: It's a good thing she wrote that. When my mother, well a few years before my
mother died when I was visiting in Sparta, I uh, we hauled out reams of old
00:02:00photographs from a closet and I had her dictate to me who was in those pictures.
So that I have some background.
MA: Yeah, pretty Important. Did she live in Wisconsin her whole life?
KC: Yes, mm-hmm, practically. During World War I my dad was stationed in Little
Rock, Arkansas. And I thought my mother had never learned how to drive but she
told me that (my mother and dad were married in Sparta but then they lived in
Kendall which is a little town not far from there where my father had been a
preacher and my mother had been a country school teacher and when he was, and my
oldest brother Bob was born in Kendall, when she was pregnant with her second
child, my mother drove with this four year old and a growing fetus, by
her--otherwise by herself--from Kendall, Wisconsin to Little Rock, Arkansas.
00:03:00Over mountains and other such things that she said by the time she got there
that ended her driving. She got there safely, but she was so miserable on the
whole trip that she never drove again.
MA: Uh-huh, interesting.
KC: And they actually lived in Little Rock College, which is a Catholic college
run by priests, so my mother was the only female around there. And they
maintained warm friendships with a number of those priests for the rest of their days.
MA: And was your mother college educated?
KC: No. She started teaching country school in a really rural one room school in
a community known as Summit, which is about, I suppose, 25 miles from Sparta.
Much of Laura Ingalls Wilder's books, I think one of the reasons my mother loved
00:04:00those so much and loved reading them to all of her grandchildren, was that it
reminded her of her own experience in those days. And when we move into this
photo album a few pages we'll see, I think, some pictures of, perhaps all of us,
but certainly David and me spending time at this farm where my mother roomed.
She was paid $28 a month for teaching school and I think room and board was
thrown in, in addition to the cash income. But we used to visit that farm and
just loved it. Sometimes we'd stay overnight and sleep in the barn in the
hayloft, just for fun.
MA: Were the original people still there?
KC: Yes, the whole family.
MA: Did she ever talk about how she felt about the experience, what the work was
like, about the payment? Did she feel she was fairly paid and what the work was like?
KC: Well we, she talked a lot about what it was like to teach. And she had such
00:05:00a range of ages and abilities. In fact during World War II, in Sparta, which is
where I was born and where my parents did live, they moved there in 1920 shortly
before I was born and then lived in Sparta the rest of their days. And Camp
McCoy, now known as Fort McCoy, is located just a few miles outside of Sparta,
so that during World War II there was an enormous inundation of military. In
fact, they used to come there every summer from ROTC and CMTC. And my mother was
a Gray Lady--
MA: A Gray Lady?
KC: --a Gray Lady during World War II. You're too young to know what that is.
MA: I don't know what that it is; I should, probably.
KC: Well, they were volunteer women who worked in hospitals and other military.
I don't know that the ones who worked in canteens were ever called Gray Ladies,
00:06:00but they had uniforms that reflected that, so. In any case, I guess she was at a
USO when this incident occurred. A couple of soldiers were quite drunk and there
was, one of them was wielding a knife and there were fisticuffs or whatever and
the local constabulary had their hands a little too full and all of a sudden my
mother looked and recognized one of these men as having been a first grader in
her Summit school. And she went over and called him by name he said "oh Miss
Hubble" and he sobered up at once. [Laughs] And he apologized and that was the
end of his misbehavior. So she must have had an influence on her students. She
did, my mother did have one summer here at the University, must have been before
she was married. She stayed in Chadbourne Hall, which, there was an old
Chadbourne Hall where the high rise is now. And apparently that was a very
00:07:00exciting and wonderful experience.
KC: My dad had a lot of, he has a bachelor's and a master's degree from the
University of Wisconsin and a law degree from Georgetown law school. Shall we
wait for the airplane?
MA: Sure. [Pause] Okay.
KC: Well, I guess I mentioned that my dad had--
MA: A bachelor's, a master's, and a law degree.
KC: Right. And an honorary doctorate from Little Rock College.
MA: Wow.
KC: And I suppose in each case, their encouragement to all four of us to have as
much schooling as possible, came out of their own experience. My mother was a
great reader; she loved to write, she didn't have an awful lot of opportunities
to write but she would write, for example, not only her own paper every year for
00:08:00Literary Club and papers for other organizations she belonged to, but frequently
would ghost write my father's paper for Literary Club, which he would then stand
up and read, but she would have the fun of doing the research and writing it. I
think the fact that she didn't have an opportunity to go to school as long as
she would have liked, made her value that experience. So that my, both of my
parents, but particularly my father, used to line us all up, three of us were in
college all the time that I was an undergraduate, which was a little bit of a
strain on a country preacher and a country lawyer, financial strain that is. And
in fact, he borrowed money from the bank to pay our tuition which was then
$27.50 a semester.
MA: Oh my, what an example of inflation.
KC: That's right. In fact, there was a real student protest during one of my
00:09:00early years here when the Regents threatened to increase the tuition up to
$32.00 a semester; they were successful, of course in doing it, but. Anyway, my
dad always said I will see you through to a master's degree and after that
you're on your own. He just assumed that there would be an after that and there
was in each case.
MA: For all of you.
KC: My brother Gordon who is just older than I, and I got our masters degree at
the same time here, in the same ceremony, he in Economics and I in Political
Science and then after the war, he got a Law degree and I got my Ph.D. and my
brother Bob, who was in dramatics and speech, did everything but a thesis for
his Ph.D. from the University of Iowa and by that time was kind of fed up. My
husband did exactly the same thing at exactly the same age at Columbia; he had
00:10:00everything but his thesis.
MA: That's a frightening bit of information.
KC: Well, yes, yeah.
MA: How did, did you always know then, from the time that you were a young girl,
that you would go to college? Was it kind of a given in your reality?
KC: Yes, I don't think we ever discussed it; the only question was where we
would go to school.
MA: I see.
KC: And my brothers both had a couple of years at LaCrosse, which was a state
college at the time, but I didn't want to go there. I remember a conversation
about Lawrence College, which is now Lawrence University in Appleton, but I
didn't even want to go and look at it. I don't -- I have no idea why. I just
assumed that the University in Madison was where I wanted to go to school.
MA: Did you have any reasons? Just because it was the biggest school?
KC: I don't know that I ever thought through; I must have had some semiconscious
00:11:00reasons, I had visited a lot in Madison. I had friends here with whom I would
come and spend the week. Our family would come here frequently from the time I
was very, very young. We'd come just for the day and go to the zoo and look at
the Capitol and my father would show us a lot of his old haunts. He was born in
Madison and went to high school here and in fact, worked his way through the
university by preaching in two little communities near here: Ironton and
Cazenovia. He would hire a rig on Saturday and drive to these places, conduct
two services on Sunday and then drive back. And apparently was paid enough to
make out. When we would come to Madison as kids, he would point out where he
used to play Hare and Hound chases out, and of course the way in which the city
00:12:00had expanded since his day, and of course it is even more so in the 27 years
that we've lived here, but that was always kind of interesting.
KC: In fact, I was thinking a little while ago, of the kind of sense of history
that particularly my father, at least I identify it in my memory, had, not only
on trips that we would take, which I can got to in a minute, but in our little
community of Sparta, which was just shortly over 3,000 population when I was in
school there. Now, of course, it is a metropolis of some 6 or 7,000. And my dad
frequently, if we were in the car going downtown, he would stop at the
blacksmith shop or take us around by what was called just the square I think, I
00:13:00can't remember, where there was a watering trough and where the farmers would
hitch up their wagons when they came in on Saturday. And he also took us to the,
a flour mill that we had, a little creek that runs through town called Beaver
Creek only it's called Beaver Crick, to see the feed mill and point out that
these things wouldn't last much longer and that we should really become
acquainted with them and know that they were, you know, on their way out. And
so, this was similar to our visits to Madison or wherever we went, he would
point out changes of things that had been different when he was young and that
were going to be different pretty soon. On some of these trips, we did have some
awfully nice vacation trips again when I was a kid. One summer, we had, one
00:14:00summer when I think I was about 12, we had an eastern trip for about 6 weeks or
so and we went by train to - you'll see snapshots in there of Plymouth Rock and
oh the Gettysburg battlefield - we went to Frederick, Maryland because our name
was Frederick and one of my brothers purloined what today would look like a
bumper sticker marking Frederick, Maryland, saw where some of the witches of
Salem were persecuted. Wherever we went, my mother would try to fill us in on
some historic information and my dad would walk us through. And I remember my
mother loved to tell the story of having to intercede in what turned out to be a
very unpleasant, I don't know if it was a real fisticuffs, but my brother
00:15:00Gordon, he would have been 14, and his friend from across the street, Doug
Burnett, they had been absolutely fast bosom friends since they started
kindergarten together, never had unhappiness between them and they were actually
wrestling and fighting and my mother went out to stop it and to find out what in
the world was going on. Doug said well Gondy said his dad was in the battle of
Gettysburg and I know he wasn't and Gondy said he was too, I saw exactly where.
I am sure my dad had pointed out where Wisconsin Civil War Union soldiers had
participated and made it so real that my brother was absolutely sure he had to
have been there.
MA: You really grew up with a sense of history.
KC: Yes, without really knowing that we were.
00:16:00
MA: Yeah.
KC: The earlier, when I was five or six, we had had a west coast trip and we had
stopped to see friends in Denver and other places, and then took the train to
Seattle where we got on a boat and went down to San Francisco, by boat. And my
mother used to tell me that I was absolutely certain we couldn't possibly sleep
on a ship or a boat. The only boat of my only experience was a little row boat
on our lake at home and I didn't see how that many people were going to be
comfortable on it. And then we had time in California and Yellowstone Park and
all of the traditional things. I guess it was unusual - there were not a lot of
families in our community who had the opportunity to do things like that. We did
go almost every summer for a few days in Chicago, for quick few--we went to a
00:17:00World's Fair, but also my dad would time these visits to Chicago to coincide
with baseball games. He was a Chicago Cubs fan and he would try to find a time
when there were doubleheaders, so that he would get his money's worth. I would
be scared for quite a number of visits. The idea of Chicago was just nothing but
gangsters and shootings and I was very leery about going.
MA: How old were you when you first recall a trip to Chicago?
KC: I don't know. Probably about eight or ten I suppose.
MA: Do you have memories about what it was like?
KC: Yes, I do. My dad would drive to the, a garage in Evanston where he had
prearranged the opportunity to park the car because he didn't want to drive in a
great big city. He wasn't afraid of the bandits but he was afraid of the
00:18:00traffic. In fact, he was a terrible driver. I always maintain that he never
really made the transition from the horse and buggy; he thought the car could
take care of itself. [Laughs]. When he used to drive from LaCrosse to Sparta,
which is about 30 miles, he had an office in LaCrosse for another job that he
had, State Patrol and Probation Officer, and when anybody in Sparta knew that he
was in LaCrosse for the day, they would try to head home earlier than they knew
he generally did, so that they wouldn't get behind him on the highway, because
he literally was stopped at least a half a dozen times when there would be a new
traffic cop who didn't know his car thinking he was a drunk driver because he
would watch the scenery and forget to stay in his lane. In any case, when we
went to Chicago, he would then park in Evanston which I'm sure was a blessing
for the entire metropolitan area. We took the elevated into town, into the loop
00:19:00and my dad and the three boys stayed at the YMCA and my mother and I stayed at
the YWCA because those were the cheapest places in town. I guess my mother got
dragged to the baseball games, although after we had done this a few times she
would even beg off from going to the ball games. I got a little bored before the
second game was over, especially if it lasted kind of late, but also sometimes
my mother and I would, because we weren't staying with the men, would get up
early. I remember one time we went to a morning matinee. We thought that would
be so risque to go to a movie in the daytime. Oh I used to go Saturday
afternoons to see the westerns in Sparta, but to go in the morning! When we
walked in, maybe we only did it once, I can't remember, my mother said "Isn't it
00:20:00strange that all of these men are sitting around in the theater, why aren't they
working?" To see men at a movie in the morning, of course, then when the gals
began walking out on the ramp and shedding their garments in between, she began
to realize why there were so many men in the audience.
MA: So it was a traditional matinee, but during intermission there was a
burlesque show?
KC: Yeah, yes, and it was in the morning. And I have thought many times that my
mother took me to my first, if not only, striptease. I thought for the wife of a
Methodist minister that was going some.
MA: That's wonderful.
KC: I might tell you what the rest of my father's occupations were.
MA: Yeah, that would be good.
KC: He, I don't know which was his primary identification, but he was a country
minister, a country preacher, who had as many as eight parishes at one time
00:21:00which he would serve. Four services every Sunday: one at 9:00 in Leon, one at
11:00 at Big Creek and in the afternoon it would vary from Angelo to Cataract,
alternate. He would alternate afternoon services around and then Sunday evening
was always Rockland, which was a little town about six or seven miles away. Then
he would have some Wednesday night services and some maybe just once a month in
some remote, more remote places. Actually as many as 8 parishes going at once.
He would meet the people, he was never great at remembering names and faces--oh
he would remember the individual but forget where they lived, and so when he
would meet people on the street and they'd say "now when are we having services
again", if he couldn't remember where they lived he would have to say "now let's
see, when did we have it the last time?" and that would identify it for him.
00:22:00Mostly, his preaching was missionary work. He really didn't, wasn't paid enough;
they'd give him the collection and that would be about it. It rarely covered gas
and oil, so that it really was no source of income. He did have an enormous
number of weddings, funerals, baptisms and such, simply because he was known
throughout several counties and in many, many rural communities.
He and my mother used to be invited to country schools back in those days even
when I was a kid. I say "even," as though it was only yesterday. There were
still one-room schools, the consolidation movement hadn't....in fact it was a
point of great discussion in our household. Both my parents thought that what
would be gained in the education of the students would be a loss to the sense of
00:23:00community and the doing things together. So, I used to sometimes tag along when
they would be invited to judge the forensics contests or give the graduation
address at an eighth grade event, and it was always kind of fun. Again, another
of the historic things.
Then my dad was a lawyer, again I have to call him a country lawyer, he called
himself that, mostly pro-bono work, not by design, but because he always
maintained that when a very poor client would go to one of the other attorneys
in the community they could see that this was a nonpaying customer so they would
be terribly busy and then say "But I think Frederick might have time, why don't
00:24:00you go and see him?" And I don't think he ever turned down anybody, certainly
not because they didn't have money. Then he was a State Humane Officer, I think
we have, I know we don't have such a one anymore, and in that capacity it was
his job to investigate such complaints of people who were being unkind to
animals. And so he would, and I remember many times going with him, he would
sometimes work these calls on a farm where there had been a complaint in with
other trips that he had to take. Or when we'd go on fishing trips, which was my
mother's idea of a real vacation. She would pack up the 4 kids and my dad for a
week and she'd stay home. And that was her idea.
00:25:00
MA: Oh, of course!
KC: And we loved going with my dad because he never paid any attention to
whether we were clean or not and the only time we would bathe was when we'd go
swimming in the river or wherever we'd happen to be. Mother said we'd bring home
the luggage with everything neatly folded just exactly the way she had packed
it. We hadn't even fished up pajamas or toothbrush or anything.
MA: Who did the cooking when you would go camping?
KC: Well, usually the county sheriff or his wife. My father was a past master at
getting freebies and so he would stop in the jail and visit the, and often have
business with parole or probation or something, I don't know, or he would
manufacture some business, I guess, and he'd ask where there was a good place to
eat or to stay overnight, many is the night we slept in jails and in actual jail
00:26:00cells. Frequently the wife of the sheriff or the wife of the jailer would notice
finally that one of us was a girl and say "oh, I don't think a little girl
should sleep here." I would be so horrified at being separated from the rest of
the tribe that I did my best to insist that I stay there.
MA: Were you mostly successful?
KC: Mmmm hmmm, I was. So we often ate there but otherwise we ate inexpensive
hamburgers and chocolate malts.
MA: I see. So you didn't bring food with you, or that kind of thing?
KC: No. I think we would have starved. After my mother died, she was 74, my dad
stayed in the house for several years and he did manage to fry an egg and a few
simple things but he never did really learn how to prepare a meal. I used to
00:27:00think he might suffer from botulism because he didn't wash things he just
figured he was going to use it over again and it seemed unnecessary.
MA: With everything you've said about your dad, I see that humanitarian thread
all the way through.
KC: That's right. And in fact, he had his office at home. I mentioned his office
over in LaCrosse when he was, during the period when he was a State Parole and
Probation Officer and that was actually his main source of income and his
primary job. These other things he kind of sandwiched in, although they
certainly took a great deal of time. Because his office was at home we all
learned to be receptionists and message takers from, I suppose the time we could
walk and talk. We had a steady stream then of people coming into our house who
00:28:00were either prisoners or trying to escape going to jail or bereaved people or,
well, and a lot of poor folks. They weren't all poor, so we were exposed to this
as normal. These were not exceptions, these were kind of the way people were and
the kind of problems people had to live with, and then this would be the
conversation at our meals.
My father was also a very political person. He had been in our State Legislature
before he was married, elected from Kendall, I'm hesitant to say from the same
district that our current governor served from in the legislature, but in a
different generation of course, and he ran for Congress, for United States
00:29:00Congress when I was quite young, maybe 1924 or 1926, he didn't, he was not
successful in his campaign. It's a wonder to me that he even....when I see
snapshots now of my dad going out by himself, maybe the kids would be along,
putting posters up on rural posts and had little, maybe one little leaflet or
something, but compared with the way a winning campaign has to be run today it
was pretty slender.
MA: What was your mother's role vis-a-vis all of this, when all of this was
going on?
KC: Well, in the first place, she had to tolerate having my father's office in
the house. They worked out an accommodation, by my father would stay up half the
night. He would often work at his desk and he typed up his own correspondence
00:30:00until 3:00 and 4:00 in the morning. My mother got up at 6:00 every morning, in
fact sometimes earlier than that, and would do her domestic chores. Well she got
up early enough because she liked to write in her diary every morning before
things got too thick. But then to have breakfast ready for four kids and herself
and then to do the housework which we had a fairly large house and she worked
just in ways that I never have had to work just to maintain the household. She
did have some help, a cleaning lady, and then for some years we had what we
called a school girl.
[Pause]
The school girls often stayed throughout their whole 4 years and really wanted
00:31:00to stay on longer. They thought they were learning a lot and were always treated
not like hired help, but very nicely. My mother kept a very special eye on their
wardrobe and made sure that they had the proper things. They would go home on
Friday after school and come back either Sunday night or Monday morning. It did
help her a lot to have somebody do the dishes or when we were very little, to
keep an eye on us when she went out.
Now you ask what her role was. She, my mother always did my dad's expense
account for his State Parole and Probation and kind of kept track of other
reports that were due. She went with him to the Methodist conference every year,
and not really out of a sense of duty. She didn't function like the typical
minister's wife. In the first place, she did a lot of her own things. She liked
00:32:00to play cards and in those days it was verboten in the Methodist Church, and she
didn't care what the rules were. She was a religious person and a spiritual kind
of person. She went every Sunday night to the Rockland church with my dad. In
fact it took me many years to figure out why I would be kind of down on Sunday
nights, lonely, and I finally traced - no matter where I lived or what I was
doing. I finally kind of traced it back to that Sunday night service when both
my mother and dad would be away.
MA: And you weren't used to that kind of absence in the house?
KC: I should have been used to it, it happened every Sunday, but I didn't like
it I guess. So when I had a family of my own I made Sunday nights very, very
special. I never absented myself on Sunday night. I figured people were getting
ready to start school on Monday morning so I always tried to plan something kind
00:33:00of special. Everybody would bathe and shampoo and clean pajamas and then we'd
come downstairs and if it was fireplace weather we would read in front of the
fire or do something to make it a nice, pleasant transition into Monday. Or, so whatever.
MA: And did that change your attitude about Sunday nights too?
KC: Yes. That's probably why I did it.
MA: I'm sure
KC: And my mother would have to meet people at the door. We had lots of
marriages in our living room and baptisms, and she would witness legal papers,
so she participated really in all of those things that my father did. But
refused to teach Sunday School, well I shouldn't say refused, she did have a
high school Sunday School class in the local Congregational Church, but not in
00:34:00any of my dad's churches. I think she was very wise, he had ultimately a total
of twelve (only eight at a time), but twelve different parishes and if she had
offered to do something in one of them, and then the other eleven would nag at
her, that could be her life, but she was interested in a lot of other things.
She was a very community-minded person. Band Mothers Association was very big in
the early days, would have fund raising events like pancake suppers to raise
money to make, to buy uniforms and instruments for the band and the orchestra.
And there never seemed to be tax dollars for those things and the school did
provide, we had a very good high school and a good school system.
My mother was elected to the School Board in a political election in the early
00:35:0020's, very soon after women were granted the right to vote. She was the only
woman for years on the School Board. I used to be teased by my friends in school
who said the reason why I was on the high honor role all the time was because my
mother was on the School Board. I don't think there was a great deal of truth to
that. My dad would get so excited on election night and he would phone down to
the City County Building every half hour to see what the returns looked like and
my mother was very calm about it. I don't know if she felt assured she would be
re-elected, which she always was, or whether--
--well, she was a calm person. Both of them are very calm. I commented to my son
the other day, in what connection I can't remember, I said that I don't think
that my mother or father ever raised their voice to any of us and I don't
00:36:00believe they ever did. They never had to. In the first place, they didn't go
around issuing commands and they had other ways of....my mother really would
make Tom Sawyer look like a piker. She had an arrangement in our family three of
us had blue eyes and three of us had brown eyes, of the kids we were two and
two, so she found that a good way to create teams as good as any other. As it
also turned out, I'm one of the blue eyed and my blue eyed brother Gordon was
less interested in making his bed and picking up his clothes than the other boys
were and so my mother knew that I would pick up any slack. So when she paired us
off this way she perhaps knew more about us than the color of our eyes. In any
00:37:00case, she had a little chart in the kitchen and there was a whole series of
things that we were expected to do and make our own bed and leave no clothes
lying around and be down to breakfast by a certain time and then practice. I
don't know how she stood it, my brother Bob played the clarinet, Gondy played
the trombone and David a coronet and I practiced the piano and we would each
practice simultaneously. She would find one in the basement and one upstairs one
in the garage, the piano didn't get moved so I was in the same place. Each day,
as a team, we would get marks on the chart, not as individuals and then at the
end of the week the team that had the best grades or score would get to scrub
00:38:00the kitchen floor and the back porch, we'd divide that up and the poor losers
would have to scrub the front porch and sweep the garage. So we vied for the
opportunity to scrub the kitchen floor.
MA: What do you think you gained from all of this? What character traits do you
have that you think came from these early years?
KC: I think caring about other family members, certainly, and enjoying one
another. When we were old enough to be going to college and be home on vacations
00:39:00we would, the 4 of us, would do the dishes after dinner. In fact meals at our
house, in my Frederick birth family, were very prolonged always. None of this
coming in when you got around to it, with lots of conversation at the table so
anyway, when we were older and home, we told my mother don't worry how long we
sit at the table, you're not to touch anything when the meal is over and then we
had this division of labor -- Gordon would clear the table, I would scrape and
get things organized and then I would wash the dishes and Bob and David would
dry and Gondy would by that time be able to put things away and we had it down
00:40:00to such a system that no one ever had to say, "Why aren't you doing this?" and
we just did it, but we would sing quartets all the time we were doing the
dishes. We all had pretty good singing voices, in fact my two older brothers did
a lot of performing, solo and we all sang in choral groups so that we all had
fun. So, even doing dishes would be fun; it wasn't anything that was a chore. I
think there is some carryover in that. I think that with our kids that doing
their school work or their political work or their community work were much more
important than emptying wastebaskets or setting the table. It never would have
occurred to me to drag one of our kids down from homework or studying in order
to do some simplistic chore. On the other hand, we didn't hand out assignments,
00:41:00we just figured when something had to be done whoever had the time to do it
ought to see it needed to be done and do it. I can remember saying that one time
when Janet, my youngest, was applying for AFS (American Field Service) and she
did go then to the Netherlands for a year, this committee of three women came
here to see us in our native habitat and to evaluate whether it would be
appropriate to send one of our kids and they asked me, "What were Janet's
assigned duties around the house?" and I said "Oh gee, she doesn't have any, and
neither does anybody else." When I tried to explain the system I think they
thought I was making it up, but we had always functioned this way. Sometimes one
or another of us, including me and my husband, would be over extended and simply
00:42:00could not do what we thought we were going to, or that was expected, and we
would send out an SOS and drag in the help. You know, if I just had another
meeting, and wasn't going to have time to finish preparing a meal, then I would
sound off upstairs and say "Who can help? I need help!" and somebody would come.
I remember a number of occasions when David had volunteered to do political
addressing envelopes or something at a very young age, and it would get to be a
much longer task than he had bargained for, and I would just sit down and say,
"Here let me help," and if one of the girls came around they would say "Ok, I'll
give you half an hour." I mean that we would see that the job got done. Those
were all the kinds of things, and an interest in justice and caring about other
00:43:00people, not in a mushy kind of bleeding heart way, but in seeing what needed to
be done and doing it. When there would be a death in our neighborhood or a fire
in the community or something I never heard my mother say "I wonder what I could
do?" She would go ahead and do--send clothing or dishes to a burned out family
or have the little ones in a family where there was a death come and stay
overnight just to be in an atmosphere that was a little different for children.
MA: Thinking back to the tasks and the woman from the American Friends Service
Committee, did she ultimately ask "Well who does the tasks?" and did she assume
that the task load then fell on you?
KC: No. I think we illustrated with some of these things, and that kind of put
00:44:00her mind at rest.
MA: It's a nice example of equality manifesting itself in the home.
KC: My husband set an example which a lot of men in households do not
necessarily set. Now I'm back at the Eton Ridge household, the Clarenbach
household. My husband was a cook and could and did do any kind of domestic
chores. He was very neat and would never throw dirty clothes--I know people who
complain about having to pick up dirty clothes from their kids or their spouse.
That was never a problem here. I also liked to organize so it made it easier. I
wanted children's closets to be accessible and available with sufficient drawer
00:45:00space. Each of our kids had a desk in their room and had whatever equipment was
necessary so that it was convenient for them and easy to be organized and tidy.
When they had no examples of disorganized people around, they just assumed that
was the way you live.
[pause/break]
MA: You wanted to say more about your mother.
KC: I guess what I wanted to say was that while she did a lot of her own things
I know that she wasn't totally happy, that she felt as though she were missing a
00:46:00lot in life. One of the reasons she encouraged me to follow my own professional
leanings , etc., was again based on her own experience. She also used to tell me
more than once, if you wait until you can afford to do something, you'll never
do it. So don't be so provident. Now that is advice that I didn't follow as well
as I should have, but I am offering the same advice to my children. She also
said that she felt that if she had done more of the things she wanted to do, she
probably wouldn't have had arthritis and high blood pressure and other ailments.
MA: She felt that she internalized some of her frustration? Is that what she was saying?
KC: That isn't the way she said it but, yes I'm sure that's what she meant. She
also said, and my kids loved this advice and I passed it along to them, "You
00:47:00don't go on a vacation to save money." I used to say "Or to lose weight!" Those
were some of her little pearls and tidbits. My mother and dad used to take
vacations or little trips or do things separately from each other. My mother had
trips to both coasts. For years she would save what she would call her cigarette
money. There was a period when all 4 of us, my 3 brothers and I all smoked, and
when we'd be home we'd have someone pick up a carton of cigarettes for each of
us, so then my mother would put the equivalent, which in those days was about a
dollar, into her little slush fund and would save that for her trips. She
belonged to a women's organization called PEO and she'd go to state conventions
00:48:00for that and sometimes out to the the west coast. She had a couple of very
favorite relatives who lived in San Francisco and she liked to visit them and
other good friends scattered here and there, so she would go by herself for a
couple of weeks and she belonged to organizations so she'd go out evenings for
meetings and things that my dad had no interest in and didn't go to. He did a
lot of his ministerial and other things by himself without her.
When Hank and I were married 41 years ago his experience with his parents in
Missouri was a totally different thing. I don't think either his mother or
father had ever, except his father going to work at the post office, had done
anything that they didn't do together. They played pinochle on weekends with
00:49:00friends and went to church so that when I announced I was going to go do
something that Hank wasn't involved in, he was absolutely surprised and kind of
shocked at first. It took him several weeks to get used to the notion that I was
going to go to places that had nothing to do with him.
You did ask me whether my dad ever had any emoluments, perks or honorariums for
his church work and the answer to that is yes. He never charged, but if anybody
offered him 5 or 10 or 2 dollars. When I was in high school I often played the
piano or the organ for funerals that my father conducted. We had an old church
00:50:00organ down in our basement that you pump by foot and pull out stops and I could
practice on that and then I had a couple of girlfriends who sang and we would
sing duets of appropriate funeral music. When he had a funeral out in the
country, in somebody's home, most funerals in those days were conducted not even
in the churches, the real rural ones were in people's homes. My dad would offer
to split his "take" with the musicians. But more often than not there was no
"take" to split. When I had given up a whole summer afternoon, well more than
that with rehearsal time and then going out there and hanging around, I finally
made a business arrangement with my father that I would get $2 everytime I did
00:51:00it, whether he was paid or not, and he finally agreed. My dad played the piano,
actually all 4 of us were somewhat musical, played an instrument and sang and
liked to sing, and my father was quite musical. My mother, I used to say
mercifully, did not offer to sing in any of the churches because my mother
wasn't a singer and didn't play. In her later years she started to try to learn
to play the piano and used to practice a lot, but it didn't take very well. My
dad could play 3 songs on the piano-- Nearer My God to Thee, Rock of Ages and I
can't remember what the third one was. Frequently he'd go to one of his Sunday
services and there wasn't a soul in the crowd who could play the organ or piano
00:52:00so then he would go over and that was what they would sing that day.
MA: I was thinking about your mother, did she ever talk to you about what it was
like when suffrage was passed in 1920?
KC: No, she never did. My mother died just the year that we had the first
statewide Status of Women Conference in Wisconsin, 1974, and in fact, the very
month of that conference which I chaired. I am sure had she lived beyond that,
that the things that I was deeply involved in we would have talked about. I
00:53:00certainly did talk about them with my father over the years. My dad used to
point out to me from the time I can remember, certainly in grade school,
whenever a woman was doing something of special note or something unusual, he
would call that to my attention, if he read an article. In fact, on our western
trips that year that I was five or six, we went to Aimee Semple McPherson's
tabernacle and heard her preach and almost got thrown out. My dad had taken
little opera glasses so we could get a better look at her and an usher came down
and told him to put those away, we weren't allowed to do that. We saw Amelia
Earhart and read articles about Catherine Lenroot who was head of the children's
00:54:00fund or department or something in Washington, so he was always pointing out
those things. My mother had 2 friends right in Sparta who wrote and published
books, so women of achievement at any level were their friends, and people that
we met and talked to.
MA: You grew up with role models or knowledge of role models?
KC: Yes, and had some wonderful teachers all through my grade and high school --
00:55:00women teachers as well as a few men.
MA: Do you recall the women teachers?
KC: Yes. You are reminding me of another wonderful institution in our Frederick
household. Because my mother had been a teacher and because she remembered how
lonely those early weeks would be, she started, from the time my brother Bob
started school, she would always invite his teacher or teachers to come for
dinner at our house. By the time there were four of us in school, to invite each
of our teachers, plus the one we had last year plus the music teacher and the
gym teacher it finally reached the point where she just invited all of the
teachers. Our house wasn't really big enough, big as it was, so they finally
00:56:00rented a place, a cabin or lodge, kind of a precursor to motels really, out on
the outskirts of town, and made arrangements to rent the place and have them
prepare the meal (Farrington's camp).
We always had all kinds of games at our house and sometimes we played something
called coffeepot which was kind of like charades and cootie and games of various
kinds anyway, we would have just a hilarious evening and a couple of the
teachers I can remember speaking to me, wanting to be sure that even though we
had acted foolish at home that I wasn't to carry this over into the classroom. I
already knew that, I didn't need to be coached and yet they were unaccustomed to
having fun and letting their hair down in front of their students. That became
00:57:00such an institution that I can remember a couple of years that my mother hadn't
given it a thought and she'd get a phone call from some of the teachers saying
"When are you having your party because we want to be sure to save the date?"
That would then goad her into doing it, and that was kind of fun. Then over the
year, if there were teachers that we especially liked, we would have them for
Sunday dinner. That is something that we have done a little bit of as parents
too, to get to know the kid's teachers personally.
MA: Bridging that gap between your personal life and education must have made it
easier for you to go on also, that education a mysterious thing.
KC: That's right.
MA: What about religion? We've talked about your dad being a preacher, a parson,
00:58:00how did you feel about it? Did you consider yourself a religious person?
KC: I certainly was a "Sunday go to meeting" person. We for a variety of
reasons, my brothers and I went to Sunday school, not in the local Methodist
Church but in the Congregational Church, which was a block closer to our house.
My mother had grown up in that Congregational Church, but I think the real
reason that we opted to go there, and more of our friends went their than to the
Methodist church, there were other churches in town as well.
MA: The Methodist Church was where your father preached?
KC: My father was a Methodist minister but he did not service the Sparta
Methodist Church. I think there was always a little bit of competitive tension
between whoever was occupying that pulpit and my dad. Now my dad stayed for 50
00:59:00years doing those country churches. He would go to conference every year. I
don't know if you know how the Methodist Church functions, but the Bishop and
the Regional District Superintendent assign ministers to parishes and they don't
always have an option. So my dad would make a joke every year, gee he'd wonder
if he was going to get Big Creek and Rockland back again or if somebody else was
going to get assigned there because no one else would take it on a bet, and the
churches did just kind of wither away after he stopped preaching. But the
incumbent in the local Sparta church would be changed from time to time, maybe
every 4 or 5 years or whatever, that's just the practice I guess of the
Methodist Church. So with my father getting all of the many weddings, funerals,
01:00:00baptism, etc., often of people who went to the local church but who knew him and
liked him, or he might have married their parents or their brother and sister so
they wanted him also and whether there really was rivalry or whether my father
suspected there might be or maybe he didn't want his kids blabbing all of the
family skeletons. I don't know, but there never was any objection. I went to
Sunday school, which I continued to do all the way through high school. We had a
marvelous woman who moved to town when her husband died and whose family had
lived there a long time who made our Sunday School really a Social Science
course more than anything else so that this same gang of otherwise reasonably
sophisticated girls we were segregated by males and females so these were gals
01:01:00and just wouldn't have missed and we'd prepare and think through what were going
to do. Then I went to a Sunday evening young peoples' thing. I sang in the
choir, I ushered, that was kind of unusual too when we were in high school the
summertime head usher was the father of one of my friends, so for one month he
would have girls usher and pass the collection plate.
MA: How did you feel about that when he did it?
KC: We thought it was great! We didn't really think about it as a revolution
Frequently all four of us kids were asked to go to the Big Creek 11:00 service
with my father. We would go from Sunday School and walk the length of the main
01:02:00drag and meet my father at an intersection where he'd be coming from his earlier
service so he wouldn't have to drive out of the way, and also he was never ahead
of time. He never hurried and he always said about his services "they aren't
going to start until I get there." So he would take his sweet time. Now that is
something I didn't learn from my dad; my mother was always terribly prompt and
ahead of time and I am always terribly prompt and ahead of time and have spent
much of my life waiting for people who are not prompt. However, I anticipate
that and always take something along to read or write or whatever. So we did go
to that one Sunday morning service with my father quite routinely, and then
later on when I was singing in the choir I would have to skip that, but we
became quite well known. In fact, there are several pews in that big church that
01:03:00had my brother's initials carved; I would never deface a church pew or anything
else but unfortunately my brother Gordon had no qualms about doing that. On
Sunday afternoon, lots of times, I would ask if I could go with him because when
just the two of us were in the car we had such fun. We would sing or talk, but
sing an awful lot. Furthermore, by the time I was 12, when we would get off the
main road onto a real country lane he would let me drive. I have actually been
driving a car since I was 12, although you couldn't drive legally in Wisconsin
until 14 in those days. But lots of other Sunday afternoons my brothers and
their friends and sometimes girlfriends of mine would go with my dad. We had
01:04:00several very special places that we liked. There were some hills around the
Tomah area that he would pass on his way to Wyeville or Valley Junction where we
liked to hike. He would dump us out on his way to church and we would have a
couple of hours then we would wait until we heard his horn honk. At Cataract
there was a country school that had a round-and-round and some swings which was
another place so we would put on our woods clothes and go there. I think mother
was always delighted when we would be out of the house. Sundays were a
nightmare, for her. She didn't behave as though she were having a nightmare but
to get all of us dressed and on our way and then to juggle the timing of all of
these services and then to have a noon meal, a real Sunday dinner ready, and
01:05:00then to clean up that mess and have an evening meal, and then for herself to be
ready to go with my dad, which she did every Sunday night was just a hectic kind
of day. There was a period later, we were still in high school at the time, when
my mother would really want to eat Sunday dinner out. We didn't do it very many
times but there was a Briggson Hotel in Sparta that specialized in Sunday
dinners. Now that I think of it, I didn't think of it at the time, what a relief
to her it was and would have been if we had done it more often and regularly but
I am sure she had to almost plead to have it done at all, and then my father
would grumble about what it was costing. So that is another aspect of....I think
01:06:00there were many times when my mother would like to have done something that cost
a little bit and my father was always very generous in one sense and with us but
paying for a meal out seemed like an extravagance to him--
--and not a recognition of all the energy that was being drained from my mother.
I don't think he ever recognized that. I think when she paid her cleaning lady
she would almost do it on the QT because he didn't like to have somebody else
around, an outsider around in the house and he couldn't understand why somebody
who kept the house as neat and clean as my mother, she would do laundry twice a
01:07:00week, 4 men with wash trousers and shirts and my dad's shirts had to be starched
at the collar and cuffs, the ironing and in those days they ironed sheets and
pillow cases and every item of clothing and on Thursdays my mother would clean
the upstairs and change all the sheets and on Fridays clean the downstairs until
it sparkled and then on Saturday bake.
MA: Did you carry that through in your marriage? When you first married did you
expect that you also would clean a different level of the house each day of the week?
KC: No, I don't think that my standards have ever been quite as high as my
mothers were and furthermore the whole routine of spring and fall housecleaning
has happily gone by the boards, but she did that. When we first moved back to
01:08:00Madison and we had a couple of years of underemployment, the first year or so I
hadn't gone back to work, but even when I did, what I was paid by Edgewood and
the Extension for those parttime things hardly covered the babysitter so there
were several years when we had no cleaning lady and that was just absolutely
dreadful because I would spend the weekend, Saturday and Sunday, doing groceries
and cleaning. I didn't have to set aside a day to do laundry because we had a
washer and drier. I had less time with the kids to do family things because of
domestic chores than I had the rest of the week. As soon as we had any income we
01:09:00hired a cleaning person and have the same one now that we've had for 22 years.
She tells me she is getting on in years and I tell her she daren't!
MA: When you were a young woman in your twenties, do you think you had the
awareness then that you seem to have now about how hard your mother's life was,
relatively speaking?
KC: No, I doubt it. I was a little aware of it. One summer my mother was in the
hospital for about six weeks or so. She had a hysterectomy and then
complications and I was, I can't remember but maybe 14. We had no substitute at
home and so I did the cooking and cleaning. I also was playing golf that summer
01:10:00with the junior golfers so I would get everything as close to done, but I even
did canning and made jelly and jam that summer because those were things that
were on the schedule. So I had some little notion. My mother used to have to
can, she would can meat--some farmer would give us half a beef--and then my dad
would keep coming home from the service with a crate of strawberries that needed
to be done right then or they would begin to rot and some of those things that
were just a real added chore for my mother. The only time, and I've told this
story many times, that my father ever used good sense, and what an inner
struggle he must have, had this person who wasted nothing, I mean he wore the
01:11:00same pair of shoes, he would polish them like a good military man, I forgot to
tell you that he'd been a colonel in the Army Reserves and used to go to summer
camp also, but one year the Cataract parish decided to pay him an annual salary.
They paid him in pumpkins! This was during the depression when no one in the
parish had any money, so they loaded up his car with pumpkins and he started
home and he thought to himself that if he walked in and told my mother,."It's a
load of pumpkins," that she might walk out the other door. Yet he couldn't bear
to waste them, and he didn't dare let his parishioners know he wasn't taking
them home and, I suppose if we'd had nursery schools then he could have let each
kid have a pumpkin, but we didn't have, so at least he had the good judgment to
01:12:00stop at a quiet, dark place and dump all but 4 of them in the gutter someplace
on the way home and not come in with them, and for him to part with anything was
a wrench.
MA: I'd like to go back to religion for just a second. Do you think that it had
an influence in terms of your social change? I'm trying to see the connection
there. Was it a form of religion in which you did take responsibility for your
fellows? I'm wondering what the transference was for you in terms of your later life?
KC: When I came here to Madison I didn't go to any, oh I went to things at the
01:13:00YWCA, in fact I was an elected officer there, but after a few weeks here I
didn't want to take the time to go to church and it didn't seem a necessary
thing for me at all. A lot of my friends and people who lived in the same
sorority house that I did went to church, and one or two years a couple people
prevailed upon me to sing in a Baptist choir when they did their Easter cantata
and that was kind of fun, but when I wrote and told the family I was doing that
they immediately said I would have to be immersed and began teasing me a little
bit about that. I did, I suppose, things that were sort of religiously oriented
sometimes; I was chair of the University Peace Federation and active in an open
housing thing. I don't even know to this day how religious I am. I never did,
01:14:00even as a youngster, know what people meant with a lot of the rhetoric that went
with religion. "Give yourself to God," I didn't know what that meant and I still
don't know what that means, and "are you saved" and these things.
MA: How would you define what other people call religion for yourself?
KC: I don't know. I think that it is terribly important to follow one's
conscience, but as far as I'm concerned that has less to do with whether I smoke
a cigarette than how I behave politically and as a human being with other human beings.
01:15:00
KC: My parents used to bring home, as guests in our house, any foreign
missionaries that they would encounter anywhere partly just because they were
hospitable, but also because they wanted us to have a chance to meet somebody
who had lived in a different culture and who had different perspectives on
things. In fact, the only Black people I'd every met in my life, until I came
here to the University, were ministers or missionaries, mostly from other
countries who were invited into our house. I remember my dad and I used to have
a lot of political discussions that my mother wouldn't enter into, and the boys,
I don't remember their taking much part in it either. My father and I didn't
mind disagreeing with each other at all, in fact we both rather enjoyed it and
01:16:00sometimes that upset my mother. We didn't argue, I mean didn't call each other
names, but we would differ about some things and that kind of upset her a little
bit. We would always do this at the table when we were eating when we had these
discussions. One time, and this is the one that I am recalling, my father told
an "Eleanor" joke. This was during the early days, my dad had been a Republican,
a progressive Republican and until my own kids began to convert him to being a
follower of Eugene McCarthy and George McGovern I think he continued to be
pretty much, well that's not entirely true either, he joined the union at one
point to, but this must have been in the early regimen of FDR and my father told
01:17:00one of these, they were very current in those days, snide remarks about Eleanor
Roosevelt. I don't remember the subject but anyway my father repeated one of
these that he had heard and it troubled me I said "What don't you like about
Eleanor? Don't you like her because she thinks niggers are as good as white
folks?" It never had occurred to him, because my father was not a racist and in
fact he deplored race discrimination as much as I had learned and have
subsequently learned to do. He had never realized that here he was making fun of
Eleanor Roosevelt, whereas she was giving public leadership on this issue that
meant something to him. That was the last "Eleanor" joke ever told in our house.
MA: How old were you at that time?
01:18:00
KC: I was probably in high school so I was between 12 and 16.
MA: So it was important to you that Eleanor was there?
KC: Yes
MA: Did you ever listen to her radio show or read her columns?
KC: Yes, a little bit. I didn't hear her much on the radio. I remember her voice
was not good, and in fact a lot of my older friends who did like her didn't
think her column "My Day" was much either. I guess I wasn't feeling like a
critic. I can remember how terribly excited I was the time I met her in the
national museum. We just rode up on an elevator together and I was surprised to
01:19:00see she was as tall as I am and we just said hello and that was about it, but it
was just a very exciting moment for me.
MA: You were in high school at that time?
KSC: No. This time I was in Washington, it was during World War II but the
conversation with my father was when I was in high school.
MA: My father changed with the times too and moved a bit. When I was at the
university, either first or second year, he came to pick me up one time or was
in town and came to take me to lunch or something and when he walked in, I was
living at the Alpha Chi Omega sorority house, and when he walked in said "I'd
like to use the phone if I could," and that was kind of unusual; usually if he
had to make a phone call he'd stop at a filling station and take care of it. I
said "sure, the phone is right there". He said, "I have to call brother
Kulpinsky" (I'm not sure I have that name right). I just thought it was another
01:20:00Methodist minister and I said "who is that"? He said "He's president of the
union of state, county and municiple workers," My dad was a State Patrol and
Probation Officer, and then he kind of, he wanted me to know this but he just
couldn't come right out, so he had to hem-and-haw around with this miserable
phone call and then he said "You know, I realize that the union has done a lot
for those of us in my position in salary and benefits and that the least I could
do is to join and pay dues." For a person who grew up with all the negative
stereotypes of unions, to not only make that change, but then to have to confess
it to his great critic was kind of nice.
01:21:00
MA: Kay, to continue from last week, lets talk about your mother a little. You
had mentioned that she had a full life but in some respects was dissatisfied.
KC: I will begin by saying I suppose that my mother was a very warm and motherly
kind of person. Not only beloved by her own children but by all of our friends
and neighbors, and as we grew not only when we were very young, but over the
years so that our friends always liked to come to our house and she was always
01:22:00quite welcoming to them. My mother, I think I already mentioned that she taught
country school and then taught in a couple of smaller communities, and in fact
was a school teacher when she met my dad and he was already in the state
legislature and he was the local preacher. She told me at one time a terribly
funny story about their courtship. I think she never dared to laugh to him or at
him about it because even in late years he was apparently still a little bit
sensitive about it. But while he would be in Madison attending the legislative
session she apparently on some occasions dated some other person in town, and
the joke that my mother told was that when my father found out about this,
either from her or however, he said to her "I suppose you went to eat some of
that inferior ice cream at the ice cream parlor," and of course it was the only
01:23:00place in town, but because she was with someone else it was inferior. She got a
kick out of that.
We all, all four of us kids, had a built-in tutor at our house in the person of
my mother. She loved teaching. She used to tutor kids in town who were having
trouble in school and their mother's would call and say, "Would you help with
whatever it was," writing, math, whatever. So by the time we were doing
homework, which was not as prevalent in those days as it certainly has become,
and....we would sit around the dining table and mother would sit with us and
help. We always had an unabridged dictionary in my father's study, he had a
study in our house. In fact, in the dining room, in addition to studying at that
01:24:00table, we had a big blackboard that covered one whole wall where we could play
and write when we were little but we could do arithmetic, etc. That is also
where we left phone messages for my dad and my mother would write "funeral 2:00"
etc. They would be reminders to him, and much safer to leave messages for him on
the blackboard than to leave a note on his desk because his desk was always a
mess and he didn't like to have my mother help him clean his desk or his office,
he knew just under which pile to look for what. He would let me help him clear
his desk; I would take the time to say, "Where does this go and where does that
go?" whereas my mother would just want to do it in a hurry and shuffle things
together. I always thought it was interesting that later on when my own
daughter, Sara, was old enough to help grandpa, he would let her help him clean
01:25:00his desk. As far as I know, we were the only two people who were ever cheerfully
allowed to do that.
My mother also was quite a reader. I don't know whether I've mentioned on a
previous tape her little arrangement with the Carnegie Library in Sparta which
was presumably the first one in the state, the first Carnegie endowed library
was in our little town, but she had an arrangement with the head librarian that
whenever they got in a new book they would phone her at once and give her first
dibs on it. We had a little place on the landing of our staircase where between
the posts my mother would keep the library books that needed to be returned. She
despaired of my ever becoming a reader. I did go to the summer reading programs
01:26:00at the library when I was in the early grades and would read the required 25 or
however many books in order to get the diploma or gold star or whatever. Reading
was not my favorite activity, in fact, all through high school I think I didn't
read just for fun very much. I read a few books, especially those that I would
receive for Christmas or birthdays or whatever.
MA: Did you have a favorite kind of literature?
KC: I loved "Little Women" and earlier than that "The Bobbsey Twins" and Nancy
Drew books of course I read, but nothing very deep I guess. It was only in much
01:27:00later years that I began to read for fun and for something to do. I was much too
busy with outdoor things all through high school really to ever have time to
want to just sit and read.
MA: You mentioned sports--that your mother was able to play in competitive
sports with other schools on girl's teams.
KC: That's right, when she was in high school, Sparta High School 30 years
before I was; she graduated in 1907. They used to go by train to Wisconsin
Rapids and other towns and play basketball and in fact she told me many times
about going when she had what they called quinsy in those days, it was a
terribly sore throat probably like a strep throat, and she would conceal that
from her mother so that she could still go to the basketball tournaments or games.
01:28:00
MA: But by the time I was in high school, or well before that, interscholastic
sports for girls had totally left the scene and had not been reinstated. My
brothers were all on every athletic team, of course that's one of the joys of
living in a small town, you do everything because they need enough bodies to do
it although my brothers were fairly athletic.
KC: It sounds like you were too.
MA: Yes I was. I recently had occasion to look in my high school yearbook when
we had our 50th high school reunion this year and noted that I had been captain
of the volleyball and basketball teams. I don't remember that I was ever the
softball captain but I played softball. I did a lot of things that were not team
01:29:00sports. I played golf a lot and swam and ice skated and skied.
MA: Did you continue those activities throughout your later life?
KC: Not really. Swimming, and had every high hope of playing golf when we moved
back to Madison 27 years ago, when we thought we would be able to afford it. On
Statan Island golf was very expensive by the time you paid a baby sitter and
everything. Those hopes were dashed along with quite a few other things when I
went back to work and maintained a household with three kids. I just had to cut
out quite a few things, one of which was the possibility of playing golf.
01:30:00
MA: Because of time?
KC: Yes. Another was concert tickets. The first few years we were here we bought
season tickets to the Union Theater performances and a few other things and
found that we were not using the tickets. I realized that was another aspect of
life that would have to go for awhile.
MA: We'll get back to that; that's interesting what you had to give up to keep
your professional life.
KC: Yes, professional and domestic.
MA: You had talked about your mother's trips, that she took separate trips from
your father.
KC: She did. They had sufficiently different interests. My mother had many
friends and a few relatives whom she loved to visit; a sister in Florida and a
sister in Texas, friends in California and an aunt in California. She would, not
01:31:00every year but every few years, arrange a trip for a couple of weeks and would
have a wonderful time. She loved planning the whole thing and accumulating
wardrobe and making arrangements. My mother came to see us, I lived far enough
away from Sparta for enough years so that it was fun for them and for us to have
my mother and dad come and visit. They frequently came separately; my mother
came many more times than my father did to visit us. It was always, whether
either or both, a red carpet event for my kids and for my husband and me when
they were coming to visit. Their other two offspring, my two brothers, lived
01:32:00near enough, one right in Sparta and the other 25 miles away in LaCrosse so that
it wasn't such a state occasion when there was a visit. But for us, we would
plan it, when we knew that either one or the other was coming, plan it for weeks
in advance, every menu item and the kids had to have pickled herring for grandpa
and we had to have this and that. Once my mother came to visit us by herself
when we lived in St. Louis on the occasion of David's birth or when he was just
a few weeks old and, my mother loved this when I told her, Sara was four or
nearly five I guess, and came to me one morning while my mother was there
absolutely indignant, scolding me this little five year old was, she said "I
think it's perfectly terrible the way you make Nina work when she is here." I
said "Make her work? What did I make her do?" "Well she was just making her bed
01:33:00and I think it's terrible that you make her do that." My mother got an awful
kick out of that because actually we never had her lift a finger except that she
would read to the kids and that was about the extent of what we made her do. She
would also do a little mending for me and a few little chores like that. The
preparation that my children engaged in in anticipation of any visit from my
parents was fun.
I had visits from my mother and dad long before I was married. A couple of them
that I recall, especially in Washington during World War II. My youngest
brother, David, was killed in a plane crash as an aviation cadet in 1943, early
1943, and I was in Washington with the War Production Board, and this was a most
01:34:00devastating experience for my father who thought there had to be a religious
message in this. As a very devout Methodist minister he kept seeking, why did
this happen, and why to him I suppose. He even sought out other religious people
to discuss this with, and in the process in which he really behaved like
somebody who was demented -- well I'm exaggerating in the use of that word--but
it was just constantly on his mind and it was very, very hard on my mother. Not
only hard to lose her youngest child, but also to have to be living with my
father when he was going through all of this, so she wrote and kind of pleaded
01:35:00with me to invite him to come and visit me in Washington. She thought that
getting away from home would be good for him, but it would be even better for
her to have him gone for awhile. I did extend the invitation and he did come.
All my friends rallied and we had a wonderful time, good meals and ate out and
went to the theater. Then he left Washington to go visit his sister on Statan
Island, where he was going to spend a week, and after he had been there two days
he telephoned me in Washington to ask if he could come back instead of spending
the rest of the week with his sister and would I please get theater tickets for
the gang as his guests, which we did. It really did what my mother had hoped it
would do and it was fun for me. I had a few dread moments before he came,
01:36:00myself, wondering whether he was going to upset me and my friends but, on the
contrary, he entered into the whole activity and it was good for him.
My mother came on a number of occasions to Washington by herself and I
particularly recall the time that she went with, I have two friends with whom I
used to go to the race track once in awhile, and she thought that sounded like
such fun that they arranged to take her one Saturday when I was not able to go,
I had to work on that day, so she took me into the little dressing room of our
apartment and hauled out this role of bills and wondered it that would be enough
money to put on the horses. I just loved this idea of the country preacher's
01:37:00wife with her wad of money to go to the races.
MA: Do you recall how she did?
KC: No. It's possible that she didn't ever tell me. We never did go to the races
in order to make money. We just took as much money as we needed to come and go
and eat and if we made a couple of bucks we'd put it right back on the next race.
MA: You had also talked about your mother's role as an educator. I wanted to
back up for just a second -- was it necessary for her to quit teaching public
school because she married, was that a law in Wisconsin at the time?
KC: I don't know if it was a requirement, or if it was just de regour. My hunch
was that it was just the thing to do.
MA: In some states it was a law.
01:38:00
KC: Yes, I know it was, particularly during the depression, but of course this
was before the depression. My parents were married in 1913.
MA: As you look back on your mother it's clear to me that your sense of family
and what family meant, came from the influences of your own family. But on a
personal level what qualities do you feel that you have that were influenced
significantly by her?
KC: I think, I don't know qualities so much as behavior, I don't know how one
distinguishes those. My mother was a very dignified person and a calm person,
01:39:00respectful of other people. There was never any sense of class in our family,
that I think partly because of the kinds of people who came to our house because
my dad's office was there not only rural but people of all walks, people came to
see him for legal or for ministerial or for parole and probation or whatever.
Then my mother's activity in the Church Women United and some of the school
functions and other community activities. People were kind of evaluated as
individuals and were respected as individuals. I think that is something that
01:40:00really caught without ever saying it; that you don't distinguish on the basis of
people's income or experience or rank or job title or whatever, we just absorbed
this, it's the way both of my parents behaved.
MA: They truly did not see themselves as being a class above or below?
KC: Nor did they see other people in that light. I think that's something. I
think the whole way my mother brought up kids, again, treating us with respect,
and I think we've done that with our children. Again, a lot of this is tacit, I
mean nobody ever said, "Do this." Then, the way we celebrated holidays and
01:41:00birthdays, I've patterned just totally I think the way things were done in my
birth family and the way we liked it. I mentioned that on birthdays everybody
gets a present, in fact, my Janet for example, cherishes gifts she has received
on David's birthday sometimes even more than things from her own birthday, and
lots of Christmas packages and lots of celebration at Christmas time. My mother
had a knack of making us think we had the greatest Christmases that anyone in
01:42:00the world ever had by wrapping up necessaries, etc., and that was always fun. My
mother also had a little store of gifts in a linen closet that she had upstairs
that always smelled good from smelly soap. She would just stockpile guest towels
or note paper or a nice bar of soap or something and would be able to haul them
out if she discovered it was somebody's birthday or whatever. That's something
that I also have mimicked. My mother also kept one little overnight case packed
01:43:00in case she was ever asked at the eleventh hour to go someplace. She had several
friends, women in Sparta who drove cars and who would occasionally want to go
someplace that would involve an overnight, and I guess they knew that if they
called my mother she was likely to say yes. She never had to worry about did she
have a clean nightgown or whatever, she kept this one just for occasions of that
kind. Now that I don't do. Well, I do have a traveling outfit, pajamas, robe and
slippers, that I only use for travelling and then I know they're clean and ready
to go, but I don't keep them in an overnight case.
MA: I sense, though, that you may have gotten some of your organizational skills
just through living with your mother all those years.
KC: Yes, I forgot to say how highly organized she was with lists and a place in
01:44:00the kitchen, it wasn't actually a desk but it functioned as a desk, and she
would write down menus and kept a running shopping list. I don't ever remember
her running out of stuff or having anyone have to run to the store because she
was highly organized. Of course in my very young youth, we could order from the
grocery store--pick up the telephone and read off your list and it would be
delivered. And the milkman came; in fact, the milkman with his horse, it was the
same man who used to deliver when my mother was, before she was married. He was
still--and the horse knew when to stop and when to start, and that was--
01:45:00
MA: Let's move to your education, now; your formal, as opposed to your informal
education. Tell me about beginning public school.
KC: Well, I probably was one of the longest students in Wisconsin at the time. I
started school at the age of 2 1/2 and went until I was, well, 25, I guess, with
a Ph. D. with just a few years out for other activity. But I did start
kindergarten at 2 ½, trailing my next older brother. My mother was home with
the baby and then she'd have to dress the baby and herself and go trail down to
school and drag me home, until finally the teacher said, "Let her stay," and
stay I did, but for 2 ½ years until I was old enough for first grade and it was
very disappointing to me not to be promoted along with the other kids.
01:46:00
MA: And you had the skills to be promoted?
KC: Well, I certainly thought I did. However, my last year in kindergarten the
teacher was very happy to have me there. I knew my way around, of course, so she
could send me over to the other building to get a jar of paste or whatever
supplies she might be out of. Also, I was very helpful to her in interpreting
one of the--there was a student in kindergarten that last year with a very
difficult speech impediment; and poor Ms. Griswald, the teacher, whom I adored,
couldn't understand this child and I could, so that I was useful in that sense
too. I once had a birthday party that last year in kindergarten that my parents
like to remind me of. At the time I naturally thought nothing about it, but on
01:47:00my birthday, which is October 7th, I brought the kindergarten class home for a
birthday party; and I had issued the invitation verbally a few days in advance,
but had failed to mention it to my mother and father. And my teacher didn't
think to clear with my mother and dad, because I was so responsible and our
family was so inclusive in that it seemed very natural--perfectly normal. And so
my mother and dad did not bat an eye when 30 kids and the teacher came hiking
from school in the afternoon. And never once said a word to me about "why did
you do this?" And luckily it was nice weather--some years there's a little snow
on October 7th and some years it's practically still swimming weather. Well this
was a nice day, so we played games outdoors, my mother sent my dad down to the
local dairy to get five gallons of ice cream and some cones, and those were the
01:48:00refreshments that were served and--
[tape cuts off--Clarenbach talks about technical difficulties regarding another interview]
MA: We were talking about your school experience.
01:49:00
KC: That's right and I had gotten into kindergarten. Well, I finally did make it
into first grade and then the first grade teacher had me take first and second
grade in the same year, which was fine because I had been reading quite awhile
before I started first grade. As a matter of fact, I think I got to be a junior
or senior in high school before it even began to dawn on me that people went to
school to learn something new. I mostly went to school to kind of show off what
I already knew. I'm sure I was learning new things as I went along, but we had
what I loved at the time but I think was an unfortunate practice in my high
school, or junior high as well as high school, "A" students, students who had a
01:50:00solid "A" in a course, were exempt from final exams. I had never taken a final
exam in my life until I came to the university.
MA: How was it?
KC: It was a shock! In fact I looked forward to those three days of vacation at
the end of each term because while the other kids were taking exams I would have
a holiday. One year I did cheat in junior high, my mother was a collaborator. I
think of my mother as a completely honest person and in fact I think of myself
as an honest person, but in seventh grade we had to take sewing the first
semester and cooking the second semester and the big sewing project was to make
the apron that we had to wear in cooking class. I never did really learn to sew
nor have I ever enjoyed--well one year when I was about a freshman or sophomore
01:51:00in high school I made four summer dresses because I wanted some clothes and we
didn't have money to buy any, but that's about the extent. I got it all out of
my system that one year. So here I was spending my holiday from taking final
exams in seventh grade finishing up this apron so I wouldn't flunk sewing, and
finally I was making such a mess of it that I sneaked it home and pleaded with
my mother to finish it up for me so that I would pass from sewing into cooking.
She did, and I did, and I sneaked it back and probably got a B- on it, but at
least it was over and done with.
My mother also collaborated with me on other things, but this was not really in
the dishonesty department I think. She was highly respected in our community and
01:52:00beyond, and I used to get a bee in my bonnet every year that I would like to
play hooky sometime, so my mother and I made an agreement that once each
semester when I really wanted to not go to school that I should tell her that
this was the day. I never stayed home just to stay in bed. I'd wait until there
was a perfectly beautiful fall day or a perfectly gorgeous spring day and say,
"This is the day that I don't want to go to school, I want to go play golf or
take a walk in the woods or just ride my bike. So my mother would telephone the
school office and say "Kathryn will not be in school today." She didn't lie, she
didn't say I'd broken my leg or had the sniffles, just "she would not be in
school" and the assumption at the other end was that I had a perfectly good
reason not to be there, and I'd get it all out of my system and that would hold
01:53:00me until the next time. I've always thought that was a good idea.
Now I don't know that my kids ever asked to do that or ever did that but I do
know that I've always had an attitude that when the world is too much with you,
you should be relieved of some of it. I have tried to relieve my kids of excess
pressure, encouraging them sometimes when they were in school to drop a course
or to somehow lighten whatever, or to be helpful if the kids had one too many
things to do to remove one of them and do it for them, or whatever, and I think
that that's important at any age.
MA: Have you done that for yourself throughout life? Do you feel that you have
01:54:00taken that to heart in you own management of your work and your family life and recreation?
KC: I have. I don't know that I've always used good sense about which things I
removed and which ones I retained. I have a feeling I removed a lot of the fun
things such as the theater tickets and golf and going on vacations that may have
cost more than I thought I should spend so I didn't go. I certainly have
realized as I've gone back to work that there still are 24 hours in a day and 7
days a week and if you're adding something you jolly well better subtract
something. When I was 35 I remember my birthday, we were living on Stanten
01:55:00Island, and I decided I was probably, according to statistics, half way at 35,
now the life span is extended a little bit for women, and that for the next 35
years I was going to do a few things my way and immediately decided I would
never wear a hat except in the winter to keep myself really warm and that I
could have guests for dinner without having to make yeast rolls from scratch or
a pie from scratch. There were just a few domestic things I could do without. It
also was sort of an attitude that I had.
MA: It sounds like you were deleting some of the things perhaps that your mother
01:56:00hadn't deleted.
KC: I don't know, my mother wasn't such a great baker. A part of her Tom Sawyer
bit that I spoke about earlier, it was a great privilege for me to be allowed to
make dinner rolls from the time I was 10 or 12 and bake cookies. To this day I
really enjoy making yeast rolls but I don't do it very often and I love to do
donuts. My aunt Carrie in Sparta, mother's sister, made donuts for the whole
damn town and she lived to be 82 or 83. The last time that I saw her she had a
little batch of donut dough, always in her refrigerator, and when anyone stopped
by she would say let's have a cup of coffee and she would knock up a dozen or
01:57:00half a dozen donuts to have fresh with the coffee. I didn't want aunt Carrie's
recipe to go to her grave with her so I made her make donuts several times,
because she didn't measure anything and didn't know what the measurements were,
so she would dump and then I would measure it, so I got her recipe finally
written down. Later on I discovered it was quite similar to one in my Meta
Gibbons cookbook so that it was alright. I still do donuts once a year or so.
I have a wonderful donut story if you are intersted in the donut story. When we
lived on Staten Island and Janet was an infant, she was born in August. On
Halloween, that's my favorite time to have homemade donuts, Sara came home from
fourth grade the day before Halloween, and announced that she had told her
teacher that she would bring donuts for the class for Halloween, and she had
01:58:00forgotten to mention it. That was unusual for Sara to forget to mention
something, but I said, "fine." Then I had to figure how do I make, donuts have
to be fresh to be good otherwise there's no point in having homemade donuts, I
think, so I wanted to make them in the morning so that she could take them hot
and fresh to school. But I had a four year-old and a new infant and I didn't
want donut grease around with a four year-old especially, so I got up at 4:00,
before it was time to feed the baby and before David was around to be in the
way. My husband and I had a team, we did donuts as a team. I would roll out and
cut and he would fry, so that we could handle it and chill it. Well you don't
need to hear the whole process right now, but we had fresh donuts for Sara to
01:59:00take to school. About the time we were finishing the donuts the baby was waking
up and crying and Sara, who usually had good sense --eight years-old-- said "Do
you suppose the baby would like a donut?" and, two months old maybe closer to
three, instead of saying, "Don't be foolish or are you joking," I said "Oh I
wouldn't give her a whole one, maybe just a little round hole," and when I went
in a little while later there was this cheerful little baby with donut crumbs
all over her crib. Luckily she didn't choke to death. In any case, the donuts
were a hit in school.
I always sent, I didn't make donuts frequently for school, but cookies, every
02:00:00year that my kids were in school. I was a room mother for whatever grade and
sometimes more than 1 kid at a time which didn't involve much, it meant making
cookies a time or two or going to a program or something, but they always
assumed without asking me that I would want to do it, the kids did, and I did
always want to. Even though I was working full-time and doing other things that
was one kind of relationship and association that was just assumed. I had the
same assumption with my parents when I was growing up that they would be not
only willing but delighted to do anything that had to do with school.
MA: Did your husband participate in, for example, PTA meetings or PTO?
02:01:00
KC: He did. In fact my husband and Judge Jim Doyle, both of whom died this year,
we both had kids, Annie Doyle and David Clarenbach were in the same room all
through Randall School and all through high school. But Jim Doyle and my husband
were the two fathers who could always be counted on to be at a school program
over at Randall grade school. Sometimes a few other men were there too, but
those two inevitably. They would schedule their days to be able to be there and
lots of times I would watch Jim Doyle instead of watching the kids on the
program because he was so sentimental, such a marvelous person, and he would be
tearing, I loved watching him.
When somebody was in senior high, Hank and I were urged to be the co-presidents
02:02:00of West High School PTA. By that time I was up to my eyeballs in the women's
movement and in other things, and I told my husand that I didn't see how I could
possibly do it and he said that he would do all of the behind the scenes things
that take all the time, the telephoning and setting up of committee meetings,
etc., and that I could stand up and give the reports which I didn't mind doing
and which he was uncomfortable doing and which was a total reversal from the
other co-presidencies where the women would do all the scutwork and the men
would stand up and read the reports. He thought that was only divine justice and
he was willing to do it, so we did and it worked out. We did initiate a couple
of good scholarship programs and a few things that were useful.
MA: You were philosophically of like minds, so that anything you would do you
02:03:00would pretty much be together on?
KC: Right.
KC: Lets move back now, we're still following your education. You mentioned that
you didn't ever feel that it was new learning in school until you were a junior,
but rather, that it was an opportunity for you to show what you learned, which I
think speaks to the kind of education that had occurred in your home, but tell
me when the change occurred and what that was like.
I suppose my memory is faulty to begin with but I can remember now, not that
you're pressing me, but that general science as a freshman and algebra and
geometry were new, but they never seemed tough. I thought they were always fun.
My senior year in high school when I took physics I had the same science teacher
02:04:00I'd had as a freshman when I took general science. Another classmate of mine,
Mary Cornell, and I loved physics, just loved it and I would really work at even
the little diagrams that we'd have to diagram the experiment we were doing would
be a work of art, at least by my standards and for me to do. But, she and I had
other ideas of things we would like to do so we bargained with the teacher,
Walter Pribbenow, the physics room was not in use during the 6th period which
was a free period for Mary and me, and we asked if we could do extra, not extra
credit but extra experiments, things that would occur to us, and he said yes,
that we could go in and use that room during 6th period provided that we didn't
spend any of that time on the lesson for that day. He didn't want us to have an
02:05:00added opportunity that the other students didn't have. So we not only agreed to
that, but loved the arrangement. He had a chemistry class next door and he would
stick his nose in three or four times during the hour because he'd be so excited
about whatever it was Mary and I were doing. Anyway, that was something I did
that was lots of fun.
My German class was fun. I took two years of Latin and two years of German in
high school. At our 50th high school reunion this year somebody had written a
little skit and part of it involved this German Club and had a little part
written in for me to do so it brings this back to mind. There were 14 of us in
the German class and we stayed the same 14 for two years. We had a marvelous
teacher, Alvina Helmke. Very early, maybe the first week or so of our first year
02:06:00in German class, we decided we'd like to have a German Club and could we meet on
Fridays. She said well sure, provided that in the four days before that we would
do five day's assignments and that no one in the class should fall below a 90 in
any of these lessons and that we would spend German Club talking only German. We
bought that whole package with enthusiasm and of course what teacher wouldn't be
overjoyed, and for two years that's what we did. I was elected president both
years of the German Club and immediately memorized some parliamentary procedure
in German which had absolutely nothing to do with the class but it would always
have the teacher in hysterics. We collected a few dues so that on Fridays
02:07:00someone could run down to the local dairy and bring up treats for us and then
sometimes we cooked German meals. Once the German Club conducted a pep rally in
the gym and had a schnitzel bank, which was all germane to the basketball team,
etc. We did a lot of very inventive things. We made up games in German and
anyway, that was another thing that was just kind of fun.
During my senior year in high school I sold tickets in the theater, the movie
house which we called the theater. I did that seven nights a week and two
matinees to earn a little money, $4.50 a week for those nine times! In the
summer time between my junior and senior year and after my senior year in the
02:08:00daytime I worked in a gift shop and got $7.00 a week for doing that. I put all
of that money in the bank and it was available then for when I was in college
for spending money.
MA: As you describe your school experience I'm so taken with what an incredibly
cohesive group you were, with a good many teachers that you liked and respected
and who were good teachers. Did you have any disruptive elements in your
schools? It's so striking when we look at it in contrast to school today.
KC: Well, what we thought were disruptions in those days were exemplary behavior
today. There was nothing like, oh there were always kids being sent to the
02:09:00principal's office for one little infraction or another.
I did some practice teaching while I was still in high school. My sophomore year
in high school in a social studies course we had to select a career and then
find an opportunity to do something with it. Well, I wasn't very imaginative and
so I selected teaching as a career and I asked around and some of the junior
high teachers said I could come in and conduct a class. One of them was a man
who was an assistant coach, Orv Kane, in fact I think he lives in Beaver Dam and
teaches, he may be retired by now--probably is retired by now, but he taught
02:10:00geography and something else in junior high and he used to come to our house and
play pool, or billiards, in our basement, anyway I think he was just overjoyed
to have an hour off so he would ask me to come back and teach another geography
class. I did the few I had to to fulfill the assignment for my social studies
class so I would be pleased when he would invite me back. Then the word got
around, well I don't suppose its a secret in a school system that size, and when
a teacher would have to leave early for an emergency and be gone for an hour or
two, the office would sometimes fish me up from wherever I was and ask if I
would take the class, whatever it was, English, history, whatever. I did a
little of that, not an awful lot, but I was apparently on-call for the rest of
02:11:00my high school days.
MA: Do you recall what you thought about it? Were you initially frightened like
a student teacher in college might be now when he or she has reached their
senior year and it's finally time to step into the classroom for the first time?
KC: I don't recall being uneasy about it.
MA: Public speaking was comfortable for you even then, wasn't it?
KC: I did a lot of public speaking in school. We had a good forensics program in
our school system and in fact I think I started public speaking when I was in
the early grades. I would be put on programs to recite poems or whatever and
then my mother had me take lessons, elocution lessons. The piano teacher who was
also the music teacher in the school gave little, maybe I was her only student I
02:12:00don't know, but I would memorize poems and sometimes some prose, but by the time
I was a freshman in high school at age 12 I went out for extemporaneous speaking
it was called then, it has another title now, but what we had to do was be
prepared on about a dozen subjects and then on the day of the contest whoever
was in charge would draw a title out of the hat and you would go and prepare or
recall or whatever. During that freshman year we had contests between Sparta,
Viroqua and Tomah, a three way thing and then a regional in LaCrosse and I won
both of those, first place, and went to the state contest in extemporaneous
speaking for two years. Then I got a little weary of doing that and I was on the
02:13:00debate team and that took enough of that sort of time for me, so I just did
extemporaneous reading which didn't involve that kind of intense preparation or
any nervousness about what they were going to draw out of the hat, because it
didn't matter, you'd have half an hour to look over the readings. I also went to
the state contest in extemporaneous reading and had some interesting debate
experiences so that was easy enough for me to do.
MA: Do you remember how you felt about teaching? Did you enjoy it? Did it
actually confirm a career choice?
KC: Absolutely not! I mean I loved doing it because it would get me out of a
class and it was fun to do and I did it seriously but I had no intention of
02:14:00becoming a teacher and every year when my dad would line us up, there were
always 3 of us in undergraduate years together, he would line us up to write out
the check for the tuition and room and board and would ask us what we were
studying and he always put the question to me in the same way "Is this the
semester that you go into the School of Education?" So I could always honestly
answer "no" because I had no intention of, but I didn't see any need to debate
it. When I would tell him I was majoring in political science again he'd say,
"Political science, what do you do with political science?" I would hem-and-haw
a little bit.
MA: Was he putting real pressure on you or was this simply his way of
communicating at the time of the check? Did you feel that he would have been
happier if you'd have transferred to the School of Education?
02:15:00
KC: I think he thought I should have an objective, a career objective.
MA: But he wouldn't have withheld the money?
KC: No that wasn't related at all.
MA: It was more rhetorical?
KC: No. I think he really thought I was preparing to teach or to do something.
MA: What did you feel you were doing?
KC: I was learning a lot of things I wanted to learn and also what I heard about
the School of Education left me so icy cold and when I would see kids who were
taking courses in the School of Education, I thought, "I don't want that," and
then I had professors who would make fun of it. Bill Ebenstein who was one of my
favorite polititcal science teachers, used to say "I wonder how Socrates could
ever teach, he didn't go to the School of Education."
MA: I was the valedictorian of my class, so I spoke at the commencement
02:16:00ceremonies and I had the lead in our senior class play. I don't know if I've
told you this, but early in my senior year the woman who was going to be
directing the senior class play spoke to me very privately and secretly and
asked if I would be able to leave my job of selling tickets at the theater long
enough to rehearse for the senior class play and to be in it, because if I could
then she would select a play that would have a part especially good for me. I
kept her little secret and of course told her "Yes, by all means." All year long
whenever that thought would occur to me I pictured myself as Katherine Hepburn
02:17:00and I thought "Oh, I just wanted a role like one of those Hepburn things." When
the play finally came, I was so glad I hadn't breathed any of this to a soul
because the play she had selected, and my part was of Sophie, an old maid. It
was a dumb play, the kind that lots of senior classes do. It was fun and at our
50th reunion the fellow who played opposite me in the play was there and was
reminiscing about it and he told me, 50 years later, that he was so concerned
that he had asked me at rehearsal one time whether my parents would be at the
play and I said "Of course, and so will my brothers, why?" He said "Don't you
think this is a little risque," because in the play I faint at one point and he
had to pick me up and tote me someplace. He thought that maybe my parents would
be offended.
02:18:00
MA: Kay, last week we talked about your high school experience. After graduation
from high school, what next?
KC: Well, of course, I worked that summer, as I have mentioned, doing my two
little mundane jobs and playing golf as often as I could and then enrolled in
the fall at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. That was a choice that I
made without really examining very many alternatives. I just really wanted to go
to Madison. The year that I was a freshman my next older brother had decided to
transfer from LaCrosse where he had had his freshman year, which was then a
02:19:00state college, and to go to the university in Madison. This was 1937 and things
were not flush in the Frederick household. My third brother, David, was about to
enter his sophomore year in high school and my family thought about this for
awhile. My brother Bob was thinking about transferring to Madison. He had had
one year there but he was kind of a nomad I think, he had had a year at Carroll
College and a year at LaCrosse, he hadn't flunked out, he just simply thought he
would like another institution better. So there was an outside possibility that
three of us would be enrolled in Madison and with the fourth coming up soon. My
parents made the decision, I rather think it was my mother who made the
decision, to move herself and enough furniture to Madison to establish an
02:20:00apartment. My father would stay in Sparta in the big house by himself and
conduct his life as usual. I think part of that decision, although it was never
explicit at all on my mother's part, was really to get out of Sparta. She had
always enjoyed Madison and she had friends here and whenever we had come to
Madison or she had come by herself she had always had particularly good times.
So, that's what we did, rented an apartment at 440 West Dayton Street, the
building is still there although neighboring buildings are not any longer there,
on the third floor. They even moved my baby grand piano up -- that was some
enterprise to watch while they heisted with ropes from the outside of the
building. In any case, about the time we moved brother Bob, number one, decided
02:21:00not to come to Madison, so there was just Gordon and me in the university, and
David went to what was then called Central High School, the MATC building, part
of which has recently been torn down. It was the same building my father went to
high school in. It was then called Madison High and was the only high school in
town when he was in school. For one semester we lived in the apartment and we
all were doing our thing in school but by the end of the semester it just wasn't
working out. My father was terribly lonely and I think it was difficult for my
mother. I'm sure that just climbing those stairs was more difficult, and she
didn't have the access to a car, even though she wasn't driving she could be
driven anyplace in Sparta. I don't know what all of the considerations were, but
02:22:00in any case she moved lock, stock and barrel back to Sparta at the end of the
first semester. David was very happy to return to his old friends in high school
in Sparta although he had been an awfully good sport about his move, and Gordon
and I had to find a place to live.
That's one of the reasons why we each joined a fraternity, I joined the Alpha
Chi Omega sorority and he the Kappa Sigma fraternity, even though we were
ambivalent about that, but the dormatories were filled and we needed a place to
stay and the idea of a room in a rooming house was just abhorrent, I suppose, to
both of us. We had friends in those organizations.
02:23:00
MA: Why were you ambivalent about joining?
KC: Because the whole Greek system is a very exclusionary one and discriminatory
and sometimes a little bit upstage. I found many wonderful friends in that
sorority house, some of whom I'm still friendly with, one came from Washington,
D.C., and another from Milwaukee for the three of us to have a little reunion
here in town this summer, so we still are in touch. In any case, I lived there
then for three and a half years in the sorority house. My senior year I was
president of the sorority house and my junior year I'd been corresponding
secretary, and in that capacity I not only had access but had to read
correspondence with national officers and previous officers of the local
02:24:00chapter, and came across one letter regarding me. Apparently I was being
considered the year before to be nominated for the presidency which I didn't
know anything about, and some comment in the correspondence was "But we're never
sure what she might drag into the house." I was very active in International
Club and I chaired the University Peace Federation for four years and was vice
president of the YWCA and had many friends who were not traditional Greek and
WASPs and so that's what the comment was about.
MA: Do you think in your time there that you politicized your sisters in any respect?
KC: I'm sure. As a matter of fact there are a few of us who connived among
ourselves very consciously. We didn't start out to think of it as politicizing,
02:25:00but the table conversation was so boring and superficial. There were two or
three of us who found each other more interesting than the others, who would
rush to the dining room so we could sit together. We would save seats for one
another simply to have a reasonable conversation. One of them, Ruth Thompson,
who is now married, and has been for years, to Boudon Curtis and the two of them
have run a couple of rural newspapers down in Darlington. Her brother ran for
governor of Wisconsin unsuccessfully but was a state senator for 20 or 30 years,
so she came from a very politically alert family and just interested in public
affairs. She had a subscription to the Capital Times and, believe it or not, it
just wasn't customary for students anywhere that I know of to feel the need to
02:26:00read a daily newspaper. They would read the student newspaper, but to know what
was happening in the real world was beyond them, and of course this was before
the era of television. On Saturday afternoon I would often sit in the little
lounge with a friend and listen to the opera on radio, but there was no
television and no addition to daily news or certainly to reading newsapers and
magazines. In any case, three or four of us set out to improve the table
conversation. We would give it some thought before the meal as to what subject
we could raise that would make an interesting kind of discussion and it wasn't
long before other people would drift to our table and want to sit with us
because they found the conversation more interesting. Before the end of the
02:27:00year, I remember a national officer came to visit or inspect the chapter or
whatever, and that was one of her primary comments, that it was the most
interesting and alert conversation, she didn't know that it had been carefully
nurtured and cultivated. And then women in the sorority did meet all kinds of my
friends from International Club from all over the world and instead of being
horrified they gradually found this interesting.
MA: Tell me about your academic life. Did you know initially what your major
would be?
KC: No, I didn't. I did something I may have done in many other contexts all my
life and I think in retrospect it was very foolish. I deliberately avoided
courses that had been such a snap for me in high school. I decided not to take
02:28:00speech courses or to even attempt to be on the debate team. These were things I
had done and done successfully and now I want to do something different. I
didn't take courses such as physics, I think I mentioned previously what fun
Mary Cornell and I had had in high school using that extra period, and so I
moved into areas that were foreign to me. I had a couple of friends, again in
the sorority house, who were majoring in anthropology, and they kept trying to
interest me, not in my freshman year but at some point, into taking anthropology
because they found it so fascinating. Two of these women made a career in
anthropology and have done fascinating things over the years. I enrolled in one
02:29:00anthropology course and the very first reading left me so cold that I
transferred out of it right away. Again, that was a mistake. If I had it to do
over again that's an area that I would really enjoy, cultural anthropology
MA: Was Margaret Mead in the news yet at that time or were you aware of her?
KC: I don't really know, I can't remember. My first memory of reading anything
about Margaret Mead was actually during World War II, reading an article called
"And Keep Your Powder Dry." Now Margaret Mead had her 80th or 85th birthday ten
years ago; we celebrated it at the Houston conference, she was there. The whole
2,000 delegates stood up and sang Happy Birthday to Margaret Mead and it was
lovely. That was not too long before she died. That means that Margaret Mead was
02:30:0030 some years older than I so she was certainly publishing by the time I was an undergraduate.
MA: I was just wondering what her influence might have been on female students
in the field at that time but perhaps she wasn't well enough known at that time.
KC: Not to me and not to my circle.
MA: Now you asked about academic. Well, I chose to study a little more German;
I'd had 2 years of German in high school which is the equivalent of 1 year at
the University. I had a very exciting experience during my very first semester
when a professor of German invited me to have a part in the Christmas play.
Apparently the German Club every year did some kind of a Christmas dramatic
02:31:00performance and I was quite excited to be invited. Later on I found out that
most everybody else in the performance and in the organization were graduate
students and I was just a freshman. I realized that the man was type-casting; he
thought that my pronunciation of German was good, which was one reason, but also
the most peculiar Christmas play I've ever heard. I was die frau virgin, I was
the landlady where the shepherds came and spent the night. The only other woman
was the Virgin Mary, of course, and that was not I. But I was trying to keep the
shepherds from getting too drunk at my tavern so they'd still be able to go on
and greet the baby Jesus. It was a very peculiar play; it was lots of fun to do.
I probably had more B+s than any undergraduate who ever attended the University.
02:32:00I thought I was a, just assumed I was a good student, but as I told you earlier,
I had never taken a final exam until I came to the University, so I had no idea
how to prepare for a final exam and I always did my classwork and recited in
class and was actually generally doing A work, got A on my papers. But when it
came to my final exams, I didn't do A work, and so I would get these B+s which
was a great chagrin to me. Also, I had been all through high school kind of a
big frog in a little pond and I came to the University, where there were at the
time 10,000 students. And you know my whole town was 3500 people, and I felt
very conspicuous. I felt kind of country and overgrown and most of the gals--we
02:33:00called them gals in those days--at the sorority house were not only much better
off financially, much better. And their wardrobes and their experiences, some of
them had cars, made me feel, again, a little--they didn't do anything to me or
say anything that suggested that I didn't fit in, but I felt very conspicuous,
as though I were not properly dressed.
MA: How did your parents pay for this? There were two of you then in a
fraternity and a sorority.
KC: Well, I believe that the room and board was $30 a month. That was not much
more than dormitory--the cost of living in a dormitory. And that and our
02:34:00tuition, and my dad also insisted that we each have a season ticket to the
athletic events and a season ticket to the theater, concerts at the Union
Theater, and those things he paid for. And then, anything else we had to take
out of our own earnings and our own savings. So if I ever wanted a Coke or what else--
MA: Kay, we were talking about your college experience.
KC: Yes. Well I guess I was pointing out what courses I enrolled in and what I
did and why.
MA: I was wondering if you felt academically inadequate, or less adequate in
such a huge institution?
KC: I encountered new ideas and I had to study for the first time, not only to
02:35:00prepare for exams which I didn't learn to do until about my junior or senior
year, but had to really study. I did a lot of my reading of textbooks for
example in the student union in the Paul Bunyan Room which was the only room
that women were allowed to go into. We couldn't go into the Rathskeller. We
could go upstairs into meeting rooms, could and did, but for refreshment.
MA: Why weren't you allowed in those other rooms?
KC: Because there was sex based discrimination in the student union. We were at
least allowed in the front door. In earlier days, well before my time, there was
a special back door that women had to walk into to get into the building. I do
remember being irked that we couldn't go into the great big Rathskeller so that
02:36:00when I would get a refill on my coffee cup, black coffee was 3¢ a cup in those
days and second cups were free, that's how I learned to drink coffee, I didn't
really like it but it was the cheapest thing to buy and 1 cup and 3¢ worth
would last me the whole afternoon. I did a lot of my reading down there and then
I'd be ready to go to meetings; I belonged to quite a few organizations.
KC: So I don't know that I really felt inadequate, I often found a good student
in the class with whom I would study, at least there were a number of classes in
which I found that a good thing to do and we would just kind of gravitate to
each other, people I only met in the classroom and while there were a few big
02:37:00lecture classes we always then had small discussion groups so that the classroom
situation wasn't a formidable one at all, but was rather nice. I was just
thinking of some of the people I studied with. I don't know if that bears
remarking about.
I did have an interesting experience in a geography course, a 5 credit geography
course which had a lot of tedious ....We had I think two, 2 hour called
labs--there were a number of field trips that were terribly exciting in
geography. We went to Devil's Lake and looked at glaciated things and some of
that was quite interesting but in the laboratory itself we had to sit and draw
02:38:00maps of rainfall and of other such things, really kindergarten activity. It
didn't take long before 4 or 5 of us in this geography lab decided to combine
forces and each of us would draw one rainfall map and then the others would copy
it quickly. We couldn't leave when we were finished, we had to sit there for two
hours so then we would sit and talk. Among the people that I talked with were
Roland Day who is now a Supreme Court Justice and Charlie, who is an attorney
here in town, Jim Hudson who lives in the Milwaukee area who is a very
progressive left wing kind of person who taught me more about politics, at least
I learned more, sitting in that miserable geography lab visiting with him and it
was he who persuaded me to belong to the University Peace Federation, to which I
02:39:00was promptly elected chair or president. We brought Harold Laski from England to
address the university student body under the auspices of the Peace Federation.
I can remember that was the first time I went to the lion's den, the president
of the University, to ask permission to do this and to ask for funding from the University.
MA: And you were successful?
KC: Yes. That was the first year that Clarence Addison Dykstra was here as
president of the University. We had the meeting when Harold Laski came in the
Old Red Gym. It was one of the places big enough to have a meeting of that kind.
I can remember my brother Gondy, aka Gordon, was in the audience and he was
so--he didn't know I was going to be introducing Harold Laski, we could have
02:40:00been doing a Charlie McCarthy stunt because Harold Laski came barely to my
shoulder--anyway, my brother just about died of embarrassment because there I
was in the spotlight. Anytime I did anything, at least in those days, kind of
public it would just embarrass him, just as it had in 3rd and 4th grade when I
would raise my hand too often.
I'm sure I spent more time in extracurricular activities which in itself were
wonderful education experiences for me. Just meeting, not only the kinds of
people and kinds of issues--Ed Nestigen was a person who was on the staff of the
YMCA at that time, he was from Sparta, and he made it his business apparently
02:41:00every year to tap 4 or 5 freshmen who looked promising in leadership and then to
kind of groom us without our knowing his full agenda of course. He would have
little meetings and Bob Lampman who was on our faculty and has chaired the
Economics Department was one of those and I was one and a fellow named John
Bossort who is now an attorney over in LaCrosse, we were three of the little
handful whom our class whom Ed--I even can remember now asking him, and that was
50 years ago, how in the world he could read a newspaper as fast as he could
because I had never read a daily newspaper as a regular thing, all through my
02:42:00high school years. So it was only when I came here that I began to do that, and
I can remember Ed very patiently walking me through a paper and telling me how
he would look at a headline and decide it was nothing he wanted to read or read
the opening paragraph if he had a little interest and then read the whole thing
if it was something else. That's a skill that ought to be taught. I don't know,
maybe they teach in it Journalism or English, but it ought to be taught in high school.
MA: Gerda teaches it in her history class, and it's the first time I've come
across it being taught.
KC: I'm sure that Ed Nestigen was another influence in my concerns.
KC: I spent some time in an open housing committee; Madison in those days was
far worse than it is now. When Paul Robson came to Madison to perform in the
02:43:00Union Theater in Othello he could not stay in any hotel in Madison.
MA: Where did he stay?
KC: He stayed at the Haagen residence, Euta Haagen was in the performance with
him and her parents were here, her father was on the faculty, so he had a place
to stay, otherwise I suppose some black family in town would have put him up.
It's hard to believe, isn't it?
MA: Did you go to the performance? Tell me about it.
KC: Indeed I did. I don't know what to tell except that it was just terrific.
MA: What was the audience's response? Were any black people able to come and
could they afford the tickets, for example?
KC: I have no memory of how many black people were or were not in the audience.
They certainly would have been permitted in, there were black students on the
campus. I met Hilton Hanna, who has since been a labor leader with the
02:44:00International Brotherhood of Meat Cutters and whatever the total title is, he
has moved back to Madison in recent years, but I can remember eyebrows being
raised when he and I would take a walk across Bascom Hill, but that was all.
Nobody made any slurring remarks, he was a student in Economics at the time.
MA: Was it unusual that you, as a woman, were involved in all of these things?
You've mentioned a lot of men who were involved with you, but you haven't
mentioned other young women.
There were other women who were active in the Peace Federation and open housing.
I don't know how close I was to any of them. Usually the secretary of any of
02:45:00these organizations would be a woman and I would work with her and there were
women on the newspaper staff of the Daily Cardinal who covered things and would
be in touch with me a lot and with whom I had a lot of contact and relationship.
By about my junior year I became quite friendly with a fellow by the name of
Jerry Kaiser from New York and in fact we dated fairly steadily for 5 years here
in Madison and then when I went to Washington during World War II with the War
Production Board, he was also in Washington. He had some friends, also mostly
from New York, his friends were in graduate school--Joe Peckman who a few years
ago got an honorary degree from the university and with whom I've stayed in
02:46:00touch, and Ben Stephansky who later became a labor attache to our embassy in
Mexico, and some very, very interesting people and quite intellectually active.
I spent a lot of time with this crowd. It wasn't just all of those men and me,
those other men had dates and were friends of mine. In a way I suppose I had a
kind of compartmentalized undergraduate time of having a lot of good friends at
the sorority house and some of us would rush every noon and have a short game of
bridge with the woman who was housemother before we had to rush to our 1:30
class so I had very good friends there. Then another gang in the International
02:47:00Club, and then some of this left wing progressive peace and housing kinds of
people. They might or might not mingle or know one another, but I didn't feel
fragmented at all, it all made sense to me.
I was taking a lot of social studies or social science courses and I might just
mention that the reason I chose to major in political science as an
undergraduate was that in the course of the junior year students were required
to name a major and have "x" number of credits and related credits, etc., and
political science had the fewest required courses of any of those subject areas
that I found interesting, so I thought why not, then I could take whatever
02:48:00additional things I wanted.
MA: That relates to the question I wanted to ask you next. How did you
experience the classroom? Gloria Steinem in "Everyday Acts and Outrageous
Rebellions" states that college women experience the least discrimination of any
group of women. I wonder if that was the case in your day? Did you find that in
college life it's easier to be equal than when you move into the work world, etc.?
KC: I wasn't conscious of sex based discrimination.
MA: The faculty I assume were primarily male or isn't that a correct assumption?
KC: Yes that is a correct assumption. It was particularly true for me; by that I
mean that I had very few women instructors at all. In fact, I had one woman full
02:49:00professor, Helen Clark, in social work. Actually the School of Social Work had
not been founded yet, she founded it or was instrumental in getting one started
here. But I took social legislation, group work theory and practice, case work
theory and practice because I wanted more of what she had to offer. She and I
stayed in contact and were friends after I moved away from Madison. She sat on
my orals committee for my masters degree and for my Ph.D. and in some ways was
kind of a surrogate resident mother for me. I'm sure if at the time I had said
that to her she wouldn't have liked it probably very much. She was 25 or so
years older than I am. When we moved back to Madison 27 years ago I got in touch
with her and she had us over to her house for parties, particularly when her
brothers would be in town. Then she moved out to Attic Angels and had a little
02:50:00apartment, that's a residence for elderly people, a very nice one, and then as
she got older and couldn't maintain the apartment she moved into their nursing
home facility. She died a little over a year ago and I was asked and did speak
at her memorial service, which was very nice. In fact in 1980, when I was 60,
the Women's Studies program on the campus had a birthday party for me at the
Wisconsin Center and Helen Clark came in a wheelchair, the young man who was her
driver and attendant brought her, and that was so wonderful for me to have her
02:51:00there and be able to introduce her as the one female professor I had in all my
years as an undergraduate and graduate. There were other women professors here,
Gladys Borchers in the Speech Department, Helen C. White, for whom the building
is named, in the English Department who was an absolutely marvelous, gorgeous
woman with the most beautiful posture and she always wore lavendar or purple,
every item of clothing I think she had and she just was such a figure as well as
a brain of course, and she was once I think maybe both of them in turn were
advisors to Mortarboard which was a senior womens honorary society to which I
belonged and of which I was president. So I did have opportunities to meet
02:52:00these--another woman in the English Department--so there were maybe half a dozen
women professors around, but you could count them on your hand.
MA: Do you think that you consciously saw them as role models?
KC: No I don't think so. I know that I enjoyed being with them and I admired
them. The Dean of Women at the time, Louise Troxel, was also somebody that I
liked spending time with. I guess I never thought about it, it wasn't part of
one's vocabulary and maybe of ones--I can't think of ever saying to myself "Gee
I want to grow up to be just like that person."
MA: Were they married women? I ask the question because I'm wondering if a
02:53:00married woman could actually balance a profession with marriage.
KC: Not any of those people were married. Helen Clark did marry when she was in
her 40's a man who was widowed and had 1 daughter who was either finishing high
school or starting university, but that marriage only lasted a couple of years
and then they were divorced. The other women I named were not married at all.
Louise Troxel did marry an M.D. who was widowed and she was more than in her
40's, maybe in her 50's, and that marriage didn't last--Louise Troxel Greeley.
When Dr. Greeley married for the 3rd or 4th time I don't know which it was, 4th
I guess, his first wife died then he married her sister, I don't know if she
02:54:00died or they were divorced, then he married Louise Troxel and then they were
divorced then he married a younger woman who had been dating his son--I know all
this because my friend Jerry Kaiser his brother Phil is married to Hannah
Greeley and so I paid special attention to a lot of this stuff. I know for a
long time when Manchesters would send out their monthly bill to Mrs. Greeley
they would get each other's bills mixed up.
MA: Did his 4th marriage last?
KC: Yes.
MA: When you were in the classroom with male professors it sounds as though you
felt comfortable in discussion. Did you in any way feel inferior? You must have
been in the minority in the numbers in the classroom as a woman student, or were you?
KC: There again I don't even remember counting noses or wondering what the ratio was.
02:55:00
MA: Which means it probably wasn't affecting you one way or the other, then?
MA: During my first year in graduate school which was the year of Pearl Harbor,
by then the draft was on and men were beginning to vanish from the scene or to
appear in uniform, then the ratio began to be upset with more females then males.
KC: The reason I ask you about your discussions, is in graduate school today for
example if there is a seminar with 50% men and 50% women there is a tendency for
men to dominate the conversation unless the women are quite assertive and able
to take control.
That's true everywhere. It's true at the lunch table where our faculty eat
together. We have enough sensitized men now after 3 or 4 years that they will
02:56:00call each other's attention to the fact that they are interrupting and that they
are hogging the conversation so I think we're making a little progress but it's
very slow.
MA: I'm wondering if you experienced that or if you recall experiencing that as
a student?
KC: I don't recall being uncomfortable about it. Now it's very possible that I
just accepted the fact that men talk more than women. On the other hand, I never
felt silenced or that I ought not to open my mouth, at least not because I was
female. There were times when I didn't know what was going on and then I knew
enough not to open my mouth.
MA: Which is actually a sign of intelligence.
MA: Let's continue this. You made a decision to major in Political Science ....
02:57:00
KC: It just gave me more opportunity to take other things. For example what I
just mentioned with Helen Clark, the group work theory and practice.
MA: How long after that time was the School of Social Work started here?
KC: Not too long. I can't remember the actual date but not too long after
that.When I came back here, we moved back here in 1960, in the very early 60's
when I was working in Continuing Education for women I called together a little
meeting with Dorothy Witte Austin who is a journalist from Milwaukee who has
worked for both of the Milwaukee newspapers and who I often refer to as the
02:58:00"Boswell of the Wisconsin women's movement." She covered everything and anything
and kept us on our toes by asking me in advance "what's going to be newsworthy
at your meeting, because if nothing is I'm not going to bother to come". So then
I'd have to think we'd better do something that's newsworthy. Anyway, I gathered
together a few people including Helen Clark and Ersel LeMasters who was then
head of the School of Social Work and Dorothy Austin--I can't remember who else
was there, some other women on the faculty--to talk about the university's
discrimination against women faculty and just to ask what their experiences
were. Both LeMasters and Helen Clark confirmed that the day Helen Clark bought a
house in Madison, which would have been in the 1940's probably, she did not get
another raise. Her salary was frozen at $8,000 because the head of the Sociology
02:59:00Department at the time, McCormick or E. A. Ross I've forgotten who, said "she's
not going to leave even if she gets a better offer because she's got a house
here now, we don't have to pay her any more". That was the way she was treated.
Finally LeMasters managed, many, many years later, to get her salary up a bit
but it never amounted to what it should have.
MA: Was that generally the rule, that the women faculty made less money than the
male faculty?
KC: Oh sure. In fact that was going on in the 1960's when I came here and was
doing the continuing education. That was one of the things we discovered and
when the Faculty Women's Association got organized, which I helped to organize,
first on the Madison campus and then the following year system-wide that was one
03:00:00of the first things that we were concerned with. The fact that so many
departments had no women at all and when they did have they had them in as
lecturers or as non-tenured people, and that the salaries at any level were that
there was a great growth disparity; that battle isn't over yet.
MA: I'd like to hear more about that when we get to that time period.
MA: So you took social work classes, political science classes, continued with
German it sounds like.
KC: Just for two years. Also a lot of economics, sociology, I don't kmow what
else--English, loved English. Again, Warner Taylor was my--I had to take
03:01:00freshman English, in those days people took a placement test - incoming freshman
took a placement test--and were exempt from freshman English, didn't get 3
credits for it just moved right into I just assumed that I would be exempt from
freshman English and I was not. It turned out that even though we thought we had
a very good high school in Sparta that we were not reading a lot of the more
contemporary authors that I learned over the first year or two in just visiting
with my friends who had read this, that and the other that I had never even
heard of, so I realized that at least in that department my senior year in high
school that we had not had the same kind of preparation that a lot of other
students had. I don't regret in the least having had that experience of having
03:02:00had Warner Taylor as my English teacher, a full professor and a marvelous,
marvelous person. I thoroughly enjoyed all of the things we read and learned how
to kind of analyze. I think I learned as much about how to think about things in
a somewhat analytic way from my English classes as I learned anywhere and it all
was in a very pleasant and painless way.
MA: Do you recall favorite authors from that period, anything that particularly
stand out as having been extraordinarily meaningful to you?
KC: No. I remember writing a term paper on Robbie Burns that year which got a
03:03:00lot of wonderful comments and a nice grade. Do you know that in my office I have
that little poster that somebody gave me "Of course God made man before he made
women, you always make a rough draft before you have a finished product." I've
asked people if they know the Robbie Burns poem and so many do not. I think
feminists ought to put that on a poster too and I'd be glad to recite all 4
lines to you.
MA: Please do. I don't know it.
KC: Auld nature sighs, the lovely dear, Her nobelist work she classes, oh, Her
prentice hand she tried on man And then she made the lasses, oh!
KC: Did you, and this is probably hard to remember, I am wondering how many
female authors were included in a literature class in that period.
Again I have no idea, I didn't pay any attention. This morning I got a brochure
03:04:00in the office of some international thing related to Nicaragua and the first
thing I noticed was 5 male speakers, not a single female speaker. That now of
course is the first thing I notice, before I even notice what the subject is.
But I wasn't conscious of that at the time. I'm sure it wasn't pointed out
either. Now we're reading this, or this woman author has a different view.
MA: While you were an undergraduate did you expect that you would go on for a
masters and a Ph.D.? Was that a given for you?
KC: Not really, even though my dad used to say that he would see us all through
03:05:00a masters and after that we were on our own. I never have in my life planned
ahead. You know that's very pro forma these days with counselors and advisors to
women, "Where do you want to be 10 years from now?"
We were talking about planning ahead and did I plan ahead for my masters and
Ph.D. I think not. It must have been sometime during my senior year that I made
a decision to go on the following year for at least one year of graduate work.
MA: What prompted that?
KC: I don't know. I don't remember at least. I do know that I applied for and
03:06:00received a scholarship, a cash award from the Political Science Department and
that I was invited, I guess I didn't know about housefellow jobs in the
dormitories but the Dean of Womens Office asked me if I would like to apply,
which I did, and I became what was called a housefellow in Elizabeth Waters
dormitory. It was fairly new, I think it was about its second year I believe. I
was one of five people in that dorm and each of us had one unit with about 100
undergraduate girls whom we didn't supervise but were just there to help them
organize stuff or to be there when they had a problem and wanted to talk about
it. I had free room and board at Elizabeth Waters, marvelous food and a private
room with a telephone and a view of the lake. It was just absolutely gorgeous
03:07:00and a $400 cash award from the department. At the end of that year I had $200
left from that $400 and that's what I lived on. I still like to remember that
there was a beauty shop in the dormitory and every Monday they had a special:
for $1 you could get a shampoo and set and a choice of manicure or eyebrow arch
so every Monday I would have a $1 manicure, shampoo and set.
MA: You didn't have an eyebrow arch?
KC: No. I didn't want anybody plucking at my hairs.
MA: How did you like working with the young women? Were there any notable
experiences there?
KC: I'm not sure I was the world's greatest dorm fellow. I was always available
if people came in with a problem or just wanted to gab, that was fine with me. I
03:08:00very soon and in short order decided I wasn't going to be available 24 hours of
the day for just anyone to come in and gab, I was after all enrolled fulltime in
graduate school including a course in statistics which I regarded as one of the
worst wastes of time because it took a lot of my time. I would figure out a
problem and think I had it perfect and then realize I'd gone off on the wrong
track and have to do it over again and have never used the mathematics that is
what took all of my time. I invested more time in that course than in all the
substantive courses that I took put together. To this day I wonder why, it was
one thing to learn about averages and the meaning of statistics when you read
them and it's another to work out those silly problems. I decided to post office
03:09:00hours for when I was a housefellow. Nobody else did that but nobody told me I
couldn't do it. I thought it was fairer to the students to know when they could
expect to find me there rather than to have them running up to my floor and
finding I wasn't there, so that's what I did. I never snooped around, in those
days people were supposed to behave in a more decorous fashion.
MA: What were the rules for the dormitory? Could boys visit someone's room for example?
KC: Oh my no. There were parlors or lounges where they could visit at certain
hours, only certain hours. Of course women students had hours in those days,
03:10:0010:30 on weeknights and 12:30 on weekends. You had to be in and were locked in.
Boys had no hours on the theory that once the girls were in, the boys would go
home. That's the way it was explained.
There was a separate women's student self government, in those days. Women were
also a part of the regular student government but to make some of our own rules
that governed females. I was never an active participant or officer in WSGA
(Women's Self Governing Association) but one of my very best friends was
president. In fact, a couple of them were over the years, trying not only to
monitor and encourage adult behavior, mature behavior at least, but also to get
03:11:00some rules modified.
MA: To change some of the more repressive rules?
KC: Right. And also to be sure that the women students who lived off campus or
in rooming houses had proper accommodations and had some voice in student
government and just because you might be isolated, one or two or three in a
house someplace shouldn't exclude them from things. There were a lot of good
things that were going on. It was after my time here that the rules were changed
so that women could come and go.
MA: If a young woman were to have gotten pregnant, would she have been able to
stay in a dorm and stay in college if she wasn't married, or even if she was
03:12:00married, was that something that would have been acceptable?
I knew several married women students who were pregnant and there was no problem
with that, but I never knew a pregnant unmarried person who stayed on the campus
to the point that anyone knew she was pregnant. Now I don't know what was
happening with abortions.
I do know that one of the first things the housefellows had was a meeting with a
woman psychiatrist from the Medical School, Nettie Washburn, and a great gal she
was. She tried to give us some insights into what kinds of behavior on the part
of students might suggest that they ought to see an expert or a physician or
03:13:00whatever. She had some very enlightened and progressive views about sexuality.
MA: Did she talk about birth control or anything like that?
KC: She did to us and then we were supposed to be able to pass some of this
along. I don't ever remember a student mentioning anything to me about birth control.
MA: Or abortion?
KC: No. I do remember when I was in the sorority house of girls being frantic
thinking they might be pregnant but I never was privy to any information from
anybody about that.
MA: Did you know or did you ever hear gossip about abortionists and where they
might be found or wasn't that information that went through your grapevine?
KC: No.
MA: What about violence against women at night on the campus, for example. Were
03:14:00women afraid of assault as they are today?
KC: No. We walked anywhere but of course we had to be in at 10:30 or 12:30. But
even people in town who were not students who worked at other jobs didn't seem
to be worried.
MA: Busses cost 5¢ in those days. There were not a lot of bus lines but it was
adequate to the size of the place and the size of the population.
KC: How about bicycles, had they emerged yet?
MA: No. Only a few queer ducks rode bicycles in those days. That was something
for kids or something you did for recreation but not a means of transportation.
MA: Kay, we were talking about your time in graduate school. Let's back up to
03:15:00summer before graduate school. I would like to, because that summer I had an
experience which was one of a kind for me. I was a camp counselor at a Girl
Scout camp in Bear Mountain Park, New York, which is north of New York City,
called camp Quidnunc and there are all kinds of camps here in Wisconsin of
course but one of my good friends at the university had been there one year as a
counselor and was asked were there some people on our campus who might spend a
summer so she got in touch with several of us and we decided to do that. It
didn't really pay much in fact, well Girl Scout counseling never does, I doubt
that even my train fare was covered and I was there for 12 or 13 weeks, at least
03:16:00it was the entire summer. It was a beautiful, beautiful place and I met a lot of
wonderful people. Just by coincidence, in part by coincidence, when we lived on
Staten Island and my daughter Sara was a Girl Scout she went to camp Quidnunc
and I thought it would be fun for her to go. Actually she was so homesick the
whole 2 weeks that she almost died, but in any case she had that experience.
That was the summer of 1941 and I remember being rather horrified as I'd go
through cities with what now one would think of as the "winds of war" with all
of these huge billboards urging people, men particularly, to join the services
and of course that was just before Pearl Harbor and the war in Europe had been
03:17:00going on for some time but it came home to me when I saw those, in a way that it
hadn't before, we had still been very active on this campus in trying to
forestall, rightly or wrongly, U.S. participation in the whole thing.
MA: What had you done on the campus? I had chaired the University Peace
Federation and we kept bringing speakers here and even though I no longer had a
....I didn't think of myself as an isolationist, but just ways to prevent ....of
course we knew we didn't know everything about Hitler but we knew things were
pretty bad, and it was worse as each year went by, and the Nazi's took over more
and more of Europe. We were more persuaded that our options were closing.
03:18:00
Let me get back to camp Quidnunc. One of the things I remember very well about
that summer was that I was transferred after a couple of weeks into the Brownie
unit. They had had, those are for the very youngest kids, they had had a
counselor who was a kindergarten teacher or something and no fun at all for the
campers and so whoever was in charge thought that maybe I would be more fun for
the campers. I can remember first walking into this Brownie unit. I was wearing
shorts, which I think possibly makes me look even more long legged than I do
otherwise, and when I walked into this group of maybe 30 kids they all backed
03:19:00away and kind of looked and nobody spoke to me and I wasn't going to rush them
of course, and finally a couple of them started whispering "you ask her" no "you
ask her". Finally one of the braver ones stepped forth and said "We want to
know, are you really a giant?" So I acknowledged that I was and we had lots of
good times. In a day or two about six or eight of them, they must have planned
it in advance, tackled me and I felt just like Gulliver and the Lilliputians
because they all piled on and I was rather helpless. But I did have a good time
that summer. When we had time off I went in to New York City which was a
reasonable bus ride away. I had a boyfriend in fact for a total of five years I
03:20:00guess, my junior and senior years and then he wasn't around during all of my
graduate year but came back to Wisconsin from New York City where he lived. He
came to vist me at camp a time or two and then I would go down to New York and
visit with some of his family. When I went to Washington in 1942 he also went to
Washington and got a job in one of the war offices so that we saw each other
there for two more years.
I had been a Girl Scout when I was a kid and had gone to Scout camp, always
loved it, and did as much canoeing, hiking and swimming as possible. I had gone
to other kinds of camps, or had done camping I guess is a better way to say it.
03:21:00A group of my best girlfriends in Sparta, when we were in high school, used to
rent a cottage at Spring Bank where there was a little spring fed lake and a
wooden hanging bridge and a cave and it was fun. We would rent a cottage for a
week, ten or twelve of us, no chaperone although there were families living in
nearby cottages so we really were probably under surveilance at all times but we
had the feeling of being quite on our own. I used to be asked, I think I was
probably the youngest member of this group (we probably started this when I was
twelve or thirteen and then each summer through my high school years at least)
03:22:00they would ask me to plan the menus for a week for all of us and work out a
shopping list of how many cans and how many pounds etc. of this and that we
needed. I didn't do it totally alone, I would do it in consultation with others,
but I would certainly be the one to estimate what the cost to each one would be.
I had apparently done enough shopping with my mother at grocery stores and paid
enough attention to what things cost so that I would almost come out on the
nose! It was always my assignment, at least I always was the one who did it.
When we were staying there I frequently would be the first one up in the morning
and would, some of the gals smoked and some of them occasionally had a boyfriend
in who would bring a beer or something. There wasn't a lot of late night
carousing but enough to titilate a little bit. I would often be the first one up
03:23:00in the morning and tidy up the dining area and wash cups and glasses and things
so they would be ready and sweep the floor which it seemed to me it always
needed. Years and years later when I was telling this to someone in the presence
of my brother Gondy he looked at me and said "Why do you think they invited you
to go along?" So that gave me pause years later, I hadn't realized that. I have
wonderful snapshots of myself floating in an inner tube; I could swim and was a
good swimmer, but that was my favorite thing to do, just sit in an inner tube
and read or lie in the sun. That is still my favorite thing to do. I have
snapshots from this summer up at Rhinelander, at our cottage, in an inner tube.
I still love to do it!
03:24:00
Was it very common for young women to participate in athletics at that time? I
think it must have been because all of my friends did summertime, golf, tennis,
swimming and in the winter we would to tobogganing and sometimes skiing although
skiing was not the activity that it is now. We only did things that were
inexpensive. The week at Spring Bank, probably $5 apiece is about what we
pitched in to have all of our meals; I don't know if we even paid rent at the
cottage. I think someone we knew must have let us use their cottage for a week.
So skiing was without--we just wore our regular boots and just had a strap
across the ski.
MA: Did you have cross country skiing at that time in Wisconsin?
03:25:00
KC: There may have been, but I didn't ever do it. We would find a golf course
with a hill or other things like sledding and tobogganning. We did go on sleigh
rides. We'd rent, a church group or sometimes even just a private thing, and
we'd call up someone we knew with a sleigh and a team and that was always fun.
MA: Was that a form of dating also, using these group recreational activities?
KC: Yes. We had some Friday night parties all through my high school years with
boys and girls. A few of the people really came as dates but most of us didn't,
but usually we had pretty even numbers of males and females. We took turns
hosting these events. My brother just older than I and I were always in this
03:26:00group and half a dozen of his good buddies and half a dozen on mine. I know that
when the parties were at our house we usually played games, some that my mother
remembered from her youth, spin the bottle, sly winkem or we would play murder.
Anyway, it was games and eating and lots of laughs. When some of the other
people hosted they sometimes had dancing, dancing was not prohibitied at our
house but neither my brother nor I were very good dancers so it wasn't an
activity that we tended to sponsor. That was something to do in a small town,
03:27:00especially in the winter; we tended to do this during the school year and it was
something to look forward to that was kind of fun too. The clientele may have
changed a little bit over the years but it was pretty much a standard group.
Another major social event in Sparta in those days was the high school
basketball tournament. Every March, and because the gym in the Sparta high
school was the best one among the schools that participated in this, we had the
tournament in Sparta. Again, this gang of girls, mostly the ones who went to
Spring Bank but with some additions and subtractions, would have lunch and
03:28:00dinner at various peoples homes....available for me to host and I was so
disappointed and my mother said "Well how about Saturday breakfast?" which
wouldn't have occurred to me or to anybody else, so we had Saturday breakfast.
After that, every year the other girls counted on the fact that we would have a
Saturday breakfast. There was no Saturday morning game that I recall so we went
right from breakfast to the lunch party.
MA: This was a boy's tournament, you played basketball but it wasn't in a league
in the same way?
KC: That's right, only boys were playing the game. I suppose the other unique
social event, and this I suppose I did more of after I was out of high school,
but when I was home for the summer, Camp McCoy, which I think I may have
03:29:00mentioned already, is near Sparta and the ROTC students from Illinois, Michigan
and I don't know where else would spend several weeks at Camp McCoy every summer
and sometimes CMTC (I can't remember what that stands for anymore but they were
not university based activities) there would be dances out at the camp, highly
chaperoned. The chaperones would take us out and then bring us back home. At
least once and sometimes twice during the summer there would be a moonlight ride
on the Mississippi River, which is just 30 miles from Sparta, in an old paddle
boat where there would be a band on board and that was really kind of exciting.
03:30:00The boat would go up the river not too far but the whole thing would last three
or four hours I guess and that was kind of fun. Those were the excitements in
Sparta, all kinds of things you make for yourself. So we did have a social life
that extended beyond playing softball in our back yard and going ice skating.
MA: An active social life actually, and you were always very, very involved in
terms of hosting. When you look back on it did everyone kind of host equally or
did you, I sense you being in a leadership role in terms of your home because of
your family and your home?
KC: I don't know how much of a leadership role I would indicate but I think we
always did probably more than .... I had several friends who were always
03:31:00included who never were permitted by their parents or the size of their house or
their economic means or whatever, who never hosted. I had others for whom it
would be a state occassion when they did and so I guess, in fact in my head I'm
going through a number of these friends and I'm sure we had more events at our
house. I always enjoyed them more at my own house to begin with.
MA: Because you liked the way they were set up?
KC: I guess so, and what we had to eat. My mother and dad always had fun at our
events. Instead of ever saying they were too busy or it was a nuisance they
would like to participate. When my brother Bob, who was six years older than I
03:32:00am, was in school at LaCrosse he often would bring a few of his LaCrosse
University buddies home for a weekend and we would read and do dramatic
performances. We'd use the stair landing as a balcony for certain balcony
scenes. My mother used to remember that some of these things where the dead
bodies would be strewn on our livingroom floor, but my parents always, either as
audience or sometimes as participants, we could .... my mother would play these
games with us, not just when we were small children but high school and early
college. Everyone liked to have my dad come in because he had such a great sense
of humor and also was a wonderful raconteur and if they could get him to tell
03:33:00funeral stories or other things then my friends always enjoyed that.
MA: Sounds very lively.
KC: Anyway, those were some of the social event things that I remembered I
hadn't talked about.
MA: It sounds like they were a good training ground for what you were doing at
the Girl Scout camp. Did that kind of social life and activity oriented life
prepare you well for what you were doing there?
KC: I suppose, and the outdoors, that camp was very much semi-primitive.
MA: What were your tasks? Did you teach swimming or did you have certain groups
that you did things with?
KC: Yes, we were with a unit, two or three counselors with an age group. We did
03:34:00almost everything; I did not do waterfront at camp Quidnunc nor at any other
camp now that I think of it. The first year that my husband and I taught at
Olivet College, Sara was a year and a half when we went there, that, I already
mentioned. I think that the College paid us a salary and a half for two fulltime
people, and that I developed four different courses each semesters that I was
there because I had students who thought they were majoring in sociology and who
until I got there would have the choice of two courses I guess in the whole
curriculum. In any case, the school ran out of Money by about March I guess any
nobody in town seemed to worry about it. They knew that eventually, maybe the
03:35:00next fall, they would have collected enough from the Congregational Church to
pay back salary. We had no cushion at all and luckily the landlord didn't boot
us out, he was accustomed to this little delay and the grocery store let us
charge. Hank quickly took a night job down at Battlecreek making Kellogs Rice
Krispies or something to bring in a little bit of money. When the end of the
year came we didn't know what we were going to do for the summer when the Phy.
Ed. teacher at Olivet college informed us that she was the director of a Girl
Scout camp, Camp Long Lake I think, but I'm not sure, so she hired all three of
us. Hank as handyman and Sara as mascot and me in handicraft. Marian Howgate was
03:36:00the name of this Phy. Ed. teacher; I can remember her name because she was the
world's worst bridge player that either of us had.
MA: Kay continue with the story about the bridge game.
KC: All I was going to say was that if anybody opens with no honor count and
long suit we refer to it as a Marian Howgate special. She was just a terrible
bridge player but she was a great camp director and a good faculty person.
Anyway, I said "handicraft" that's absolutely the last thing in the world
MA: You haven't mentioned that in your past.
KC: No, and for good reason. I could have handled waterfront because I'd had
senior lifesaving and canoing and whatever would be required there. I could have
03:37:00done dramatics and music without any credentials, but with a lot of interest and
enthusiasm and nature; I had done some nature things with Girl Scout groups
elsewhere. But oh no, where they needed someone was in handicraft. I can
remember telling her that I am all thumbs and that I have no talents in any of
the kinds of things that I know Girl Scouts do and she said "That's perfectly
all right. It's one of the philosophies of Girl Scouting that the leader should
not be too far ahead of the troop." I thought, this one won't be!
We had one exciting event that is just now entering my mind, a prowler in the
camp one night. Hank and Sara and I had some kind of special accommodations. We
were allowed to spend our overnights in the infirmary, which was available in
03:38:00case any of the campers got sick. We very rarely had to use it as an infirmary
but it gave us some privacy and the opportunity to be together. Sara had a
marvelous time because all the kids liked having this little two year old
around. Anyway, one night Marian Howgate came over and routed out Hank to say
that there was one or two male prowlers stalking around in the camp. Hank went
out with her and I stayed with Sara, who was asleep, but after I had been there
for about a half an hour I got a little bit nervous and so I decided to go out
and find them and see what was happening. I've always, again for good reason,
03:39:00regarded myself as a physical coward, I just don't want physical danger. I don't
do anything that is deliberately dangerous and in fact I suppose I'm not even
adventurous because I avoid it. In any case, here I was out by myself in the
middle of the night and suddenly came across Hank chasing this prowler. They
were kind of going around a bend of some type so I thought "A ha, I'll head him
off", so I came in the other direction and he and I bumped point blank. He gave
me a shove and pushed me down but that also slowed him down enough so that Hank
was able to catch him. Hank, I think got a little extra adrenalyn because he saw
me get knocked down. Between us we corralled this guy and took him down to the
dining hall and called the sheriff. Actually it was more of a prank than a "bad
03:40:00guy". Still, who knew what kind of....and the fact that he wouldn't stop when he
was asked to stop to identify himself, and it turned out that he was the son of
a woman who was a big sponsor of Girl Scout stuff in that community so the
sheriff didn't want to do anything about it and the camp was unwilling to press
charges very far. That was one of the interesting kinds of things. Some of the
girls had been frightened in the night because they could hear this guy, in fact
there were two of them I guess originally, but one got away.
MA: Did this change your perception of yourself as a somewhat timid person in
those kinds of situations? I guess I realized that when I have to do something I
03:41:00will, but I still don't like to.
MA: When you were talking about the camp we hopped over to World War II for a
second. Do you want to take a diversion in that direction or save it for a bit?
KC: During that first year in graduate school, which started in the fall of
1941, I was at Elizabeth Waters at the time of Pearl Harbor, and I think it was
03:42:00during the second semester of that year, so that it was after Pearl Harbor, but
not only were people being drafted, the draft had begun prior to that of course,
but people were signing up and any who were not yet drafted knew that they soon
would be. I think that at the beginning of the second semester I had another
note from the same John Gaus who, years later, was saying, and I wasn't the only
one to receive this message, saying no matter what course you have signed up for
at this particular hour drop it and come and take this course with Professor
Lancelot Houdman from London, who had just arrived on the scene in Madison. It
03:43:00seems that Lancelot Houdman and his daughter, whose name I can't remember right
now, had gone from London I think to Oslow for a weekend back in, would that
have been 1939, in any case to give a lecture or two. They had just weekend
luggage and were going to go right back home and that was the time that the
Nazi's occupied Norway, came in in a blitz without any forewarning, and old
Houdman had to get out. He got to the United Sates by having crossed Europe and
Asia and finally, because there was just no way and it wasn't safe to get back
across the English Cannel, I don't know how he stayed alive financially, whether
he was paid for giving lectures whatever, but in any case he finally arrived in
03:44:00San Francisco and then was trying to find a way to earn his keep and someone at
Wisconsin found out that he was there and imported him here. His daughter was
housed at Elizabeth Waters and Houdman was given a room at the Union, there were
a few hotel rooms at the Memorial Union. It really was exciting to sit in his
course. He taught sort of the History of Science, but it was under the auspices
of the Political Sciences Department. He had published two books that the
bookstore managed to get copies of, Mathematics for the Millions and Science for
the Citizen. He had this wonderful way in both his lectures and in his writing
to integrate history and historic developments and political developments with
03:45:00the scientific advances of the time. I don't even know what his course was
called, but I do know that Elizabeth Brandice Rauschenbush who died a year or
two ago was a professor in our Economics Department, the only woman in the
department for a hundred years, she sat in on the class and was there in the
front row, so a number of faculty people and towns people also came for this
opportunity to hear this very unusual person. I think he was perhaps a little
bored giving the course, I don't know that he was, but I think he gave every
paper that was turned in a "B" and I don't know that he even bothered to read
them. Nevertheless, his lectures were absolutely fascinating. It was almost as
much fun for me to watch Elizabeth Brandice because she would lean forward and
03:46:00be so excited about things. That was another of the highlights.
MA: What did you take away from that? Was it intellectually significant, the
blending of the fields in the way that you just described?
KC: I would think it must have been, but I was never all that introspective or
self conscious about "now what effect is this having on me." In fact I probably
still don't.
MA: And so you wrote papers for him because you were in the class. Did you
always receive "Bs" also?
KC: I think so. Also, he wasn't accustomed to the American exam business. I
03:47:00don't know that we wrote papers but we did write exams, six week, mid semester,
final. I think that in the British universities they had none of that nonsense.
They expected students to read and absorb.
MA: And it wasn't necessary to grade them because they were all so motivated.
KC: Yes. Anyway, that was another of the highlights.
KC: It was not long then that the university males began to drain away and there
were military, I think that they were Waves, women in the Navy as well as Navy
men who were stationed .... then sometime during that same year on the campus
and were taking work. Somebody got the brilliant idea it would advance the war
03:48:00effort if classes started at 7:00 in the morning instead of at 8:00 in the
morning. Whoever had that bright idea probably is now in Congress having other
bright ideas! So we would get up, pitch dark, and it was dark enough in
Wisconsin at 8:00 in the morning, but to be in the classroom by 7:00. I never
could figure out how that scared Adolph Hitler, but we did it.
MA: I was asking you about Jeannette Rankin's vote against our entry into World
03:49:00War II. Did you hear anything about this among your friends?
KC: No, I don't recall any conversation, though I'm sure there was note of it in
the newspapers but I don't remember that it was a cause for ....
MA: What was your response to the War? Do you remember how you felt when Pearl
Harbor was bombed? You mentioned that you were certain women would be drafted,
that was one thing that you thought would happen which of course didn't happen.
KC: I'm sure I shared all the horror that .... and of course the inevitablity,
just as in a Greek tragedy, had been apparent and I kept wishing it away up
03:50:00until the moment of Pearl Harbor. Of course I knew I had three brothers who
would be doing what they did and all sorts of other people and of course we were
just in the right generation. That was true of everybody we knew, the whole
dormitory of course was filled with people who had friends, relatives, etc.
There was a sense of getting with it then too .... I think that there was still
a lot of the detail of the atrocities of the Nazis, were either not reported or
not believed and people thought that this was the same kind of propaganda that
accompanies war. It took really a long time, there was almost an anger with the
03:51:00Nazis and their arrogance and their taking over rather than, at least in my
case, I had not ingested the numbers, the horrors of the concentration camps and
the deaths. That took time, a lot of time.
MA: You were not receiving the information either in the newspapers. Is that correct?
KC: Yes, that's right. I did go to a couple of performances, one possibly in New
York that previous summer, and one in Washington which were sponsored by some of
the Jewish organizations to try to tell the people what actually was happening.
I can remember being totally horrified when the Japanese were interned on the
03:52:00west coast. Then to win the war was the important thing and to do whatever one
could do. I never felt any kind of deprivation because of ration cards. I would
be very annoyed when I would be home in Sparta and see some of the friends of my
parents, my parents were very circumspect also about ration cards, and how did
it possibly hurt anybody to go without a little bit of butter or a little bit of
meat and yet they had friends who would cheat or hord. This was very hard to
take, to see some people doing that when others were contributing so much.
03:53:00
I believe I started to say that I had taken a Federal Civil Service exam, I
guess it was for the professional service. These were things that were available
and were given on college campuses all over the country. Then I got a telegram,
as did thousands of other people I'm sure, saying "come to Washington and start
your work" so I did just that.
MA: Did you have your masters degree at that time?
KC: Yes, I already had my master's degree. My brother Gondy and I both got them
simultaneously at a June graduation ceremony. He also took a civil service exam
and in fact I think he got a higher grade on his than I did on mine.
MA: That must have pleased him.
KC: Yes, it did and it didn't displease me. He never really accepted the fact
that he had as much ability as he did have, so it was good. However, he went
03:54:00into the military instead of a job in Washington.
MA: Did he have the option for the job in Washington?
KC: No, I think he was drafted. He took the exam and got his grade and when was
drafted. So I went to Washington. I got in touch first with a friend of mine who
had preceded me there by a year, Lois Warfield, a person I still see. I made
reference to her earlier, she was one of the people who had been president of
Women's Self Government Association. Her grandmother was Jesse Jack Hooper who
in that picture is the calendar person over on the right. She was Carrie Chapman
Catt's right hand. She ran against Bob LaFollette for the U.S. Senate back in
the 1920's. In any case, Lois and Lois' mother were always good friends mine. I
03:55:00moved in with her and I made a third female in this one room apartment, not one
bedroom but one room apartment. In fact, on weekends my brother and sometimes a
friends would come and somehow we managed to make full use of the floor space. I
didn't intend to stay permanently with Lois and she didn't intend for me, nor
did I do so. Another friend, Carla War, who was a UW graduate, and I did room
together for most of the two years that I was there. We moved about every other
month because the only housing we could ever find were sublets. Somebody would
be leaving for a limited time and wanted somebody there who would take care of
it and pay the rent but then get out when they returned.
03:56:00
MA: How difficult.
KC: It was difficult but I got to know a lot of Washington because we lived in
so many parts. There still were trollies in Washington at that time, trollies
and busses.
MA: Were you living in the heart of Washington, D.C., and not out in Maryland
like everyone lives today?
KC: Right in town. Anyway, the job I thought I went to get wasn't a job at all,
it was a fishing license. This was happening to hundreds of college graduates
who got their telegrams saying "come to Washington."
MA: In reality you didn't have a job?
KC: No; I had to go from agency to another. I went to this one office because
this friend said another Wisconsin graduate is in this office. Dave Levine
03:57:00interviewed me and it sounded kind of interesting and he said he'd let me know.
It all seemed kind of vague so I went to other offices and asked around and as I
was relaying this conversation to a friend they said "it sounds to me like Dave
Levine was offering you a job" and I said "it didn't seem that way to me" so I
finally got up my nerve to call him back "Yes, when are you going to report to
work" said he.
MA: You didn't know you'd been hired?
KC: No, I didn't, but I was, and I stayed in that same office even though the
office was moved to a couple of different buildings a couple of times. First we
were in a temporary building, temporary from World War I, a little wooden kind
of shack and then finally into a railroad retirement building which was air
conditioned. Not all of Washington buildings were air conditioned in those days.
03:58:00
MA: And it was summer wasn't it?
KC: Yes. It was summer when we started at least.
MA: What did you do specifically in your job?
KC: It was a very interesting job, the Office of Policies and Procedures for the
War Production Board. It was the function of that particular office to design
procedures and processes for controlling materials that were used in war
production that were in short supply, and having to know enough about the
industry to know at what stage do you control the raw material, do you control
the parts at this stage of production or something else and how to do it with
the least red tape and the least burden on the industry, so they don't have to
send in a report every day, and do we allocate a certain amount to each
03:59:00manufacturer and then they don't have to apply for specific applications for
each thing. It meant finding out and, of course, the War Production Board as a
great many of the war agencies, were filled with what were called "dollar a year
men" and I imagine they were all men too; there might have been a female among
them, but these were people on loan to the government from their industry and
the government paid them $1 a year and the rest of their salary was picked up by
the industry, and Washington was filled with just such people. Most of the
industry or commodity divisions in the War Production Board were staffed with
these people with expertise in what it was all about. We had to do the writing
of these procedures and then making sure the industry followed these procedures.
04:00:00Had to be instructed by these people. I was hired experimentally as a young and
totally inexperienced worker and another woman was hired, she had preceded me in
the office, an older woman, she was about 35 I think and had years of government
experience, but hadn't been in that particular, well no one had been in that
line of work because it was a new line of work. Anyway, they wanted to see how
well women would be received by these industry types who assumed that any female
was a secretary and was there to take dictation and not to be telling them what
to do etc. The two of us were obviously successful as an experiment because by
the time I left that office it was about 50% female. In fact, it wasn't very
04:01:00long before these men would call up the head of our office and say "Send one of
your girls over." It was never "women" of course, but nevertheless they liked
doing business with those of us who didn't pretend to know anything more than we
did know, but were fast learners and knew what questions to ask, and then were
absolutely dedicated to keeping the red tape to a minimum and doing a job
quickly and well.
MA: What I hear you saying then is that they were skeptical about having women
but because you did your job well there was a fair amount of acceptance.
KC: Yes, I would say a lot.
MA: Did you have any negative experiences at all in terms of the male/female ratio?
KC: I had obvious skepticism initially, and as I would have to go to a different
04:02:00office with different people it would sometimes happen and then we'd work out
arrangements on our own staff, of sometimes going two by two and I'd go with
some man or if there were people in my office who knew certain things better
than I did, we had a lot of teamwork in the office, I don't recall the kind of
competition for brownie points or whatever. We hadn't been there very long,
maybe six months or so, it was the practice for everyone in the building to go
across the street to a coffee shop in the middle of the morning and the middle
of the afternoon. It wasn't too many months before the word came down from the
04:03:00head of the War Production Board, "No more leaving the premises to go get
coffee." The alternative, of course, was to make coffee in our own office so we
approached the boss and said "How about a coffee pot and cups?" and he said "No,
he didn't want any mess and he didn't want people taking the time" and we said
"Come on now, we can write procedures for every industry in the country, we
certainly can write a procedure for making coffee and keeping it neat and tidy."
"Ok, write the procedure and I'll see if I approve it." A few of us wrote the
procedure, bought a coffee pot and had everybody bring their own mug and then we
worked out a schedule with absolutely no sexism and no classism. Every person
took his or her turn being responsible for brewing the coffee and washing the
coffee pot. Each person had to keep his or her own cup the way they wanted it,
04:04:00clean or dirty, we didn't care.
MA: What a breakthrough!
KC: Yes and nobody raised a hackle about taking a turn. One of the men who had
actually been a Latin scholar before he'd been, Prince but I can't remember his
first name, from the South, very gentle, a real scholar, it was a motley outfit
because there was no specific preparation for doing that. The ability to write
was helpful, the ability to absorb new information, to be well organized, but
very difficult I would think to know from an interview what kind of a person was
going to be successful and what kind wasn't. Apparently on some occasion when it
04:05:00was his turn for KP he encountered a cockroach because there was a sudden
amendment to the procedure to be sure on the canned milk to put a cover and a
rubber band on it.
MA: The cockroach was in the milk?
KC: I don't know if it was in it or if he thought there was a possibility that
it could happen.
MA: We made a lot of good friends. We used to carpool, I finally lived in one
place for a few months where I could latch onto a carpool and get a ride.
KC: One of the men in our office, I just think of him now, from Gloversville,
New York, his name will have to come to me, came to Washington and volunteered.
04:06:00He was a little older, too old to be drafted into the military. He was so
homesick for his wife and daughter and unable to get back too often from
Washington, that was an expensive trip, so I can remember the time he said he'd
"give anything for a good cheese blintz" and I said "Well, describe it to me and
come on over and I'll fix one." I had never eaten a cheese blintz and had never
even heard of one but he described it and I did fairly well in my .... (Saul
Sakheim was his name) who had wonderful stories always. He told stories. When he
left and went back to Gloversville, while I was still in Washington, we had a
04:07:00farewell party for him.
MA: You were talking about your friend Saul.
KC: I think maybe that was all I was going to say about Saul Sakhiem.
MA: There was a lot of great congeniality in the office. I suppose in a way
that's part of what kept -- we weren't on the fighting front, we were sending
things. I sent a box as often as I was permitted to to my brothers who were
overseas. Everybody had someone they were writing to or sending things to and we
had maps around because we would read about where the Germans were and where we
were losing everything in the Pacific. You know, you had to be nice to the
04:08:00people you were with and be sympathetic and do some things.
KC: There was rent control and price control in Washington in those days, enough
to make a good socialist out of anybody. Well I don't need to give my lecture on
socialism, but it made it possible for us to eat a decent meal. I started work
at the same income range there that everybody in my category did, $2,000 a year
and after a six months or whatever the probationary period was it jumped to
$2,600. I think that as I decided to leave Washington and come back to graduate
school after I had been there for two years, I was about to receive $3,600 a
04:09:00year. Out of that salary I was able to buy war bonds, $25 war bonds, quite often.
MA: You received the same salary as the men then, there wasn't any
discrimination within your unit?
KC: Thats right. Also, incidentally, the man who's name I mentioned, Herman
Director, who was the director of the office by coincidence, I ran into him in
Washington a few years ago. I was in Washington for a meeting of some kind and
one of the old timers knew I was there, had read it in the paper or something,
and told me how to get in touch with Director. I went to see him in his private
04:10:00consultancy, I can't remember what he was doing now--or what he was doing just a
few years ago, but he couldn't wait to take me around and introduce me to his
entire staff so that I would see that he had an Asian, and American Indian, a
Black, male and female, handicapped and .... it was a matter of principle with
him and he just wanted me to know. He had been that kind of a person all along.
I was, I think, in a way very kind of lucky to be in an office that I was, but I
met people throughout that war experience, war time experience, in Washington
who were just terrific people. They were there to do, from whatever vantage
point, what they could do.
04:11:00
MA: It doesn't sound to me like you had any kind of a special sense of, "as a
woman it's my job to do thus or so," but as a person that you felt fairly united
with the men.
KC: Yes, and then my housemate or roommate Carla Waller, who had been an
economics major, was in a different, not in the War Production Board, but
whatever the economic office was (I can't remember the exact title now) and she
had the same experience there that I was having. In fact, there were many, many
women, bright women, in Washington. Of course, even the whole "New Deal" had
opened doors to women and of course the war experience began opening doors to
minority people, men and women, in ways that they hadn't been in before
04:12:00
MA: I wanted to ask you about that. How did Washington, D.C., look during that
time in terms of black/white housing; we know today we go to Washington, D.C.,
and it is a primarily black community and the whites have escaped to the suburbs
of Maryland.
KC: That was not the case at the time. There were still many places within the
city where blacks could not get housing. The city was predominantly white at
that time. Within the government agencies there were increasing numbers of black
people. They tended to be delivering the mail and service kinds of jobs.
04:13:00
MA: Any black female secretaries?
KC: A few, and a few receptionists, but not very many.
MA: The women that you worked with in the War Production Board and your friend
in the economic section were primarily or completely college educated women then?
KC: Yes. I met a great many women through other friends who were graduates of
some of the Ivy League womens colleges. There were social gatherings lots of
times of Wisconsin people, University of Wisconsin people. It's a joke, and
continues to be a joke among my children, that there was a dance at which a
Miss Big Ten was, each of the Big Ten, the midwestern institutions, put one
04:14:00female up as a candidate. It is interesting to me that it had nothing to do with
swimming suits and exactly what one looked like, because having a masters degree
was worth points -- it was better than having just a plain BA. I don't know who
the judges were and I don't know what the qualifications were, but a couple of
my colleagues from my graduating class asked me to take part in this competition
which I did as a joke, and then I got the prize.
MA: And you won Miss Big Ten -- that's wonderful!
KC: Yes. Some years later I gave my ribbon which announced this great victory to
04:15:00a friend of my mother's that she used to play bridge with and visit with, a
woman who lived up the street who is actually one of the homeliest people I have
ever known. I just loved her and her husband; they had no children. I don't know
what the occasion was when I felt that I wanted to give Hattie some kind of an
award or a prize and I thought that this was perfect, Miss Big Ten.
MA: Did she appreciate it?
KC: Yes, she loved it.
MA: You worked with the War Production Board for one year.
KC: Two years. During that time, sort of by the end of that time, in the first
place I was deciding to terminate this five year relationship.
MA: Why was that?
KC: I had very mixed feelings. I realized that I didn't think he would be good
04:16:00husband material. He was a fascinating person and lots of fun and witty and
someone with a great zest for life, but someone with no sense of direction and
no kind of follow-through. He had enrolled in law school and had not done much
with it and we were both kind of off and on. He came from a fairly Orthodox
Jewish family. I used to think at the time that if his own sense of direction
had not been so in question I don't think the religious difference would have
been a huge factor, but in combination. That I think was one of the reasons I
04:17:00left Washington before the war was over. It looked at that point that we were
actually winning but nevertheless what's to win. I saw a bumper sticker today
that said "War doesn't decide who's right, it only decides who's left."
MA: Right, and your brother was killed in the war?
KC: Yes and the other two....I don't think the war experience did either one of
them any good.
MA: However, I also was very aware over the passage of those two years of how
very little I knew about political science or about the things and about how
casually I had gone to college. While I had learned an awful lot, I had really
04:18:00majored in extracurricular activities and had filled in with going to classes on
the side. I had a real, I suppose to call it a hunger is a bit too dramatic, but
a real desire to almost be a scholar, to sit in the library and read things
carefully that I had heard about and never gotten around to. I sent applications
to a few institutions to see about not just admission to graduate school but
scholarship support. Because those were what one of my professors called "the
years of the locusts" with very few people wanting to go to graduate school, I
04:19:00was accepted and offered scholarships at almost every place that I applied. I
made the decision, and I might not do the same things now that I did then, but I
made the decision to come to Wisconsin where I was familiar. I knew which
professors to avoid and which courses to avoid and which ones to take and I
figured I could do the most expedient kind of polishing off a degree under those
circumstances. I did have fellowships both years. I came back to Madison in 1944
and began a Ph.D. program in the fall and then went to school around the
calendar for two years, summer included.
KC: How long altogether did it take you to complete your Ph.D., from the masters
04:20:00to the completion of the Ph.D.?
MA: I had two years in Washington not in school and two calendar years here on
this campus.
KC: Then you were done with your dissertation at the end of two calendar years?
KC: Right. Well, who knows how great it was but...
MA: But you went with a new commitment. How did you find the experience? I
understand what you were saying about really wanting to learn at a deeper level
than you had prior to that.
KC: I certainly had the easiest, the smoothest kind of going to graduate school
imaginable. At first I looked around for a place to live here in Madison and
visited a couple of sort of one room things that were just dreary. Somehow word
04:21:00got around, because this was a lovely at least it was a small town then, and a
woman that I knew only very casually, who was an instructor in the Ph. Ed.
Department, she and her twin sister were two of the most glamorous undergraduate
women in the Kapa Kapa Gama House, so I thought maybe I would be out of my class
again but anyway, her husband was in the military and so she needed someone to
share the rent and share the space and invited me to. My share of the rent, I
don't know if it covered utilities or not, was $30 per month. I had a
departmental scholarship so I didn't have to pay tuition. My father sent me the
$30 a month for my housing and I had no commitments -- no job to do, no work, no
04:22:00family and if I wanted to I could either walk to the campus from University
Avenue or take a nickle bus. Anyway, the living arrangement turned out to be
just wonderful. I had know Cease as a very proper, mannerly, attractive, person
and I couldn't believe that anybody was that polite and sweet all the time, I
thought that was her company manner, but she was that way if we were doing the
laundry, cleaning on Saturday, fixing morning coffee and she always looked, even
when she was dressed to do the laundry in dungarees, she would have a scarf here
or there and just always looked great. It was a real pleasure. She for example,
04:23:00the buildings across University Avenue which are there now were not there back
in 1944 and 45 so that we could look out from the apartment window and see
cattle grazing on the university field or corn growing, so she had this plan
that we would set the morning alarm 15 minutes ahead of what we would need to
and whoever's job it was to do breakfast that day, the other one would shower
first and we had this great schedule that worked out and 15 minutes before we
needed to leave the house we would sit in the living room with a second cup of
coffee, maybe we would talk to each other and maybe we wouldn't but we would
just sit and relax and look out the window, maybe think about what we were going
to do that day. It was just sort of a meditative time and we started every day
that way. It's a wonderful thing to do.
04:24:00
MA: How delightful. Do you ever see her or did you ever run into her later?
KC: Yes, she and her husband live here in town. I had a lovely note from her
when Hank died. I get Christmas notes and we see each other once in awhile. She
has done some teaching for our University Extension office over the years and
has taught at College Week for Women on how to relax.
MA: In your Ph.D. program, do you recall what the ratio was of women to men?
KC: No, but there were two or three women. There were not a lot of men because
it was still the war years. Of course that's where I met Hank when he came back
from his military service. His brother was teaching on the campus in political
04:25:00science so he came just to visit his brother. He never did remember the first
time we met and I remembered it very vividly. I don't know what impression I had
but I could remember meeting him in South Hall which is where political science
was in those days, it's now in North Hall. He was in his military uniform and
with his brother and his brother stopped to introduce us. Hank had absolutely no
memory of that. It was before he even had decided to come to Wisconsin.
MA: And you don't recall what you thought at the time?
KC: No, but I did remember meeting him.
MA: When did you meet him again?
KC: He came the second semester of my second year as a graduate student in
political science. So he also had space in South Hall as I did. Bill Evenstein
04:26:00was one of my favorite professors, in fact, Bill and Ruth (his wife) used to
invite this friend of mine and me over when I was still an undergraduate. We'd
have an evening of charades or some other so we were always good friends. In
fact, I had meet Bill Evenstein when I was a freshman and went to an
International Club event of some kind. He was just freshly on the campus as a
faculty member, but as a young unmarried faculty person, so I've known him a
long, long time. When Hank arrived in January 1946, to do graduate work at
Wisconsin Bill Evenstein said "why don't you go down the hall and talk to Kaye
Frederick and she'll give you information, help, etc." He stopped in at the
04:27:00office of the other female who was in graduate school. I don't know what their
conversation was, all I was that I heard him as he left, he just walked out of
her office and said "thank you Miss Frederick" so he thought he had been talking
to the person he was sent to talk with which he had not. I guess she
straightened that out.
We had a couple of dates in the cold weather including a toboggan party which
several of my roommates or my landlady, however one refers to such a person, and
Elizabeth Bardwell and some other old friends arranged this toboggan party and I
invited Hank to come along. Some other man from the Econ Department apparently
04:28:00thought he was my date, and so did the other gals who were doing a little
matchmaking. All evening, it was 18 below zero and I thought only a fool would
think of going tobogganing in that weather, but I think it was these matchmakers
who were encouraging the evening more than anybody else, so we did and then came
back to the apartment where Cease and I lived and had pineapple upside down cake
which Cease had baked and coffee and had a good time.
MA: Did you end up having a date with Hank rather than the man in the Econ Department?
KC: Yes. In fact at one point Hank had borrowed his brothers car at the toboggan
place and I can still remember Elizabeth Bardwell saying "Oh Henry, Kay looks so
04:29:00cold I think you better take her down to the car." I told my kids he did
acquiesce and do that and gave me a blanket to keep me warm.
MA: Were there any women teachers in your Political Science Ph.D. program?
KC: No. Helen Clark in Sociology again was the only woman and there was
Elizabeth Brandise in Economics but I didn't have work with her. I had no female
instruction at all during those two years.
MA: While you were going through the Ph.D. program did you have a sense of what
you would do with the degree? Did you have a goal in terms of the work you
wanted to do when you were finished?
KC: I was a teaching assistant the first year. I didn't do a lot of teaching or
04:30:00instructing but I think the closer I got to the degree the more I thought I'd
like to teach at a university. So, in 1946, I went to the Political Science
Meeting that year, one of the few times I ever went because I knew that was the
slave market. I was then invited to Bryn Mawr for an interview and was offered a
job at Bryn Mawr and also was offered a job at Purdue and had to make a decision
between those two. I think I told you before on tape that a midwester
coeducational institution was more comfortable for me. Maybe now I would opt for
Bryn Mawr. Also, Hank was trying to go to Columbia and both he and Bill
Evenstein were plunking for Bryn Mawr because it would be so close to New York
04:31:00and I thought "well I don't want those people telling me where I should take a
job" so I disregarded all of that advice, or rejected it, I didn't disregard it.
MA: Did you have sense of yourself as a woman in the way that we do today while
you were in the Ph.D. program? By that, I mean were you aware of female role
models in political science, the fact that you were a minority in the
department, that there were no female professors, that really you were unique to
be receiving a Ph.D. as a female at that time in history. Did any of that ever
cross your mind?
KC: I was aware of how few women were around but it didn't seem particularly
04:32:00remarkable to me that I was doing what I wanted to do.
MA: Because it was a continuation of a long line of you doing that.
KC: Yes. But I did write my Ph.D. thesis on "Anti-Democratic Ideas and
Tendencies in American Politics" without word one on sexism or the suffrage
movement or any of the rest.
MA: So you had not come into an awareness about that at that time, but you
certainly had, about injustice generally.
KC: Right.
MA: How did you like doing your Ph.D. thesis? What kind of a process was that
for you and did you really learn from it?
KC: Well, I think I did. I enjoyed writing. I had done, in addition to the
04:33:00theoretical aspect of the thesis which actually the first three chapters were
about, an exploration of the meaning of liberty, equality and the public good I
guess those were the three. I also examined the really native fascist movement
of the time and subscribed to a lot of ultra right wing, really fascist stuff,
and went to rallies incognito and actually heard Gerald L.K. Smith and Father
Couglin and some of those. It was my thesis that if fascism as such would ever
04:34:00come to this country it would come not riding on a white horse and with all the
bluster, but through the accepted institutions that exist in our society. I
guess I would still maintain that and that we have come awful close to right
wing, especially if we look now at how many poor people and homeless people and
hungry people in this country and what Justice Brennan calls the "cruel
disparities" in our society. Then the limitations and the creeping limitations
on civil rights and violations of token government, lots of pretty horrendous things.
04:35:00
MA: Were you able to use your dissertation in any way? Was it published or were
you able to disseminate this information beyond the department?
KC: I never tried to and I never did.
MA: When you attended the rallies did you ever see women participating?
KC: Oh yes! Very reminiscent of the fundamentalists right now. The .... the
right to life, those who are attacking abortion clinics, and the women who
stoned the integration busses in Detroit (at a later time then when I wrote
this). Anyone who ever maintains that women have a monopoly on the virtues and
04:36:00are not subject to violence and some of the other things need to take a second
look at the right wing. The difference is less in gender than it is in political.
MA: If you had to make a generalization about social class what would that be?
Was there a particular social class that was involved in the neofacist movement?
KC: I don't know. I'd have to think about that.
MA: I was thinking about Nazi Germany and the groups that fascism initially
attracted there.
KC: Which were, of course, middle class but funded by the big industrialists.
04:37:00Whenever I read about our military budgets in this country right now I wish some
of that would be published in terms of not what the government is spending to
build certain things that are obsolete before they're built anyway, but who is
receiving the billions of dollars, who benefits. Once in awhile a good
progressive publication will indicate who is getting what in terms of income.
MA: Well, we've reached the end of your Ph.D. program.
KC: That's a good time to stop.
MA: Kay, lets talk about receiving your Ph.D. in political science. When did
04:38:00that occur?
KC: Well actually I never went through any graduation ceremony to receive the
Ph.D. I did receive it in August of 1946. I was kind of sorry to miss that
because, perhaps they still do it this way but in those days a Ph.D. candidate
got to be accompanied by her or his academic advisor and major professor and
walk across the platform together, which would have been sort of fun to do, but
I didn't have time. That was the summer, which I think I have mentioned to you;
I wrote my thesis in short order and probably got into bad habits then, bad
04:39:00habits that I've continued for 41 years since, and that is doing a rough draft
of something and then turning it in. I may read it over for spelling or
grammatical errors but very little total rewriting; I'm very much in favor of
rewriting but I just don't do it myself. In any case, I worked very steadily
from spring until close to August writing the thesis and having it typed. I used
to tell some of my friends that I had to get married because Hank typed the
rough draft of my thesis. I then turned it over to a more professional typist
for the final typing but he typed it for me. I did then and always have since,
do my writing with a pencil on a yellow pad of paper; I can hardly write on a
white pad of paper. I hand wrote things, I did know how to type. I typed my
04:40:00previous papers all through my university work. When I got to New York City a
couple of years later I actually lied, they asked me if I knew how to type at
the Ethical Society after they hired me and I knew then that either they'd hire
a secretary for me or they wouldn't, depending on whether I could type so I
thought it was worth that deception.
MA: Did it work?
KC: No. But now I'll never be able to run for president because someone will
dredge that up or listen to this tape and know that I lied to the Ethical
Society, of all places. In any case, that's the summer my favorite major
professor, John Gaus, was off in California for the summer teaching there when I
04:41:00finished my thesis so when he got back he left this little note in my box, I had
an office in South Hall and a mail box. "My dear Miss Frederick, I understand in
my absence you have completed your dissertation, passed your final orals, have
accepted a teaching position at Purdue and are engaged to be married. You must
have had a busy summer!" signed John Gaus. I loved that note and I did have a
busy summer.
Hank and I were married in Sparta on September 5th and we honeymooned at the
Lake of the Ozarks in Missouri. Missouri is his home stamping ground. Then I
went to Purdue in West Lafayette, Indiana, and he went to Columbia in New York
to enroll in graduate work there. Our wedding was great, it was in our living
04:42:00room in Sparta and my father performed the ceremony as he had performed
thousands. Actually by the time he died, according to his own records, he had
performed over 3,000 marriages and he thought his batting average was wonderful,
he thought none but certainly very few marriages disintegrated. He always stood
the happy couple in front of our fireplace with the same stale joke so they
wouldn't get cold feet. He performed the ceremony and one of my brothers played
the piano and the other one sang. We had just a couple of friends and then a
little reception at the hotel then afterwards. That was sort of to placate my
mother who thought, well my father too, that we should provide an opportunity
for some of their many friends and ours to say congratulations. My older brother
04:43:00had been married only a few weeks before that in Ohio where the bride lived. My
father refused to perform the service for either of my brothers when they were
married, saying that the bride's pastor should do that and the bride should have
the....so on those grounds I prevailed, I didn't give him any choice and so it
was just very nice. My father I think was a little bit, well it was an unusual
experience for him to perform the ceremony for his own offspring, and I had
chided him in advance that I didn't want any prolonged business here and he said
"oh no, it takes seven minutes" and so when he pronounced us man and wife with a
final benediction instead of kissing the bride or congratulating anybody he just
pulled out his watch and said "seven minutes on the button" which was his
04:44:00termination. I remember the night before the wedding, my father obviously wanted
to give me some good fatherly advice but he didn't quite know what to say or
maybe it wasn't even advice, he just wanted to have a final conversation. He was
in his study and I was starting to go upstairs to retire when he called me down
and said he wanted to talk. He kind of hemmed and hawed and finally he said "Now
remember, always sleep with your window open a little bit even if it's cold, you
need a little fresh air and keep your bowels open."
MA: What do you think the significance of that was?
KC: I don't know, but such was his advice.
MA: How did you feel, did you have any questions about getting married? Were you
concerned that it might in some way cramp your style?
04:45:00
KC: I didn't think about style cramping but I must say I was not euphoric. I
wasn't forced into this marriage but I think I was kind of dragging my feet a
little bit about the notion of marriage. I don't know that I ever sat down with
somebody as one can in this day and age and say, "What about the institution of
marriage, is it a form of slavery, is it empowering?" Neither one of my
daughters was married at a very early age; Sara was 32 and that marriage is
ending, and Janet was almost 30 when she was married.
MA: How old were you?
KC: Twenty-five, a child bride of 25! Of course that was older than the average
04:46:00age in those days.
MA: Did you and Hank talk about marriage expectations, your career, his carrer?
KC: There were a lot of just assumptions and givens and I was, after all, almost
completed with my Ph.D. when I met Hank and spent our courtship months writing
my thesis and handing over chunks of it for him to type so there was no question
in either of our minds that I would be doing something with that. I went to the
annual meeting of the Political Science Association, I can't remember if it was
in Washington or Philadelphia, doesn't really matter where it was, but--
--that's where I met the person from Purdue who offered me the job. I also met
04:47:00somebody from Bryn Mawr who asked me and they did have me come there for an
interview and offered me a position at Bryn Mawr also.
MA: Why did you chose Purdue over Bryn Mawr?
KC: Because I thought I would be more comfortable in a midwestern coeducational
institution than in an Ivy League, private women's college.
MA: Even though you would have been closer to Hank?
KC: Yes. I thought he and Bill Evenstein, another of my professors, were selling
Bryn Mawr on those grounds and I just didn't want to be pressured I guess. In
any case, I did go to Purdue and had enough of a lonely few early weeks there
04:48:00until I knew anyone, to help me be sympathetic to people who are new in a
community and lonely, haven't made their circle of friends or whatever. In
subsequent moves over the years I have kind of enjoyed coming to a new community
where nobody knows me because then they don't prevail upon me to do things right
off the bat. It's almost as good an excuse as being pregnant when you don't want
to have to say yes to everything. I felt very much alone at first at Purdue. I
think partly because I was renting a room with a couple of old ladies who were
very, very nice, and I had a private entrance and my own bathroom so that it
wasn't as though I had moved in with these older women, but I never had had to
04:49:00live in such a living situation and I suppose there isn't a lot of room for
expansion when you have one room with your bed and coffee pot and books. It
wasn't very long before the other faculty people began to take me under their
wing and I had someone to eat lunch with then and dinner and really wound up
having an awfully good time and enjoyed my teaching a lot.
I had a few good students and a lot of terrible students, especially male
athletes who were....This was right after World War II so that the GI Bill was
bringing lots of folks, many of whom were older than I was, which was never a
problem for me at least, and I don't think it was for the students either. I
04:50:00remember several very attractive young women who were among my very best
students, in fact they took, I only taught two courses, American Government and
International Relations, but they made it their business to take both of these
courses. The would always arrive even before I did into the classroom so they
could grab their favorite front pew seats. At the end of the semester, after the
grades were in, they were very circumspect about this, they invited me to have
lunch with them and then told me why they were always there so early in the
morning. They had wagers with each other of which jewelry I would be wearing
that day. I do have a supply of junk jewelry that could warm the cockles of any
rummage sale or fund raiser.
04:51:00
MA: That was how you perked yourself up each day?
KC: I think that was part of my daily decision for myself, which pin and
earrings would look best with whatever I was wearing.
MA: What was the ratio at Purdue at that time of male to female students? Since
you mentioned the GI Bill, the male students must have increased dramatically.
KC: Yes, and furthermore the Purdue campus of the University of Indiana was the
Engineering and Agriculture campus. In those days those were almost totally male
preserves. The liberal studies or liberal science whatever they called it, was
really just a minor part of the whole campus. They also had home economics so
there were women faculty largely there. The numbers of political scientists,
04:52:00economists, historians and people in literature and the arts were not numerous
and in fact we became a very congenial group and we would often have a separate
lunch table in the faculty dining room where interlopers didn't sneak in.
MA: What was the percentage of students in liberal arts and men to women?
KC: It was very small. I would think almost numbered in the hundreds of students
who were there with a special interest in the liberal arts. The Bloomington
campus, I don't know if that is the setting for the main campus of the
University of Indiana. Now Purdue had a good football team and a good basketball
team and those were some of the students who thought they could sleep through a course.
04:53:00
MA: How many women would you have in your courses?
KC: Maybe a fourth might be.
MA: How did they perform in contrast to the males? You mentioned the two very
good women students who sat in the front.
KC: I don't remember any real duds among the female students as I do among the
males. My memory is a little blurred about that one year at Purdue. I enjoyed
the Purdue experience and the teaching so much that when I announced to them at
the end of the year that I wouldn't be coming back that they pleaded with me and
even offered Hank a job on the faculty if I would stay but we decided not to.
MA: Why?
KC: I think we were tired of this commuting marriage.
MA: But even if Hank were to come?
04:54:00
KC: Well he had a course of study set out at Columbia and had several years to
go in fact he stayed there for four years, either four or three I'd have to
count again. During the spring of that year Hank was making arrangements in
consultation with me for a European trip. I had never been to Europe; he had of
course during the war. It seemed so remote to me, the possibility of really and
truly getting to Europe that I could not quite comprehend that we were going to
do that. We did. We went with a study tour from Columbia University of faculty
and graduate students. We left the U.S. by boat, of course, in June and didn't
get back until September. We visited nine countries in all and had wonderful
04:55:00opportunities to meet with political leaders, journalists and academics. Had
entree to institutions and individuals we never would have except with a group
of that kind. We were offered, then, the opportunity to lead a similar tour the
following year, but we decided we had other things we would rather do. That
might have been a mistake also but at the time we thought that was what we did
or did not want to do.
MA: Sound as though it was your second honeymoon.
It was. In fact we invested our life savings, our joint life savings, in that
trip. Which I have never regretted and I kind of encouraged my kids to live it
up a little. I haven't, again, done that very well over my lifetime. I think
04:56:00I've mentioned before that that was part of the advice my mother frequently
gave, "If you wait till you can afford to do it, you won't do it," and it's
absolutely right. I hope I've never raised an eyebrow when my kids squandered
money on a trip or something that they just very much wanted to do.
When we came back from the trip, the European trip, we knew that we'd be living
in New York to be near Columbia and that I would look for work of some kind. I
didn't even go to an educational institution to think about teaching, and I
don't know why I hadn't made some prior arrangements the previous spring, but I hadn't.
MA: It is curious since you were so enamored with your teaching experience.
KC: I suppose that by the time we got back school had already started of course.
04:57:00
MA: That's true. Your preparation time was actually spent in Europe.
KC: And application time also. I guess I found out from Columbia University that
there was housing out at what had been Camp Shanks during and probably before
the war, a military camp with barracks which was on the Jersey side of the
Hudson River near Nyack, New York. The housing there, at $27 a month, was
available only for married student veterans so we got one of those apartments.
They were in what I've often described as not very converted army barracks. They
sort of put a piece of cardboard or two or three of those in one long barracks.
04:58:00
MA: So you could hear your neighbors quite clearly?
KC: Yes. I suppose that kept hostilities at a minimum with everyone knowing that
whatever they said or did could be held against them.
MA: So I did look around and found this job with the Ethical Society, with their
encampment for citizenship. We had car pools from Camp Shanks because most of
the students there were enrolled at Columbia, at least the car pools went to
Columbia. So I was able to join a car pool and then I would take a subway from
Columbia. Eventually we bought a car; we paid $100. It was a model A Ford and we
literally bought it from an old lady, she wasn't so old, I keep saying old lady
but none of them were probably as old as I am now, but from an older woman who
04:59:00had only driven it to the bakery where she worked and home again and I guess to
church on Sunday. It was in beautiful condition, but of course looked almost
like an antique car even then, It had "spark" and "gas" on the steering wheel,
you probably don't even know what those things are about.
MA: I've only read about it.
KC: We didn't have to crank it though. I guess the opportunity to crank that car
was built in, but we didn't have to. We had one of the snowiest, longest
winters, so far at least, one of the winters that we were there and this Model A
with its narrow tires and built up high could skim along on top of the snow and
ice when more modern cars would be stuck and churning and having a terrible
05:00:00time. We often were called to the rescue to transport people.
MA: Would you actually drive to work, then?
KC: No, I still carpooled. Although on the one occasion when I did drive that
car into town some very dear friends, and they are still very dear friends, Bob
and Irene Bland, who lived on the opposite side of the Hudson River in
Westchester County near Amoch, New York, and in fact Hank earned a little money
to supplement the $90 a month after I stopped working by working with Bob Bland
building houses. The Blands built their own house with their own hands,
beautiful, modern sort of Frank Lloyd Wright style, with a hugh beautiful
fireplace. While they were building it they lived in a tent. We stayed with them
a few times and watched the progress in the building of that house.
When Sara was a baby and Irene and Bob had a baby Allison, Irene and I decided
05:01:00we would have a night in the town and the men could babysit. So she and Bob and
Allison came over to Shanks Village and then Irene and I piled into this old
Model A and drove into Manhattan, both of us feeling that we were really dressed
to the 9's. I was in a yellow pique dress. I still remember, I don't know if I
made it or it was certainly a home style, and Irene was in something probably
comparable. We both thought we looked alright to be in the city. We drove down
Riverside Drive and people kept staring at us, at the car, they obviously
couldn't see our costumes yet. I got a little further down and all of a sudden a
cop, I wasn't on Riverside Drive anymore, I had turned somewhere else, halted
05:02:00not only us but all traffic, walked over to the car and said "Lady, this is a
one way street and you are going the wrong way!" We looked like such hicks from
the backwoods driving this old Model A Ford, that instead of giving us a ticket
or reprimanding us he just guided us with all the comfort and care in the world
and helped us get turned around and go back the correct way with the traffic.
That was the only occasion when I drove in Manhattan.
MA: Shades of your father.
KC: Oh dear! Even onto the seventh generation.
MA: Life in Shanks Village was an interesting experience. We stayed there from
05:03:001947, the fall of 47, until the fall of 1950, three years.
MA: Even though you only worked at the Ethical Society for one year?
KC: Yes, in fact slightly less than one year. In the fall of 1948, Sara was born
in January of 1949 in the fall of 1948 both Hank and I were employed by the
Henry Wallace campaign for the presidency, a third party candidate. Hank worked
on the other side of the Hudson, we continued to live in Shanks Village, but his
campaigning was done over there, not in Westchester but in some of the more
working class neighborhoods and I had assignments to do campaigning and hold
05:04:00meetings and distribute literature on the side of the Hudson on which we lived.
I would go up to Poughkeepsie, not too far into Upstate New York, but stayed
overnight frequently with sympathetic political people. I once stayed at the
mental hospital, the head physician and his wife were active in this campaign so
they put me up. The woman asked me to come out to the kitchen while she was
preparing supper and she was making chopped liver and I said I had a great
recipe for chopped liver. Saul Sakheim, who I mentioned to you in a previous
interview from Gloversville, New York, the one for whom I made the cheese
05:05:00blintzes when I didn't know what they were supposed to taste like, had given me
a cookbook from his wife's congregation, the Gloversville Hostess I think it was
called, where individual people had autographed their own favorite recipes. It
was from that cookbook that I learned to make chopped liver, which I didn't do
very often but which was always very good. This woman, it wasn't at Poughkeepsie
I don't know where the mental hospital was, said she was fixing chopped liver
and I said "Oh I have a wonderful recipe for that in the Gloversville Hostess"
and she reached over and handed me her cookbook which was the Gloversvill
Hostess. I thought what a small world when we had the same cookbook.
MA: What inspired you to work for Henry Wallace; what was it about him?
KC: I think all of his stands on issues. I'm hard-put every two years, not just
every four years, when the democrats sound so much like the republicans, the old
05:06:00tweedledee and tweedledum. I think the only thing that keeps me ever from always
voting for a certain party is that I know it's kind of a wasted vote.
MA: But you must not have believed it was wasted with Henry Wallace. There must
have been hope.
KC: Well there was not hope of his being elected but there was hope of a
sufficient turn out and sufficient campaign to influence some of the policies. I
think that is the primary hope of third parties in the United States.
MA: Like with Jesse Jackson today?
KC: Right. In any case, it was sort of a fun thing to do. I was sort of
burgeoning with child and driving, I had the Model A Ford during this campaign,
and I think there were people who thought I wasn't really for real. I stayed a
lot overnight with a farm family, the Rice's, who had an apple farm and who also
05:07:00thought that nobody had eaten breakfast until he or she had at least three eggs
plus whatever else was going. They would load the front seat of the car up with
apples so there I would be, chugging along eating apples and throwing apple
cores out of the window in this old Model A Ford and quite pregnant.
Then we went to some great rallies in Madison Square Garden for Henry Wallace.
MA: At that time did he have any particular stand on women's issues?
KC: I don't remember any on women's issues. I do remember one of his brochures
on race and I don't remember race being a predominant issue in any other
candidate for president for that year. This one that said "Ten Extra Years" was
the heading on that brochure and that a white child had ten extra years. Then it
05:08:00pointed out all the other ways in which Blacks in this country were disadvantaged.
MA: Did he have much of a Black following?
KC: He had some, I don't know but I am sure there are some who know.
MA: How about the other people you worked with in the campaign, were you all
liberal democrats, socialists, communists?
KC: All of the above. In fact the campaign kept being smeared, of course, by
poeple who didn't like it by saying it was communist dominated and entirely red,
etc. There were some notable and outspoken communists who were working very hard
for Wallace and for his campaign.
05:09:00
MA: I thought of something else just now that was related to that, oh I know
what it is. We had a very exciting campaign in Shanks Village, not for Henry
Wallace but for the right to vote. Have I mentioned that to you before?
KC: No, you haven't.
MA: I don't know how it began or who knew that we were not being permitted to
vote, or even to register to vote. I think we were in Orange County in New York
and I believe that this was a decision of the County Board or whatever. In
Shanks Village, as you can imagine among married college veterans, there were
05:10:00some very able and very bright people. There were a couple of attorneys, in fact
one of them we visited several years later, Milt Carroll, and there were a lot
of politically active people. The decision came down, maybe at an earlier local
election, that not a single resident of Shanks Village was going to be permited
to register to vote, much less to vote. We wanted to appeal this to whatever
authorities were in charge.
KC: What was the reason?
MA: The reason was that as students this was not our permanent address and if we
wanted to vote, in my case in Sparta where my parents lived and in Hank's case
in Jefferson City, Missouri where his parents lived, then we could vote by
absentee ballot. But that as students, I think that it was just generally
05:11:00maintained and maybe even by law, that students who lived in a dormitory could
not vote from that residence. In fact, in those days one had to have a year's
residence in a state in order to vote in the presidential election. Hank and I
were disqualified from voting in the presidential election, we must have been
able to vote in 1948--sure, because we had been there for a year, but in 1952
and 1956 we were disenfranchised because we had moved into a new state in less
than a year, so it was a great joy to us in 1960 when we moved to Madison,
Wisconsin, to discover that the Wisconsin voting laws had been amended to permit
people to vote in the presidential election with just 30 days of residence on
the assumption that people have access to information about presidential
05:12:00candidates wherever they lived and a years residence wasn't going to improve
their understanding of candidates.
Back to Shanks Village. Hank and I were part of a little group there that
planned and strategized and worked with Milt and some of the others to do
something about changing that either law or practice as the case might be. We
got the word out to everybody by doing leaflets and distributing them that the
time to register to vote in was such-and-such a time and the place to do it was
wherever it was. We had to organize, the local politicos were fearful that this
would be a radical vote and if they allowed us to vote it would be curtains for
05:13:00them or whatever, so we organized lines to bring food and drink. The politicos
at registration time locked the door and took a two or three hour lunch break
and did everything they could to harrass and discourage us, well not everything
they could, they didn't sic dogs on us or whatever, and then took forever to
register one person. We were sort of prepared for that and expected it and as
you can imagine in that population every female was either pregnant or had a
small child or both so that it was terribly inconvenient, but we wanted everyone
to do it, so we had folks warming bottles for babies and carrying them and
bringing lunch.
KC: So you were just lining up to register inspite of the inconvenience.
MA: We knew that unless we had registered to vote that if we won the right to
05:14:00vote we wouldn't be able to anyway because we had failed to register, so this
voting registration took place even before we had won the victory of being
allowed to vote in the election. I do remember one night when we were sound
asleep, it was midnight I'm sure, when someone was pounding on the door of our
little apartment and went to the door and it was one of these fellows and they
were going to drive up to Albany because they'd had a court appearance or
something the next morning, so Hank quickly threw on his clothes and got in the
car. It reminded me very much of a Paul Revere kind of thing because it was
exciting and risky. Anyway, we finally did win the right to vote. That had
repercussions not just in New York state but in a lot of other states when we
made the point that we were adults and that this was our domicile and we had no
05:15:00other home and the fact that we were students meant nothing and there should not
be a disqualification for casting a ballot.
MA: Wonderful example of grassroots organization and the impact it can have.
KC: It was exciting!
MA: I don't remember much else about Shanks Village except that it was a very
tedious, the sameness of, everyone there was of the same age category and doing
the same job and had lived through the same experiences. Once in awhile
somebody's mother would come to visit and it was such a joy to see a gray head
or a slower pace. I think I would feel the same way if I ever lived in a
retirement home. I think I would miss the generations or at least the variety or diversity.
05:16:00
MA: Is Shanks Village still there? Is it still student housing?
KC: No, but a lot of the people who were there as students stayed permanently in
the community, built homes elsewhere. That's when we visited Milt Carroll, I've
forgotten exactly when it was, but the landscape was entirely different. MA: You
were talking about the Henry Wallace campaign. What happened with it? How did it
all come out for you and for him? Did it affect any other parts of your life
that you were working in that campaign? I'm referring to the idea that some
people thought it was a radical campaign, and in fact it was for the time.
KC: I don't know in what ways it might have affected me.
05:17:00
MA: It didn't affect your job, for example, at the Ethical Society.
KC: I did that after I left the Ethical Society; I wouldn't have had the time
because I did that pretty much full time.
MA: So you worked a little under a year at the Ethical Society and then worked
for how long on the Wallace campaign?
KC: Until the election in November, probably six weeks or so. It might have been
even longer than that.
MA: When you look back on that, are there skills that you see yourself using
today that you used then, that you perhaps were not aware of, but the beginning
of your organizational skills?
KC: I had developed a lot of organizational skills of a different sort while I
was in college, while I was in school before and all through high school. I have
05:18:00always I guess been an organizational kind of person. I had never done that kind
of political campaigning.
MA: The door to door kind of work?
KC: I didn't even do as much door to door as I did organizing a meeting in a
community, but going into strange communities and meeting with people I didn't
know. I found that there was a great deal of comradary and of support and of
trust among the people who were active radicals I guess. That's been an
experience that I've enjoyed many times over the years.
MA: What were women's roles within the organization? I'm thinking of Sara Evans'
book "Personal Politics and Women's Role Within the Civil Rights Movement". Were
you on equal footing with the men?
05:19:00
KC: Oh I was! In fact I probably had more responsibility and I don't know if
authority is even the correct word in the territory where I was serving.
MA: So you certainly weren't relegated to typewriter and coffee pot.
KC: Nor were a lot of the other women and there were many women, well there
weren't many of either men or women, but I can think of two or three or four
women right now who were doing as much brain work and position development as
the men were.
MA: Then it wasn't stated, it wasn't as though you had to come into the campaign
and make this an issue it was just a given.
What did you do after the Wallace campaign?
05:20:00
KC: I gave birth to Sara in January. My mother came to visit for Thanksgiving I
remember, and it was wonderful to have her there and see her. One day we went
into Nyack, I probably had a doctor's appointment, so we rode in in-style in the
Model A. I can remember walking down the street and we walked in front of a
candy store and I had been so faithful to this diet of eating all these healthy
things and nothing that wasn't on the list, and I stood in front of the candy
store and didn't even realize that tears were streaming down my cheeks and my
05:21:00mother couldn't believe it! She said "Well, for heaven's sake, let's go in and
get some candy!," and I said it wasn't on my diet and she said "So what!" But
just think of it, I didn't even realize
MA: You had so internalized the discipline
KC: Yes, but I didn't realize I was weeping over want of, like a small child, so
I had a small piece of candy.
MA: I gained an enormous amount of weight. When I went into the hospital to
deliver Sara I remember this wonderful old French doctor, who looked like Dr.
DeFoe who delivered, or at least the actor who played Dr. DeFoe in the movie
about the quintuplets, and I had asked if he thought I should be in Nyack around
the due date instead of coming all the way from Shanks Village in the old car,
05:22:00and he said no he thought that shake, rattle cruise would be very healthy so I
didn't worry about that. But I weighed 180 pounds when I went into the hospital
to deliver.
MA: What was your normal weight?
KC: I weighed 140 when I came out of the hospital and she only weighed a little
over six pounds so the rest was fluid. My normal weight is 130. Within two
months I was down to 116. I made lists, which I have always done and probably
always will do, but I thought I had to do everything everyday when that baby was
brand new. I'd make out a week's schedule and think I should do it in one day
and when I didn't and wasn't able to cross everything off that would be a
frustration. So the truth was that I didn't eat properly and didn't sleep
properly and when the baby was maybe six weeks or two months old it finally
05:23:00dawned on both Hank and me that we'd better stop being night persons because
we'd be resentful at 5:30 or 6:00 in the morning when this happy little baby
would start waking up and we'd be grumpy, and we thought maybe if we went to bed
at night we could be cheerful when she's cheerful so we began to change.
MA: What was it like giving birth at this time in history? We know that
childbirth practices have changed considerably. Did you have a good relationship
with your doctor? What was your experience in the hospital?
KC: It was different even from my next two babies. But I started to say, that
05:24:00about two weeks before Sara was born the enormity of what was ahead suddenly
just came to me and I realized that for the rest of my days, 24 hours a day,
seven days a week, I would have an obligation. I think if I could have reversed
things at that moment I would have done so; it was a terrible realization!
MA: Yes, I had a good relationship with my doctor, it was no first name kind of
thing, but I respected him and he was very easy to talk with and ask questions
of. He treated the pregnancy as a matter of course. In fact, he would never have
done, I had each of my children in a different city, state and obviously with a
05:25:00different physician attending. When I was pregnant with Janet, eight years
later, I went to a doctor who was referred to me by my cousin on Staten Island.
I walked in and he wondered why I was there and I said "I think I'm probably
pregnant." "How old are you?" I said "I'm 36." "Well I suppose I've had worse."
That was my introductory conversation; I suppose I should have walked out and
not returned. However, the old French doctor was not like that but he was a big
believer in a long recuperative period in the hospital. Sara was born in January
and one of the nurses came in a few days later and said "Oh, your still here.
Who's your doctor?" I said "Dr. " "You'll be lucky to be out by Easter!" said she.
KC: How long were you in the hospital?
MA: Eight or nine days. He thought it was important in the long run that even
05:26:00though it was standard in that time, maybe four or five days was fairly
standard, he was also very critical that the hospital wasn't as neat and tidy as
he--he was accustomed to Catholic hospitals where the nuns didn't let dust
accumulate anyplace. I didn't mind having eight or nine days of rest.
KC: There is something to be said for that.
MA: I never was hustled out in two or three days or less. David was born in
Missouri and I'd had several quite serious miscarriages between Sara and David's
arrival so I'd been going to the University people in St. Louis to find out what
to do about avoiding miscarriages. David was probably one of the most wanted
05:27:00children who has ever arrived on this planet. He couldn't wait to be born, he
arrived at four and a half pounds with about two hours of notice, well that
isn't the delivery you're interested in but I will talk about it anyway.
KC: That's fine. We'll deal with all of the deliveries at once, a comparative look.
MA: The doctor who delivered David, I went to the hospital right from the dinner
table and was hustled right in to the delivery room without any prep or
anything. Had a whole class of male students. He said "Do you mind if we watch
this delivery?" What I thought was "What if I do mind," but what I said was "I'm
a teacher myself, so go ahead." Then it took awhile for that baby to emerge so
05:28:00it was kind of luck that the doctor was teaching his students and he said
"There, you can see the head but the chin is obviously getting in the way." And
I thought, "Why the hell didn't he tell me that," so I just did a little push
and out he came. The doctor sent the nurse back three times to weigh David again
because he was so perfectly formed that the doctor couldn't believe he only
weighed four and a half pounds, but he was just tiny.
KC: So he didn't need to be put in an incubator?
MA: No he wasn't and they let me take him home. I had to hold him in my hands
because I'm long armed and he would have fallen through! He had all kinds of
little things wrong with him, but Sara didn't.
KC: Sara was a fun, very cheerful child. My dad came to visit her when she was
ten weeks I think and I have this lovely picture of them smiling at each other.
05:29:00Sara did everything rather early; well all of my kids crawled when they were
about five months old. Again, I have photographic evidence in case people think
my memory has slipped. I never could bare to put kids in an enclosure. I
borrowed a playpen once for Sara to put out in the yard and she was so unhappy
in it that one time that I never used it again. I had neighbors in Shanks
Village who actually had cages, a crib with a lid on it, for kids even when they
were able to stand. I just thought it felt like an animal to me. Anyway, I
didn't entrap my kids. I'd put a sheet on the floor and let them lie there and
roll as much as they wanted to so they had mobility and learned mobility and I
05:30:00thought kind of were happy under those circumstances.
MA: Did you want three children?
KC: We actually didn't plan on Janet but as soon as I knew I was pregnant I
wasn't unhappy. In the first place, Hank and I were each a third child in our
own families and I figured that this one would be either male or female and in
either case it would help me to break down any stereotypes--because Sara did
something that must be what girls do and because David did something that must
be what boys do--and that this one would then, which in fact she did, I don't
know what stereotypes I had, I know that Sara was saying real words by the time
she was eight months old and was doing a lot of things at a very early age, so I
05:31:00might have presumed that girls were this or that. Janet is my tallest child. In
fact David was nearly four when Janet was born but by the time Janet was two
people thought they were twins. They were just about the same size and the two
of them had great times together.
MA: How did you combine, during the time that you had three small children were
you continuing to do community work or teaching or anything?
KC: When Sara was a year and a half Hank and I found these jobs at Olivet
College in Michigan, that was in the fall of 1950, and so we went with Sara.
That's the community from which we went to Camp Longlake that I did talk about,
and we were there for two years on the faculty.
05:32:00
MA: So you were teaching when she was a baby?
KC: When she was a year and a half. I didn't do anything for pay from the time
she was born until she was a year and a half when we went to Michigan.
MA: What was your adjustment like? You mentioned that two or three weeks before
she was born that you were wishing you could reconsider this entire thing. Once
she was born and the reality hit, what was it like for you?
KC: I was so overly attentive that that was why I lost weight. My mother and dad
gave us as a gift a washing machine so every day I'd go outside and hang up diapers.
MA: You were approaching childrearing like you approached everything else in
your life, with total commitment!
KC: Yes and then some. In fact I think that's the kind of mother I have probably
05:33:00been. I don't know that I have, these are not evaluations that I should make, my
kids should be asked what kind of a mother. My feeling is that I did not overly,
that I didn't smother and that they had a lot of leeway. I know that they had a
lot of respect from their father and from me and we never ignored a question or
a comment and they certainly were allowed to disagree.
MA: How did you find, personally, fitting all those pieces together? The
difficulty that we read about and talk about of trying to be a professional
woman, a political woman, a mother, a wife.
KC: I suppose I didn't do many of those things as well as I would have done them
if I had had fewer things on my schedule. I remember Betty Friedan's comment
05:34:00twenty years ago that we don't know what women might have achieved if they had
had equality.
MA: If there had been really good daycare that you could have taken the kids to?
KC: Actually all three of my kids had preschool experience. We moved from
Olivet, Michigan, via a summer in California, to St. Louis and by that time Sara
was three and a half and she needed the experience of being with other children.
She had had some in Olivet at the household where we had asked if they would
consider taking another, they had a little girl of their own so at least there
were the two of them, and the woman there, Esther Wilkes, would often arrange
for other kids to come in and play too, so it wasn't an isolated child just with
05:35:00her own parents. We enrolled her in a nursery school in St. Louis. In fact one
of the first things we did when we got to St. Louis, this was held out as a
peace offering to Sara in order to move from Michigan, that we would get her a
library card when we got to St. Louis.
MA: At three and a half?
KC: Yes. So we hotfooted it to the St. Louis County library which was right near
where we lived and went in to go through the rigamarole of getting library cards
for all of us. The librarian introduced us to the books of Laura Ingalls Wilder
and this was thirty some years ago. They had, in the county library, little
replicas, little dolls, of the Ingalls family, of pa with his bow and his
05:36:00fiddle, and they had a bookmobile named the Laura Ingalls Wilder Bookmobile. All
of Laura Ingalls Wilder's books had not been written yet and she was still
living on a farm in Missouri. We tried after we had read a couple of the books,
and when my mother came she just loved them and ultimately bought the entire
eight or however many there are for each of her three families of grandchildren,
and loved reading them outloud.
MA: You mentioned earlier that you thought she loved those books because it
reminded her of her own life.
KC: Yes, that's right and of much of her own experiences. So that's what we did
when we got to St. Louis. I don't know how I got onto this subject.
MA: I was asking you how you balanced everything and we were talking about childcare.
05:37:00
KC: Oh, I see and that Sara did go to nursery school and David on Staten Island
also went to Wagner College which had a nursery school where they had student
teachers learning what they were doing.
MA: Being in a university community it sounds like you had more options perhaps
for alternatives for the children.
KC: Yes, although only the one David went to on Staten Island was associated
with a college. When we were here in Madison Janet went to the Unitarian Society
nursery facility. There were not a lot of options available, just as there
weren't these other places where we lived.
MA: Did you feel guilty when you would send them away?
KC: Not that I can remember, except that it was an expenditure that sounded
probably out of line with our means, but it was one that both my husband and I
05:38:00thought was important for the kids at that point. I don't think that I felt
guilty about being away from them. The only time I was employed for pay was when
Sara was in care in Olivet. It was a tiny little town and a tiny little college
so that she was one block from the campus and I could look out my office window
and see the house where I knew she was and she knew that I was that nearby. I
had all of my classes arranged for the morning so she was only there from 8:00
till 12:00. The juggling was trying to do my preparation and reading of papers,
05:39:00etc., at home afternoons and evenings when I was also mothering and that took
some doing.
MA: Why did you stop at three children? Did you consciously stop at three children?
KC: Yes. I thought that was plenty.
MA: How old were you when the third child was born?
KC: Janet was the third one and I must have been 37.
MA: Was that considered "old" at the time to be having a child?
KC: Well the doctor thought it was old! I have a wonderful story about being in
that doctor's office. I think I tend to remember the fun and funny things more
than the unpleasant ones. I used to take David with me when I would go for my
check-ups with this doctor and his office was right across the street from a
convent so that frequently there would be nuns in the waiting room in their full
05:40:00habits, of course. David had one of the loudest voices for such a little guy. We
sat in the waiting room one day and he said "Who are they? What are they?"
because they were in these habits, and just sort of shouted it out, of course,
looking at a couple of them, and I said, "Those are sisters from across the
street." "Sisters! They look more like mommies to me!" was his loud retort.
MA: Did the nuns respond?
KC: They laughed.
I think part of the juggling, to respond to your more basic question, really and
truly had to do with my husband's view toward me and toward the causes that I
05:41:00was engaged in and that he too was engaged in. Political things, peace things,
the whole women's movement--and every time I would turn down something, I would
decide not to go to a conference because of the expense of the travel or the
time away from home--he would urge and encourage me to go and to spend the money
and he would cancel whatever he had going. He wasn't just going through the
motions, because whenever I would take him up on that or make the decision
without having to be persuaded there was no question about what he would do. Our
meals and our laundry and things of that kind we always did either together or
05:42:00whoever was here first and had more time would do it. I just wouldn't have known
any other kind of marriage I think.
MA: When you married Hank you expected that it would be this way. You married
someone who's political ideals were the same, you were both educated and it
didn't ever occur to you that you wouldn't be equal in the home?
KC: No. There were many things that it was easy for me to do, public speaking
for example, was not Hank's forte at all and it made him nervous just the notion
of having to.... I don't even know what kind of a teacher he was in the
classroom. He had taught at Olivet, he had taught at Rutgers evenings when we
were living in Shanks Village and he had been a TA when I first met him here at
the University of Wisconsin. That's about the extent of his teaching experience.
I used to wonder when he would respond to our own kids, who would have a
05:43:00question about whatever it was about, whether it was foreign policy or the
mechanics of political institutions or whatever, that his responses often didn't
take into account what the root of the question was. What was it the kids didn't
understand and what was it they were trying to understand? Because he would give
a response that told them what was in his head, rather than speaking to what was
probably in their head, and then saying, "Am I really getting at what you wanted
to know?" It was always my hunch, I never sat in and monitored his classrooms,
but I wondered if part of the reason he didn't really enjoy teaching was that he
never really got the whole idea of what a teacher does. I don't know about that,
but maybe I do him an injustice, but this is still my observation. I know that
05:44:00the kids would have to.... I would either chime in at some point, add to what
their father had told them without saying "well for cripes sake..." or else they
would come to me afterwards and say "How would you explain this?" I think I
enjoyed very much the time with the kids when they were in school and were
studying or learning something and would seek my help.
MA: You were continuing to be a teacher.
KC: I enjoyed those times and some of them were occasionally a real challenge of
how do you get them to understand what it is they are reading without just doing
it for them, so there would be long-range ramifications.
05:45:00
MA: Did you ever think about, since you were raising two girls and a boy, how to
raise them so that they would perceive their roles in society as being equal?
KC: I don't know that we really talked about being equal. Of course I was
brought up in a household where the boys were expected to do dishes and make
their own beds.
MA: And where your father treated you as an equal.
KC: But my father never lifted a finger in the house of course to do housework.
MA: So that's a difference.
KC: But my brothers did and in fact they taught their wives how to do laundry
and how to cook.
MA: When you observed the kids, I'm thinking about today when we spend a lot of
time talking about are we buying a truck for the girls and a doll for the boy
05:46:00and how do we socialize them to be more androgynous?
KC: David had trucks to play with when he was little and I don't know that the
girls ever expressed any great interest in having trucks, however he used to
cuddle teddy bears and dogs and things. One of the things David cuddled in his
crib when he was still drinking from a bottle at nap time, of course that was
another dreadful thing I did with all my kids, I let them have a bottle of milk
in bed.
MA: Propped?
KC: No, until they were practically old enough to start school. It made them
happy going to sleep and that was fine with me. Nor did I care when they started
using a toilet instead of diapers and finally they'd say "I think this is the
time." They actually did mostly tell me when it was time to dispense with diapers.
05:47:00
MA: That was radical child rearing for your time.
KC: Was it?
MA: Wasn't it?
KC: I remember in Shanks Village that a couple of people I knew were doing
things on schedule. It just didn't make sense to me to have anybody cry until
your time said, "Now you can feed or take them outside or do something else."
It's probably one of the reasons I spent more time with our first baby than one
should have been required to.
MA: How did you learn to be a parent? Did you read books about child rearing?
KC: I read a few books and Hank read them to. I remember being impressed every
time I came across the statement "You have to do what comes naturally" I mean,
these may be helpful suggestions but you've got to do it your own way. I kind of
05:48:00knew that about myself anyway. I'm very bad at pretending I enjoy something that
I don't enjoy. I never did that with the kids; if they wanted me to play or do
something that I found boring I would have to tell them, I did tell them that
this bores me, you get somebody else to do it, ask me to do something else.
MA: Do you recall who you read at the time?
KC: No. Of course we owned a copy of Dr. Spock and got some helpful advice on
what to do if certain things go wrong.
MA: The crises
KC: No. I don't remember what other things; not a lot, I didn't read a lot.
MA: Did you look at your friends and how they were raising their children?
05:49:00
KC: Yes. I got a lot of negative notions. I wouldn't put my kids in a cage and I
wouldn't let them cry.
MA: Learning from bad examples.
KC: Yes. I think my mother was helpful when she would come to visit. She didn't
come very often, but every year either she would come or we would go to visit.
She never said, "Now I'm going to give you some good advice," but just the way
she would handle the baby or the children or would kind of suggest to me some
things I could do differently or do better.
MA: Did your idea of who you were change during this time? What I'm thinking of
here is often times even as professional women when we give birth to children
05:50:00all of a sudden our identity has taken some kind of a shift and we're not
exactly sure anymore who we are. We know we're a mother and we know we're a wife
but we're not too sure about the other things. Did you ever experience that kind
of blurring?
KC: I don't know. As I've said to you before, I'm not a very introspective
person. I remember after Janet was born on Staten Island that I was active in
the PTA in PS 11 (Public School 11) where Sara was enrolled. David was enrolled
very briefly in PS 11 and the classroom was so crowded the teacher couldn't even
open the cupboard where the materials were kept. They were so crowded in that
first grade or kindergarten, whichever it was, that those kids had to go at one
05:51:00hour of the day and come back at a different time from everybody else. And right
across the street from where we lived was the Staten Island Academy, a private
school, with eleven children in the first grade and this marvelous teacher who
was recently back from Japan, a play field that would make any high school
envious. In violation of all the things we believed in with regard to public
education, we enrolled David in the Staten Island Academy. He had a marvelous
year including this nutritious hot lunch and then an afternoon nap on a cot; the
contrast was sinful! I was active in the PTA and Sara stayed in the Public
School. She was big enough and old enough to cope and her own grade wasn't all
that crowded. The principal, Mrs. Sereta, who had been principal there for 25
05:52:00years I guess, was just wonderful. She was so delighted to have someone who had
a little education, I shouldn't say that because there were other parents there
also who had, but I could go to afternoon meetings (I took Janet with me as an
infant) and old Mrs. Seretta was something, she was retiring while we were still
there so the PTA and some of the other faculty people wanted to have a special
event and they rented an elegant place out on Staten Island to hold it. I wrote
the script for "Mrs. Seretta This is Your Life." There were others on the
committee who then got in touch with old friends and old relatives and they
really did come in the way the television program used to go. That was just a
fun thing for me to do. She and I had a very nice relationship. I also had a
05:53:00Girl Scout Troop when Sara was a Girl Scout. I didn't have a troop but I had a
role with the troop, International Relations. I would have the scouts come to
our house. I became very conscious of the class distinctions and of some other
discriminatory things about Staten Island. I've already told you that our
property abutted the only remaining private country club in the city of New York
but we would join because they had such discriminatory membership. It was very
hard to explain to David and Sara why all their friends could go over and swim
and play tennis and why they couldn't. They ultimately did understand and they
kept saying, "Just because so-and-so isn't allowed to join, we are allowed."
05:54:00They kept inviting and we said "yes, but we do not want to be party to
something... They finally got the word I guess.
I realized because we lived on the hill, on Tote Hill, and most of them came
from down below, that apparently there was an awful lot of class distinction.
Also Staten Island or at least the neighborhood where our school was located was
heavily populated with people of Italian descent, many of them artisans, many of
them artists, and wonderful kinds of people. I realized in this Girl Scout Troop
that there was a lot of this uneasy sense of inferiority.
MA: Did you feel that even when they would come up to your house?
KC: Oh yes, but we had wonderful international relations games that I used to
05:55:00love to.... the best part of having children's parties for me was making up the
games, inventing something that would be appropriate to the time and to the
clientele, etc. I made up some things for the Girl Scouts to do. I had them do a
little personal history, find out from their parents when their folks came from
Italy and why they came and what they did and then we would locate it on the
globe that I had in our playroom.
MA: Reaffirming their culture.
KC: Sure, by pointing out and by reaffirming I suppose what you mean is putting
a real value on it and knowing that other people valued it. I found out that the
husband of one of the women in the PTA actually had done a number of the
important sculptures that were in Washington, D.C. at certain bridges and gates
05:56:00and stuff. We visited, as a group, his workshop and watched some of the things
he did. I suppose that if he hadn't been of Italian origin I might not have
thought to do it but I was still on this....
MA: It sounds to me like you, going back to the question that I asked about your
identity as a mother, if you'd sort of lost your other identity, clearly you
were basically doing many of the things you had always done but within a
different context.
KC: Right. I even had a chance with Mrs. Seretta's retirement, which I hadn't
thought of for many years until this moment, to do some writing, some creative writing
MA: Probably a public speech.
KC: Yes, right. I also got to know her well enough to point out that the
05:57:00geography book they were using was thirty years old and I thought the school
system could well invest in something ... I mean the very idea of teaching
geography out of....
MA: Did she agree?
KC: Yes. She first gave me a song and dance about no money and I thought, "Well
what kind of fund raising do we need to do in order to get some current books or
to whom should I write in the school board system", and pretty soon they found
the money for the books.
MA: Let's go back to Purdue for just a second. I have one question I wanted to
ask. How did you find being a woman on the faculty? Did you feel equal? Was
there discrimination? Were you paid equally?
KC: I don't know that I ever checked out the salary. There were several other
05:58:00women in the department, I guess I was the only woman who was a political
scientist but there was an economist and a historian. In fact, Patricia Graham,
she has been on the Harvard faculty and is active in the higher education,
Alberg, Patricia Alberg Graham was a little girl at Purdue when I went there to
teach and her mother and father were both on the faculty at Purdue. The woman
who was head of the Liberal Science special program that they had, which was
excellent, was a woman whose name I can't think of at the moment, anyway there
05:59:00were a number of very competent, good women on the faculty. I didn't really
feel, I don't know, the salary was modest but it was modest everywhere in those days.
MA: You didn't feel like an isolated woman then, there were other women for you
to commune with.
KC: That's right. Although I must say that I spent more time with the men on the
faculty, the men and their wives I think, maybe just because in my own
department.... One of the men, Babcock in English I think, his wife had recently
had a stroke and of course I never knew her before she had the stroke, but she
was quite disabled. Her speach was nonexistant and she was very fraile.
Apparently she had been one of these witty hostesses, but because of her illness
they ate out a lot and they knew I had to eat out all the time so they would
06:00:00have me come along with them, sometimes with others and sometimes not with
others. They were among my mainstays and then the others in the department, Bill
Robinson, we had a lot of dinners together.
MA: So that the women faculty did not automatically join together in the way
that they would today around a women's center for example.
KC: That's right.
MA: You stayed within your departments probably pretty much.
KC: Yes. Dorothy Bovay is the name of the woman who headed Women's Studies. She
went from Purdue a few years later to Mills College out on the west coast. Now
there were women, Harriet O'Shay who was in Psychology and Hilda Schwein in Phy
Ed, and a few others would occasionally have a womens gathering or dinner or
06:01:00something and include me. I stayed in touch with those people for years. Hilda
died a year or two ago.
MA: Were most of those women married that were on the faculty?
KC: No. Dorothy Bovay got married and then moved out to Mills College. She
married later than the average bear, but the others were single and they never
married. I understand that after I left Babcock's wife finally died and that he
then married someone from the Home Ec. faculty that I had known when I was
there, so that one was married.
MA: Was it usual that faculty women might not -- it sounds like there were a
large number of faculty women who were not married and that was not considered unusual.
06:02:00
KC: No it was not unusual at all.
MA: Were they considered odd?
KC: No. When I joined the faculty here in Madison in 1961 and 1962 I began
getting invitations, which every female faculty person gets, to come to meetings
of the University Women, I don't know what it's really called, who are the wives
of male faculty plus female faculty. I had never gone to it and in fact I think
it is an insulting combination. If they want to have spouses of faculty then
they can have spouses of faculty. I don't know what their common bond was. They
learn Chinese cooking or whatever.
MA: I assume that you didn't take up the invitation.
06:03:00
KC: Never, and I kept getting it annually, at least. It was a very distasteful
notion to me. Last year, actually Sheila Earl, who at the time was the First
Lady of Wisconsin and is employed by the LaFollette Institute, which is a public
policiy institute, she hosted the Spouses of Govenors and asked me to serve on
the Planning Committee for the program and then to chair some of the sessions.
Gina Shapiro chaired some of them also, and was on the Planning Committee so it
was fun to do things with her. They referred to the sessions as "Gubernatorial
Spouses", two of the spouses are men who decided they should refer to themselves
06:04:00as "First Mates" so the whole gang, men and women, referred to themselves as
"First Mates" which I thought was a nice twist.
MA: I agree.
MA: Okay, tell me about the encampment for citizenship just briefly that you
were involved with in 1947.
KC: It is or was a special project of the Ethical Society which is kind of a
religious fellowship, they describe themselves a little more in detail than
that, but a very progressive group in New York City. I believe they had two
06:05:00other sites where there were local fellowships, one in either Cleveland or
Cincinnati and one someplace I think in Pennsylvania. The organization in New
York City actually either founded and started or was a very active participant
in any number of interracial, antidiscrimination, antipoverty activities in the
New York area.
MA: So you applied for this fellowship and were chosen.
KC: No. I had no fellowship; I had paid employment. It seems to me that I had
mentioned on a previous tape that one summer when I was in graduate school here
at Wisconsin that Hank Herman (Henry Herman) who was one of the leaders of the
06:06:00Ethical Society, they didn't have what they call ministers but leaders, was on a
recruiting tour and did invite me to be on the faculty at the Encampment for
Citizenship which was way ahead of its time. It was a summer six week program
for young people I think between the ages of 18 and 23 who had to be specially
chosen or at least approved by the faculty before they could be admitted. They
very deliberately and intentionally were as diverse a cross-section racially,
economically, geographically, religiously and by gender as they could possibly
put together. The encampment program consisted of visiting, looking at,
06:07:00interviewing, and seeing what the real world was really like, so it was quite a
program. Eleanor Roosevelt had been very much interested in and in fact some
years the group would get to go to Campobello. That was what the encampment for
citizenship was all about. I declined the opportunity to be on the faculty
because I wanted to finish my thesis at that time. When my husband and I
returned from our summer in Europe in the fall of 1947 and I had already
resigned from Purdue and had made the decision to stay in New York it was rather
imperative that I find employment. I really had a good time job hunting. I have
hardly job hunted in my life. I described my job hunt in Washington, D.C., which
06:08:00would up with the War Production Board but this was then another occasion when I
did need to tramp the streets of New York City looking for a job.
MA: What did you enjoy about the process?
KC: It was the most legitimate way to ask employers and organizations what they
do and why they do it and how they do it. One can be as nosy as possible as an
applicant, or a potential applicant at least. I can remember that I had
interviews with the Antidefamation League of B'nai B'rith and I don't even
remember what some of the others were.
MA: You were looking for progressive organizations then, it sounds like.
06:09:00
KC: I was looking for a place that I would feel at home and comfortable and feel
that what I was doing was worth doing. In fact I have advised mature women,
during the period later on here at Wisconsin when they were thinking about doing
something that I still think that it is more important to be associated with a
group whose purpose is consistent with your own than whether the tasks you are
performing are your first choice or not. Just as I think counselors in school
ought to be asking kids, maybe kids of all ages, not what do you want to be when
you grow up but what kind of a world do you want to live in and what can you do
with your life to help move the world a little closer to your own definition.
Then if you have to earn a living to keep body and soul together, then that's
06:10:00something we all have to do. It doesn't need to conflict necessarily with how
one really invests energy and thought. Anyway, back to New York City.
MA: So that's what pulled you toward the encampment then?
KC: Well, in fact, I had no notion when I went in to visit with Henry Herman. I
remembered having met him and in fact a mutual friend of ours in New York said
"why don't you go ask him, he has his fingers in a lot of pies and might know
some possibilities," so I went to visit with him and said I was looking for a
job. Immediately he got this strange expression on his face and said "Who told
you?" I said "Told me what?" "That the executive secretary of encampment had
just submitted her resignation and they needed to find a replacement." So that
was just one of those lucky coincidences. I was employed and, as I think I
06:11:00mentioned earlier, I told an untruth when I was asked if I could type and I said
no, figuring they would hire a typist if I couldn't type which is just what
happened. In fact, a very lovely young woman from Queens whom I got to know of
course quite well while we worked together. I was not with the encampment very
long. I spent my time, I did have a couple of field trips trying to recruit,
well recruit and market perhaps because I made appointments in a number of
communities to which I went not only with people who would know young people who
might be eligible to come to the encampment but to try to interest organizations
and individuals in making contributions of one kind or another. Other than that
06:12:00my memory is a little bit vague about what I did at the encampment. I limited
the evening time that I spent in the office, the offices were with the rest of
the Ethical Society in the West 70's, Central Park West someplace in the 70's,
72nd I think but I'm not sure, because I had to commute back and forth to Shanks
Village and if I didn't travel when the cars travelled that meant taking a late
night bus which was a nuisance. One of the leading lights of the encampment was
a woman named Alice Pullitzer, everyone called her Nanny Politzer, she was
somebody's grandmother. Her sister was a very well known figure in labor
06:13:00education. Nanny Pullitzer was close to 90 when I knew her and just about as big
as a minute, a tiny little person who lived just a couple of blocks from where
the Ethical Society was so she used to walk back and forth. I had dinner at her
home a number of times. When she was 90, or there abouts, she and her sister
sued the federal government and they were defended in that suit by her (Nanny's)
grandson who was Dean of the Yale Law School, I may have some of this
information slightly inaccurate but I think this is correct, and their suit was
to make a change. The federal government was requiring people, in order to
06:14:00qualify for social security, to sign a loyalty oath. These two women who had
never stopped fighting city hall all their lives picked and chose their turf on
which to fight, and won that suit. In any case, there were a lot of remarkable
people that I had an opportunity to sort of work with and watch and listen to.
MA: That must have been influential in terms of your development in some way?
KC: They were very unhappy at the Ethical Society when I wore a Henry Wallace
button on some occasion; there liberalism had its limits.
MA: Henry Wallace was to radical for the Ethical Society?
KC: That's right. I found that very interesting. In any case, I was pregnant
06:15:00with what turned out to be Sara Clarenbach before the summer encampment actually
began and I was very much interested in the Wallace campaign so I never did go
to the summer thing. I felt badly about missing it but it just didn't seem to
fit in. I suppose because of what looked pretty radical to them in my case was
mutually satisfactory that I didn't. I continued always to have high regard for
the many things that both the Ethical Society and the encampment were doing. I
have no idea whether that still exists or not. Hank Herman and his wife,
Gertrude, moved to Madison sometime after we came here in 1960 and I think it
06:16:00was probably still in the 1960s. They were both graduates of the University of
Wisconsin and her home had originally been someplace here in Wisconsin and Hank
Herman was employed by the Memorial Union, the Student Union, as program
director and he also had faculty rank and status. I remember they were dinner
guests here along with several other of my good friends on the faculty the night
we invested in our first air conditioner. My husband had always assumed that in
Wisconsin no one needed air conditioning, that we'd get one or two hot days and
then they'd be gone. You weren't here this summer to know that for six weeks it
was so miserably hot that everybody nearly died if they didn't have air
conditioning. However, I think it was over 100° and certainly in our living
06:17:00room it seemed so, so people left a little earlier than they would have
otherwise. By 9:00 the house was empty and Hank said "excuse me I'me going down
to Klein Dickert" and he brought back an air conditioning unit.
MA: When you spent time with the man from the Ethical Society in a comfortable
way, did you ever talk with him about the Henry Wallace campaign and where the
Ethical Society stood politically.
KC: I don't know that we ever had a very open conversation. Hank Herman died
very suddenly of a heart attack at a much too young age a few years after they
moved here to Madison. His wife continued, she has now retired I think, but she
joined the faculty of the Library School and is a real feminist and has done
06:18:00some lovely things particularly in books and literature for children. I see her occasionally.
MA: After the Ethical Society, you then went on to teach in Michigan, is that correct?
KC: Yes. From the Ethical Society I did the little Henry Wallace campaign stint
and then Sara was born the next January of 1949 so I was not employed for pay
then for the next year and a half. It was during that second year that my
husband and I sent applications to various institutions of higher learning. Hank
was teaching one evening a week at Rutgers to augment the $90.00 a month on
06:19:00which we otherwise lived and having actually literally spent what money either
one of us had accumulated for our Europe trip we had nothing other than that
$90. My dad would mail us, from Wisconsin, a crate of eggs about every month and
by the last week or two of the month our $90 would be all used up, $27 for rent,
and we would practically live on those eggs. I'd mail the empty carton back to
my dad and he would, from his various farm parishioners, get farm fresh eggs and
send it back. That was a real essential part of our maintenance. In any case,
the one institution that responded to our inquires favorably was Olivet College
06:20:00in Michigan. We had never heard of it so we made some inquiries from the AAUP
and got mixed messages about the college. We knew that it was a small school and
that it was essentially sponsored by the Congregational Church, just as Oberlin
is and a number of other institutions. There had been some kind of faculty
administration blow up a few years before that and there were questions whether
the school was in good standing or whatever. We figured that was the reason they
looked favorably on the possibility of hiring a husband and wife team. We came
back to Wisconsin where Hank's brother lives here in Madison and my parents of
course were in Sparta and borrowed a car to go over to Olivet College to have a
06:21:00personal interview with the president who had been a missionary, a
Congregational minister and a missionary in China or someplace and really had no
business trying to be president of a college, but he was. They offered us a
salary and a half for two full-time jobs and we took it.
MA: What did you teach?
KC: They only needed one political scientist and that was all that Hank was
really qualified to teach, so I became their sociology faculty and Hank was the
political science. There were students there who thought they were majoring in
sociology (I can't remember if I mentioned this before or not but it seems to me
I did.) who up until that year had the option of taking maybe two or at most
06:22:00three sociology courses which didn't strike me as being much of a major. I
designed four courses each semester, eight different courses, the first year
that I was there.
MA: And you had a child?
KC: Yes, a year and a half old. The first year that we were there we found a
family for Sara to stay with who live across the street from us. They were
members of the Bahai faith. I remember when we told the people who ran the local
newspaper, the Olivet Optic, they said "now where is your little girl staying"
and we said "with Jean Farrand," "Oh" said they, "rock-a-bye baby". Anyway, I
06:23:00had never known anything about the Bahai faith and was certainly well and
favorably impressed with the international peace and the fact that, at least
those Bahai that I met, really took their faith seriously and it was expressed
in their daily relations with other people which is not the case with too many
people who profess various religious faiths.
MA: So you were very pleased to have Sara with them.
KC: Yes, and they lived right across the street from us so we would take her
there in the morning. I arranged to have all of my classes in the morning only
so that I could pick her up at noon and be with her the rest of the day and hope
that she would take a nap so that I could do my school work and do more of it
again at night when when she was in bed.
MA: Do you recall what you created? It is incomprehensible to think of creating
06:24:00four courses per quarter.
KC: I don't remember them all, but I do remember the History of Social Thought
which was a two semester course so that was one of them each semester,
Introductory Anthropology, Criminology, some social problems kind of things, a
number of them courses that I had never taken myself and they were some of the
best courses I ever taught because I made no bones about never having known what
it was about and I would stay at least even with the students if not a day ahead
of them in my preparation, but I relied on the students in the class to help
with the teaching and urged them to do research to bring in materials to
06:25:00supplement or to argue or to get us going in a different direction and the
students kind of liked that.
MA: So it was successful.
KC: Yes, I think so.
MA: Was that the first time you had taught in that way? Was it a new awareness
for you?
KC: It was the first time I had been totally unprepared.
MA: What I am wondering is if you integrated that process into later teaching,
then, as a result of this even if you weren't under pressure to do so.
KC: Well I suppose I did. One thing that I have never been able to do or never
wanted to do is to pretend to know something when I don't know it or to pretend
a lot of other things. I never pretended with my kids that I enjoyed something
when I didn't enjoy it because I figure I'm pretty poor at doing that. I always
06:26:00have wanted in later teaching a lot of group participation. I don't care if I
stay on (maybe you can tell that from the way these interviews have been going)
I have a tendency to veer off in a lot of directions. If something strikes a
student and they want to move off in that direction that's fine with me. I think
that is the way learning takes place. I don't know to what extent .... I
remember an incident, you are reminding me now, when we moved to Madison, I
think I mentioned that first Edgewood and then the University Extension called.
The University Extension course that I taught in the evening was a course in
American government (this is later and I will get us back to Olivet in a minute)
06:27:00and one student in the course mentioned on some occasion that there was a good
article in the Progressive magazine that was illustrating whatever it was we
were talking about. That was a student who up until then had sat there looking
not only bored but almost annoyed that he had to be there and I said "oh,
wonderful" and asked if he could bring a copy of the article in for us to look
over because I wasn't familiar with it and he said "I can bring copies for
everyone" and he kind of brightened up at the prospect of doing that so the next
class period he did. Then I found out that he was the son of one of the men on
the staff of the Progressive magazine. His mother teaches in Extension but I
06:28:00only met his mother and father later on. They continue to this day, and that was
1961, to tell me that the experience of that son of theirs, Sean McGrath, in
that night course was almost a turning point for him. He had kind of hated
school in high school and after he brought those articles in and kind of
explained, from then on he was a very active participant in that class. It may
or may not illustrate what you were getting at.
MA: It does, evidence of your theory actually working, even though it wasn't a
theory initially.
KC: It may not still be a theory.
KC: So, back to Olivet. We really in many ways loved that experience at Olivet.
06:29:00I can remember my mother came to visit us one time, she came on the train to
Battle Creek, Van Johnson (is that the name of the movie star?) was on the train
with my mother to, in fact they got off the train together at Battle Creek, he
was coming for some kind of medical attention and she got off there because that
was the closest train station to Olivet. He had bought her dinner on the train
and they had visited almost the whole time. I'm sure he enjoyed her the way all
of my friends always had. It was also kind of an exciting experience for my mother.
MA: To meet a notable
KC: Yes. One of her observations when she visited us and we had our friends,
06:30:00both from the faculty and from the town, the whole town was only a couple
hundred people and the enrollment at the college was something like 500 --it was
very tiny-- and my mother said she wondered if we'd ever live in a place where
we would have as many interesting nice, friends as we had in that tiny little
community. Hank and I taught an adult Sunday School class, these were things we
did in order to stay alive.
MA: Above and beyond your teaching job you mean?
KC: Yes; we were urged to do this. It was really another course in political
science but we were trying to integrate ethical notions with people's political
outlook. We belonged to the PTA of the local school. Again, we had no one in
06:31:00school but it was something to do. Then one of the men on the high school
faculty who did something with the Kellogg Foundation, which was based in Battle
Creek, got a little money and asked us to teach an evening course (this was at
the time of the Korean War) in foreign policy. That group met in our own house
one night a week for I don't know how many weeks. With the money we bought our
first, it wasn't stereo really, just our first decent record player. It wasn't
much money but it was enough to get something and that was kind of fun.
MA: That also was the place where we met Ruth and Paul Engle. Paul Engle was the
local M.D. and his wife was very active in a lot of things. About the first week
06:32:00we lived in Olivet, at at least that first autumn anyway, I wanted Sara, who was
just a year and a half, to have the opportunity to be with other children and
there was no childcare, nursery or preschool in this little town, but one of the
faculty wives was teaching a children's art class down at the local church which
was just a block from where we lived. In fact you could hardly get further than
a block from almost anyplace in Olivet. So I asked if Sara could enroll in this
painting class, not that I had any aspirations for any artistic development, but
just as an opportunity to be with other kids. When I took her down there the
first day they were having a rummage sale, not connected with the art class but
in the church basement, so I looked around and there was a wonderful snowsuit
exactly Sara's size for $1 but I had come without any money. I asked someone
06:33:00running the rummage sale "would you hold that for me and when I come to pick up
Sara I will bring the dollar?" They were afraid they couldn't do that. They took
one look at me and weren't sure I would ever have a dollar! I thought that was
so funny! Anyway, this Ruth Engle who had met me and knew I was on the faculty
came over and vouched for me and was willing, if necessary, to put up the dollar
so I did get the snowsuit. Sara did enjoy the art class and occasionally when I
would go to pick her up the teacher, Pat - Patricia her last name may come to
me, it doesn't really matter, used to have parties, she and her husband, for
adults where we would do art things as entertainment in the evening and that was
06:34:00kind of fun. She also baked delicious homemade bread. She would make me do art
work instead of just sitting there as an observer if I wanted to come while the
children's class was going.
CK: And that wasn't one of your comfort areas was it?
KC: No it wasn't. She used the affirmative approach always. I never heard her
say to anyone, adult or child, doing art work "Oh my god is that awful" or "You
can do better than that." She always found something good to say about it. One
of the times when I was down there with Sara I had painted sort of a winter
scene with a denuded tree in the snow and she came by and I could just see her
wracking her brain trying to think of something good to say and finally she said
"I love this little trail through the snow" which had been created by some kid
06:35:00walking by and inadvertently running a fingernail over it. That was not my
forte. We did, especially the Engles, well there were others, I just this very
day shipped to my daughter Janet a box that has a gift in it from one of my
Olivet friends, Esther Masters, who lives there. Ruth and Paul Engle went from
Olivet where he had been a country doctor for 25 years, Ruth was never gainfully
employed in Olivet but she certainly was a spark plug in getting all kinds of
community things in motion and staying in motion. He got weary of being a
country doctor in this one town. Hank and I only stayed there two years and we
had, especially Hank, had had enough of being in that small town so we departed.
06:36:00(I'll move myself on from there in a minute but I want to tell a little bit
about the Engles.) They visited us several times in St. Louis which was our next
permanent landing place where we lived for four years. About the time we moved
to Staten Island Dr. Engles took a job with the State Department to be the
American physician overseas in countries that had inadequate medical facilities
to treat American civilians. A whole arrangement that I had no notion was going
on in part of our government. He had the equivalent status of an ambassador, at
least particularly when he got to the South Pacific, but first they were
06:37:00stationed in Pakistan and Beirut and then ultimately they went to the Pacific
and he was in the Phillippines and had charge of medical facilities for the
whole South Pacific at that time. They visited us on Staten Island coming and
going to several of these places. When they finally retired they built an
A-frame house or cottage up in the wood near Rhinelander, Wisconsin and invited
us up to visit them, offered us a chunk of land if we would put a cottage on it.
I said "Who wants a cottage 200 miles from home? Not I!" and then we made the
mistake of going up to visit. It is such a glorious, georgous spot, this
glaciated area with the terrain and undergrowth and the white birch and pine and
06:38:00oak trees and I had to recant and we accepted. First they gave us just one acre
of land and then we bought another four acres and built a cottage, that was 20
years ago, and had marvelous times. Both Ruth and Paul are dead now. Ruth died,
she must have been around 65 I guess, of cancer and Paul lived another 10 or 12
years, in fact just died in fact this year. I went to each service over in
Michigan. I had to speak at Ruth's service, I say "had to" because it was not
something I really wanted to do. I also went this year to Paul's services. They
remained marvelous friends of ours and their four daughters and in-laws and
grandchildren, Ruth and Paul's grandchildren are about the age of our youngest,
06:39:00Janet, and of David too. We are all, even though Ruth and Paul are now gone, the
rest of their clan still come up there and use the cottage.
MA: How nice!
KC: It is very nice. Our kids used to ask us, even when they were grown, "now
tell me again, what relation are we to the Engles?" On Paul's 80th birthday we
had a big birthday bash up at the cottage and all of their kids and kin were
there. I'm regarded as the poet laureate of the Rhinelander woods. When Susan
Engle Lawrence, who is Janet's age, was married I did a big poem for that
occassion and used the Hiawatha motif, "By the Shores of Gitchigumy" this one
06:40:00was "by the shores of Crystal Lake". Then on Paul's birthday I told them about
our 35 year friendship in rhyme with many verses and read that at the big beach party.
MA: It sounds wonderful!
KC: It has been a wonderful relationship and we just think of the Engles with
our cottage and with our summer vacations.
MA: When you look back on all of that, this is certainly forcing an intellectual
jump I suppose, did you ever think about womens role then? Did you look at the
community and ask yourself what women were doing or question in any way what was
happening? I would imagine that was a fairly traditional, middle-class community.
KC: It was and it wasn't. It was semirural as well as...
06:41:00
MA: It did have a college in it which made it somewhat different.
KC: That's right.
MA: You mentioned that women were involved in a lot of reform or a lot of
community things.
KC: There were also a number of women on the faculty, I suppose on the same
financial basis perhaps that ....
MA: With their husbands you mean, at one and a half salaries?
KC: Yes. There were a number of married couples on the faculty. There were very
few institutions in the country that permitted or would even do that.
MA: Were you treated equally, the men and the women on the faculty?
KC: Oh I think so. We were treated with the same amount of respect.
MA: That's my question.
KC: Yes. In fact I think some of us women were better than the men and that was
kind of acknowledged by the students, not by any great payment. Women were
06:42:00employed. This friend who just sent Janet this gift that I'm shipping today, she
and her husband ran a furniture store. They lived in the funeral home, they were
not morticians but whenever there was a funeral they, as Esther would say,
passed out programs. They assisted the undertaker, not in undertaking but for
the service itself. Everyone of the little shops in town tended to be "mom and
pop", the drug store and...
MA: It doesn't sound like then Betty Friedan's Feminine Mystique would have been
06:43:00very much in evidence in that small town.
KC: Of course the Feminene Mystique was written and published almost thirteen
years after we were there in Olivet. I don't know, people managed to keep
themselves occupied. I know that I joined a women's church circle; there was one
church, it was kind of a community church. I guess people who were Catholic
would go to other nearby towns in order to go to a Catholic services, but anyone
else, including a couple of Jewish families just, it was a community church and
a lot of activity centered around that so that we who are card carrying atheists
06:44:00.... As I told you, I taught an adult Sunday school class and did other things.
All the women's church circles had funny names, they were named for women who
had been stalwarts in the church I suppose. One was named Fanny Quick and I
don't even remember which one I belonged to but I would pick up a couple of old
ladies who lived near me who didn't drive and when it was a day to go to a lunch
meeting of the circle that was held out of town like on a farm, one of these
women was kind of retarded, anyway, I chauffeured these two old ladies. When
there was a church supper I volunteered to work in the kitchen. I remember the
first time or two that I did that the locals, those who were not affiliated at
the college at least were quite shocked to see a college professor working in a church.
06:45:00
MA: That must have endeared them to you.
KC: Or vice versa. I didn't see any reason not to do that.
MA: It sounds like the women didn't experience isolation for one thing in the town.
KC: No. I think they made activity. There was a lot of bridge playing. We played
bridge a lot especially with Ruth and Paul Engle. We also became the recipients,
very early in our stay there, temporary custodians of a great big, round poker
table. The house we were renting was big enough to house that table so that was
a great joy to all these other families who didn't want to have it on their
premises I'm sure. That's because there were a couple of husbands in the group,
06:46:00some faculty and some just local business people, who didn't play bridge so that
occasionally we'd have an evening of poker and that was always kind of fun. Sam
Robinson who was the head of the Music Department, and Olivet had a very good
Music Department, Sam and his wife had two grand pianos in their living room!
Nothing else in the living room because it wouldn't hold anything else, but they
would play four handed. Once in awhile Lou Robinson, Sam's wife, would invite
four of us and we would play eight handed things, two people sitting at each
piano (that makes eight hands doesn't it?) in their living room. After we had
lunch we'd sit in there and that was really kind of fun.
MA: Oh how nice.
KC: Just as I had grown up in Sparta, 3,500 population, where you either made
06:47:00activities or you atrophied.
MA: And this does sound very similar. You must have felt at home then in many ways.
KC: Yes, I did. Even I suppose the church and the school, the PTA kind of
affiliation were things that were certainly familiar to me.
MA: If Hank had wanted to stay would you have liked to?
KC: I suppose, although I didn't mind leaving. We left there not knowing where
we were going or to what we were going.
MA: And you didn't mind that?
KC: Well, I didn't like it especially but I figured we'd find something
someplace. We thought that it might be fun to go to a warmer climate, as I still
06:48:00think it would be, not only fun, but intelligent! The Michigan winters were
worse than I had remembered Wisconsin winters. Somehow it seemed to me that a
cloud came across lake Michigan and covered the State of Michigan, or at least
the part I lived in, and stayed there all winter long. The numbers of bright
sunny days were so rare. I don't know if that is an accurate memory or not but
at the time that's what it seemed to me and my memory as I look back seems the
same. In any case, we decided when we left Olivet, they had a couple of
magnificent farewell parties for us, one that was a total surprise that our
students had for us. We had gone over to the Engles for the afternoon, they had
06:49:00invited us for bridge or something, and it kept getting later and later in the
afternoon and they didn't say anything about having supper with them which they
would normally do. That's the kind of relationship we had, either one of us
would fish out what we had in the refigerator and call it a meal. As we drove
away from there I said to Hank why don't we just go to the restaurant (there was
one restaurant in town) and he said alright but he thought he should stop at the
house first, I suppose to use the bathroom. I said as we were driving away
"Isn't it strange that Ruth didn't say anything about having supper with them?"
He thought it was strange too. Anyway, he went into our house and came out in a
few minutes and he said "Telephone for you" and I said "Well can't you take a
message?" "Well no, this is for you." Our students, especially our very best
06:50:00students had been at our house all afternoon and Ruth and Paul knew it; had
prepared a meal, [break in recording].
The students had cooked this spaghetti dinner, a couple of them had even gone
down to the local creek and picked watercress to throw in the salad. They had
gifts for each of us: Hank's was a yellow sport shirt; Sara a beautiful little
yellow piqué dress; I can't remember what they gave me but it was again
something appropriate and nice. So here was our house full of kids and it was no
wonder Ruth and Paul didn't invite us to stay! They had collaborated by sneaking
us out and keeping us out. Then there was another going away party for us which
06:51:00the adults, town and campus folks together. The second year we lived there Sara
was cared for by another family, the local dentist and his wife, she was quite a
good musician and they had a little girl just a little older than Sara, anyway,
this party was at their house. They had converted the garage into kind of a
dining area. There was a program at that party that was so funny, a couple of
the men, Harold Masters dressed up in a cap and gown and did imitations of he
college president. That was the one part that I did remember and I remember it
06:52:00particularly because the next day or so some spy told the college president and
the dean about how they were both taken off and mimicked at this party. He had
the poor judgment to call in this Harold Masters, who wasn't even on the
faculty, he ran the local furniture store with his wife, and scolded him, which
tells you quite a bit about the college president. Esther Masters gave Sara, as
a little going away gift, a kitten.
MA: Just what you needed.
KC: Just exactly what we needed. Also, Bobby Wilkes, the son of the Wilkes where
the party was and where we stayed our last night, gave Sara the chickenpox. We
found out, as we were driving away with this tiny little kitten, that Bob Wilkes
06:53:00broke out with the chickenpox, so we knew that Sara would be getting it soon. We
stayed with my mother and dad in Sparta long enough for the chickenpox to
develop, for my mother to teach me what you do with chickenpox and for the
kitten to have a field day running around the yard at my parents house.
MA: When we got ready to pack up and go, our intention had been to go to
California and see if we could find a job.
KC: Just drive to California?
MA: Yes. We had friends living in Los Angeles who invited us to stay with them.
They only had two children and a one bedroom apartment, so the three of us did
stay with them for a month or two. We loaded up, when Sara recovered from the
pox, and offered to drive my mother's sister, Aunt Carrie, with us as far as
06:54:00Little Rock, Arkansas where their other sister lived and had a motel. We got in
the car and this little kitten who had had three weeks of running wild didn't
much like being confined in a little box. With my old aunt there I didn't want
the kitten jumping all over her so it got to be kind of an unpleasant ride. We
got as far as Dubuque, Iowa and stopped at a filling station or a garage for
something and the kitten jumped out and we had to chase it all around town
before we caught it and brought it back. I figured this can't go on all the way
to California so I had the job of explaining to Sara, who was then three and a
half, that her sweet little kitty would be much happier elsewhere than in our
car and that maybe we could find a home for it. Anyway, it took some doing! We
06:55:00were driving through the Iowa rural area and saw this beautiful farm up on a
hill, it just looked beautiful from the road. So I said "Hank let's go up there"
and we did. We honked and out came a woman and two or three little kids. I was
the spokesperson for this negotiation and I said you may think we have just
flipped but could you people by any chance use a kitten. The children began to
cry, they had just moved there and had to leave their own cat behind and
couldn't believe that someone....We gave them the kitty litter box and the
eating dish and the kitten and then took down their name and address because
06:56:00this was part of the deal with Sara that she could send postcards to the kitten
and the kitten would be delighted to receive them. Anyway, those folks were
overjoyed, we were overjoyed, we thanked them and went on our way. Sara didn't
even cry. She thought that the people looked nice. A further part of the
bargain, a part I shouldn't have forgotten, I said when we get to Los Angeles we
will get you another kitten. We stopped at my Aunt Mary's and Uncle Harry's in
Little Rock and they wouldn't let us drive on the 4th of July weekend. We did
stop in Jefferson City and visit Hank's parents and then on. We stayed with my
aunt and uncle for a few days and that was kind of a nice opportunity for all of
06:57:00us to be together. We got to Los Angeles and told Bob and Irene Bland, or just
happened to mention the kitty incident, and Bob Bland who was an architect and a
builder, came home, out in the back yard of their little apartment place, built
a cat house, bought four kittens, one for each, and they were really pretty
young to have left their mother but anyway
MA: One for each child?
KC: There were only three children but I guess there were four kittens in the
litter so he bought them all. That's the kind of a person he is.
MA: Did you take that one cat then and continue?
KC: No we never took it with us but their kids and ours enjoyed the animals a lot.
06:58:00
MA: You lived with them then in Los Angelse for two months while you were
looking for work?
KC: Yes. I think it was almost, well we were there sometime after the 4th of
July and I think it was early September when we drove back to Missouri.
MA: So you didn't stay in California then, you decided not to stay?
KC: I think if we had not been in the Los Angeles area, if we had gone up the
coast a little bit to either San Francisco or the Monterey Bay area that we
might have looked more diligently for something but we really didn't care about
the Los Angeles area. However, mostly Hank didn't find a job and I was not
looking for a job, he was.
Finally, through a friend, met someone who was employed by the American School
06:59:00Private Home Study Correspondence who told Hank that there was a vacancy on
their staff in St. Louis. Of course Missouri is his home state so he agreed,
sort of sight unseen, to accept the job and the guy with whom we spoke was
empowered to offer it to him. So we got in the car and drove madly back to St.
Louis. We got as far as Jefferson City and I began having what turned out to be
a very serious miscarriage. Hank had to report on the job in St. Louis so he
left Sara and me in Jefferson City with his dad and mother and sister. His
sister and her husband and little boy all lived with the parents. It was a very
07:00:00unhappy occasion, not only to have this miscarriage but I think Hank's mother
must have felt imposed upon, unless she was just always mean, I don't know if
she always was or not but she would talk very loud in the kitchen, I was up in a
bedroom, so her voice would come up through the radiator and she would make
critical remarks about how I was dressing Sara and how I did this and that.
MA: And when you were sick!
KC: Yes, and very painfully so, plus disappointed. Finally they called the
doctor. I'm not a grumbler to begin with and definitely didn't want to impose
any more than I already was, if I'd felt more in charge of myself I suppose I
07:01:00would have had a doctor there much sooner. We finally did get a doctor, someone
that they called, and with Sara right within his hearing this guy said, he was a
young doctor and by that I mean he should have known better, "can't leave her
here to bleed to death" shouted he, with my poor little girl looking. So then he
said he'd get an ambulance. Well the ambulance turned out to be a hearse, so
I've told people I've had my ride, I don't need another one in the back end of
hearse. They took me to the hospital and I did have this miscarriage. Hank came
running back from St. Louis where he was supposedly starting a new job.
MA: And little Sara was left with grumbly grandma?
KC: Right. Anyway, Hank started his job and found a house for us to rent in the
outskirts of St. Louis. He took me home.
07:02:00
MA: Did they know why you had a miscarriage?
KC: No, there were quite a few theories. It's possible that the drive from Los
Angeles didn't help but later on when we were in St. Louis I went to a physician
at the university there who was kind of a specialist and had theorized and, in
any case, I finally did produce two more children. I think I've told you one of
my favorite stories (don't even bother to stop me and I'll tell it quickly). I
looked like, as my father would say "the last carnation on a rough box," just
awful. Monday after we were in St. Louis I was sitting there in front of the
mirror, combing my hair or something, and just looked at this gaunt, pale, and
was feeling very sorry for myself and I said "oh Sara, I look just like a
07:03:00witch." She came over and hugged me and said "oh no you don't mommy, you don't
even have a pointed hat!" So there we were in St. Louis and I did recover.
MA: How long were you in St. Louis?
KC: We were there four years. I can't even remember how I got to meet some
people from the League of Women Voters. I suppose if I were to think long enough
I might remember whom I met where. I know that we developed bridge partners
right away. Almost every time we moved to a new town I would need a dentist the
first crack out of the box. I might not need a dentist for four years but as
07:04:00soon as we'd move...Anyway, the dentist, the first time I went there said you're
new in town etc., and pretty soon he said "do you play bridge" and I said "yes,
indeed we do" and he and his wife liked to play bridge. We developed a nice
friendship but that was not my introduction to the League of Women Voters but it
was probably something equivalent to that. Somebody from the League of Women
Voters, when they found out here's a Ph.D. in Political Science and they had a
vacancy on their State Board in sort of a civil liberties subject matter, this
was 1952, Joe McCarthy was riding high in the State Senate, Wisconsin's
contribution. One publication the League of Women Voters had out was called "To
07:05:00Bigotry No Sanction" and it really is a ...I stumbled across it recently among
some other stuff that I had. One of their items, I never even belonged to the
League of Women Voters wherever I had lived.
MA: This was your first time?
KC: Yes, and I only did to serve on the State Board and went to meetings or
conferences whatever and made presentations on that subject. I met a lot of
wonderful people through that League experience in St. Louis.
MA: How did you like the experience?
KC: I liked it very much. I was ready for, in the first place Hank's work did
not give us any kind of associations or companionship or meet any people. He was
out in the hinterlands enrolling students in the private home study
07:06:00correspondence course and leads would come in through advertising. He would have
to track down these leads and drive to heck and gone in his area of Missouri,
sometimes in the St. Louis area but more often in the hinterlands. He didn't get
to meet, you know when you're on a faculty or if you work for a firm...
MA: There were no colleagues to bring home.
KC: That's right. However, I did get in touch with the League of Women Voters
people, as I say I can't remember but I met and developed some good friends in
the St. Louis particularly suburban area and through the State Board. I stayed
on the State Board for as long as we stayed in St. Louis.
07:07:00
MA: Which was four years?
KC: Yes, and in the midst of those four years David was born in September of
1953. Just about the time we were ready to leave St. Louis, well we didn't know
we were ready to leave, that's when Hank went to St. Louis University and
brought home an application form because I was obviously getting antcy. David
was almost two then and I wanted to be doing something more than I was doing. We
did have a babysitter, Mrs. Dendler, who was a widowed woman in her fifties who
was the only person we every had to stay with the kids when we were in St.
Louis. She was lovely with the kids. She thought David was the smartest little
07:08:00baby she had ever met in her life.
MA: And you probably agreed
KC: Yes, probably. Anyway, he was crazy about her.
The reason we moved from St. Louis, I believe I already mentioned earlier
something about Laura Ingalls Wilder (she had nothing to do with our leaving St.
Louis, I just wanted not to forget) Hank was offered a promotion with the
American School in the New York office. His predecessor, who was regional
director for New York and New England, dropped dead at his desk. It was a very
stressful, maybe a lot of private enterprise where you have to make another buck
is stressful, so Hank was offered this job which meant he was in charge of all
07:09:00personnel, hiring, training, firing, for nine states and also for advertising,
for developing the advertising strategy and deciding when and in what media to
put what kind of an ad. His office was in Manhattan which meant a move from St.
Louis to New York. I suggested that, he went ahead to find a place for us to
live before I took off with the kids, that he get in touch with my aunt and a
couple of cousins who lived on Staten Island. This was my father's only sibling
and her two sons, one was a physician and one a dentist and they all lived on
Staten Island and I had visited them a number of times over the years. He did
and found a house on Staten Island where there was fresh air and green grass and
07:10:00open space.
MA: How nice!
KC: Yes it was nice. He described it to me over the phone and I said fine go
ahead and we have an address to come to. He had driven out. I had a second car
in St. Louis because he was gone with the family car all the time, so we had
this elcheapoo used car but it was adequate. I sold it for $100 the guy gave me
cash, a $100 bill for the car. That one I parted with without tears; Usually I
had a terrible time parting with cars. The model A was just a wrench, from
Shanks Village when we sold that.
In any case, we did move to New York. Once again, I was not employed and I
07:11:00wasn't thinking about employment. Janet was born in New York on Staten Island.
MA: It's no wonder you weren't thinking about employment!
KC: But again, when she got to be about two, Hank went to Wagner College on
Staten Island, I mean we talked a bit and he would say "aren't you wanting to
get back in the classroom?" It wasn't because we needed money; his income from
that New York job was more than we ever though we would ever earn or have.
MA: How nice for you.
KC: It was nice. So for a few years we had an adequate income.
MA: He knew that you needed to go back to work. Did you know that?
KC: I had inklings, I didn't know it as strongly as he did, but maybe I was just
never as fast to move on an inkling. Hank always you know if there was a repair
07:12:00needed in the house, he would have it fixed almost before I noticed that it
needed to be done. Unlike a lot of husbands who need to be nagged and coaxed he
was always.... and that's the way he did everything.
MA: A few steps ahead?
KC: If he needed a new shirt or socks or something he got them that day, he
didn't put them on a list to do.We talked for close to two years about leaving
Staten Island and leaving that job before we really made the firm decision,
because it wasn't our kind of life.
MA: Were you in suburbia, is that what it was basically?
KC: Yes, but it's even more than suburbia, well maybe not even more, but we
lived on the hill where the rich folks lived and in the country club.
MA: That's right. That's the country club you wouldn't allow the children to
07:13:00participate in.
KC: Well that we wouldn't join, yes. Here Sara was going to the public school
and I was active in the PTA but there was sort of a rift between the rich people
up on the hill and the common folk down in the valley.
MA: And that wasn't a lifestyle you were used to?
KC: That's right, and then there was no political activity, in its broadest
sense, not only party politics, and community activity would consist of a dinner
party or a bridge party. One of the saving graces for me personally were our
neighbors across the street, the DuBois (I don't know if I've mentioned them
before or not). I viewed them as surrogate grandparents for our children. He was
07:14:00retired from the Yale Medical School. Mr. DuBois was an engineer who was
employed by the Medical School to develop new equipment for use in medical
research or medical practice which was very interesting. Theodora McCormick
DuBois was a writer who published half a dozen books. They had a big loom in
their house; he loomed draperies and throws and things and were just wonderful
people. They would have us over on their verandah, have me and the kids for
afternoon tea or morning coffee or whatever and came to our house a lot. They
gave us some intellectual life which is not to say that they were just
dunderheads living around us, they were not at all. A couple behind us, the
07:15:00Nachburs from Switzerland who had a three acre garden and hired two or three
gardners were lovely people and very interesting. But there was no activity, the
kind of activity that Madison just absolutely is filled with.
MA: The energy of social change.
KC: If there were political issues in the community, I was never aware of them.
I didn't know
MA: I want to digress a moment with regard to that because when you were in St.
Louis, this is the time that Joe McCarthy was really coming into the public eye,
what was that like? Was there talk among you and your friends on an ongoing
basis about this?
KC: Well there was among some of the people I met through the League of Women
Voters. Eleanor and Herman Kaplow and some other folks that they introduced us
07:16:00to so when we had time with these people, yes.
MA: We know historically what a danger he was. Did people realize at the time
what was going on?
KC: Yes, some people did. Those who were civil libertarians.
MA: It depends so often on what the press is printing and what the radio was saying.
KC: And of course by the time we were in St. Louis, we were there from 1952 to
1956, it was after 1956 wasn't it that the army hearings.....
MA: I believe so.
KC: I believe that we watched some of those when we lived on Staten Island which
was 1956 to 1960.
MA: So you were on Staten Island when the hearings were going on, but yet there
07:17:00wasn't an organization in your community around that?
KC: Oh no. That's part of what we were talking about when I was on the State
Board of the League of Women Voters in Missouri.
MA: So that was an issue the League of Women Voters addressed?
KC: Yes.
MA: Okay, let's talk about your move from Staten Island to Wisconsin.
KC: In 1960. We actually moved in August but made the decision six months at
least before that. Hank had some time persuading the American School, his
07:18:00employeer, that he really and truly was going to leave the job. It was regarded
as one of the plum assignments in that national organization or business and
people didn't belieave that he really meant that he was going to leave. He gave
them sufficient advance notice that they could hire someone to replace him and
that he would even be there to train the person or help with the transition. In
our conversations at home we were trying to decide, we knew we wanted to leave
New York City and wanted to leave the rat race of that kind of employment but
where to go was a question and the world was wide open to us. We hadn't
07:19:00familiarity with a great many places and neither one of us particulary liked
cold weather, so of course we wound up in Madison. With all the criteria we had
in mind, the one place that we were familiar with that seemed to meet them was
Madison. So we did make the decision to come here.
MA: And it was a mutual decision, you wanted to come as much as he did?
KC: Oh yes. Of course for me it was coming back home to Wisconsin. Hanks brother
lived here in Madison, that was no special inducement to Hank although he had
liked his brief experience here in graduate school. In my case it was getting
very close to my parents and my two brothers and their families which I liked. I
think that was part of the inducement but I think it was just the general spirit
07:20:00and the political environment of Madison that was the most compelling reason for
this choice.
MA: For you?
KC: For me and Hank. We did just what we had done when we moved from St. Louis
to New York, Hank went on ahead and looked for a place to live. When we moved to
Staten Island we both thought we wanted a modern, one story house, in fact the
one we did live in for four years was so close to a cardboard model we had
played with for a number of years, our dream house, that it was just kind of
uncanny. We had loved that house and the garden, the people from whom we bought
it had planted beautiful things. I suppose my love of the garden was more than
Hank's because the mowing was so enormous. It was a corner lot, 200 feet
07:21:00frontage and 200 feet on the side, so that was a lot of grass! The neighborhood
kind of required one to manicure and keep things looking nice. One of the things
we wanted when we moved to Madison was what Hank called a "postage size" yard.
We both decided by that time that we wanted kind of an old fashion, two story
house with a small yard and a neighborhood that felt like a neighborhood. He
came on ahead and was making inquiries. He went to the school board office, the
main office of the Madison schools, to inquire about elementary schools and
07:22:00which ones were good, etc. and while he was there someone said "if you're
looking for a place to live, a member of the School Board had a house that isn't
for sale but they've been talking about needing to move into something smaller
and one story because of her health problems." They referred Hank to this house
and to Mr. and Mrs. Samp. They hadn't told anyone, in fact they hadn't decided
to sell their house, but he came here, explained and then telephoned me and said
he was, because they agreed that was a good idea and why not sell it, so he
telephoned me from this house, I was in Staten Island, and said he was with Mr.
and Mrs. Ed Samp. I said "you may tell the Samps that I once had Thanksgiving
dinner in that house as their guest." They of course didn't recognize my married
07:23:00name at all but one of their daughters was a sorority sister of mine and had
invited me here. That made it kind of fun.
MA: Full circle.
KC: Yes. We agreed to buy the house for $20,000, it is now assessed at $82,000,
which just showes you what inflation has done. Ed Samp told us not long after
this that when he had told his friends the next day that he had just sold his
house for $20,000 one of them said that he would have given him $25,000 in cash
if he had knows he wanted to sell! We did really get a bargain and we have just
loved this house. It isn't exactly two story, it has a full basement and a full
stand up attic in addition to two full stories. It was just the right size for us.
07:24:00
We moved in August. I flew with the kids. Hank had driven, I can't even remember
who did what but when we moved from St. Louise to Staten Island I has spent
weeks, Hank went on ahead to start his job and find us a place to live, and I
had been going to the grocery store and the liquor store bringing home cardboard
boxes to pack stuff and spent weeks deciding how many dish towels I did or
didn't need and packed the others. The day the movers came to take care of
pictures and mirrors and such things and finish up the packing I thought the
moving man was going to cry. He said "Oh lady" I had 30 or 40 boxes all tied up
and labeled, he said "I'll bet you spent weeks doing this!" I said "yes, I did"
07:25:00and he said "I could have done the whole thing in an hour if you'd just left
it!" I learned that lesson! I don't intend to move very many times but when we
moved from New York we cleared with the movers first what did we need to do or
didn't need to do and they said "leave things on hangers in the closet, leave
stuff in your dresser drawers, just don't bother to monkey with any of that
stuff," so I didn't! I've advised other people who were moving a whole household
to find out if they should go through that awful ordeal so unnecessarily. In any
case, we moved in here in August. It was Janet's third birthday the day we moved
in. While we were unloading stuff here a neighbor from two doors down came
07:26:00knocking on the door, I suppose Janet had announced it was her birthday or
someone had, and they brought a picnic table, put it up in our driveway and
brought a birthday cake and ice cream and gathered all the little kids in the
neighborhood and that was our introduction.
MA: How lovely!
KC: It was lovely and by the end of the week, the neighbors across the street,
the Fitzgerald's, this had been arranged before we ever got here, but their
backyard was the site of a neighborhood picnic of some kind so we were included
in that and got to meet everyone on the block right away. It was just friendly
from the very start.
MA: When you came here, did either of you have a job?
KC: No. We owned two house, we hadn't sold our house on Staten Island, had no
job and assumed that Hank would find a job immediately, either with the
07:27:00University Extension, doing something similar to what he had done with the
American School, or with the state service because he had had a lot of various
administrative experience and had a masters degree and all of his work for a
Ph.D. The state of Wisconsin had a freeze on hiring which lasted for awhile and
whoever he visited with at University Extension was not, either they had no
vacancies or they weren't interested in hiring him, whichever. We didn't worry
about it for a little while but our meager savings began to dwindle. Hank was
looking around for other things and took a series of jobs that he knew were
temporary, at least they were not things he wanted to stay with forever, they
were a miscellaneous three or four different things and finally he met Pat Lucy,
07:28:00who subsequently was elected Governor of Wisconsin in 1970 and then became
Ambassador to Mexico during the Carter years, and ran for vice president with
John Anderson as a third party person later on. At any rate, Pat Lucy was very
active and important in the Democratic Party in Wisconsin. Hank met him in that
connection but also told him that he was sure looking for a job. Pat Lucy
finally said "why don't you learn the real estate racket?" He hired Hank or took
him on his staff, which was a fairly sizeable staff, and there is no salary
connected with that, its total commission, so the incumbents have to fish around
07:29:00and list properties and then also sell, if not the one they've listed sell one
somebody else has listed. He did that, in fact that became his permanent employment.
MA: That's what he did the rest of his life?
KC: That's right. After a few years working with the Lucy Real Estate Firm he
decided he really would like to become a broker and have his own outfit or his
own office at least and be self-employed because then his hours could be his own
and anything he listed or sold any commission would be all his and not something
he had to split with the office and he has just always like to be his own boss.
07:30:00I suppose that is something that is quite a human desire.
MA: But he was able to do it.
KC: Yes he was. He opened a small little office just over here on Regent and
Allen just three blocks from here so it was convenient. One of the two
extravagances of his forty years married to me at least was the time he bought a
Cadillac with great guilt feelings and explanations to himself more than to me,
I didn't question what he was doing, and it wasn't an exorbitantly expensive car
but it was a fancier car than we had ever had. He made the point that the car
was his office more than his little hole in the wall and that taking clients or
prospective clients around in the car was important and that if he looked
07:31:00impoverished they would assume he was and that it would be good for his
business. He had all of this rationale which amused me that he was explaining to
himself that it was really a legitimate thing to do.
MA: In a sense it sounds like you were his political conscience also.
KC: Well I don't know what kind of a conscience. His other extravagance, in as
much as I've mentioned that there were two, was our sound system which is now I
suppose fairly antiquated but our record and cassette player and the speakers.
He wanted to have something that sounded good.
MA: State of the art at the time.
KC: It doesn't look expensive, I mean the equipment isn't the fanciest to look
at but he wanted really good fidelity in the sound and so he did.
07:32:00
MA: In the meanwhile, what were you doing? Did you feel an urge to become
employed also then since his salary could not be counted on?
KC: I felt a real urge to bring in some money and that seemed more urgent to me
than the fact that I was restless and not doing something more intellectual or
challenging. In fact, I began my return to the teaching field before Hank became
a realtor, while he was still in that temporary job stage. We came here in the
fall of 1960 so it was sometime in 1961, late summer of 1961 that I had a phone
call from Edgewood College. Have I talked about that?
07:33:00
MA: No you haven't.
KC: The president of Edgewood College, which is just a few blocks from here, a
private Catholic girls school run by the Dominican Sisters, the president, whose
name was Sister Nona, telephoned me and said that somebody had told them I was
in town and they were desperate for someone to teach economics at the college
starting the following week, well starting in the fall term which was only about
a week away. They had just heard from the nun who was supposed to come back that
she wasn't for some reason. Of course I was looking forward to that fall term
because Janet was enrolled in a nursery school out at the Unitarian meeting
house, five afternoons a week and I would have two hours all to myself for the
07:34:00first time since before David was born. Really I suppose for the first time
since I had Sara. I'd had these lovely visions of taking the car for two hours
and whether I just went to the zoo or the arboretum or went shopping or window
shopping or came home and took a nap I just had gone through every one of those
things that I would be doing during those two hours.
MA: I think most women can relate to this story!
KC: I went over for the interview with Sister Nona, in fact I told her on the
telephone that my major was political science, not economics. She I guess knew
that but in any case over I went. We had a nice interview; I liked her and I was
07:35:00impressed with her. Then I said, toward the close of this interview, I said "I
don't really know if I'm wanting to do this or not" because the class was
scheduled for 10:00 in the morning, three days a week, I said "my daughter is
enrolled in nursery school from 1:00 until 3:00" or whatever those hours were
"so if I'm over here from 10:00 till 11:00 plus at both ends of that that means
I have to get a babysitter for her" which would more than eat up the pittance
that Edgewood was offering to pay.
MA: The time involved.
KC: Yes. But I underestimated Sister Nona. She said "I think possibly that can
be taken care of, I'll phone you in two hours" or whatever time she said. She
had not only rearranged the class to coincide with Janet's nursery hours but
07:36:00that meant shuffling the schedules for all the students who were enrolled in
that class so that they wouldn't have conflicts. She had done all of that so I
taught. That was Introductory Economics and just as at Olivet College I taught
courses that I had never taught before and some that I had never taken, at least
I had taken economics. I had a fairly strong minor in economics so that it
wasn't a totally foreign field to me.
MA: As you look back on that teaching experience, how was it?
KC: I loved it!
MA: And it was all women this time which was a new experience for you.
KC: And a Catholic institution was a new experience and a private, small school was.
MA: What were the differences compared to what you'd experienced so far?
KC: One of the things that I liked best, and maybe it also was the right time
07:37:00experience for me, was the peace and beauty of the institution itself. The
physical, the art work and it was quiet. I would run Janet out to the nursery
school and then had half an hour before the class began of just actual peaceful
setting. That I liked very much and the students were excessively respectful of
their teachers. I'm not sure, that was new to me certainly, it was a different
kind of experience. They did their homework
MA: Was this a rather expensive college to attend?
KC: No, I don't think so. I have forgotten what the... It was very small. I was
07:38:00there for just one semester.
During the week after I had made this arrangement with Sister Nona I had a call
from someone at University Extension with a similar kind of story. The person
who was to teach American Government in their night class had just sent a cable
from Germany that he wasn't going to be there. Once again, someone told someone
that I was in town and would probably be available. Of course American
Government I had taught at Purdue as a graduate assistant here and would have
been able to
MA: So for one you were truly in your field there.
KC: And the timing worked out fine there because that was an evening class that
met twice a week.
MA: So you did that at the same time you were doing the Edgewood Class in Economics.
07:39:00
KC: That's right. I had preparations in two different fields and that was kind
of I even enjoyed the preparation that I would do here at home to take a little
of the rust off and update illustrations, etc. The evening class had more male
students than female.
MA: Were they older students?
KC: They probably were a little bit older than the Edgewood students, although
there weren't any super mature students. I enjoyed that class. We did a lot of
flexible, I think I did mention Shawn McGrath and his experience when we were
talking about teaching styles
MA: When he brought the article is.
KC: Yes. I enjoyed some other things. One of the students for example came in
with a guitar one evening. We didn't play and sing in class although that may
07:40:00have been fun to do, but I made some mention of Woody Guthrie who had been a
guest in our house when we lived in Shanks Village, he had been there for a
political doings. One of these young men could hardly believe this!
MA: Well I can hardly believe it! I want to hear the story too .
KC: I said "Oh yes, and I have a nice little sort of paperback book of Woody
Guthrie's songs" I couldn't remember whether he had signed it for us or not, but
this young man was so excited so I lent him the book and even just to touch it
was exciting for him. That was one thing that I remember. Then I remember being
a little flexible about the, in those days the University semester ended after
Christmas. It started a little bit later and then there would be a short winter
07:41:00break, two weeks instead of the current four weeks, and then kids would have to
come back after Christmas and do exams or term papers or whatever. I discussed
that with the class and said I didn't think there was any hard and fast rule, I
always believe in not asking about rules.
MA: So that you won't consciously break them.
KC: Yes. But that if we go the required number of hours in I think that's the
only requirement, not when we have the hours in and I wondered if they would
rather wind it up before Christmas by putting in an extra half-hour each time we
met. I had figured it out, my arithmetic is great with old math, how we could
get it in, and they were all just as delighted with the idea as I was, just to
know that when they left for Christmas that would be out of the way! That was
07:42:00one little flexibility that we had. Then when the final exam was scheduled,
which was the last class period, two of the people were absent and somebody in
the class informed me that the father of one of them had died that day or the
day before and I've forgotten what the reason was that the second one was
absent. I telephoned each one of these students, after the exam, and asked if
they would like to schedule it at our mutual convenience taking the exam. In the
first place they couldn't believe that anyone was offering them, they assumed
that they would have to flunk the course.
MA: And that you would call them, that you would make the overture!
KC: Which I did. I had them come here then Hank didn't have to take care of the
kids and I didn't have to hire a babysitter so they came here and took the exam
07:43:00on the dining room table and I made hot chocolate of coffee or something. It
didn't seem a bit unusual to me to do that but it certainly was unusual from
their standpoint.
MA: Humanizing education, has that been important to you all the way through?
KC: Sure.
MA: I'm curious about Edgewood College. We look at all women institutions now
and see that it gave women strength and the ability to go out into the mixed
world and perhaps function a little more effectively. I realize you weren't
there very long but did you see any of this? It must have been interesting to
observe how women interact when there are only women vs. the coeducational
institutions you've been a part of.
KC: I don't know that I had a great opportunity to observe or certainly even to
07:44:00reflect but, a little bit later on, in 1968, Alverno College, which then was run
and still is by the School Sisters of St. Francis in Milwaukee, invited me to be
on their Board of Trustees when they moved for the first time from a Catholic to
a lay Board, not totally nuns, etc. I was elected by the rest of the Board to be
chair of the Board, actually by default. (I may have told you that story--I'll
stick the story in now quickly and say that I did have much more observation
opportunities at Alverno because I spent quite a bit of time there during those
four years when I chaired the Board. Gerda Learner is familiar with Alverno and
07:45:00with the president there Sister Joelle Reed.) When this lay Board met for the
first time to elect officers we had some kind of discussion.The first thing that
we talked about was that in as much as this was a women's college and we wanted
to continue to purvey that image that probably the chair of the Board should be
a woman so people agreed on that. Then there were quite a few men on the Board
of Trustees in fact their current Board I think has many more men than women on
the Board of Trustees. The next criterion was that because they were moving to a
lay Board instead of having an institution run by nuns, they thought it would be
good to have the chair of the Board be a lay person. Well that right away, if it
07:46:00was going to be a female and a lay person dwindled it down to two of us. Then
the third though that people put forth was that this person either live in
Milwaukee or close enough to put a lot of time in during the early years. The
other woman lived in Ohio and I lived in Madison. As I say, by the process of
elimination if not by default.
MA: You were on the Board for four years?
KC: Yes. I chaired it all four years. When I was first invited by the outgoing
president, St. Augustine, who was getting on in years and who in fact retired
just very shortly establishing this new Board. In fact, at our first meeting,
she announced that she would retire so that our first order of business would be
07:47:00to find a new president for the college. I regard one of my primary
contributions to the women's movement from my role of Chair of the Board I
absolutely insisted that Sister Joelle Reed take the presidency of the college,
almost over her dead body, but certainly over her very firm objections that she
wasn't the person for it. After we looked at the finances of the institution we
knew that we couldn't afford somebody from the outside that we would have to pay
a salary and provide living and a car and all of these things. We didn't get
much argument from the nuns on that score, that for starters at least we would
have to, but the question of which one and so Frank Zeidler who had been the
socialist mayor of Milwaukee and I were the two who did most of the interviewing
and talking with, you know kind of factions or some who were more progressive
07:48:00than others.
MA: What were you looking for specifically?
KC: I don't know that I had ever, just somebody who could pull the thing
together, someone who was terribly bright and energetic and the fact that I knew
you see Sister Joelle and Sister Austin Dougherty had been on the First National
Board of NOW. That's where we got really acquainted, that was in 1966, and that
probably accounted for my being invited to be on this Board.
MA: You knew then that she was a progressive woman.
KC: Yes. I think she was afraid that some of the more conservative nuns might
not be as totally cooperative and they needed everything. Right now that
institution has received national and international plaudits as being the best
07:49:00undergraduate teaching institution, not only the best in the midwest, a Carnegie
study, I think that's the one, has listed, evaluated and ranked what they
regarded the five top institutions in the country for undergraduated teaching in
this order, Harvard, Chicago, Alverno, and one of the schools in the New York
State system maybe Brooklyn or something and then I've forgotten the
fifth--maybe it's one in North or South Carolina. They've had all kinds of and
it's under the leadership of not only Sister Joelle
MA: Is she still president?
KC: Oh yes, twenty years later. So I did have opportunities to observe first
07:50:00hand, and then I read a lot about, or used to, about the products of [unclear].
MA: What do you think, that was the question, what happens for women in that
environment do you think in contrast to coed institutions?
KC: I think when it's a really first rate institution which is conscious of what
they can do for women, and I don't know if this is true of all single sex
institutions, that there is the total opportunity for women not to be second
class in any sense and to develop a confidence and an expertise in a range of things.
MA: Do you think it has any negative affects?
KC: I don't know whether the unreality, I suppose for some individuals it may,
07:51:00who may suffer some reality when they get into the outer world but I think a
well run institution anticipates that and wards it off, having opportunities for
young women to experience the real world while they are in school.
MA: That's what you mean by the institution having a conscious kind of direction.
KC: And certainly the evidence of women who have achieved a lot of things from
first rate institutions bears out a lot of the pluses. I felt very badly during
that period when the because a lot of the men's institutions didn't want to
07:52:00discriminate and keep out women and they became two sex or integrated
institutions and a lot of the women's institutions did the same thing. I felt
the circumstances were totally different. Women were kept out of the men's
institutions which is why they had to start their own institutions to start
with. I once made a presentation at the National Association of Governing Boards
of Institutions of Higher Learning on the subject of the role of single sex
institutions for women. I can remember saying that I remembered the words of
some political scientist, whose name escapes me at this instance but his words
07:53:00do not escape me, who said that "as a national policy isolation was not a
policy, it was a predicament". I realize that women's single sex institutions
were a predicament to begin with but then had become a policy. Anyway, I didn't
see any reason why women's colleges to open up to men. I know Alverno College
had a couple of suits brought against them by men who wanted to enroll in their
nursing program. I can't remember if they let them in or had to go to court or what.
MA: But it is still a women only institution?
KC: Yes. They have a lot of men on the faculty and men on the Board of Trustees
but it is a school for women. They have developed a whole system of competency
07:54:00evaluation and it also is an acknowledged and admittedly feminist institution.
In those very early days the first thing they knew they had to do was raise the
consciousness of the faculty. I sat in on some of, in fact I helped to plan some
of the very early faculty training, we didn't call them consciousness raising
sessions, but they still continue to go on at a much more sophisticated level so
that every faculty person and every course of study not only knows this
competence, no matter what kind of a class a student is enrolled in it is
07:55:00expected that they learn how to analyze and question and to be articulate in
writing as well as speaking. Each incoming freshman does a video tape of herself
making a presentation and then at least one a year, maybe beginning and ending
of every year they are there, then they critique themselves and have others help
with the critiquing just to see how they can stand in front of somebody and do something.
MA: And their competency is evaluated vis-a-vie what they came in with in a sense.
KC: I suppose, but that wouldn't be universally so. Some improvemnt would be
great but I think they have to be able to do more than just improve. There is a
bottom line below which they can't fall.
07:56:00
MA: How were your students at Edgewood College? Do you remember, was it a good class?
KC: It was alright, I don't remember that it was anything spectacular.
MA: Did you ever have the urge to teach at Alverno College? Would you have liked that?
KC: I think I might have liked it. In fact, I had the urge to become a School
Sister of St. Francis! One part of me used to envy that life, the single
mindedness of not having to be deflected with other kinds of responsibilities.
MA: The solitude of it.
KC: I don't witness a lot of solitude down there but I sure witness a lot of
serious, thoughtful, inventive kinds things. Hard work! They work very hard. I
07:57:00stayed at Edgewood College only one semester because that was the spring of 1962
that I met Martha Peterson and asked her what the University of Wisconsin was
doing in continuing education for women.
I forgot to even mention that before I began teaching over at Edgewood and even
during that period, some of the women in the neighborhood were earning a little
money by, across the street from me lived a family named Trump and he had
something to do with SAT or some testing of some kind and so he and his wife
07:58:00employed some of the neighborhood women to do some, I don't know if it was
grading or clerical stuff and so when I moved into the neighborhood the women
asked me to join them, which I did, and earned a few bucks and it was a sociable
kind of way. I'm remembering this now because I've had an opportunity to see
Justice Shirley Abrahamson from the Supreme Court and during that period she was
putting together a volume in her role in the Law School, as a Professor of Law,
she was sending to each of the fifty states and trying to get copies of their
state constitution. Incidentally, lots of states didn't have in one place as one document.
MA: Because there had been so many amendments and things?
KC: Yes, and then that would be filed someplace else and nobody ever put it
together so that was a fascinating project. She read a little item in the paper
07:59:00about this women at home work group here on Eaton Ridge.
MA: And you worked as a group together?
KC: Yes, sometimes two and two. What we did didn't require or couldn't use more
than two people on a piece of paper, however, four or six of us were involved in
it. So Shirley Abrahamson thought this might be a good group to proofread what
she was doing with these state constitutions. She would tote the stuff down and
I kind of became the primary proofread I guess and it wasn't long before I was
really doing some editing as well as proofreading because I would find
inconsistencies from one place to another. I was editing less of Shirley's work
than whatever had come from a state that didn't have their act together. It was
08:00:00fascinating and especially fascinating for me as a political scientist to see
some of the ancient history in state constitutions.
MA: Did you think about women as you were looking at this?
KC: I couldn't avoid thinking about women! The prolog or the introduction to
quite a few state constitutions initially had said citizenship is not available
to however they phrased it --to slaves, prisoners, idiots, women and --we were
right among this great group of incompetents who couldn't be citizens. More
states had that kind of prohibition that almost that didn't, I don't know what
the numbers were.
MA: Was that for you what Gloria Steinham calls a "click"?
KC: I don't know if it really was but
08:01:00
MA: Did you have knowledge of this prior to this time?
KC: I knew of course that women were not citizens in the...
MA: What puzzles me is that you personally don't appear to have experienced that
kind of, so far what you've told me about your life I don't see you
acknowledging discrimination. Do you know what I'm talking about?
KC: I don't think that was a "click" for me but every time I've heard women put
together or lumped together, the state protective legislation that applied to
women and minors, I used to gag when I'd have to say women and minors because it
is such a derogatory thought.
MA: Part of an infantile group.
08:02:00
KC: Sure.
MA: It sounds to me that what I am hearing is an intellectual awareness always
even if you personally didn't experience this.
KC: I remember now the reason I stopped teaching at Edgewood College was that I
had by the time second semester was due Martha Peterson had be head up this
project on the Madison campus in Continuing Education for Women, for mature
women. I remember saying this to Sister Nona when I had to not accept her
request to stay there for a second semester. I told her I was going to start
this and she said "Well I think it's just as important for you to continue the
education of immature women here at Edgewood!" But of course I didn't do that.
MA: Well, let's hop back to the state constitutions for a minute. You were
08:03:00editing those and proofreading, what came of it all?
KC: Well, this group--I think I learned from a couple of people in the
University Extension about the continuing education for women, which turned out
to be a movement
[break in recording]
There was publicity in the local paper about this gang of women on Eaton Ridge,
it just made an interesting feature. They took photographs of our kids hanging
around while we were doing this work. A couple of people at the university and
University Extension read this and though aha here are some possible people to
08:04:00do things. I had a conversation then with I think it was Ted Shannon and Harold
Motross whom I had not really met so they were simply names to me and mentioned
the Minnesota Plan and would I have any interest. I didn't know if I had any
interest and I particularly have any interest in University Extension at the
time so I didn't pursue that with them but I did go to a Mortarboard breakfast
which is an annual event on the Madison campus. I had been president of the
Mortarboard Chapter my senior year as an undergraduate so I was invited to go
and thought I would. Martha Peterson was the Dean of Women on the campus at the
time; she subsequently became president of Iron College and of Beloit College
and is not retired. She was at this Mortarboard breakfast so I introduced myself
08:05:00to her and said I would love to talk to her about the Minnesota Plan and asked
what the University of Wisconsin was doing that might be related to that.
MA: What is the Minnesota Plan?
KC: That was the name they gave their continuing education for women program. I
don't know if it still uses that title or not but that's what it as known as for
a long time. Virginia Senders was the woman who headed it up at the beginning in
any case. Martha Peterson hadn't heard of the Minnesota Plan and asked me to
come into her office in a week or so and tell her what I knew about it at least.
From that time on, all summer long, I was kind of a volunteer in Martha
Peterson's office. She would have staff meetings once a week or every other week
08:06:00or something and ask me to come and sit in on the staff meetings while we kicked
around the notion of whether Wisconsin ought to be doing anything for mature women.
The whole idea of continuing education for mature women seemed an absolute
natural to me. Again, I was not conscious that I knew all kinds of women whose
talents were not being used. This was before Betty Friedan's book came out, but
I knew how my own uneasiness or restlessness would develop over those time
periods that I have already mentioned.
MA: The Elizabeth Katie Stanton Syndrome.
KC: It was getting close to fall and I just went at the invitation of the Dean
of Women to these staff meetings and we talked a lot about how to decide what to
08:07:00do or if to do anything. We decided to have a survey of people in the Madison area.
MA: Of older women?
KC: Yes, and see how much interest there might be and what kind of interest. We
didn't have time to do a real we put together a very good questionnaire and we
sent it to, and this is a reflection of the times--1961, to the wives of
university faculty, the wives of lawyers and the wives of doctors. The mailing
lists were available. These were largely educated people who might have an
affinity toward something the university was doing. A very elitest kind of
initial outreach. We got a very high return for any kind of a questionnaire.
08:08:00Some of us realized it was high because some of these women might have thought
it would reflect badly on their husband if they didn't send it back in. Whether
that was true or not, we got an enormous return of questionnaires. We made one
mistake on the questionnaire, as a final question we said "Would you be willing
to have an individual interview?" because we thought we might want to follow up
and have a face-to-face with some of these people. Four hundred said yes! The
phone began to ring "When can I have my appointment for an individual interview?
I'm dying to be doing something!" Of course nobody was set up to conduct any
interviews. So it was very soon we decided we couldn't do individual interviews
08:09:00with hundreds of people.
MA: How many, were there two of you doing this at this point?
KC: Oh no --Martha Peterson had a whole staff in the Dean of Women's office, Pat
, Debbie Townsend, Ann Topum, Ann Rogers and there were a couple of others.
MA: So seven or either people. What did you do?
KC: We thought that because we can't really, and the other people on the staff
had full-time responsibilities in the office, and we would have just a special
part of a staff meeting to talk about this each time, decided that maybe we
should have a conference and invite all the people who sent back their
questionnaires and probably invite Virginia Centers to come from Minneapolis and
08:10:00tell us what they were doing there and how they were doing it. So several of us,
I went along with Martha and I don't remember who else, to visit with Fred
Harvey Harrington who was the president of the university at the time and tell
him what we were up to and what we wanted to do about the conference, and to ask
if we could have a few hundred dollars to put on the conference. The answer was
yes to all of that and he sounded quite interested in it. As we were leaving,
walking down the hall he yelled "Say Martha, have you got somebody on this
fulltime now?" She said, "I'll take care of that." That was not one of the
things we went to request at all but it was a wonderful
MA: So he was saying he would finance a fulltime position to be working on
KC: Well at least to draft a plan and to
MA: Wonderful! The universities were not hurting for enrollment at this time
08:11:00--now they are more so they are looking to and kind innovative program, or many
are. As I recall, enrollment was really up in 1961, so I'm thinking that it was
simply that it was a good idea and he was responding to a good idea.
KC: Yes, he was responding and I have subsequently come to know that he has a
lot of progressive inclinations. I really didn't know much about him then, I
don't know that I know a lot about him.
MA: Did you have the conference?
KC: We not only had the conference but I came home from that day and said to
Hank, told him what had just happened and I said "Oh boy, I sure wish Martha
would ask me to be the one to do this." I would have been terribly disappointed
08:12:00if she hadn't. That evening she called me and asked would I be willing to
undertake this. It wasn't a fulltime, long-range thing but to develop a plan for
the university, I think it was a five month appointment. I said "I'll have to
think about it" and hung up the phone and told Hank what the conversation was
and he said "What do you mean, you have to think about it?" I said, "Well if
Janet were just in kindergarten now, then she'd be taken care of for half the
day and we would only have to worry about the other half." He said, "This isn't
next year, Janet is not in kindergarten, the job is now, it's tailor made for
08:13:00you, call Martha back and tell her you've thought it over now!"
MA: Was it just a given that Hank would take up the slack with the kids if you
weren't able to?
KC: No I don't think that it was totally, I mean he said we would work it out.
MA: One way or another, whether it was a babysitter or Hank.
KC: We did and of course he did schedule his real estate work always, that was
one of the reasons that he really wanted to have his own office so that he could
be here when I on a daily basis he would be here when the kids came in from
school in the afternoon and then schedule appointments for 5:00 and later when I
would be back.
MA: So you didn't feel guilt? Is that what I'm hearing that because of his
response, it's very common I think for women to feel quilty about what they're
08:14:00leaving behind, and his response certainly must have not allowed that to happen.
KC: He had always been a participating parent with the kids and a homemaker. We
did cooking together, we did have somewhat of a division of labor, I don't know
if one could say it was along gender lines, but he was good at mean and gravy
and I was good at salads and desserts when we had them so that's kind of the way
our cooking got divided. From the moment our first infant came home from the
hospital he was more comfortable about changing diapers and bathing a tiny
little baby, I was not only all thumbs but so afraid that I would break the baby
or whatever. Even though he didn't know anymore about it than I did he was more
08:15:00of a risk taker perhaps, but in any case it needed to be done and I don't know
if he was as deft as I was at it but at least he was willing.
MA: That is very significant.
KC: Over the years he also was better.... I've always been a very poor nurse.
I'm excellent with the kids when they're recovering, I mean I'm wonderful about
pulling shades down or up, bringing them a cold drink or rubbing backs, but if
they're in pain or have a wound then I'm, if necessary, if I'm the only one
around then I can and do cope with it but the kids learned very young that if we
were both there to go to Hank for that kind of emergency care. Of course, I made
08:16:00the most of that, if any of the kids would wake up in the night with a stomach
ache or feeling sick to their stomach they would call "daddy, daddy" and I would
let daddy go and I'd be so glad they were calling for him. It was always a
partnership in all kinds ways.
MA: So you accepted then without guilt the Continuing
KC: Well I can't say I was guilt free but I did learn fairly well that partly I
had to do what I was telling women to do when I began to--We had the conference
and then I drew up a plan and then I was put on the faculty and I opted for
three-quarter time instead of full time so that I could leave early if I needed
08:17:00to. I got into some very bad habits of bringing work home so I put three-quarter
time in in the office and then another three quarters at home.
MA: Which was volunteer time of course.
KC: Right. Martha Peters was willing to do some flexible things. A lot of
employers were not, in fact to this day a lot of them are not, but she hired
Ruth Doyle who was a wonderful woman and had been in the state legislature and
on the School Board and many other things and was married to Federal Judge Jim
Doyle who died this year. She hired Ruth and me at the same time as an
experiment, married women with children who wanted somewhat flexible hours. The
other people on her staff none of the others were married. The experiment worked
08:18:00out quite well, in fact I think we brought not only a little maturity but
another dimension to the job. Martha was very up-front and explicit with us that
some days you aren't worth a damned, your head is somewhere else or you have
other responsibilites, go and do what it is. Then she urged her whole staff to
just mark off on their calendar at least half a day every week to just go to the
library to stay current with journals and publications which you never would get
to read if you stayed in the office all the time.
MA: What a brilliant administrator!
KC: Yes. She was a firm taskmaster and she still is. One time I didn't realize
there was a deadline for something we were to take up to E. B. Fred, who was the
08:19:00Emeritus President of the university, the one whose name we finally cajoled into
letting us use, and she was ready to go and asked me where it was. I said, "I
have a draft that hasn't been typed" and she said, "Well that won't do me any
good!" and she stomped off up to E. B. Fred. That was the only time that I was
ever late and if I had known when she wanted it, it would have been on her desk.
MA: What would you tell the women? You made what I think is a very interesting
comment, that you kind of had to force yourself to live up to the ideals you
would tell the returning adult women.
KC: After we had made some kind of a plan then I actually did work full time, I
can't remember if it was full, but what I did for a couple of years was to
interview individual women who were thinking of making some change, either go
08:20:00back to school, update or refresh or take a job. There was nothing in my job
description that made me an employment agent but I counted one time, while I was
still doing that kind of individual interviewing, 300 women in the Madison
community were employed at jobs they got through my office! The service was to
the employer as much as to the individual woman. But sometimes I would urge the
women to think through the range of skills and interests that they had and
create a job.
MA: You were years ahead of "What Color is Your Parachute" you should have
written that book!
KC: Some of the things that I learned and tried to do myself and tell others are
08:21:00simple-minded things such there are only 24 hours in a day even for women and
that when you add a new activity that means you have to take away something and
it can either be sleep or...We made very conscious decisions in our household of
what things we would forgo and I think that I mentioned before that I gave up
playing golf. I had looked forward to that as one thing I would be able to
afford to do when we came back to Madison.
MA: You mentioned that you are a little bit sorry that you gave up some of the
pleasures. What else was there to give up, Kay, when you look back on it?
KC: I don't know. I've always been kind of a meticulous housekeeper, not
neurotic, but I like things neat and tidy. As soon as we could afford a cleaning
08:22:00lady that was helpful. I wanted some time with the kids and I would always do
something on the weekends during those years that the kids were all at home and
I was working fulltime. I have wonderful neighbors on this block, two of whom
are registered nurses and were at home with their own young children and several
are teachers and right now there are four women Ph.D.s in a row here and we had
another one across the street who has now gone back to Finland.
MA: What an educated neighborhood!
KC: It is, with the exception of one family that is unbelievable across the
street now, they are all wonderful, friendly, civilized, not intrusive but
helpful. Anyway, these several mothers on the block, including the two nurses
and a couple of the teachers, individually would come to me and say "any time
08:23:00you can't get home at noon" (I would come home to be home at lunchtime which was
a drag) "just have the kids stop in here." A few times I would call and take
advantage of that and also, all three of my children knew that they were welcome
at any of these particular houses.
MA: What a nice community you had.
KC: Right. Then I would feel not, I suppose I felt a little guilty but these
people volunteered this to me, these three or four women, "You're doing things
for women and this is something we can do for you." What I would do then on
weekends and this was not totally altruistic, it was self serving as well
because it was something that I wanted to do anyway, but I would load up the car
08:24:00with neighborhood kids whose mothers would be these same women home with little
one, and we'd go to the zoo or the arboretum or do some, especially outdoor kind
of activity because I didn't get out during the rest of the week. That was a way
of thanking them for doing things during the week and it was nice for the kids too.
MA: When you would interview these individual women, how would you handle the
woman who said "oh but my husband just won't help" or "my husband doesn't want
me to go back to school" you must have encountered those sorts of things
KC: All the time, in fact I encountered some of the husbands. We used to be
invited to quite a few parties in Madison. After Hank got Parkinson's Disease it
08:25:00wasn't long before he didn't want to have anybody here and he didn't want to go
anywhere, so our social life kind of dwindled to nothing much. Before that all
happened and we did go to I always hated to go to some of these parties because
one man after another would corner me and say "What are you doing to my wife?
How come she's "It was during that period when they weren't used to the idea and
when it was a reflection on their own ability either to keep their wife happy or
to provide a proper income. Somehow, some of the women were looked on as freaks,
I mean yeah.
MA: I understand.
KC: So I had a lot of explaining to do and it seemed to me that every social
08:26:00event I was working, either the husbands or else the wife would "I've been
meaning to come in and see you because I'm interested in doing this."
MA: Would you give advice? How did you handle delicate situations where you
could clearly see that there was a situation of very obvious oppression but how
could you say "what you really need to do is"?
KC: I don't know that I ever gave direct advice to anybody. It was my own
perception that men who were upset by this continuing education weren't MCP's or
weren't necessarily deliberate oppressors or bastards but were people who needed
some understanding and some information and needed to be able to take pride in
08:27:00what their wife was wanting to do.
MA: So you must have attempted to foster that somehow.
KC: Yes, and let this guy know what a wonderful wife he had and what a
contribution she could make or how much more interesting their table
conversation could be if she had done something besides talk with preschoolers
all day long and that a lot of other people were finding this to be the case.
MA: Did you get positive responses?
KC: Not necessarily right off the bat, especially after they had had the
experience for awhile of having their wife be in school or back on a job or whatever.
MA: How did this change the women? Did you see dramatic changes in the women
that you worked with?
08:28:00
KC: Sure, a lot of them. Over the years I've always had the great good fortune
to be able to define my own job. When I would get tired of doing something I
would find a rationale for either having somebody else do it or discontinue
doing it or change the format. After I got a little bit tired of a lot of
individual interviews, although no two of them were ever alike, somebody in
Extension in fact, I was not in Extension, I was on the Madison campus at this
time, until 1965, when there was one of the many reorganizations of stuff.
Somebody, a woman named Mary Farrell who has long since been retired from
08:29:00University Extension, suggested wouldn't it be good to have an evening class for
some of these mature women under the auspices of Extension. I thought that was
great! We could siphon off a lot of these what really want an hour interview.
The course didn't have a very inventive title, I think it was "Today's Woman in
Tomorrow's World" which had been the title of some publication of the Women's
Bureau that the Labor Department put out. We designed and did this in
collaboration with Martha Peterson and her staff. I then administered the course
and was there to. We brought in experts and among other things we, we had a four
week session, one night a week for a four week period in the summertime, had
women do one little library assignment to get acquainted with the library and a
08:30:00little writing assignment to refresh their writing and we had them write how
their life today is different and in what respects than their grandmothers life
at that age would have been. That was a real consciousness and fun for them to
do. We brought in people from all the other resources in the community, MATC,
secretarial school, nursing schools, and Edgewood College so that the
educational opportunities in addition to the university would be available. We
had a couple of excellent counselors there and if people wanted to pay an extra
$10 they could sign up for an individual counseling session with a bona fide
counselor and take an aptitude test and get the scores and interpretation and I
don't remember everything else.
MA: How did that all turn out? Was it successful?
08:31:00
KC: We had something like a 150 enrolled the first year. They came from
Appleton, they came from LaCrosse, we had no idea how many people
MA: That's extraordinary!
KC: You asked me, and this is a long way to get back to what you asked me, did I
notice any remarkable
MA: Oh yes
KC: I still hear from women who came to one of those, we did that three summers
in a row, whose lives were changed. That just gave them the spur that's all, it
was just what they needed at a time when they needed it. It's kind of fun.
MA: Did you see the kinds of dramatic changes that some of the men were worried
about for example that the woman would discover another world out there, decide
that marriage really was not what she wanted and leave it?
KC: Yes, there were occasions when that happened. I remember one man, whom I
08:32:00will not name but whose name I know, phoned me here at home one evening. He was
so frustrated and so furious that he didn't know what else to do but to call me
and bawl me out for leading his wife down this primrose path! The only part of
this conversation that I remember is that their refrigerator hadn't been
defrosted in months and it was my fault! I wanted to tell him over the phone how
to go about doing that and it wasn't a chore that only a female could perform. I
didn't get a lot of anger that was poured out directly on me.
MA: And like all change, people respond differently and, depending on what you
need at the time how significant
KC: One woman, I had actually forgotten she had ever been in that summer course
08:33:00and then I guess had been in my office also, from Green Bay I guess, she was
widowed or divorced I don't remember which but she was a single parent with I
think five little kids and wondering whether she ought I don't know. Anyway, she
did go back to teaching Home Economics and somehow I had a hand in whatever
decision she made or at least proposing options on how she can cope with the
kids and whatever else. I would have never known anything about this but maybe
two or three years ago, no more than that, I received a letter from a female who
08:34:00identified herself as the daughter of this woman. They were going to have a
special birthday, it was around Christmas time but they were going to have a...
I know, the youngest of these kids had just graduated from college and they
wanted to do something special for their mother and asked if I would write a
letter for them to include along with the gifts they were giving her because she
held me responsible for her ability to do that.
MA: How empowering! That's what you were doing, it seems to me, you were
empowering women at a time when most parts of society were saying your role is
in the home and that should make you perfectly happy, you were saying there are
other options and here are the alternatives for going about doing them.
08:35:00
KC: And of course there was nothing. That's what was happening at other
institutions. There was nothing so special, I mean we handled it in different
ways here. We had our inspiration from Minnesota and Sara Lawrence and Rutgers
retraining in math and then of course the whole national. All the institutions
that were providing something would meet together and the National Association
of Deans and Women's Counselors were very much a part of that whole movement and effort.
MA: I'm wondering how the experience changed you. It seems to me that it had to
have in some way to so closely be viewing all of these lives coming before you.
KC: I've told this many times to people that our second conference that we had
08:36:00(this may not sound as though I'm responding to your question but in my usual
roundabout way) our second annual conference, after this first one with Virginia
Center, was one on Professional Opportunities for Women. We structured a day or
two days (it was the day John Glenn orbited the earth --we had to recess long
enough for people to run to the TV and watch this happen) we invited Esther
Peterson who was then the Director of the Women's Bureau of the Labor Department
to be our keynot speaker. I remember asking Fred Harvey Harrington if we could
have enough money to bring her and he said "how are you going to invite her?" I
said "I'll write her a letter." Well you don't invite important people by a letter."
MA: Kaye, lets continue from where we were last week
08:37:00
KC: When we were interrupted by Jean and Burt Boyer. I can throw their names in
because Jean Boyer is one of Wisconsin's outstanding feminists and has been
since our first statewide conference here and the founding of NOW, etc., etc. I
was telling about the second statewide conference and bringing Esther Peterson
here. I guess I was actually telling about Harrington saying, "You get on a
plane and go to Washington and ask in person!" Which I did. I had never known
that was the way the higher echelons operated, but I was happy to do it. In any
case, Esther Peterson agreed to come with a little string attached, with a
proviso that we assemble, while she was here, the statewide chairs of women's
08:38:00organizations in Wisconsin so that she could tell us about President Kennedy's
Commission on the Status of Women and ask the assembled group what they would
think of having a state level Commission on the Status of Women. This was all a
brand new idea; to me it was brand new. I knew that the President's Commission
existed and was meeting, but I really didn't know very much about what they were
doing and had no notion of a statewide commission. We arranged the special
breakfast meeting and about 50 state heads of women's organizations came and
were delighted to have an opportunity to come. One of the local artists, a woman
08:39:00named Annaliese Steppat, was so delighted with the idea that she arranged table
decorations. She made little straw flower bouquets in little vases which was a
nice touch.
When Esther Peterson asked the question, "Did we think a comparable state-level
Commission on the Status of Women, modeled after the Kennedy Commission, would
be a good idea?" not only was there unanimous approval on the part of everybody,
but for me, coming out of the experience of this continuing education, it came
as a "gift from on high" because throughout this experience of interviewing a
lot of individual women and feeling, as I often said to my family, as though I'd
played a giant game of "Captain May I." It seemed almost pathetic to me that
competent, able women, in what I've always called their best years of their life
08:40:00(that's whatever age I happen to be), would have to say "Is it alright for me to
take some of the family money for my own education?" or "Is it alright that I
don't spend full time at home and that I think about a job or utilizing my
professional trainings" or whatever, and then I would say, "Yes it's alright."
Then they would be greatly relieved and go out and do it. Even before Esther
Peterson came here, I had already written a memo to Martha Peterson, who was my
boss and the Dean of Women here at the time, saying, "I wonder if we are doing a
disservice to all of these women, to encourage them to develop their abilities
and to broaden their horizons and to add more gratifying things to their life
when the outer world is so inhospitable to them?" When the job discrimination,
08:41:00educational discrimination, maltreatment --not physical abuse but putting down
of women wherever they turn, no childcare and even some...I wasn't at that time
very much aware of how the law discriminated against women, it didn't take too
long to begin to find that out. In any case, I realized that if there were a
state-sponsored Commission on the Status of Women, we could look into all
aspects of public policy and of private practice as well, and look at and make
recommendations and do something about areas of life that the university wasn't
capable -- wasn't within the purview of the university to do something about.
For me, this was the greatest idea, not only since high-button shoes, but the
08:42:00best thing that could happen.
It wasn't very long then after...Your question was "did this experience change
me?" and the answer is, it certainly did! It not only changed my life, it has
subsequently become my life! Not long after that meeting, in fact the meeting
with Esther Peterson was in February of that year and I believe it was in March
that three of us, Geraldine Hinkle, who at the time and for many years was
secretary and administrative aide to Ed Young who was head of the Economics
Deparatment and later became president of the University, or was he simply
08:43:00chancellor of the Madison campus?--well, one or t'other. Geraldine Hinkle was at
the time the State President of BPW (Business and Professional Women). Another
person who had been at our conference was Marguerite Gilmore from Chicago, who
headed the regional office of the Women's Bureau of the U.S. Labor Department.
The three of us conferred and then went as a group to visit our governor, who
was John Reynolds, with the proposition that we have a State Governor's
Commission on the Status of Women. He was immediately supportive of the idea, I
think in part because he was a devote of Eleanor Roosevelt and she was the
official chair of the Kennedy Commission, and in part I think it was just his
view. He was a progressive person and he agreed immediately to name a commission
08:44:00for Wisconsin. We suggested to him --and I felt very strongly about this -- that
he not name a commission immediately, but that we first have a statewide
conference on the status of women to be widely advertised so that we could
compare the findings of the Kennedy Commission with the circumstances in
Wisconsin and so that other leadership could emerge. We now had a list of the
state presidents of various organizations, but we didn't know what other kinds
of people might be out there. I certainly had met enough in the continuing
education thing to know that there was all kinds of interest and talent and need
all over the place. So we urged him not to name a commission immediately but to
call a conference.
In July he issued a press release calling for a conference on the status of
08:45:00women. He asked me to chair a planning committee and to chair the conference,
which I was happy to do.
MA: What year is this, 1962 or 1961?
KC: This is 1963. It was in 1962 that we had our first Continuing Education
Conference with Virginia Centers. In February of 1963 the Professional
Opportunities and in July of 1963 Governor Reynolds issued the press release. We
set the date, I must have done this later, long after I had assembled the
Planning Committee, for November 23 or 24, a two-day conference. We really had a
marvelous Planning Committee. I've written up--made a presentation a year ago to
08:46:00the Women's Studies so if you're interested in more detail of the Planning
Committee which was so wonderfully broadly representative with men and well as
women, with people who had, if not prestige, credibility in whatever
constituency they represented. We had people from a number of educational
institutions, from state agencies, from private employment people in labor, men
and women, and I'm sure that the seriousness with which the press and the
general public in Wisconsin took that conference and the planning for it had a
lot to do with the quality of people who were on that planning committee. I make
a point of this because while it is not unusual for conference planners to do
exactly that, it was about to become very unusual in the women's movement to not
08:47:00restrict the planners to only females and not to pick people who had any
relationship to the establishment as though there was something...as though
there was something improper about doing that.
MA: So that you had a broad spectrum, a representative spectrum from the
population rather than a handful of radical feminists?
KC: Right. In fact the very notion of radical feminist hardly, well it was a
little bit around by then but remember that this was 1963. It was before the
Feminine Mystique came out, before the American Women, the report of the Kennedy
Commission, came out and three years before NOW was formed.
MA: So it wouldn't have been realistic. What was a radical women then? Who would
have been the most radical elements that you would have included?
KC: I suppose maybe ....
08:48:00
MA: Perhaps you were the most radical women?
KC: I was certainly depicted as such, which always struck me as a laugh.
MA: I'm trying to get a picture of it though but I think I'm beginning to see.
KC: We didn't even use the word discrimination and oppression would be way out!
It was not long after that that the pejorative "women's libber" came into being,
but so far it hadn't. In Wisconsin we were never subject in the press, on TV or
on radio or print, to ridicule. When our commission was finally put together and
named by the governor, which was the following May of 1964, we went to the first
08:49:00National Conference of Commissions on the Status of Women. We were then the 25th
State Commission to be formed. The chair of each commission made a brief
presentation at that first conference in 1964. The woman from North Carolina,
who was a Women's Historian, Anne Firor Scott, chaired, at the time, the North
Carolina Commission. She and I were the only two chairs who didn't spend most of
our time talking about how they were being ridiculed in the press, or given the
total silent treatment. I think maybe we had a more enlightened press in
Wisconsin and we have a progressive tradition in this state, but also the
circumstances under which this whole thing came into being in our state was a
different experience.
08:50:00
We set this first conference for November and the day that people were
assembling and coming not only from all over the state but quite a few from
out-of-state, main speakers, was the day that President Kennedy was
assassinated. It was just six weeks after the report "American Women" was
presented to the president. In fact, we had deliberately scheduled our meeting
long enough after that report was to be issued so that we could make use of it
in our meeting. After a series of frantic phone calls to the governor and here
and there, we decided to cancel and postpone the conference. With over 300
people registered and meals ready to serve and everything. I'm sure that similar
cancellations of other events took place all over the United States that day and
that weekend. In fact, I had to spend the rest of the day in the Wisconsin
08:51:00Center to greet people as they arrived and tell them what we were doing and how
we were doing it. I spent the evening there with out-of-town folks from
Washington and other places. We sat together kind of in mourning and watched
Lyndon Johnson being sworn in at the airport by Judge Sara Hughes. I wanted to
be home with my own family because I knew how they would be feeling about it,
but I felt an obligation to do what I did. We finally set a new date and
reconvened the conference the last day of January and the first day of February,
1964. Every speaker and discussion leader and I think every person who had
enrolled previously as participants actually came. You have been in northern
08:52:00climates long enough to know what happened the end of January and in February,
but in spite of weather, people did come.
We were so glad to have had that conference before an official designation of a
Commission, even though it made us only 25th instead of an earlier number. By
the time our Commission was named we were, what I often call "light years ahead"
of the other states that had to start from scratch. We had a very good notion of
what the burning issues were in the state; how we wanted to divide up the
subcommittees of the Commission; what were key areas of concern; and also who
were some of the people in this state who could give terrific leadership in
those subject areas. We didn't have so much trial-and-error. We really had a
good beginning and we had wonderful publicity from our conference so that we
08:53:00weren't a total strange creature.
MA: You had a plan, a very clear plan.
KC: That's right.
MA: What did you do at the conference to highlight the issues, to find out what
the people were concerned about?
KC: The Planning Committee itself had some notions that we wanted to discuss;
education, employment, health, home and family. We used a great many of the
outline things from the President's Commission and then we made use of our own
experience by having met with women. We had the top people in the state heading
up the discussion groups in whatever these areas of concern were.
MA: Were there any new areas of concern that emerged as a result of the conference?
KC: There probably were. I would have to look at the report. I have that also.
08:54:00
MA: Do you have the ones with the pictures on the cover?
KC: Yes.
MA: I imagine that the effect of the conference though was to reaffirm that the
direction in which you were going was appropriate.
KC: I suppose. We hadn't started to go yet, of course.
MA: But your goals. Were there people at the conference who you would not have
thought to draw in? Were there constituencies that you became more familiar with
as a result of this?
KC: Yes, and I don't know if it was precisely the result of the first conference
--a lot of this kind of blends together. I hadn't really thought a lot about
08:55:00nurses and social workers. I am sure there were a great many things that I
hadn't thought about, certainly a lot of the legal inequities. In fact, one of
the books that I had made use of in my continuing education office was a book by
a sociologist from Iowa, which I have someplace on my shelf now, on the
potential of women, filled with a lot of wonderful information and then a
statement in it which said, "Of course women have legal equality in the United
States" and I thought how --I mean I accepted that when I first read the book.
It was very gradually over the years that we uncovered more and more of the
08:56:00inequities in our own state law and also at the federal level. We had Martha
Griffiths come from Washington or Michigan, wherever she came from, she was in
the Congress at the time, to talk about federal law and the way in which it
--that was a couple of years later though of course. I was in my own office, my
university office, a woman came in one day, just didn't know where else to turn,
I think this was after we had a Commission on the Status of Women, her son had
reached the age of 16 and her husband was a faculty man, was on a field trip
down in the jungles of Brazil. Her son wanted to get his driver's license so he
08:57:00had already promised his friends that he would drive to the senior prom because
he would have his license by then. She went with him to get his license and was
told that only fathers can accompany children, sons or daughters. She explained
that the father was off and unavailable by any means of communication. Well, did
she have power of attorney? Well no. It hadn't dawned on her to get power of
attorney. So, this kid wasn't able to get his driver's license. The same week
that this event took place in her life her washing machine went on the fritz and
she had the man come to make the repair. It needed a new motor and was going to
be expensive and she said "That's fine, just charge it." (These were Madison
residents in good economic standings.) "Well, I'm sorry, we can't do that. We
need your husband to sign," and she went through the same song and dance. She
08:58:00had to go without a washing machine because the store was adamant that only the
husband could sign for that kind of indebtedness.
MA: Was this a surprise for you?
KC: Yes, an absolute total shock to me! I didn't know about either of those
things. As these things happened, what else? We had a nose out for the "what
elses" from then on. Our Commission on the Status of Women unearthed, and then
having unearthed you have to do something about it, which we were able to do.
MA: Let's go from the conference and what came out of it, then. You put together
a Commission on the Status of Women after this last conference?
KC: The governor asked me if I would chair the Commission. The governor's legal
aide at the time was a man named Len Zubrensky. Len and his wife Ruth lived not
08:59:00very far from us and Ruth was active in the School for Workers. Several of my
friends were on the staff at the School for Workers.
MA: Was that a school here in Madison?
KC: It still is. It's a part of the University. It wasn't quite as early as the
Bryn Mawr Summer School for Women Workers but was started I think in 1925. It
has a very interesting history which I've only found out about in recent years.
The School for Workers at the University of Wisconsin actually began as similar
to the Bryn Mawr thing, as a school for women workers and there was a woman at
the head of it. After this had existed for a couple of years they decided to
09:00:00extend the purpose and to have short term courses available for all workers,
union, non-union, but mostly union, men and women. Then of course, no female
would be competent to be director of the school. The woman who had started it
and had been in charge was relieved of her responsibility while this institution
took on a man. Apparently no hackles were raised; this was back in the 1920's
because that was just the way life was.
In any case, I think it was Ruth and Len Zubrensky who encouraged my appointment
by the governor as chair of the Commission.
MA: Were you pleased? Had you hoped that you would be the person chosen?
KC: I don't know that it had even...I was delighted, absolutely delighted! My
mother had died that January and I remember feeling sorry that I couldn't tell her.
09:01:00
MA: She would have been thrilled!
KC: That was the first time I was ever tapped by the governor, I suppose the
conference too, to do anything. It hasn't been such a shock since then.
MA: You've become more accustomed to things.
KC: That's right, but it was very exciting to me.
MA: How old were you?
KC: What was the year?
MA: 1965 or 1964.
KC: In 1964 I was 44.
MA: Exactly my age.
KC: In fact, a lot of the leadership were around 40 and in the early 40's.
MA: How do you explain that?
KC: Well, I don't know that an explanation is necessary. However, I think that
09:02:00it is probably a stage in life when individuals may have a little more wisdom,
we certainly have more experience, and we have probably encountered some of the
frustrations of being a female in this society. As you know, from all of our
previous sessions together, I was never very mindful personally of having my
options foreclosed by reasons of my gender.
MA: You had to learn that through other women?
KC: Yes, and then just the experience of motherhood and some years of being a
non-earner, a homemaker. I'm probably a slow learner! I think also of this when
I hear people being upset that young women in college or of that age are not
09:03:00200% in the women's movement or, if they are, it is just very restricted aspects
of sexuality and other things that have something to do with, but not a lot to
do with the economic and political involvement and the legal changes, etc. So,
maybe that is...Also, people have time by the time they are in their 40's. Those
who are married or do have children aren't as bound to those obligations. We've
often said that one of the reasons there aren't as many spokespersons on
childcare and the needs of our community, is that those that need it most are so
busy they can't be advocates. Once one has passed through that stage of greatest
09:04:00need, it may not be a priority issue. I used to smart off with some of the
younger women when abortion rights and family planning were big issues I would
say, "Go away," and say "don't bother me, just talk to me about retirement benefits."
MA: Yes, I think those are good points. It makes sense. So, you were women in
your 40's. How did the governor decide who would be on the commission?
KC: He got a little help from some of us who had been on the Planning Committee.
Now this governor, John Reynolds, named our Commission in May of 1964 and then
he was defeated for reelection that November. We had only two year terms in
those days for governor of Wisconsin. He was defeated by Warren Knowles who was
09:05:00a Republican--a very enlighted Republican. Warren Knowles served six years as
governor, three, two-year terms, and continued our Commission throughout that
period. We did the same thing everytime there was a new election and a new
governor or continuation of the old governor. We volunteered to be helpful. We
didn't wait for something to happen from the governor's office. With John
Reynolds, a few of us from the Planning Committee presented him with a list of
categories, classifications from which people should come, occupational
categories, racial and ethnical categories, geographic and organizational and
then had suggestions of, where we were asked for them, of actual individuals,
09:06:00or, if there were individuals who had particularly emerged during the conference
itself and in subsequent communications we would suggest those people. In those
early days there wasn't such a big political --John Reynolds was a Democrat,
Warren Knowles was a Republican --and they weren't as partisan as subsequent
administrations have become. As a matter of fact, when John Reynolds was
defeated, we looked around on our Commission and said "Are there any
'card-carrying' Republicans here?" We had been together just a short time, six
months or so, but what one's party affiliation was hadn't entered in at all to
09:07:00any of our deliberations or any of our viewpoints.
MA: Had you had any battles that we would term today "conservative vs liberal"?
KC: There were differences of opinion. Some people were much more knowledgeable
and informed than others, but no, there were so many new things --we needed to
identify issues, we needed to inform ourselves about the establishment.
Even if you did discover, for example, later on, it took awhile for us in
looking at our employment situation, that there either was a law or a rule in
Wisconsin that with regard to unemployment compensation that no woman could
apply for or receive unemployment compensation for a ten week period before the
09:08:00birth of a baby or four weeks after the birth of a baby. It took a lot of
ferreting to find out whether there was a state law or whether this was a ruling
made by the Unemployment Compensation Board and if so, who had the authority to
change it and who had to be persuaded that this was highly disadvantageous and
wasn't logical at all. People, in the first place, didn't necessarily stop a
paid employment ten weeks before the birth of a baby --most of us couldn't
calculate that closely anyway to know when it was ten weeks before --and that
families usually needed money more at the time of the advent of a new member
09:09:00than at other times. It just made no sense at all. It took some time to find out
that it was a ruling of our Unemployment Compensation Board, a ruling that had
been made many, many years ago and was still being enforced, so we made an
appointment. One of the members of our Commission was a man named Doug Ajer, who
has since died, who was very helpful in finding out what the source of this was.
This also was repeated and could be repeated many, many times...We had members
on our Commission on the Status of State Women from a variety of state agencies
who served really as built-in liaisons. They would alert us on the Commission to
proposals that were forthcoming or to policies that were being thought about and
they would carry back to their agencies recommendations from the Commission in
09:10:00ways so that we could function. Everything didn't have to be public; we could
negotiate things behind the scenes and have them happen without embarrassment to
a lot of people. We made a presentation before the Unemployment Compensation
Board explaining why we wanted this ruling to be changed. One of the members of
that Board, a man named Jake Friedrich, for whom the Friedrich Center on the
campus was subsequently named, he was a representative of the AFL-CIO, on the
Board of Regents and also had sat for many years on this Unemployment
Compensation Board, had literally tears in his eyes as he heard how
discriminatory and damaging to women this ruling was and acknowledged that he
was one of the initial advocates for that position, thinking it was doing a
09:11:00great service to women.
MA: He looked at it as protective legislation?
KC: That's right, exactly. He thought all those years that they had been doing
this wonderful thing for women so that they wouldn't have to be in the labor
force during that period. I remember asking what these men thought, and they
were all men, a pregnant woman does? That she sits in her straight backed chair
or lies down for ten weeks? Even if a woman is not employed she is working at home.
MA: How did they respond?
KC: As though these things had never occurred to them before. That was the
reaction from all kinds of men in all kinds of issue areas. They had never
stopped to think how, whatever the rule was, how it affected women. Had there
been women in policy making positions who could have explained, as they went
along, how women were affected by this, things could have been a lot different.
09:12:00That's a lesson I think is absolutely important. Every person who is hired these
days --when the extreme Right Wing is in the saddle, and it may not be as true
under those circumstances, but a lot of policies that had the effect of
discrimination are simply the result of ignorance or of not knowing how times
have changed. The whole big issue now about parental leave in the minds of many
people, the fact that women are employed for the same reasons men are employed,
not just for the hell of it or to get away from their obligations at home, and
that the necessity for a two-paycheck family where there are two adults is a
necessity not simply a luxury. A lot of this information, when people really
09:13:00begin to really understand, they change their minds.
We always thought that one of the greatest obligations of our Commission on the
Status of Women was public education. We did a lot of conferences and meetings
and making speeches and meeting with target groups. I can remember some of the
hostility at the early meetings I addressed of school counselors, pointing out
how the kinds of advice and treatment of women students foreclosed options that
ought not to be foreclosed, particularly if we are to prepare women for the
facts of life. There was absolute hostility on the part of some of the men in
the audience when I suggested that girls should not be told to take typing
09:14:00because "They need it; it's something to fall back on in case they ever needed
to work."
MA: How would that hostility be expressed by the men?
KC: Sometimes in the kinds of comments they would make. Otherwise it's the
grumpiness or their expression or the mumbling among themselves.
MA: How would you respond? It must have been hard not to be a little defensive.
KC: I always thought I responded quite well.
MA: I'm sure you did!
KC: It was wonderful to see the change in attitude over the years. In the middle
60's I would get this kind of hostility. Sometimes I'd get it from the women in
the audience, women counselors, women deans and women that I would expect to
have a more enlightened view.
MA: Would you simply try to continue to explain?
KC: Yes
MA: Using reason, basically?
09:15:00
KC: Yes. Sometimes I'd just stop and shrug and go on to the next point. Over the
years the attitudes did change and it was very pronounced in my observation. I
can remember a woman who was a dean I think, in one of the small private schools
or colleges here in the state, who heard me talking about --again this was in
the early days, in the 60's --the life of women, etc., and what women could do
if certain changes were made, etc., saying to me finally --I could see she was
just uneasy and champing to do something --and finally said to me "Well you
wouldn't talk that way if you were married and had children!" I simply said, "I
happen to be married and I have three children and I do talk this way." That was
09:16:00sort of the end of that. It was fascinating to me that she said I was only
speaking for all the single people.
MA: Being married and having three children must have been quite an asset at
times like that because it must have identified you as "normal."
KC: I think I made, and maybe I'm not proud of myself for this, but I used to
try to get audience identification at the beginning of almost anything. If I was
with rural people I would just happen to make some mention of Sparta; if it was
a religious organization, I didn't bother to say I'm a fallen away Unitarian,
but I'd talk about my dad, the Unitarian minister, and get some kind of rapport
09:17:00so that...Many was the time when I would be invited to other states or another
place to which I was a stranger, universities or when I was president of the
National Association of the Commissions, then Commissions from all over the
country would invite me to come. I would step off the plane and, this happened
so many times that I even began to anticipate it, people would kind of look and
then I'd see this disbelief and "Oh, you don't look anything like I imagined
you'd look." Some who were a little more subtle would wait...and then I didn't
sound --I don't know whether they thought I had horns.
MA: I wonder what they imagined? You never really got an inkling of that?
KC: I think I got the full inkling right off the bat. I think they didn't expect
to see anybody who was calm and a little dignified, if not stuffy.
09:18:00
MA: Somebody who was perhaps more like themselves than they had expected?
KC: Yes, because I was often very much like themselves. I think maybe they
thought...The press was still talking about bra-burners and foul-mouthed people
who were on the streets or whatever. I think they just expected somebody who was
less mainstreamed and more radical. I don't know if they were disappointed or
if, of course the shoe was sometimes on the other foot. I can remember the first
time I was invited to South Dakota. I was subsequently invited there several
times. In getting ready to go to South Dakota to address their Commission, which
was having a state-wide meeting in the state capitol, I thought now "I'm going
09:19:00to be very careful of how I look and how I sound in South Dakota".
MA: Prim and proper I take it?
KC: That's right. In those days we had just begun to wear pant-suits but I
thought "I'll just wear a suit with a skirt." I don't know to what extent I
moderated my remarks, or my plan for my remarks. I, who pride myself on having
absolutely no stereotypes whatsoever, so totally stereotyped South Dakota. When
I arrived, I was the only one there without a pant-suit on. When we began
discussing issues, after I had made my presentation, there was a little group of
women there who were starting an effort in South Dakota to require that the
telephone company list two names on the line without charging any extra. We
hadn't even started that in Wisconsin! It wasn't long after that Florence
09:20:00Dickinson up in Door County began a one-person effort which then was you know
assisted by other people. But she was largely responsible for that change in our
state. And I laughed at myself after that South Dakota incident, and had others
not to different. One of the best meetings I ever went to was in the Appalachian
(and I learned not to say "Appalaychin" when I was there)--but people from a
number of the states and from some of the most impoverished areas--I was doing a
special project for the National Advisory Commission on Women's Educational
Programs, which was a commission established under the Women's Educational
Equity Act. We had a fourth of four consultations on the educational needs of
rural women in the Appalachian area, met in North Carolina. And I encountered
09:21:00some of the most creative, inventive, caring, marvelous people that I
have--that, of course, has been the real bonus of all of this women's activity,
wherever I've gone. Even though I know that this is the kind of person I'm going
to meet, and still overwhelmed again to meet a whole new batch.
MA: How wonderful! And when you would go to these various states, they already
had state commissions and they were often having conferences to--
KC: Many of them did, yeah. By the early 1970s, and we did start our Interstate
Association of Commissions in 1970, which may be a story you want to hear a
little bit about, by that time all 50 states had a Commission, some established
09:22:00by legislation, others by appointment of the governor. Some were really first
rate, others were kind of, didn't allow too much, but by that time, cities and
counties were beginning to [?] commissions. And at one point, I don't know the
date, but in the early 70s, maybe by 74, there were over 200 official
commissions in this country, including city and county and state. There was a
time when I--probably 1980 or thereabout--when I saw a list put out by the
Women's Political Caucus, of cities over 50,000 that had women mayors, and there
were some 65 at that time in the United States.
[break in recording]
20 to 30 of these cities that have women mayors were in California in locations
09:23:00that had had county commissions on the status of women, so that the kind of
development that was taking place in such communities--
MA: So you think there was a political development as a result of this--
KC: Sure, there had to be.
MA: In Wisconsin's Commission, what was the representation by women in the labor movement?
KC: Always good in numbers and in quality. I think we never had fewer than four
union women and sometimes a few union men. We had from different parts of the
state, from the AFL-CIO and from the UAW and sometimes from the teacher's union.
They were all very active members. I spoke just a week ago in Milwaukee at a
banquet honoring Helen Hensler, who had chaired the Women's Committee of the
09:24:00AFL-CIO from 1970 until 1986, and made mention of some of the participation, the
importance of the bridge building between the women's movement and the labor
movement which was provided by people who had a foot in each camp. I of course
belong to the AF of T, the American Federation of Teachers, which my union
sisters used to kid me about and say that's really not a union. But at least it
was an opportunity to feel a part. I've belonged to CLUW, the Coalition of Labor
Union Women since it was founded in 1974. I haven't been a very significant
member of that; I was on the local Executive Committee of our local branch of
the Coalition of Labor Union Women.
09:25:00
MA: On the Commission, do you recall how many men were there and how many women?
KC: Every two years the membership of our Commission changed as a new governor
or new term of a governor took place. We did have some continuity of leadership
and I remained chair for 15 years. Also, as we would approach a governor at the
beginning of a term offering to help with appointments, in addition to giving
categories (as I mentioned earlier), from which people should be named, we would
also, after we had been in existence for awhile, have a little list of deadwood,
09:26:00of people who didn't seem to be interested and probably would not want to be
renamed (we always put things in rather polite terms), and a little roster of
the most active members, that it would be wonderful if these ten people would be
renamed. So we were giving direction without being arrogant or assuming too much
because the governor wouldn't have to pay the slightest attention.
MA: But the governors did, it sounds like.
KC: Did, I think in large part because this was probably not the top priority of
the governor and they needed some slots to pay off a little patronage, although
why anyone regarded it as patronage when there was never any compensation. Our
Wisconsin Commission had absolutely no budget even to function on for its first
09:27:00ten years!
MA: How did you function financially?
KC: Partly because I was chair and the University administration said "Yes, take
this position. You can use your desk and your telephone and secretarial time,
even occasionally a little travel money to get to a meeting because this is the
Wisconsin Idea, that the resources of the university should be available across
the state."
MA: How wonderful!
KC: Otherwise, in all kinds of states that also had no budget, the poor chair
would have to work off her kitchen table on any typing or Xeroxing or whatever.
MA: It must have helped you a lot to have access to the university.
KC: Yes it did. The access was not only in this replacement budget, but knowing
where the intellectual resources were and being able to tap those and ask people
09:28:00to come to our meetings and provide us with information and with help. So that
was important.
MA: Clearly, you had a special breed of "man" on the Commission. I'm wondering
about just the dynamics of it. We always hear about it and know from our own
experience what it can be like being in meetings with men.
KC: We sometimes had as many as seven or eight men on a Commission of maybe 30 people.
MA: So the women were clearly predominant all the time?
KC: Yes. Sometimes the women who would be named might be named for political
purposes or because they wanted to be on and had applied directly to the
governor. Whereas the men who were there were either designated by their agency
--for example, we learned this before we ever got going, that if the head of the
09:29:00Department of Public Instruction or the Bureau of Personnel or the Labor
Department in the state --if the head of the agency would be asked to name
somebody, then that somebody would be there kind of officially and could have
access to a state car to get to a meeting and take along a load of people who
didn't have access to a state car and could sometimes speak on behalf of the
agency. When they came in they weren't there as just Joe Doe in his spare time.
So we had a caliber, now once in a while a man would be named who wasn't any
great shakes on the Commission, but we had Jack Barbash from our Economics
Department, a Professsor of Labor Economics; Doug Ager I've already mentioned;
09:30:00Judge Irv Bruner from the Family Court who just had magnificent insights; we had
the head of counseling for the Department of Public Instruction; a couple of
farmers; and a couple of labor people. Once in awhile we got some lemons too
from the...I remember one man who was an attorney who would come to the meetings
that we were going to out of town, sign up for the meeting and then that was the
last we'd see of him.
MA: Did that happen with women as well?
KC: Not so much; I suppose there might have been some, but none that stick out
in my memory the way that one man in particular did. Every once in awhile there
09:31:00would be someone named who just never showed up and never responded, probably
wondered why he or she was appointed in the first place.
MA: It sounds like in the early days you were joined by your purpose so that
there wasn't much conflict. You were moving right ahead.
KC: Right. Towards the end of the last term of Warren Knowles, a number of
Republic women were named to the Commission, I think this was because they were
Republican and not for other reasons, who came from a fairly Right Wing, nothing
like what we have these days, but certainly very conservative. They were not
very happy with me for a number of reasons but one that they kind of zeroed in
on was that Jean Boyer from Beaver Dam, who was one of the founders of NOW,
09:32:00started the Beaver Dam Commission on the Status of Women and has been
instrumental in a million things since...Warren Knowles didn't name her to the
Commission on the Status of Women. She first was named in 1970 when Pat Lucy
became governor. The reason she wasn't put on the Commission, even though she
chaired the only local Commission in the state, was that there were some
Republicans in her community, in Beaver Dam and in that county, who didn't like
her because she was too progressive for them and they told Knowles "Do not put
her on!" Even though he was not terribly partisan, he took seriously that word
from his local Republicans. In fact, he even made it known to us what was tying
09:33:00his hands, that he was sorry he couldn't name Jean Boyer and that this was the
reason. I suppose I asked any number of times to have her named to the
Commission and that's how I got the information.
MA: What were the Republican women angry at you about?
KC: Jean would come to the meetings, all of our meetings were public so that
anyone could come, and I would call on her to speak and let her speak her piece.
She didn't take advantage of that and I would even give her assignments of
things that she was volunteering to do.
MA: So you acted very much like she was a part of the Commission.
KC: That's right. Aand that's what these women objected to. They thought we
should have some bylaws. We never had any bylaws; we just operated by Robert's
Revised Rules and were somewhat informal anyway. I created a Bylaws Committee
and put these three particular women on it. They were so busy trying to design
09:34:00some bylaws that they didn't butt into much of anything else and it kept them
very busy. The one thing they wanted to write in was that only members of the
Commission could speak or could whatever.
MA: Did they succeed?
KC: No, but it kept them busy and out of our hair. I don't think non-members
should be allowed to make motions or vote on motions.
MA: But certainly if there is work to be done and they are willing to do it.
KC: You bring up an issue which I think is very significant and that is that if
you are trying to make change within a system, yet you are going through the
system to make the change which is necessary, but the change that you're making
could challenge the system at the same time, and they then might draw back and
not want you to do it. How did you keep that fine line because you were making
09:35:00radical change in many ways?
MA: They were, I suppose, incremental changes, a distinction the textbooks like
to make.
KC: So that it wasn't as overwhelming to the "powers that be" if it is one law
at a time. In 1966, when we had our third meeting of Commissions on the Status
of Women called in Washington by the Labor Department and by the Citizens
Advisory Council on the Status of Women, that was the occasion when NOW was
formed, and Pauli Murray's posthumous autobiography and Betty Friedan's book,
they make mention of the fact that I was the big hold-out in the smoke filled
room, and I was. It took the next morning of being turned down by my three
09:36:00friends, women that I knew quite well and assumed were friends, in wanting to
pass resolutions. I've been thinking about that, especially since I read the
Pauli Murray book again, well I didn't read it again, that my experience in that
smoke filled room, my Wisconsin experience was probably unique or fairly unique.
We had had a Commission going for two years and, if I add the previous year of
planning the conference, had not been rebuffed. We had been able to make
changes. We had been able to bring things to the attention and then figure out
what is the channel and whom do we need to persuade and educate and then do
09:37:00something about it.
MA: Then you would do it and the change would take place?
KC: That was not the experience of the other people who were in the room. That
was one reason that I was in a minority in that room. Secondly, the kind of ring
leaders in the room, I didn't know who were ring leaders and who weren't because
I hadn't been privy to any of their previous conversations in which they had
talked about the importance of what Betty Friedan referred to as an "NAACP for
women", but Betty, Pauli Murray, Catherine East, Mary Eastwood and others and
had met together any number of time saying, "If we're going to budge we've got
to have pressure from the outside!" It's what became a political movement. So I
wasn't privy to any of that and then we had not really tried to attack the
09:38:00federal establishment. We had taken positions on some federal pending
legislation but it didn't amount to anything more than a letter to a committee
or a letter to our own congress people. Figuring how to budge the EEOC people,
for example, wasn't one of the things...It was a combination of these three
factors that kept me being a slow learner or at least looking at it from a
different perspective.
MA: Sure, because you were going from your own experience within the state. I
can see that because I read the section in Pauli Murray's book just the other
day to see what the response was.
09:39:00
MA: Okay, lets continue from where we were last week and talk about where your
energies went after the State Commission.
KC: I often wonder where it went! But it did; not right away I guess. We were
speaking last time about the smoke filled room and the decision actually to form
NOW. On that fateful June day when I was turned down requesting the opportunity
09:40:00to have the conference pass resolutions, a couple of very innocuous ones, but important.
MA: What specifically were the resolutions?
KC: There were two that we wanted to have the voice of the assembly on record
with. One was urging President Johnson to reappoint Richard Graham to the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission. He was if not the only one, one of two at
least members of the EEOC. Eileen Hernandez was the other one who took seriously
their mandate to end sex based discrimination. We knew that his term was coming
up and the scuttlebutt was that he might not be reappointed; which in fact he
was not. The second resolution was one of urging the Equal Opportunities
09:41:00Commission to take seriously sex based discrimination which they were mandated
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to do something about. So far they had
never done anything but laugh at us and think it was some kind of a joke.
MA: Both of these resolutions were defeated?
KC: They were never brought to the floor. We didn't get permission. When I said
in a previous tape that my three friends turned me down. I was given the
assignment the night before if I thought we could pass resolutions which no one
else in the room thought we'd be allowed to do. I said at the time, "I've never
been to a meeting in my life where you can't speak your piece and pass a
resolution, of course we can." So they said "Ok, you be the one to go to Esther
Peterson and Margaret Hickey (who was head of the Citizens Advisory Council at
09:42:00the time and an editor from the Ladies Home Journal) and Mary Keyserling, head
of the Women's Bureau. So I did and I was sent from pillar to post, from one to
the other then back to make the rounds again. I spent the entire morning,
instead of going to workshops, simply speaking with these women. Each one of
them said those are important resolutions, it would be wonderful to have
--Margaret Hickey is the name, she chaired the Citizens Advisory Committee --and
these were the three women who were essentially in charge of that big
conference. Each one said this would sound critical of the Federal Government
and you are all here at the invitation of the Federal Government and therefore
it's inappropriate to have any resolutions. Of course this gave me real insight
09:43:00into what the women the evening before had been saying. I was absolutely
appalled! I guess others were not so appalled, but I was. I'd been doing this
all very privately and quietly so I reported in to Betty Friedan and a few
others and said "You were absolutely right! It's no go with these resolutions."
So, at the closing session of the conference, which was at noon that very day,
we found a table, eight of us sat at the table, and then some others sat at a
neighboring table. I was at the table with Betty Friedan and Catherine Conroy. I
don't remember which other people were at our table and who was elsewhere. We
sat there right under the head table which had several tiers of hot-shots and
09:44:00did our business while the program was going on. Inka O'Hanrahan was at our
table; she became the first treasurer of NOW. She was very active in the Women's
Party and BPW (Business and Professional Women). As we sat there, dreaming up a
name and an acronym, and a Statement of Purpose for this "to be" organization,
Inkawould see somebody she knew on the other side of this hugh ballroom, which
was converted into dining area at the time, and she would run over to tell
somebody what we were up to, and then run back again. There was a table full of
labor women sort of back-to-back with us who were assembled by Marguerite
Gilmore, the Regional Director of the Women's Bureau of Chicago, who had wanted
an opportunity for some of the labor women to convene and talk I suppose, so
09:45:00they had half an ear on what we were doing. At one point at this lunch table,
Catherine Conroy, from the labor movement said, "Ok, let's put our money where
our mouths are." She put a $5 bill on the table, so each of us followed suit.
That looked like a sizeable chunk. Here I was, from the Wisconsin Commission,
which didn't have a penny of budget for its entire first ten years, so when
eight of us each put down $5, that was $40 and looked not bad. Then other people
from other tables kept coming over and saying "What are you doing? What are you
doing?" So by the time that the meeting adjourned and the lunch was over, 27 or
28 people had signed up and paid their $5. One of them was Anna Roosevelt
09:46:00Halsted. There is a list someplace of who all the others were. We had $5 from
each one. Also, Catherine Conroy volunteered me to be the temporary chair,
although someone pointed out that I had a desk and a secretary. So, I had that
chore. One of the first things I did when we got back to Madison was to convene,
or invite, about a half-a-dozen people to serve as a temporary Steering
Committee so that I wouldn't just be making decisions by myself.
MA: Let's back up just a little bit. Why specifically did you want to form this organization?
KC: I was convinced by my experience that morning of the need to have some
09:47:00external pressure, and particularly for pressuring the federal establishment. We
were not thinking, at least I wasn't, I don't know what visions other folks had
of what ultimately developed was local chapters, state level, regional, all of
that. In fact, one of the early discussions at Board meetings in fact Pauli
Murray was one of the people who raised these questions "Are we a leadership
organization or are we thinking about a mass membership organization?" That was
something that hadn't been talked or thought about.
MA: At this point you certainly hadn't made that distinction.
KC: Oh no. Of that original 27 or 28 members, eight or ten of them were from
09:48:00Wisconsin. Then Analoyce Clapp, who sat at our table and took some notes, or
minutes of that little kind of organizing session, was at the conference not as
a member of a State Commission--her husband is Norm Clapp who had some important
job in Washington at the time--but while she was in Washington, she is a
journalist by trade, they had owned a rural newspaper in Wisconsin before they
went to Washington--she was acting as a stringer for the Milwaukee Sentinal, I
think it was the Sentinal not the Journal, so that she had been trailing the
Wisconsin Commission delegation in order to send back home stories for our state
newspaper. That was why she trailed Conroy and me to this table, which was
wonderful because she kept a full list of who was there, who paid as well as
09:49:00what when on. She sent her story back to Wisconsin and had a scoop on the
formation of NOW, for which she was paid $15 by her newspaper. We still kid her.
She came to our 20th anniversary celebration in Washington a year ago and also
when the state NOW feted, the local folk who had been initial organizers at the
governor's residence also a year ago, in 1986 at least, Analoyce and Mary
Eastwood came to that too.
I communicated with the members of this temporary Steering Committee. Carolyn
Ware in Washington was one, Betty Talkington from Iowa from the labor movement,
AFL-CIO was another, and Betty Friedan I suppose. One of the first things we
09:50:00really needed to do in addition to setting a date for a real organizing
conference, which was finally held in October of 1966, was to get some bylaws
put together which would structure the organization. All we had was this little
one sentence Statement of Purpose and a title, but nothing more than that. I did
go to Washington and I stayed with Mary Eastwood so I only had my fare to pick
up and not the hotel. Marguerite Gilmore, Phineas Indritz--I wrote to Phineas
several times thinking he was a woman and I should have known that Phineas was a
man and in fact it's a biblical name, so I was an embarrassment to the Methodist
Church I'm sure. Let's see, Betty Friedan, Mary Eastwood, Marguerite Gilmore,
09:51:00Pauli Murray and I met in Mary Eastwood's apartment and spent a couple of days
drafting. Marguerite Gilmore had probably drafted the bylaws for a dozen
important groups. Catherine Easton and I have a tape, we interviewed Marguerite
about ten years ago and we finally managed to wheedle out of her, because she
had forgotten half of the things she had started to organize--she's in her 90's
now. There was so much at those sessions, drafting the bylaws and answering
questions and...Betty Friedan had never organized anything in her life.
MA: What had she done prior to this time?
KC: She wrote a book which was published in 1963 and then had done a lot of
lecturing based on that.
09:52:00
MA: But no community organizing of any sort?
KC: I don't believe so. That made it difficult to work together with Betty. She
is a brilliant woman and an idea person and has a great deal of vision and great
deal of insight. Her field actually is psychology. But the shouting that would
go on in that...I can't remember who shouted back to Betty because the others
there were not particularly shouters. I was totally unaccustomed to anybody
losing their temper or sounding off and I should have, I suppose, gotten
accustomed to it over the four years that I chaired the board of NOW because
that board, no matter how many changes were made, would be filled with prima
09:53:00Donna's, mostly who had no organizational experience except with the labor women
and an occasional person from BPW--
KC: --but maybe I'm getting a tiny bit ahead of my story. We did finally hammer
out a draft of some bylaws that looked workable and then set the date in October
for the organizing conference.
MA: What kind of conflicts would you have over the bylaws? Could you state for
me, were there ideological differences?
KC: I don't think so, not at that point because we still haven't gotten around
to doing ....
MA: Organizational glitches then?
Yes. Marguerite Gilmore who is an attorney and a highly organized person and has
been national president of Women Lawyers and BPW and I don't know what else, is
a very organizational kind of person. I suppose she would say "We've got to have
09:54:00provisions for this, that and the other thing" and Betty would say "Oh no, let's
not tie our own hands."
MA: How would all of this be resolved? Would you resolve it through consensus or
take a vote or just whoever wore out?
KC: I don't remember. Sometimes there were just honest differences. I suppose
they were all honest differences but even among some of us who had done some of
this before. We got organized enough that we were able to do a draft and we sent
it out to the temporary Steering Committee and to others.
The October date was set in Washington at the Press Club building. By that time
I couldn't afford to go again. I'd been there the June time and then a second
09:55:00summer trip. I didn't even want to...I made that decision myself, I didn't take
a vote in my household but I had already spent more on going to these things
than...because our Commission didn't send any of us to that June meeting either.
So, I just didn't go. I did suggest to Dorothy Witte Austin, the journalist in
Milwaukee who was then with the Milwaukee Journal, and who had covered all of
our own Commission stuff for three years, that she might like to go and she
could keep her eyes and ears open and report back to me. Well, she went and I
got about three or four phone calls from that meeting, I was here at home,
mostly from Pauli Murray, but one was from Betty Friedan, "Who is this Dorothy
Austin? This meeting is closed to journalists. We're not allowing any journalist
09:56:00to be here, not even women journalists." Those were still the days when women's
groups, although by 1966 there still weren't a lot of feminist groups, were very
suspicious of any journalist. I wasn't suspicious of Dorothy Austin because she
had been an ally, and a very important ally to us here in the state, but
apparently others there had had negative experiences with journalists covering
something and then making fun of it in their stories. They were going to boot
her out. She comes to all of our events and is honored among the rest of us and
likes to tell that, even though they had confirmation from me that she was a
good person to have there, and that it would be valuable to us to have her
report. They were still going to ask her to leave and she said, "All right, the
09:57:00newspaper had sent her to cover this organizing meeting and if she had to leave,
that was going to be the lead of her story." They reconsidered and let her stay.
One of the things that Pauli Murray kept calling me about --kept calling, she
called maybe twice I think --in the original bylaws, I don't believe it was
structured the way it was finally passed at that October meeting, but it was a
natural that Betty Friedan be president of the organization. She was well known
already and a leading light in moving this thing along and because she was
getting all over the country to make speeches because of her book, she would be
09:58:00mobile and a good spokesperson.
MA: Was there any debate about that?
KC: I don't believe so. However, the debate was that she was not an organizer or
a very well organized person, and that was raising a lot of fears. What they did
was to structure it; Pauli, when she talked to me about it was sort of
apologetic and said this is sort of a corporate structure, but we want to have a
chair of the Board, somebody who will not only chair the Board meetings but will
see that everything else moves along and they asked me to take that job which I
finally agreed to do with reluctance, I don't know why I was reluctant, but
that's kind of my style I guess, to be reluctant, the reluctant dragon.
MA: Were you worried perhaps that it would be more work than you bargained for?
09:59:00
KC: I suppose. In any case, I was pleased; one part of me was please. I agreed
and I was elected in absentia. There were people at that conference that I had
never heard of.
MA: That was my next question. Who came to the conference and how were they
notified? How was the decision made?
KC: I guess anyone who had paid their $5. I kept the treasury such as it was,
over that summer time, and took in memberships and people just sort of by word
of mouth would write to friends or phone up friends and tell them that we were
starting this and if they wanted to join...By the time of that October meeting
there were 300 paid members, of which 120 or 130 were in Wisconsin, because of
the publicity and because there were enough of us from Wisconsin so that we had
10:00:00passed the word among our friends. Alice Rossi, the sociologist, was at that
October meeting--I can't remember if she'd been at...I don't think she was at
the Washington conference in June--but she was absolutely certain that she knew
30 or 40 sociologists who were feminists who would immediately join us. She
wrote personal letters to these women. Not one was willing to join! It seemed
too radical, people were not yet using the word discrimination, we were talking
about disadvantages and obstacles, but nobody used the word oppression, even
those of us who were getting this thing off the ground.
10:01:00
MA: Were there any lesbian women in the initial formation within the initial group?
KC: Not who identified themselves as such. The first time the question, within
the organization, was formally brought to the floor of a national conference was
in 1970 at our Chicago conference.
MA: We can get to that later then.
KC: We began having Board meetings very soon after this organizing meeting in
Washington which was in October. I think we had our first Board meeting in November.
MA: You were all self-consciously feminists then? That was part of your program
to be stated explicitly, you would use terminology to...
10:02:00
KC: No. We didn't use the word feminists to begin with. I don't even know to
what extent people identified themselves in that language.
MA: But yet, you think the women sociologists identified you in that way?
KC: In fact, the current expression was "women's liberation/women's lib" so that
was almost a pejorative, especially when it was used in the press. I must look
sometime at one of those old clippings and see when I see the word "feminist"
first appearing. I know that the first time I used the work "sexist", I even
thought I invented it because I'd never read it anywhere, was in 1969. I was
asked to address the American Psychological Association and I spent my vacation
10:03:00up at our cottage writing my paper for that. It took me quite a few years to
learn not to take work up to the cottage. I finally did learn that, but it took
a long time. Anyway, I used the words "sexist" and "sexism". "Racism" I knew but
I had never heard or read the words "sexist' or "sexism", they might have been
around but I hadn't encountered it.
MA: How did your audience at the Psychological Association respond?
KC: It was kind of a self-selected group, so the response was very affirmative.
Some of the KNOW members who were present at that thing, which had nothing to do
with NOW, published the paper later on--KNOW was a publishing outfit that some
10:04:00of these Pennsylvania women had put together.
I started to say, we had our first Board meeting of the NOW group in Betty
Friedan's Victorian Parlor--that's the way the New York Times described it--but
we did meet in Betty's apartment in New York. One of the decisions we made at
that meeting was that we would either ask for or demand, I don't know which, an
audience with the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission as long as we
weren't allowed in June to. So, Betty Friedan got on the phone, called
Washington and said that we were meeting and, in fact, got this into a news
story. Quite a few reporters came and took pictures. Muriel Fox, who was on that
10:05:00first Board and was a friend of Betty's, I think they became friends really
through the organizing of NOW. Muriel is a public relations person and an
absolute genius and was vice president of Carl Bior and Associates in New York,
which I think has just very recently retired from that. She made us sound like
we were the marching millions. Whenever we had--we had Board meetings in
different parts of the country in order to do a little recruiting and get some
local press, TV, and newspaper. After every Board meeting Murial would type up
this press release. We didn't want press to come in to our meetings so we would
issue our own press releases. She would carry it by taxi or vehicle of some sort
around to every newspaper, radio and TV in whatever community we were meeting,
before she went to bed that night so that it was there for coverage. That's one
10:06:00of the reasons that we had such good press, the reason was Muriel Fox.
Betty Friedan, that first November of 1966, telephoned someone at EEOC and said
that the members of the Board would like to meet. This person at the other end,
I am absolutely convinced, responded in this way in hopes that we wouldn't be
able to accept, said "Alright, they would see us the next day at 2:00 in the
afternoon or whatever." A lot of us had our plane reservations, because we came
from all over the country, we were about 15 or 20 people, and that we weren't
going to be out-foxed by those people so we said, "Fine. We'll be there." I know
that I for one had to reroute myself. Luckily, in those days before deregulation
you didn't get fined for doing that. But I did have to leave from Baltimore. We
10:07:00went from New York then to Washington for the meeting and I couldn't get out
from National so I had to take a bus up to Baltimore, and that was a royal pain.
Nevertheless, we did have the opportunity to meet with them and I think by
calling their bluff we at least began some explorations with them and then let
them know that we were serious.
MA: What was your goal of the meeting with them?
KC: I can't remember what the issue was...Well, to let them know that there were
a lot of people who cared about sex discrimination and the mandate and we wanted
them to take it seriously. We may have come in with one or two specifics, I
don't know. The BFOQ (Bona Fide Occupational Qualification) was one issue that
we wanted minimized or removed from their guidelines. I can't remember exactly
10:08:00the occasion for that. Also, newspaper advertising "Help Wanted" columns. They
refused to, for years, the EEOC refused to say that that was discrimination to
segregate jobs for men and jobs for women. It took a long time. In any case,
that was our first but not only meeting with the EEOC, but the first thing that
we did as Board members.
It took a long time, I don't know how long, for Betty Friedan and me to work out
a harmonious and trusting relationship. She would phone me quite often and
always in what struck me as a very disjointed kind of "I've got this idea and I
10:09:00want to" and she kind of stammered when I met her. I remember one of those phone
calls, she had a great idea, we should have a national action and go to every
one of the ten regional offices of the EEOC and make demands for this or that,
like tomorrow. We were to organize, we had a pocketful of people in each of the
areas, but Betty would get an idea, and they were usually good ideas, but she
would have no idea what was involved in implementing or how much lead time or
how many communications...
MA: How would you deal with her then when it would happen?
KC: Well, it seemed to take a little while.
MA: Would she hear you?
KC: Yes, I think so. But, for a long time, she thought I might be a spy for the
10:10:00Women's Bureau of the Labor Department. I had such good working relationships
with all the people in the Women's Bureau, had relied on their materials and publications.
Mary Keyserling was Director of the Women's Bureau at the time that we started
NOW, and she was very, very miffed and I don't know if she was fearful of the
organization but she didn't get the message that you could have pressures from
the outside and still work with people on the inside. She behaved as though she
were personally affronted and had no more communication with me until years
later, in fact, it was when she retired as Director of the Women's Bureau that I
wrote her a very lovely letter. That was our first communication. I thought to
10:11:00myself of the old "Turn the other cheek" biblical injunction. I thought about it
before I made a decision to. I guess I was invited to the retirement event but
it was in Washington so I didn't go, then I thought "Well, what the heck." We
really had the same goal in mind, not only in mind, but we were investing
ourselves in the goal of an improved society, particularly for women, but we had
different ways of getting there, so, I wrote her. It was general to that effect,
I was sorry that we hadn't communicated and I thought there was no point in
rubbing salt in the wound.
Anyway, Betty Friedan was suspicious of me because I had such warm relationships
and that, for some good reason, to be a little bit suspicious that the
establishment, not necessarily the Labor Department or the Women's Bureau, but
10:12:00FBI, CIA kind of monitoring of any protest movement. We knew full well that they
were infiltrating everything else, I don't know if Betty ever thought I was one
of those, but over the years, from time to time, she would be suspicious of
certain people. I don't think she's paranoid but I think she's insightful.
MA: Were you ever monitored in any way, to your knowledge?
KC: No, not really to my knowledge. There were lots of suspects around. In any
case, I wasn't suspicious of Betty but I was, again, the screaming lots of times
and the I don't know what it was but the fact is that I would have to be geared
10:13:00up in order to receive one of her phone calls. My whole family then got the
message and would protect me. If they would answer the phone and I would say "If
it's Betty, I can't talk now" and they would say they would give me the message
and have me call. When I felt up to it, I would call.
MA: Do you think that it was a case of very different work styles, or was it
even more than that? Were you the only person that had difficulty working with
her or did other people as well?
KC: Oh no. In fact, I developed one of the best working relationships that
anybody had with her I think. We did come to respect each other. We are quite
different in working style, and I am a slower learner and I'm deliberate about
10:14:00the things I do and plan. Betty would carry her whole file of information with
her in a sort of carpet bag that she had on the plane. If you would ask her
about something, boy she'd start pawing through this and finally found a little
piece of paper. Getting these ideas, the ideas for Women's Equality Day, October
26, which is now nationally celebrated.
At our 1970 conference, which was held in Chicago, Betty and I had agreed before
that that we would each step down from our respective --we'd been reelected at
each conference in between, and we figured nobody was urging us out or
necessarily dying to run. But, we thought that we'd been there long enough, in
10:15:00fact, I was exhaused from those Board meetings which were incredibly fatiguing
and wearing. I was still chairing the Wisconsin Commission and we met with more
regularity than the national NOW Board and had as many or more people and
subcommittees that really produced materials and did things, and we had
conferences and things all around the state. While I would be tired at the end
of the day because I put a lot of myself into it, it was never a frustrated or
angry or whatever, and every one of the NOW Board meetings was just something to
behold. In the first place, the people on the Board, part of them came out of
the woodwork, everyplace Betty Friedan was going to make a speech if she would
meet someone who was particularly active or bright or interested, she'd say, "Oh
10:16:00come and be on our Board," or "Come at least to the Board meeting." In those
early days she was just naming people so we would have just the most motley kind
of collection of people who just that day had discovered that women were
discriminated against or else viewed themselves as the latter day Susan B.
Anthony, I don't know, just lot's of prima donna's. As the days moved on or the
years moved on, I think some of the feminist ideology or procedure, no stars, no
procedures, no rules, sort of anarchy. There were quite a few feminists
anarchists who would come into the meetings who would want to know why they
10:17:00needed to ask permission to speak, I exaggerate now, but it wasn't easy to...
I was happy enough to leave the chair. I was re-elected to the Board for several
more terms and actually was never defeated, I finally didn't run again. When we
came to that Chicago meeting Betty pulled me aside and said "I think I want to
have my retirement speech have something forward looking in and I just read up
on this and found out that the last state to ratify the 19th amendment was
Tennessee and it ratified on August 26th. Wouldn't it be great if we declared
that Womens's Equality Day and had a celebration. What do you think of that? I
10:18:00don't want to do it unless you think it's a good idea?" I said "It's a great
idea." I'd never heard of it and never thought of it but ok, fine. She just had
to sound out.
MA: So she put it in her speech?
KC: That's right, and declared it for that very year and with the motto "Don't
iron while the strike is hot," and we were off and running. People did celebrate
it all over the country that first year, just by that declaration.
MA: Given what sounds like a fair amount of disunity and organizational
difficulties, how do you explain the phenomonal growth?
KC: I don't think there was disunity in the sense of where do we go from here.
MA: You believe there was unity for the goals?
KC: Yes. In 1967 we had an annual conference in Washington. There was disunity
10:19:00there because we took a vote on whether or not to endorse the Equal Rights
Amendment. The women for UAW, who were there in force knowing that this issue
was going to come up, said "Don't do it now because we can't remain in this
organization if it takes a stand in favor of the Equal Rights Amendment.
However, we've been working on the organization of the UAW and we think they're
almost ready to approve;" which is quite a switch of course from the protective
labor stuff and if the organization voted then at that moment to endorse the
Equal Rights Amendment the UAW people would have to leave. Well, in that
interval between the organizing conference of NOW and this annual conference a
10:20:00year later, the UAW volunteered the time and office of Caroline Davis in
Detroit, she was head of the Women's Division of UAW, to be the secretary and
treasurer of NOW, which was an enormous service and in-kind contribution. They
received all the new memberships, typed up and duplicated the minutes, mailed
them out, took care of all the postage costs and everything. Well, if UAW was
going to go then Caroline Davis' services would also and we'd have to find
another place to do all of that or else not have it handled well. Mary Eastwood
10:21:00and Caruthers Burger, who were two of the attorneys who were already handling
cases for us; we did not yet have a legal defense and education fund, but still
the membership organization was handling a number of landmark court cases, and
these were two of the volunteer attorneys, Mary and Caruthers. They stood up on
the floor and said "If we don't act that very day, they will withdraw," and the
UAW people said "If you do act today, we will withdraw." There was no question
in the organization of support for ERA. The question was, which incidentally was
a new thought to an awful lot of us, the Equal Rights Amendment; what it would
do and why it was necessary. I had never heard of the Equal Rights Amendment in
all my graduate years in Political Science. Phineas Indritz and I tried to
nullify the conference and say, you know, I really wanted them to postpone the
10:22:00vote and I didn't see any reason why postponement should affect Mary and
Caruthers so. But, in any case, the vote was not postponed.
10:23:00
MA: Kay, you were talking about in 1972 some pressure in Congress regarding the ERA.
10:25:0010:24:00
KC: I said that the NOW people had a significant hand in lobbying congress and
finally after 49 years of looking at the ERA they finally did vote. So, I
suppose that action in 1967 was a part of all of that. By 1970 the AFL-CIO had
endorsed the Equal Rights Amendment. I've already told the story of how the
Wisconsin Women's Conference had a significant hand in having that happen.
10:26:00
But back to NOW, I remember one very difficult decision we had to make at a
Board meeting that took place in Chicago in I think about 1968. I know that it
was the worst snowstorm, as bad as the one that brought Jane Byrne into office,
that wasn't the one of course, that was a discussion of what dues we should be
charging for membership.
MA: You were always short of money as I recall in my reading.
KC: That's right. At $5 a head that hardly covered anything and nobody's
expenses for anything could be paid.
MA: So everyone paid out of pocket then?
KC: That's right, as well as postage and long distance calls as well as
10:27:00traveling and getting to meetings. It was expensive. In fact, I've often said
jokingly that I never belonged to anything at the right time. I always belonged
before there was money to pay anybody's way to anything. Buth then I suppose
somebody has to do that. Alice Rossi was leading the discussion at that Board
meeting in Chicago not to raise the dues because she did not want to keep people
out of the organization for economic reasons. We had to weigh that against the
absolute necessity to have more money. I don't suppose going to foundations or
to anybody else for a grant was even feasible. Grants weren't so common in the
'60s as they became later on. I think we finally did decide to raise the dues to
10:28:00$10 and maybe have special dues for students or low income people.
Also, Catherine Conroy continued to raise the question of having some advance
thought into structuring national conferences. To have delegates to conferences,
based on her union experience, we not only had our Board meetings moved around
the country, but so did the annual conference. At first we didn't have an annual
conference, we had one at lease every 18 months, so it could fall at different
times of the year and always in a different part of the country, one in Atlanta,
Georgia, several in Washington, Philadelphia, Detroit, Chicago.
10:29:00
MA: Did you have any on the west coast?
KC: Yes. There was one in California, in Los Angeles, which was the tenth
anniversary I believe. I didn't go to that one because it fell right on our
wedding anniversary which was never an event that we made anything of, but that
was at the time that Hank knew that he had Parkinson's. He was kind of upset
about it and wanted to give me a very special gift for our wedding anniversary,
the watch maybe not this one, but it was a very nice one. In any case, I didn't
go. Conroy very wisely kept saying that as the organization is growing and as
10:30:00new groups were being chartered --the chartering I'm laughing about now because
we didn't have any procedure for chartering local chapters.
MA: How did that begin?
KC: I think just enough members belonged in one community so they thought why
don't we just have a local one so we can have some local actions. It began like
topsy I suppose. They wrote to me as chair of the Board and said "How do we get
to be official?" I know I was writing little letters endowing them with legal
status before we had any procedure worked out. Conroy thought we ought to have a
delegate system so that depending on how many members there were in a state they
would get so many. That of course is what exists now and they do it by, I don't
10:31:00know if it is by state or region and then local chapters. She had that kind of
foresight. She began to feel like a broken record because she would bring this
up all the time and others would say "unnecessary". Of course, it wasn't
unnecessary and finally it was adopted. At one of our Board meetings, I can't
remember if this one was in Baton Rouge, no it wasn't, it was in Kentucky, it
was wherever the Colgate Palmolive -- we were active in the Colgate-Palmolive
case which was a landmark case. This was again before we had a legal defense fund.
MA: So your two women attorneys...
KC: Yes, and Marguerite Raywalt. It was at that Board meeting that Betty Boyer,
10:32:00who was an attorney in Ohio and had been on our Board, was very turned off by
the Board's stand, or the organization's stand on right to choice, reproductive
choice, right to abortion.
MA: What was the Board's stand?
KC: That was part of the original...
MA: You were pro choice?
KC: Yes. We produced a bill of rights at that first annual conference and that
was one of the planks. I don't know if it was contrary to her religion or
contrary to something else, so she decided to start another organization called
WEAL, Women's Equity Action League, which would not be a mass membership group
and would concentrate on employment and education, none of the other issues. She
10:33:00handled this I thought in a very professional way. She came to the Board meeting
and told us that that was what she was going to do and that she wasn't leaving
in acrimony or competitiveness or whatever. I think it was kind of hard for a
lot of us to accept it cheerfully.
MA: What was the response? Did you feel it would hurt NOW, for example?
KC: We didn't know if it would, but a lot of people became members of both. It
did provide a place for people who were uneasy about the abortion question. It
has done a lot of good things over the years. Arvonne Fraser from Minnesota who
was with AID for a long time, her husband is Don Frazier who was in the Congress
and is now the mayor of Minneapolis and Arvon is now at the Hubert Humphrey
10:34:00Institute at the University of Minnesota, and putting out some wonderful
international kinds of materials, was at one time the national president of
WEAL. Catherine East has been very active, Marguerite Raywalt and a great many
people who have had dual membership in both over the years.
MA: Was that the first example of a split from your organization where a new
organization was formed?
KC: I think that may have been the first but it was not long after that, or it
was in the same period, that Mary Eastwood, the attorney in Washington, started
Human Rights for Women and I don't know on what issues she was parting company.
She didn't leave NOW but she did this...
MA: Human Rights for Women?
10:35:00
KC: It still exists.
MA: Did it have to do again with the abortion issue?
KC: No because Mary is very solid on the right to choice.
Another of the big problems and one that created a great deal of screaming back
and forth and fireworks had to do with establishing our legal expense and
education fund. We got involved as an organization in supporting legal action
with contributed services from our own attorneys plus money that we would
cough-up ourselves when we had no fund to do that.
MA: That was the primary focus wasn't it initially, as I've read?
KC: It wasn't the primary focus but we did get involved. Sylvia Roberts was one
10:36:00of our members in Louisiana and she successfully handled the Weeks' case, Lorena
Weeks case against the telephone company. Mary Caruthers and Marguerite were
active in the Colgate-Palmolive and the Mengle Koch case out on the west coast
and the Rosenthal case.
MA: Was there a question about where money would go? Like most organizations you
lay out your priorities and then make a decision about where your energy and
funds will go.
KC: We established fairly early a legal committee of the membership
organization, Marguerite Rawalt chaired that, in order to make decisions about
whether to take on a case or not. It had to be a landmark one that would affect
the law, not just defending an individual who had a discrimination complaint.
10:37:00These cases that I mentioned were all landmark cases and were all handled by NOW
before we had a legal defense fund. There was an attorney in New York, Grace
Cox, and I witnessed a shouting match between Grace Cox and Betty Friedan at the
Atlanta conference the likes of which...if you can picture two little kids that
are furious with each other, just furious, but these were grown-up adults. I had
never before seen grown-up adults...they didn't hit each other but they were red
in the face, they were shouting and you could hear them for blocks. This all
began because Grace Cox had been dragging her feet. She had volunteered to get a
10:38:00charter or whatever and have us legally ensconced as a legal defense and
education fund. It took several years, first Grace wasn't getting it done and
there were two or three people that had a go at it and I think finally
Marguerite Rawalt did it in Washington for us. We finally did, in 1972,
establish a legal defense and education fund.
MA: So the argument was over whether or not it would be established?
KC: No. The decision had been made and it was just getting Grace Cox off dead center.
MA: Oh, Betty was anxious for her to move?
KC: Apparently it is a somewhat complicated process but the procedure is clearly
laid out so it was just a question of getting the move on. I don't know if Grace
10:39:00Cox didn't want it to happen or she just didn't want to take the time to do it.
MA: Did she end up doing it?
KC: No. Marguerite Rawalt ended up doing it. So there were lots of fireworks
from time to time.
MA: You've mentioned issues which were crucial issues like the abortion issue
and you mentioned earlier in Chicago in 1970 at the conference that the lesbian
issue, I believe Betty Friedan called it the "lavender menace". Tell me about
that from your perspective.
KC: Several of the women, for whom I have a lot of respect, spoke with me
privately before that Chicago conference and put it in terms of democracy. I
10:40:00think the hesitation on my own part and that of...although I was more neutral
than I was anything else, but the hesitation on the part of many people was that
our organization was having enough difficulty getting established and being
listened to and being taken seriously without taking on one more issue that was
going to increase that. So the sort of wait a little while....
MA: What was the issue? What were the women asking of NOW?
KC: That a plank in the platform, that an agenda item be to extend the
non-discrimination to lesbians. There never had been any question in the
10:41:00organization or, as Betty Friedan used to say, "We do not do a bed check." We
don't ask people what their sexual preference is and say you may not join as a
result. In fact, the only prerequisite for belonging was affirming the Statement
of Purpose which was that you do not discriminate on the basis of sex or any
other basis. So, there were quite a few lesbians, some self proclaimed and
others not self proclaimed in the organization. Some of the leadership people,
some of my favorite people in the organization were lesbians. What they were
asking was that this sexual preference be incorporated as one of the issues.
10:42:00That didn't happen at the Chicago meeting; the issue was brought up but it was
voted down.
In fact, I was telling David just the other day when he was chairing a session
of the Wisconsin Assembly recently one of his rulings was contested from the
floor and I said "Only once in my life, in all the things I've chaired, was my
ruling contested, then it was put to a vote and I lost the vote. The challenge
was sustained by the vote of the body."
MA: What was that?
KC: I told him what it was. It was at that Chicago meeting and Ruth Gage Colby,
10:43:00who was a real peace advocate and had done a lot of international things, was a
member of the organization and she proposed a resolution that NOW go on record
in opposition to American involvement in the Vietnam war. The people lined up
from here to there to speak to that from the microphone. A lot of people who
were very much in favor of that resolution said "That is not an appropriate
thing for this organization to take a stand on." So, the resolution was
defeated. Very soon after that, in the same meeting, either Ruth or somebody
else brought in another resolution that NOW opposes war or military hostilities
10:44:00as an instrument of national policy. Someone said "That's out of order, we just
voted it down" I said "No, the chair is going to rule that 'in order' because I
think that's a totally different issue, one was specific to the Vietnam war and
this is a matter of principle that we oppose violence and institutionalized
violence." So, I was challenged, I stepped down and somebody took over the chair
and the challenge to the chair was upheld so the motion was out of order and we
couldn't vote on it. I kept wondering now why in hell is this happening because
I know all of these peaceniks were taking that position. Then I realized, much
later realized, that if the issue of sexual preference came up, they also were
10:45:00going to rule that out of order. They were going through this whole motion of
anything that wasn't...and that's why that was happening.
MA: You're convinced?
KC: Oh yes.
However, I think that at the next annual conference
MA: In the next year, 1971 or so?
KC: I think that was about the time that the issue was put on the agenda or on
the Bill of Rights for the Statement of Purpose.
MA: So that a plank was included at that time. What do you think made the
difference within that year?
KC: I don't know if it was the new leadership or new membership on the Board or
just the passage of time and the organization felt strong enough. And, of course
10:46:00the idea was new to a lot of people, just as ERA was new to a lot people and
having the question of abortion rights as a political consideration. I can't
remember a time in my life, from the time I knew the word abortion, that I
thought it was nobody's business, that the government had no business, that it's
a usurpation of government authority to butt into...to jump from there knowing
that it was a political problem was a leap that I only made after I was on the
Board of NOW. I can remember Pauli Murray talking about that any other
opportunity and right for women is ultimately not going to mean a hill of beans
if a woman can't control her own reproductive life.
That was what brought another new idea to me. I encountered so many new ideas
over the years, not only in NOW but on our Commission, of things I had never
10:47:00thought about.
MA: That process, it sounds to me, of talking about it with the women that you
were working with
KC: It was important. The whole notion of sexual preference as a right and as
an...I didn't, in the first place, know anything about gay and lesbian people
and I knew that the few people that I knew who told me that they were lesbians
were people that I mostly liked. There were a few that I hated, didn't hate but
didn't want to spend any time with. There was an occasion in Washington, it must
have been in about 1969 because it was when Libby Koontz was first named
director of the Women's Bureau and she was named during the Nixon
administration, he was elected in 1968 and this was in 1969, George Schultz was
10:48:00Secretary of Labor, and named a Black woman Democrat as head of the Women's
Bureau of the Labor Department, which was quite astonishing.
MA: Yes, how do you explain that?
KC: I don't know. George Schultz knew her through educational circles and
thought she was fantastic and she was. Anyway, some of the NOW people were in
Washington and were going to have a meeting with Libby Koontz, now that Mary
Keyserling was no longer there--Mary who hated the notion of NOW. They were
having a get acquainted session and to say that maybe they could work together,
etc. I was prohibited by the NOW people from going into that meeting. I don't
know if they didn't want to take advantage of my former friendship with the
Women's Bureau or they didn't want to be tainted by Mary Keyserling's feelings
toward me, I can't remember now what the rationale was but it was explained and
10:49:00so I made myself scarce. I think they were headquartering as a staging area in a
room in the Mayflower Motel so I went there while the delegation went up to see
Libby Koontz. Betty Friedan and I were there and, I don't know how many, four or
six people who I think were pulling our leg, but who were lesbians and who were
being very obviously affectionate and making sort of veiled threats of attacking
Betty or me or whatever. I don't know what kind of a game they were playing but
it didn't set very well with me. I thought this is no way, if you are trying to
persuade somebody of something, it's no way to do it.
MA: Were they members of your organization?
KC: Yes. They were NOW members. There were a number in New York City and, of
course, Betty had her outs and was at odds with some of the lesbians in the New
10:50:00York NOW in that kind of period. It was not really I think until the Houston
Conference in 1977, which was not a NOW conference, the National Women's
Conference when the issue of sexual preference came on the floor of the
conference that Betty spoke on behalf of passing that at this national
conference. That was considered a real turning point. It was important to the
passage of that plank but it was also important to the many lesbian women who
were not only delegates, but those sitting up in the gallery, to have Betty
make...She made a very brilliant and impassioned statement.
MA: I find it fascinating that, like most organizations, it seems like there
10:51:00were issues that came from the outside that you slowly incorporated as planks
within your organization. As the organization grew, so to did the planks, is
that correct?
KC: Yes.
MA: Do you think it was in response to the pressure of women to changes in
society, a combination, your organization itself?
KC: I suppose one would have to say it's all of the above.
MA: Do you think the women's liberation movement, many books talk about this,
was a spur to radicalizing now some of the more radical small groups, red
stockings, etc., who had, even today I think we would say extraordinaryly
radical positions? Do you think the far left served to radicalize NOW?
10:52:00
KC: I don't know, I suppose so. I suppose as some of the members from the campus
based and other women's liberation groups became members of NOW and brought
their thoughts and...
MA: And that did happen. Because again, the literature characterizes the
membership of NOW as mostly quite well educated, white, middle class, women.
KC: Yes, but that is not terribly accurate, it depends on what literature you
are reading. I know that Jo Freeman is one of the people who had originally
written about that and then what she wrote has been cited and copied by other
people. To an extent, that original characterization is true, but there were, I
10:53:00would say that the original members, the early members, tended to be better
educated than the average bear. We had union members who were high school
graduates and our very first Board had Black men and Black women and from a
variety of economic classes and educational levels, so, that's an exaggeration
to begin with. Barbara Ehrenreich has an article in that 15th anniversary issue
of Ms magazine in which she says she has several responses to when people say
that the rebirth of the women's movement was a white, middle class, educated
thing, 1) is that that isn't totally accurate, 2) who is in a better position
10:54:00to be able to afford the time and money to get something off the ground and, 3)
her response is "So what!" So what if it was, but it is not totally accurate nor
do I think there was such a big...I don't think that the original Bill of Rights
of NOW is a very conservative document. In fact, almost the only thing that
wasn't in it, that is now, is the sexual preference plank, the other things were
sufficiently broad in their statement of employment, education, home and family,
legal rights, childcare, and abortion.
At that same 1967 conference where we did adopt the Equal Rights Amendment plank
Alice Rossi gave a position paper on the sole subject of reproductive freedom
10:55:00which was a mistressful, gorgeous paper, and again it opened my eyes to a lot of
aspects and ways of looking at the whole question that I hadn't thought of and
I'm sure that what was true for me was true for a lot of other people. Mary Jean
Collins, who was the vice president of NOW under Judy Goldsmith in the most
recent term, is now employed by Catholic's for a Right to Choice, or whatever
that organization is, recently told me that that was her first meeting that she
attended of NOW and it was that conference and to hear Alice Rossi's paper. Mary
Jean had grown up, not only as a Catholic, but all of her education had been in
Catholic schools and a Catholic college so that this was, you know, a lot of it
was just startling to her. Alice Rossi, I remember, talked about the religious
10:56:00view of some people that sexual intercourse is only for the purpose of
procreation, not for recreation. I had never thought in those terms before. It
was a brilliant paper and--
Alice Rossi is a wonderful person. I first met her in 1965 as part of my
university work. We had a conference on Women in Science and a science sorority,
professional sorority on campus, asked me to help them put this thing together
and we invited Alice Rossi to keynote and that was the first time that I had met
her. For part of that day-long conference we put together a panel of several
10:57:00married couples who were both in science, man and wife. I remember that Alice
and I were on that panel and found out, I guess we were talking about how you
juggle career and home and family, and I remember Alice telling about her
experience in getting a housekeeper or babysitters, because she and her husband
have always, as a team, only go to institutions that will take them both. He is
in Survey Research and she is a Sociologist. They are now at Amherst but were at
the University of Chicago at the time that I first met her. She told about when
she would hire somebody as a housekeeper to be with their three children, she
always looked for somebody as nearly like herself as she could find so that the
10:58:00children would have the values and all of this, of course, that wasn't easy to
do to find someone to do that job who was a lot like Alice. After a number of
not too satisfactory efforts she found this older woman who was kind of
maternally hefty and her grammar wasn't perfect and she was a marvelous cook and
she loved to read to the kids and have them sit on her lap and rock them --
Alice is, I don't know if you know her at all, but she's tall and slender and
kind of dignified and scholarly, scholarly to look at and to listen to -- so
this was a total contrast and the children had never been happier. She realized
how foolish it was of her to think that her children were not going to learn to
speak proper English if they were exposed to this wonderfully loving person
whose grammar wasn't perfect and who maybe didn't talk about world affairs or
10:59:00whatever. Anyway, her children are marvelous, they're all adults now. She
recently did some research with her son as a matter of fact, her number one
child, which I read about. Another thing that she and I found that we had
absolutely in common was the emphasis on birthdays in our household, that we
don't do something else if it's a child's birthday and we go to school programs
and have certain priorities.
MA: Were many of the women that you worked with in NOW married with children?
Would you say that was the majority?
KC: I don't know if it was the majority but there certainly a lot, Betty Friedan
for one, Muriel Fox.
MA: When did Gloria Steinem come into the organization?
KC: I really don't know the date.
11:00:00
MA: It was certainly not within the first two or three years?
KC: No, it wasn't. Let's see, she started Ms magazine 15 years ago, or 16 by
now, she has now sold it you know.
MA: To an Australian? The last Ms magazine I looked at the first page to see if
it noted that it was from Australia. It doesn't yet.
KC: I don't think that it is going to come from Australia is it?
MA: I wanted to see the ownership, it didn't note a change in ownership on the masthead.
KC: I think the final arrangements and final contracts and all of that has just
very recently taken place. This isn't something that I just think, it is
something that Bella Abzug told me. Last Friday I had an hour interview with
Bella Abzug and Gloria Steinem together and they were in Gloria's office at Ms
11:01:00magazine, or at the Ms Foundation. Maybe Gloria will be staying with the Ms
Foundation, I don't know that.
MA: What was your interview about?
KC: It was for the Annenberg American Government course and it was the lesson on
interest groups in political movements so the audio tape will be just this one
conversation, well, we talked for over an hour and only a half hour will go on
the tape but it will be edited down. It was a description of the contemporary
women's movement and what stimulated the rebirth and a little bit about the ERA
campaign and then where do we go from here and how do we get there.
MA: Did you concur with their thoughts about the rebirth of the movement?
KC: I think so. However, neither one made any mention at all of the Kennedy
11:02:00Commission on the Status of Women or the State Commissions or the Continuing
Education, these strands, which I think were just terribly important, and the
Citizens Advisory Council and all of the material that they put out, so I added
that -- it was a three way conversation.
MA: What do you see as important about the state commissions and continuing
education? Where do those strands fit in?
KC: Doing the public education, fishing up of information about what the life of
American women really is, what the facts are, the circumstances and what public
policy exacerbates these circumstance and what public policy needs to be changed
in order to make things better. This was going on ...I just can't tell you how
11:03:00many publications, conferences, speeches; I used to give 30-40 speeches a year
around this date to all different kinds of groups. Our conferences were all
very, very well planned and well conducted, with a lot of perceptible changes.
Anyway, this laid the groundwork that was absolutely necessary and the kind of
thing that NOW as an organization never did, or didn't do in the same kind of way.
MA: The kind of indepth research that you did in Wisconsin, for example, on the
laws that were on the books?
KC: That's right. And getting the word out and evidence that, in fact I was
11:04:00recently introduced a month or so ago when I spoke at the AFL-CIO thing somebody
was saying, "Does she look like a bra burner?" Well?
MA: They were just saying that?
KC: My response was that nobody would know the difference! I think that to
counteract what a lot of the national press and a lot of the local press
elsewhere was doing to ridicule the women's movement and to highlight aspects or
activities or things, either highlight, exaggerate, or make-up. Those things got
counteracted by people who...I told you earlier I think on a tape that often I
would go someplace out of state and people would be so surprised when they saw
me and I never knew if they were disappointed or relieved but certainly they
11:05:00were surprised. That's another of the sort of serendipity I think Commissions on
the Status of Women, while they may have been regarded as establishment by self
styled radicals had the same program that the so-called radicals, or self styled
radicals had, but pervaded in a way that was acceptable to those who listened
and heard.
MA: It didn't alienate people.
KC: I remember the time I was invited by the Catholic Diocese here in Dane
county, or whatever the Diocese is, to address a luncheon, annual affair. Two
things stand out in my mind about it: 1) that I had surprisingly affirmative
response, I mean I crafted what I said in ways I was thinking these women who
11:06:00are in the audience have a lot of very negative views of me, some.... I didn't
rush in there talking about abortion rights. I talked about the care of children
and the nurturance and the necessity for women who have to work and who need
their children cared for. Anyway, I always tried to be honest, that I didn't
have to work at, but to say things in ways that would not alienate people. What
I remembered about the.... they always had a priest who would either introduce
me or make some comments, and one of them asked, I can't even remember what the
11:07:00question was from one person in the audience and it was kind of a hostile
question and the priest interceded it was an odd homonym kind of question which
I cannot remember but I do remember I was wearing a red silk dress, and he said,
"Just look at her, her very costume is a statement." He meant that
affirmatively, that I looked like a lady I suppose or whatever. He also said to
me privately, afterwards when we sat down to lunch, he said "Gee that was a good
speech! You talk just like a man." "You missed the whole point of what I said
didn't you?"
MA: "You talk just like a man"
KC: Because it was logical and rational and I didn't hem and haw and I didn't
giggle I suppose. But, I gave him what for! I said, "That is not a compliment
and you certainly missed the whole point of what I was saying."
11:08:00
MA: Did he hear you?
KC: I think so, he kind of thought about that.
MA: It's during this time, in 1966, that you were the Woman of the Year; the
Business and Professional Clubs of Madison chose you as Woman of the Year. I was
thinking about that and I wanted to ask you what community, friends and family
thought about your involvement in all of this wild, new radical stuff?
KC: My family certainly approved. I've told you that my neighbors were so
helpful with my own children because they knew that I was doing something on
behalf of women and they wanted to repay me. There were some people, I suppose
some real conservative people who thought I was some kind of a nut and others....
11:09:00
MA: I imagine your work in Wisconsin to had layed the groundwork for a lot of
acceptance for you too. It's not as though you just ran off to Washington, D.C.
to form this group.
KC: Of course that work actually began in Wisconsin just in 1963, other than the
continuing education which had started a year or two before that. The Milwaukee
Sentinal, if you were looking at my vitae or those award things, very soon after
that named me Wisconsin Woman of the Year or Doer of the Decade -- no that was
Theta Sigma Phi that did the Doer of the Decade in 1970 --
11:10:00
MA: 1967, Wisconsin Woman of the year.
KC: That particular thing made me very popular with my son, not that I can
remember a time when I wasn't in his reasonably good graces, but the Milwaukee
Sentinal put out a special edition and had a whole page, that was during the
glory years of the Green Bay Packers, so on this one page of people they were
honoring in Wisconsin was a man named Kellet who had headed up the Kellett
Commission on Higher Education and me and the Green Bay Packers, the whole...
MA: And David thought that was just wonderful!
KC: That's right, so I told him I was an honorary Green Bay Packer.
11:11:00
MA: You had talked about the various activities and platforms that NOW
supported. I was reading in an article that NOWs shift toward more radical
issues had a lot to do with changes in the social climate, Eileen Hernandez
being president in 1971 a point was made that other more conservative groups
were taking certain issues so NOW could concentrate on more radical issues.
There was a discussion of individual members undergoing concsciousness raising
11:12:00experiences and that changed their perceptions and also a linking of humanism
and feminism in the movement and that that was significant and that was why
racial issues began to be talked about more.
KC: I can't imagine what article you must have been reading! I know that there
are a lot of different perceptions and different things being written. Many of
the ones I read are written by people who were not in evidence and who either
picked up a little hearsay.... I just read one of the women in this national
women's conference committee which just had its tenth anniversary of the Houston
Conference meeting in Washington. Someone is doing a little survey of many of
the things that are happening locally that demonstrate how mainstream feminism
really is these days in the United States. It should be an interesting document
when it's finished. She sent me a rough draft of the introduction she was
11:13:00writing, she was going to clear up misconceptions. She had more mistakes on one
page, for example, identified Betty Friedan as a member of the Commission on the
Status of Women because Betty happened to be at that conference in 1966 and had
dates wrong. She also had said that originally NOW stood for the National
Organization of Women and a few years later that was changed to the National
Organization for Women. That is absolutely wrong! I was one of the people who
dreamed up the name. There were eight of us sitting at this table and it was
always the National Organization for Women. I phoned the woman who was writing
this to give her some corrections of dates and these few corrections and told
her that and she said "somebody from the Philadelphia Chapter told me that."
This is the way history gets written sometimes.
It is true that Eileen Hernandez who is a Black woman who was married to a man
11:14:00named Hernandez and she does speak some Spanish so she is kind of a triple
threat person. Eileen has a degree in political science and acts as a consultant
out in San Francisco. Eileen was on the Equal Employment Opportunities
Commission, on the very first commission when it was established in 1965 and was
in that capacity when NOW was first formed so that she was the first vice
president elected--I don't know whether to take the time on a tape to tell about
the legal business that NOW got into before our feet were even wet --
MA: I think that would be important.
KC: At the founding conference in October of 1966, which took place in
11:15:00Washington a few months after we actually started the organization, the election
of officers took place. That's when Betty Friedan was elected president and I
was elected chair of the Board. They wanted to elect Eileen Hernandez, known to
folks through her EEOC official capacity but there would be a conflict of
interest. The airline stewardesses had asked NOW to work on their behalf. They
had brought a complaint before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; they
were being forced to retire either at the age of 32 or when they got married,
whichever came first because then the sort of "playboy bunny" image would be
gone, according to the owners of the airline. They had presented a complaint
that this was discrimination and the EEOC had failed to take the complaint
11:16:00seriously or to act on it at all. They wanted NOW to push the EEOC in some way
to force them to get a ruling on their complaint. Eileen Hernandez was on the
EEOC although she was intending to resign because she was kind of irked with the
lack of seriousness that was being given to the sex based discrimination.
Therefore, she could not, while that case was pending, take, and NOW went on
record as wanting to support the complaint of the stewardesses, so Eileen
couldn't take the vice presidency of NOW at that moment. So we elected Anna
Arnold Hedgman who was a black woman from New York and on the New York City
Council with Anna Arnold Hedgman's understanding that she would hold the slot
11:17:00and serve as vice president until Eileen did resign and would be able to
function as vice president of NOW. However, because the organization had
absolutely no money, except five bucks a head, and we couldn't afford to print
stationery first with Anna Arnold Hedgman's name and then later on with Eileen's
name, we decided to print it just once with Eileen's name but not to use the
stationery until she could be officially in office. Well, we mentioned on an
earlier tape of some of Betty Friedan's paranoia thinking the CIA or somebody
was watching, "big brother" at least. Somebody found out about the printing of
this stationery --we had not used a piece of the stationery--and immediately
accused NOW of doing something illegal, it wasn't really illegal. Betty Friedan
had a summons to appear in court, this was just about Christmas time, our
11:18:00conference had been in October and I can remember telling Betty "Ok, you take
all of the summons on Christmas and Easter and I'll take them on Hanukkah and
other Jewish holidays." In jest we made that bargain and that agreement. That
was kind of a rat smelling event from the very word go. In any case, that's how
Eileen Hernandez got involved in the organization. When she resigned from the
EEOC she became vice president. In 1970, at the Chicago annual, it wasn't an
annual conference, we had to have a national conference at least once every 18
months, so we had one in Chicago, in fact the date of it is probably on the red
poster, the thing on my desk
11:19:00
MA: March 22, 1970.
KC: That was the date the Chicago meeting went. Betty and I stepped down from
our slots and Eileen was elected president.
I think we've already mentioned that at the 1970 conference the question came up
whether the sexual preference should go on the agenda. The idea failed.
MA: Right, we did talk about that and there was also the labor issue that came up.
KC: No, the labor issue had come up on ERA two years before that, in fact 1967
at our first annual meeting after we were really functioning as an organization.
That was the time at which the UAW women felt obliged to leave, which was a
11:20:00great loss to the organization. Nobody walked out after this 1970 meeting but
the issue was very much alive. I told you, either on the tape or off the tape,
that my own foot dragging had to do with the precariousness of the organization
as it stood and taking one more, what at the time would have seemed an
outrageous position, seemed premature.
MA: Do you think other members would have concurred? That their reasoning was
like yours, being concerned about the precariousness of the organization?
KC: Yes, I think that was the reasoning of a great many people and there were a
great many others, I don't know what the numbers or percentages would have been,
who were still so unaccustomed to the whole notion of even talking about
11:21:00lesbians and homosexuality and homophobia was not a word that I knew or may even
have not come into our language yet. I know that gay meant light hearted to me.
I think there was a great deal of ignorance and lack of familiarity and almost a
phobia of just something strange that people aren't accustomed to. There were
quite a few people in the organization who were "out" and who identified
themselves as lesbians which didn't bother anybody, or if it bothered anybody I
didn't hear about it, so there was no isolation or shunning or segregating and,
11:22:00in fact, I can't remember which year our national meeting was in Houston, I
think that was in 1974, when the house detectives in the hotel were apparently
bent on enforcing laws about consenting adults or nonconsenting adults so that
the word went fast among the organization to watch your step because people are
out watching. That was a real united organization at that time, people looking
out for one another, that was at a later time.
11:23:00
I don't know what more radical notion anybody was writing about. It is true, and
I think I have already mentioned, that Betty Boyer began WEAL, Women's Equity
Action League, to concentrate solely on employment and education issues which
was predominantly to avoid anything on reproductive control. There may have been
other issuses that she was wanting to avoid at the time but that didn't mean
that NOW removed whose issues from our agenda. In fact, the Bill of Rights that
NOW produced in 1967 is essentially the same, I think sexual preference was
added after that time, but I'm not sure there were any other major issue areas.
11:24:00Whatever someone thought became more radical, maybe you have other specific
MA: Prison reform issues, issues of racial discrimination, that's where they
were talking of humanism and feminism that this article equated that joining
with Hernandez' presidency.
KC: I suppose that the fact that Hernandez is black.
MA: It was the issue of the Viet Nam War was raging at the time and so the
article was stressing NOW's broadening, I guess you would say. I don't know that
you would say it was more radical but moving into areas which were not
specifically feminist areas.
KC: There was a concern for women offenders that wasn't exactly new, Commissions
on the Status of Women had been concerned. In fact, even the League of Women
11:25:00Voters had had a big project on jails and looking at treatment of women in
jails, which is not to say that those are or are not radical, they certainly are
important and that is, in fact, an old feminist concern back from the sufferage
days when prison reform
MA: Dorthea Dix
KC: Yes, and the vote seekers who were jailed because of their behavior in
Washington. They got in there and saw the conditions and immediately had one
more fish to fry.
MA: I guess that's part of this questionning, we tend to forget the roots.
People who write about these organizations act as though everything sprung up at
that moment.
KC: Of course there were black men and women both on our first National Board of
NOW and the Statement of Purpose is one of nondiscrimination on any grounds.
11:26:00That was the only litmus test that was given to the membership in the
organization from the very beginning.
MA: I'll give you another example which has to do with lesbian rights which I
think is interesting. I read a quote that "the women's liberation groups caused
NOW to support lesbian rights because NOW was able to see that the women's
liberation groups had done so without serious repercussions". Of course it is in
1971 that NOW does make a statement about that.
KC: That sounds to me as though it was written by someone who had been in a
11:27:00campus based women's liberation group.
MA: From your experience, does it ring a bell?
KC: No it doesn't. But that doesn't...I'm sure there must be some element of
validity in the statement. I don't believe that NOW as an organization added
that platform to its agenda because it took a look at some of the women's
liberation groups and said "well it doesn't matter."
MA: Let's take this to a more personal level. How did the change occur for you,
as one founding member of NOW? Would you from the very beginning have been
willing to put this in? You were concerned with the overall organization, you've
stated that.
KC: I never saw, and it was a long time coming, why the issue of gay and lesbian
11:28:00rights needed to be an agenda item. I do not believe in oppression or
persecution or keeping people out of any opportunity. I had no idea of the
extent of the discriminatory and really horrible kinds of treatment and the
necessity for people who were homosexual to keep that identify a secret. I
really had no idea. I remember when I was chair of the Board of NOW I was
receiving information materials from lesbians who belonged to NOW who would send
11:29:00me magazines and articles. I kept in my head, come and join NOW and fight on
behalf of equal opportunity and rights, etc. We weren't keeping anybody out
because of their race, color, creed, previous conditions of servitude or sexual
preference and anyone was welcome. I thought "why is it a special issue?"
MA: You didn't see it as being like race, or some other more clearly visible
discriminatory factor?
KC: I guess so, not as a special category. I had a long time.... I can remember
returning from Board meetings with friends on the airplane and discussing ...
11:30:00Mary Eastwood, who was one of the founders and is a Washington attorney who
began an organization called Human Rights for Women which didn't really compete
with NOW but was a supplement to it. Mary was a little bit affected by some
things going on in NOW. That wasn't unusual, a lot of people wanted their own
agenda to go...I remember Mary saying to some of us that "in theory", she was a
theoretical lesbian, she herself wasn't a practicing lesbian, but she could see
the whole rationale on an intellectual level, which strikes me as interesting.
11:31:00Charlotte Bunch, the writings of Charlotte Bunch I think are very revealing and
interesting to some of us who are not homosexual but who find out what life and...
MA: You were talking about the writings of Charlotte Bunch.
KC: Probably if I had read some of those things at that time it would have been
helpful to my understanding. But I couldn't understand what Mary Eastwood was
talking about not having read Charlotte Bunch or anything similar to that. I can
remember talking with friends on the plane coming back from these when neither
one of us understood what it must be like to be a homosexual and wishing that we
11:32:00had more understanding and being open to the idea of having more understanding
and certainly not being discriminatory in our own or tolerating other people.
The leap from there to making it an agenda item was still a very long leap.
MA: It sounds like the leap from consciousness raising to action. It sounds in a
way maybe that the processing you all did around this issue was somewhat like
what we would call today "consciousness raising" don't you think?
KC: I don't know; I have no idea. I think it was only at the Houston conference,
which was only ten years ago, it was not a NOW sponsored thing although NOW is
11:33:00one of many, many organizations supporting it, that Betty Friedan made her
public statement in favor of including sexual preference.
MA: It took her a bit longer didn't it for her to feel comfortable with that?
KC: I guess.
MA: Again, that is the general impression that I have gotten from my readings.
KC: Betty is a very outspoken and a very honest....Betty has integrity and she
has courage. Even though she knew she would be criticized by not coming out with
a statement of that kind. For years she just refused to do it because she
didn't, in her heart-of-hearts think that ought to be an agenda item so she
wasn't going to be pushed into acquiescing.
11:34:00
MA: I understand.
KC: I don't know what other people....
KC: I suppose in a way the whole women's movement became more radical. When you
look at all of the old mainline organizations that have gradually adopted the
whole agenda so that in fact NOW isn't cutting edge necessarily anymore. There
is hardly an ongoing organization that has the name "women" somewhere in its
title whether it's religiously oriented or racially oriented or whether it's
Business and Professional Women or AAUW, Leagaue of Women Voters, Church Women
United, a whole snag of organizations that rarely had more than one or two
feminist agenda items, now have the whole agenda. The whole National Plan of
11:35:00Action that was adopted at Houston is now agenda for most of these
organizations. So yes, I suppose NOW did become more radical along with the rest
of the women's movement.
MA: You attribute that to what?
KC: To more and more people knowing what was happening, thinking about it and
taking action and knowing how slow the process is of change. Then of course, we
had a few years in the 70s where legislative changes and public policy changes
did take place. We had the organization of the National Women's Political
Caucus, the National Association of Commissions, and implementation finally of
the Civil Rights Act Title VII, passage of the Women's Educational Equity Act,
11:36:00legislative changes, the Equal Credit in 1963, Title IX, and the enforcement
finally of the Equal Pay Act and some changes being made at the state level with
state laws, antidiscrimination laws, in the behavior of the employment service
people who were gradually being educated. A lot of things were happening. In
1972 Congress finally passed the Equal Rights Amendment and we all assumed that
that would be ratified over night. In 1973 the Row vs Wade decision, we figured
we could put that issue to rest. We were living in some dream worlds!
MA: We certainly were.
KC: With each step forward more people were please and got in the act and could
11:37:00push on and did a little deeper and branch out a little bit more.
MA: Do you think each step forward also caused raising expectations?
KC: Of course.
MA: So, the idea of relative deprivation, that one becomes more aware of what
they don't have the more they have, in a sense.
KC: I suppose with some people.
MA: It's an idea a major historian has used to talk about the women's movement,
actually. That change doesn't take place for ... that women do not develop a
group consciousness until a lot of changes have taken place and you begin to
focus on what's coming next. That the group consciousness increases as the
11:38:00changes take place. As you have described the state commissions and your
organization I see that. But, your story talks a lot more about grass roots than
we read in the traditional history books. I think that's where the story is here.
KC: I guess in my head I was running through the 1970's and some of the major
things that took place.
In 1974, our Wisconsin Commission on the Status of Women had a series of six
regional meetings around our state on the subject of "Homemaking and the Family:
Changing Values and Concerns." That was the fancy umbrella title that we used
for all six of these meetings which really translated into the economic status
11:39:00of the full-time homemaker.
MA: The title is so conservative.
KC: It was deliberately so because we wanted all kinds of grass roots people and
organizations to come.
MA: Did they?
KC: Indeed they did! We had a different keynote speaker for each of these six
meetings and we had the meetings in various places around the state, on college
campuses which we chose because we could have the facilities at no cost, and
also a lot of in kind services and help in the process. We had Libby Koontz, who
was the director of the Women's Bureau as one of the speakers, she is black. A
home economist from Cornell named Kathryn Walker who had done research on the
11:40:00relative amount of time and energy that men and women spend in the home and in
child rearing and does that change when the wife is working full time outside
the home. Catherine East came from the Citizen's Advisory Council to one of our
meetings. June Menzies is an economist from Canada who had opened a whole new
horizon for me with an article in a publication out of London, London England,
called women speaking. It was a publication that I helped to promote in this
country later on. She had done an article called "Women's Achilles Heel: The
Unpaid Labors of Women in the Home." That was the first time, that was in the
late 60's, that I read June Menzies article, that I made that connection that is
so fundamental that why it is that anything women do is under valued and the
11:41:00whole patriarchal notion that .... and the translation into the paid labor force
of these "for free" things that women are expected to do. Anyway, June Menzies
was another. Herma Hill Kay who is a law professor out at Berkeley, and who was
co-author of the first law case book on sex based discrimination with Ruth Bader
Ginsburg and Kenneth Davidson spoke at our meeting that took place here in
Madison. My daughter, Sara, was the research assistant for this book. From this,
I don't know if I have covered all six of the meetings and speakers or not, but
from this array ...Esther Peterson was another of our speakers. Each of these
main speakers came out of a different discipline and with a different point of
view so that when we had all six of these things put together at the end we
11:42:00finally put out a publication called "Real Women, Real Lives" which had national
distribution and is a beautiful document. From those meetings a whole battery of
needed change in the law and in practice came to our attention in the kind of
divorce reform that we finally passed in Wisconsin as a consequence, and the
marital property, moving from our separate property to a community property
state. We are now the only state that has done that of the 42 separate property
states in the country. Those were among the ideas that flowed from that series
of meetings.
MA: And from women's experiences?
KC: Yes, exactly. And also a lot of insights into welfare and the horrors of our
welfare system and the need for humane reform, not the kind of reform our
11:43:00incumbent governor and incumbent president have in mind. A lot of insight. These
meetings were well covered by the press and got a lot of wide and good coverage
in the state and locally of course. We had TV at each of the locations .... That
was the kind of.... a lot of instant converts. One of our state legislators,
Mary Lou Munts, whose concern in the legislature was environmental concerns, ban
the bomb and a few such -- I don't mean to minimize or deprecate her concerns
--but she didn't see any reason why she should even come to this meeting but we
11:44:00persuaded her to do so. She came to the one here in Madison which Herma Hill Kay
addressed and she couldn't believe sitting in these workshops the stories she
was hearing from some of these women. As a consequence, she led the fight in the
legislature for divorce reform and then for marital propterty. The marital
property was a long, long haul. In fact, we kind of tease her a bit because she
likes to claim such authorship credit for something that many, many people
worked long hours over a ten year period to do, but it's fine with us if she
wants to.
MA: The politician in her.
KC: Right.
Anyway, the importance of .... The results of our Wisconsin meetings and the
Wisconsin legislation were carried from here to the Houston planning, the
11:45:00International Women's Year. Wisconsin people who participated, Mary Lou Munts,
Norma Briggs and Marian Thompson and others, were invited to testify before the
Internation Women's Year Commission. Some of us were put on committees, as a
matter of fact, as a demonstration that one thing leads to another, I was
invited by the International Women's Year Commission when it was first created,
Jill Ruckleshouse was its chair and Catherine East was on the staff, I was
invited to be on the committee on homemakers rights, or whatever it was called,
which was chaired by Martha Griffiths, a Congress woman from Michigan who had
been a keynote speaker at an earlier Commission conference here. Catherine East
told her that I had had all this experience with these 1974 meetings so I was
11:46:00invited to serve on that committee as a citizen member. Then, because of our
Women and the Arts Conference which we had held at Wingspread, through the
university's auspices, also in 1973, I was invited to serve on the Arts and
Humanities Committee of the International Women's Year. Going in just as a
citizen volunteer person just on these two committees I met other folks there
and Jill Ruckleshouse asked me if I would come and work half time, first she
wanted me to be the conference coordinator and I didn't want to be gone from
home that long, so I finally took a half time deputy conference coordinator then
when the administrations changed and Bella Abzug was appointed chair of the
commission she really leaned on me. She had previously, back in 1971, had urged
11:47:00me to be her legislative aid in congress, which I would loved to have done but
it didn't seem to fit into the family situation at the time. When she leaned on
me to become the executive director and to be there full time, I can remember
her saying "Come on now, you've turned me down once before" that was in the
congress thing. "You can't do it again!" I thought it would be fun, and of
course it was. Gloria Steinem said during her luncheon presentation in
Washington a couple of weeks ago that she measures her life, or divides her life
before and after Houston. She thinks a lot of people can do that. I don't regret
for a moment, even though I commuted every week, came home on Friday night and
went back on Monday morning.
MA: How long did you do that?
KC: Two years, nearly two years. The first year and a half I stayed with
11:48:00Catherine East and then she had the nerve to retire so she wasn't driving in
from Arlington every day. Then another friend invited me to stay for three weeks
I guess when Catherine East was on vacation, so she had me for six or seven
months instead. I felt like the man who came to dinner!
MA: Tell me about....I think that this is a perfect transition point. Would you
like to talk about that experience as Bella's deputy and what that meant to you?
KC: I wasn't her deputy. She chaired the commission and I was the executive
director which was a full time staff paid position.
MA: What were you responsible for primarily?
KC: I guess it was while I was still there part time that I prepared the
11:49:00handbook for the state meetings. There were 56 state and territorial meetings,
each had some federal funding and had certain guidelines. I wrote that manual of
the guidelines and how to do the meeting and what not to do and what some of the
options might be. As executive director we had a staff of 40 some people who had
to be supervised and given assignments and check that things were happening and
staff the Commission meetings which meant to have the position papers, agenda
and information for the commissioners and keep the various committees
functioning. Then in the preparation for the Houston meeting itself, I didn't
11:50:00have direct responsibility for finding a site and subcontracting to various
people but I had to oversee the people who did have those things to do.
MA: It must have been a huge job!
KC: It was; and exciting! It was where the action was so it was fun to be there
and holding hands.
Lots of times there was a high degree of paranoia or at least anxiety. The right
wing, et al and some of the very reactionary members of congress were really
harassing us. We had seven or eight lawsuits filed by the Eagle Forum and other
fronts which took the time and energy of our legal counsel. There were letters
11:51:00from congress people -- it didn't take me very long to figure out which members
of congress were friendly and which were not. The friendly ones never wrote to
us and the unfriendly ones, Jesse Helms and a guy named Miller from California
and a couple of others, would send down, almost daily, letters. The
International Women's Year Commission was provided certain housing and franking
privileges by the State Department; that was our administrative headquarters.
They didn't butt in to what we were doing, the substance of it.
MA: You had an office then in that area?
KC: Yes. The first offices of the staff were actually in the State Building and
11:52:00then we were moved a few blocks away where we had more space and better space.
According to State Department protocol, and perhaps that is true of all of the
federal agencies, a Congressional letter came in a special kind of envelope and
the response had to be made within either 24 or 48 hours and then the special
envelope routed back through the State Department so they knew you really took
care of it. That was a waste of time.
MA: So every time Jesse Helms sent you a letter then, you had to respond?
KC: That's right, and I had to do it in a hurry. I did manage to perfect, or at
least improve, my ability to dictate responses to correspondence. For the only,
well practically the only time in my life, I had a really first rate secretary
who was just secretary to me and to nobody else so I was able to paw through a
11:53:00whole big fat in-basket and within a half hour was able to organize it and then
have her come in and dictate and give her the stuff to go back which was fine,
otherwise it would have wasted all of my time.
MA: Seven or eight lawsuits and that continual kind of harassment that you had
to respond to.
KC: Yes, and then the harassment was going on all around the country out in the
states. The national organizations who were supporting the whole enterprise were
doing yeoperson work to keep their own members, wherever they were, informed and
to point out the lies and the misrepresentation that they were hearing
otherwise. There was a lot of necessity to keep PR out in the hinterlands, not
11:54:00just in Washington.
MA: It sounds like you were having to be very reactive also, rather than
conceiving of your own policy?
KC: We certainly had to do both.
MA: And you were able to do both?
KC: The conference came off and it was a success! I will say that there was
anxiety throughout.
MA: I'm sure!
KC: I've told a few of these little things in Washington two weeks ago when it
was my turn to say a few words, that some of us on the staff felt when the
conference was over we were going to write a book; we were going to call it
"Houston Behind Closed Doors" and tell some of the things that didn't appear to
the public. I told a few from the podium.
MA: What would have been your primary contributions to "Houston Behind Closed Doors"?
KC: Maybe some of the cliffhanging--well just one little illustration. Not six
11:55:00weeks before the--the conference was in November--and it was actually Labor Day,
but about two weeks after Labor Day, which got into the middle of September--a
man had been contracted before my appearance as executive director to arrange
the exhibit area, the huge exhibit area, several hundred booths contracted,
sold, and arranged. You know, anybody who wanted a booth to sell their stuff or
show or sell could arrange for a certain size, and I guess the cost depended on
how much space they wanted. Anyway, this man vanished--he was nowhere--with all
of his records. We didn't know who had signed up for what, who had paid in
11:56:00advance, who wanted what, and it took our lawyers a couple of weeks. We didn't
even know he'd vanished and the person who was in charge of communicating with
him didn't even tell us for a while, so some when past planning--felt obliged to
say she couldn't reach him anymore. We finally got in touch with his wife, who
said yes, he'd gone off with another woman--she wasn't sure where he was either,
and if we found him to please let her know. We finally did manage to trail him
up in Maine or someplace and by threatening to throw him in jail, he finally
reappeared long enough to turn over what records he had, which were not too well
kept, so we weren't certain about financial, at least we had a list of the
people we thought were going to--
11:57:00
MA: The weeks had dwindled down to very few....
KC: And one young woman on our staff, Susan Reuben, who looked about 12 years
old, I know she was more than that--in fact she was at the 10 year anniversary,
I was so happy to see her--volunteered to take over. She had never done anything
like that in her life. She got assistance from a couple of the other staff
people and, by dint of not getting off the phone I guess, put the thing
together. There was so much anxiety close to a few weeks before we went down to
Houston and there were many other things, that's just one illustration of a lot
of things that were happening.
The whole housing arrangement was so poorly planned to start with. Instead of
having people make their own hotel reservations in Houston and leaving the
responsibility with the hotel, which should have been done, the paranoia for
11:58:00fear of the Schlaflyites or some other bad guys would take all the rooms meant
that the decision was made, again, not by me, to have all these housing
reservations come through the Washington office. There were more terrible
decisions made out of this fear and anxiety. The woman who was housing me this
last stint, Norma Metzner, is a clinical psychologist, and I would of course go
home every day
MA: And get therapy?
KC: Yes, get some free therapy. She finally realized, as I would tell her, that
I wasn't the only one who needed a little therapy. She offered to come in over
the lunch hour and anyone who wanted a sack lunch to come, and just talk about
what some of the problems were. It was wonderful for that staff! When we got
11:59:00down to Houston and I went in to look over the exhibit area to see how things
were going, Norma went in with me, we had traveled together to Houston, and when
these young staff women, I don't mean to be ageist, but they were my daughter's
ages, saw Norma they'd say "Everything's going to be alright." That was another
free valuable thing.
MA: It sounds wonderful! How were decisions made? It sounds like, were there a
lot of people making individual decisions?
KC: Yes, and there was turnover. There had been three different chairs of the
Commission. First, Jill Ruckleshouse, appointed by President Ford. Then, when
the Ruckleshouse's moved to the west coast, Betty Athanasakis, who is a judge
from Florida, was named chair. When Carter was elected, he changed membership on
12:00:00the Commission and the chair. Meanwhile, staff changes were being made.
MA: And Bella was the last chair then?
KC: Yes. Some of the decisions about the conference in Houston, and some of the
poor decisions, were made by a woman, Hillary somebody who then was replaced.
She was replaced in large part because Catharine East and I thought she was
doing such a terrible job that the whole thing would have been a problem. The
next conference coordinator was a woman who didn't get along well with the
staff, Lee Novick. She was a very difficult person to...she had worked with
Bella when Bella was in congress and the two of them used to shout at each other
over the phone all the time and want to involve me in the phone conversations.
12:01:00Finally my therapist advised me not to be available and that when I needed to
call to Bella I would call her myself in New York and not get in the middle of
this shouting match, which would upset me, I'm not accustomed to that as I've
told you before.
MA: That's not your style.
KC: Well when people behave irrationally it is upsetting to me.
MA: That's very interesting. It sounds like you were part of the front line
people who were actually doing the work but that there were political appointees
which kind of....
KC: The Commission, the International Women's Year Commission, is like our
Status of Women Commission, appointed by the top and they make policy and they
aren't paid, their travel and expenses were taken care of but they had no salary
for serving on the Commission. That was true of Bella and Mim Kelber and the
12:02:00whole Commission, Alan Alda, Jean Stapleton and people less well known, but
presidents of national organizations served on that Commission. It was always
interracial and there were men as well as women. Several members of congress
were always on the Commission, Senator Percy, and then editors of the Women's
magazines, John Mack Carter and Sy Chessler and I don't know what her name is
but from the Ladies Home Journal. Anyway, the editors of these big, Red Book and
Good Housekeeping, who were marvelous in promoting it through their own
publications and sister and friendly publications that they knew. The
Commissions were very high powered, hard working, people who came to the
12:03:00meetings, did their homework, cared very deeply about the success.
MA: They did, the appointees?
KC: Oh yes, and were very well chosen.
MA: Do you attribute that -- was that Jimmy Carter's doing?
KC: It was true of the previous Commission members as well as the Carter
appointees. I would say that both Ford and Carter probably had advice from very
good people and had fairly broadly based....
MA: So they made policy and you paid members carried it out?
KC: That's right. We provided position papers, working papers that would give
them options. They would decide that there ought to be something on homemaking
12:04:00and then throw it at us. We would have to know a lot about the substance and
prepare the materials and present it for their approval.
I learned a lot about staff work, particularly from Catherine East, who had been
a staff person in the bureaucracy for many years.
MA: That was going to be my next question.
KC: That was a new experience for me. I had always been at the Commission end of
things and not on the paid staff end.
MA: What did you learn about it?
KC: Well, I learned --I suppose I could back up a little because what I said
isn't totally true because when I chaired the Wisconsin Commission on the Status
of Women we had no staff for the first ten years, so I did both.
MA: You were the staff!
KC: I had to learn to make recommendations and not decisions; to be very timely
in the preparation of position papers; I didn't even know what it meant to
12:05:00"script" a plenary session.
MA: What does it mean?
KC: That means that when a commission person for example, I suppose this could
be true for any high powered person who has a staff to do their work, is going
to conduct a meeting, they want not only an agenda but they want to know exactly
who is going to introduce whom, and if they are going to do the introducing,
exactly what they say, and have it all written out like a regular script. In
fact, when we did this closed circuit television from Washington, two weeks ago,
with four of us on the platform, later on we were commended by some people who
said "My that was good! Who scripted it for you?" I said "We didn't have a
script! We had no idea what questions were going to come". That was really a
12:06:00high compliment if they thought that we knew what we were going to say before we
said it. Anyway, that was another thing that I learned. We had to always be way
ahead of the action. Boy it was something when the Commission would be meeting
and the staff would sit around the outside edge, those of us who were needed in
the meeting, and they called for a piece of paper, if it was something that we
hadn't thought of to do that was the worst thing of all.
MA: You had to...
KC: Second guess what they'd need and have it ready and enough copies.
MA: Were you fairly successful?
KC: I think so. I think because we had some remarkably good staff people. We had
a few that were terrible and we had a few on loan from the State Department who
some were better than others.
MA: It sounds so exciting!
12:07:00
KC: It was exciting!
MA: And every Friday night you would fly back to Madison for the weekend?
KC: That's right. To be sure that my husband had food in the house for the next
week and to do his laundry and my laundry and decide what clothes to wear the
next week. I worked out a real system of packing though, I learned that, which I
passed along to many other people. I would wear my travelling costume, that was
my Monday, Wednesday and Friday suit, with a change of blouse so that I could
have a different blouse on Wednesday from the one I had on Monday and Friday;
then I would pack my one Tuesday-Thursday outfit so I felt as though I wasn't
wearing a uniform; and then the next week when I'd go I'd have two different
outfits. So with four outfits I could survive the season.
MA: How nice. I've always wondered how people did that.
12:08:00
KC: I have a friend who was in Hawaii for years and is now in South Carolina,
she does prison education of some kind, who could travel for a week with just
carrying her purse! I don't know how she managed; I can't do that! It was
tiring, very, very tiring, and sometimes I thought I should have consulted with
a real psychiatrist.
MA: To have to do all the cooking for Hank and all of the laundry in addition
when you came home, that must have been quite a burden.
KC: It was quite a burden.
MA: The kids are gone by now?
KC: Right. I think Janet was in Madison at the University at the time.
MA: In terms of your feminist learning, or your political, did anything new for
12:09:00you come out of this experience? We've talked about the technical learning,
learning to work with the staff and learning scripting and that sort of thing.
What about the personal learning?
KC: Once again, as has been true for 25 years, I met absolutely magnificent
people, just salt of the earth, bright and accomplished. Nobody could have told
me then, or can ever tell me now, that women are unequal in any kind of way. I
suppose part of my behavior...I once applied for a job after I was, not that I
12:10:00really wanted it, but I was urged to please come to Washington and apply, this
was after the IWY experience, and when I got there I was told by one of the
committee people that it was saucered and blown and that the person had
been....but they needed to interview some women, a woman at least. It was
alright, they paid my way and I had a nice weekend.
MA: And saw your friends.
KC: Right. They asked me what my management style is, my supervisory style, and
I have no idea what my style is except that it is not management by objectives
and it is not a very firm --it's laid back I guess. Also, I just assumed, and I
think this was my style in the IWY job, that people will pretty much do their
12:11:00best if you expect it of them.
MA: And you of course always do your best so that you are setting that model.
KC: I do, I certainly try to do. I certainly don't goof-off and I don't leave
stones unturned. I also think that if people are harassed you need to offer a
help, you don't just crack the whip. You find out what the snag is and what's
slowing them down, if they're overbooked, how can we subdivide it and take the
heat off, and don't expect that everybody functions at the same pace, that each
person has her/his own rhythm and pace. I don't know if there is a name for that style.
MA: We could call it the Kay Clarenbach style!
KC: I suppose a lot of people function that way.
MA: Or perhaps a lot of women. How did your style work vis a vi the other women
12:12:00that you worked with? Did it seem compatible?
KC: I think so. Now my style is quite different from Catherine East. She is so
thorough that and over does things from my... she probably thinks I'm a little
sloppy or I'm willing to not to look up the last possible source for something,
so Catherine is ...She expects people who work immediately with her to be more
like she is and gets very annoyed when they're not. I don't know if she gets
annoyed but she tells them she expects something better from them. I think I
12:13:00don't tend to do that; it might be better if I did a little more of it.
MA: But your style was successful for you.
KC: Yes, for me, and I was comfortable with it. I had good relations with the
staff people.
MA: That says a lot I think.
KC: With most of them, except for a few who were a pain.
MA: Two years of preparing for this conference. When you got to the conference,
what was it like?
KC: There were all kinds of snafus. In the first place, the hotel, not the big
Hyatt where most people were staying, was not prepared for us. Our rooms were
not ready, most were not going to be vacated until the next morning. They had a
big conference on and so for a whole day the whole lobby of this huge hotel was
12:14:00filled with our luggage, you could hardly walk. A couple rooms would be vacated
but not ...People were just staying on couches or whatever or hunting up an
alternate hotel. Again, the anxiety level, people were wondering "Is the Hyatt
in cahoots with Schlafly, or is this other conference that is on something that
the FBI has thrown in our way?" Ultimately, but not until well after the
conference was over, did it occur to me that the conference coordinator, the one
who left, had only booked the hotel for the precise days of the conference.
Hadn't told the hotel that probably 20,000 people would be coming in the day ahead.
MA: Of course, because it began the following morning.
KC: Right. She had done the same with booking the conference center, which was a
12:15:00separate facility from the hotel -- they used the conference/civic center which
is a huge thing. The night before we were to begin, at seven in the morning,
there was a big wrestling match in the big auditorium with a ring in the center
and chairs around which went until nearly midnight. It was only at midnight that
they could begin taking that stuff down and begin putting up our 2,000 chairs
for delegates with the placards for each state, which had been carefully worked
out in advance, putting up the big platform for our podium and our banner and
the things that...Some of our staff people had to work all night long along with
the janitors, who probably charged extra for having to work all night long. Now
that again was not a mistake of the conference facility, but of our own staff
12:16:00prearrangement and, of course, she wasn't there to take the flack.
MA: I'll bet you could have just rung her neck!
KC: We didn't figure out until after the fact that if we had booked it for the
proper time, this wouldn't have happened. One little incident that I did tell in
Washington two weeks ago was that we had a little pre-meeting the afternoon
before of getting staff assignments and knowing where things were, etc., one of
our people came rushing in and said "The Eagle Forum has been around and they've
put up signals; they have signals all over the hotel and I have taken them
down!" This heroic gesture. These were the Braille signs in the elevators that
told sight impaired people what floor they were going to! She had never seen
them before so she very carefully removed them from all the elevators.
12:17:00
MA: That's a wonderful story!
Let's move on to the Eagle Forum. We read a lot about that in the press during
the time of your conference, they probably got a third as much publicity as you
did which, I remember thinking at the time, was unfortunate.
KC: Well, and of course they continued to throughout the whole ERA ratification
effort. You would have thought that they were 50% of the population. That was
the media wanting to make it look like a cat fight and giving full credence.
They created Phyllis Schlafly by giving her that kind of publicity.
MA: What was their presence like and what was the effect of their presence in
Houston? Anxiety you've already mentioned and that I can certainly...
KC: For awhile, during the first day or so, they had pickets from some of their
groups who would shout outdoors, they didn't get into the building and then they
12:18:00had a counter meeting in another facility and that kept them pretty well occupied.
MA: I remember that.
KC: Otherwise, except that we had out conference facility very well patrolled by
the Houston police. We had to pay off-duty police quite a hefty bill for just
patrolling the place.
MA: The reason was just to make sure that they stayed out?
KC: Yes. Just to maintain order among our own people would not have required the
kind of forces that were actually hired to do that. Then of course backstage, my
family never knew I ever got to Houston because I never appeared on camera. I
guess I had to be backstage making sure that the next contestant got out on time
and that there was food for people backstage. Then there was a what was called a
"sterile" area. We had four First Ladies there who came for part of the program,
12:19:00Betty Ford, Ladybird, Roselyn Carter, or were there only three?
MA: I can't think of any others.
KC: Johnson, Carter and Ford, maybe that was it. hey had to come in an entrance
and exit that nobody else could use. There couldn't be cars parked within... and
then there was a special staging area just for them where they went around to
make sure nothing was bugged and noting was....
MA: Did you deal with them personally, the First Ladies?
KC: Well sure, I met them.
MA: What did you think?
KC: I thought they were great. All three of them are gracious and friendly
people. The other First Ladies were invited; Pat Nixon and Jackie Kennedy and
12:20:00they didn't come of course.
MA: In the participation at the conference, was there a lot of participation
from ordinary women? I know that was the goal. I'm thinking of ordinary working
class housewives.
KC: Yes. People are still saying to this day, and people who are observant,
etc., that it is the most representative meeting that has ever taken place in
this country. Gloria Steinem refers to it as a "Constitutional Convention for
Women." Every state was mandated to have equitable representation based on race,
religion, economics, occupation and I don't know what the rest were. By the time
12:21:00all of the states, all 56 states and territorial meetings had taken place, we in
Washington had a rundown of how many and in what categories. Of course it was
possible for very low income people to be elected delegates because the
transportation was taken care of and the cost of getting there for all of the delegates.
MA: That's wonderful!
KC: When we looked over the racial and economic...the shortfall, based on the
population, on the demographics in each state, the shortfall was in white,
middle class, elderly women. States had done such a good job of electing people
who normally don't participate in these things or normally don't come that the
12:22:00National Commission had the option, according to the legislation, to fill any
gaps with appointments. Of course they assumed the gaps they would have to fill
would be racial and low income and instead, while they did name some racial and
minority people in the few additional...what they really did was to name people,
for example, like my friend Catherine Conroy from Wisconsin, who had declined to
run as a delegate because she wanted to make space for somebody who doesn't
normally get elected. Joy Simonson hadn't been elected a delegate from the
District of Columbia, again, these are people who normally would have been at
the top of the list but who deliberately stepped aside. Anyway, the National
Commission were able...We did have a complete rundown on the demographics so
12:23:00there were a lot of union people and working people and welfare recipients and
homemakers. There were a lot of ordinary folks. There had been, at the state
meetings, a total of 130,000 people, mostly women had participated.
MA: I attended in Washington State.
KC: You had some right wingers didn't you?
MA: The right wingers actually took over in Washington State. There was a Mormon
delegation sent from Washington State; they were so very well organized.
KC: There was a Mormon delegation from Utah and Nevada and Hawaii of all places.
I didn't even know the Mormons were that strong in Hawaii.
MA: I didn't either. Those of us who were more liberal were not as well
organized as the Mormon women. They came in with an agenda and were able to push
the agenda through. They came with babies --it was an amazing phenomenon!
12:24:00
KC: And in bus loads. Thirteen thousand showed up in Utah where they had been
prepared for at most 5,000!
MA: Our history should tell us something about that. We should have known in the
states where the Mormon population is high.
KC: A lot of things we should have known!
MA: What is the status today, if I could just jump ahead just for a minute, of
Schlafly and the Eagle Forum? I haven't heard since the ERA has quieted down.
KC: They don't have such a visible target right now.
MA: But they exist?
KC: Oh yes they exist and are having their heyday with the Reagan administration
and encouraging the kind of nominees he puts forth and probably are helping to
12:25:00keep him from getting too close to an agreement with the Soviets. That has been
Schlafly's...She cares a lot more about cold war policies and anti-soviet and
red baiting than she does about ERA and abortion. That is her longstanding
interest and concern so I don't know what her personal relationship with the
administration is but her ilk certainly are in constant communication with
Congress and with various agencies.
MA: She has become, in a sense, main stream politically at this time.
KC: You mean now that the right wing is....
MA: Since the right wing is more powerful.
How long did it take to unravel, to put away the conference? You did all the
12:26:00statistics on who was there....
KC: The conference took place in November of 1977 and the Commission went out of
existence on April 1, 1978. By that time it was necessary to get materials to
the archives and prepare a report for the president and congress. However, the
publication of the report called "The Spirit of Houston" was not off the press
--I've forgotten what day it came off the press -- but it had to be mailed
later. I did mention that it is such a gorgeous document. The woman who was
primarily responsible for it was Mim Kelber who was Bella's speech writer and
12:27:00right hand and was co-director with her of this new National Women's Foreign
Policy Council. Mim, of course, was at our ten year reunion and I mentioned from
the podium that Mim was largely responsible for the beautiful publication and
that I share some of the responsibility for the depletion of the supply because
it no longer exists. I think it is dreadful that that can't be reprinted and
copies made available. The three years that I taught Women and Politics on the
Milwaukee campus I used that as one of the required reading and bought out the
remnants from the Women's Bureau and the Government Printing Office. Anyway, Mim
spoke to me afterwards and said did I really think it would be possible to get
it reprinted? I said I had no idea if it was possible. She doesn't know if the
government printing office saved the plates and of course the photographs are
12:28:00what make the whole thing. I mentioned this to my friend Joy Simonson with whom
I was staying, she and Dick know the bureacuracy quite well, and she immediately
said she thought possibly the Congressional Causus on Women's Issues might be a
source to request of the government printing office and to trail and find out if
it is possible. She promised to do that and said the Executive Director of that
caucus owes her something! She probably has asked by now but it would be a shame
if it couldn't be reprinted. I would think a printer could photocopy this and
make copies even without the plates.
MA: I would think so, and make new plates. Basically it was five months of work
after the conference ended?
KC: Right. It was during that period that I did have Cuba trip, so if you want
12:29:00to talk about that next time....
MA: Kay, let's talk today a little bit about your travels out of the country.
KC: They have been very little, so it won't take a long time. I just had a, I
can't remember the date now but it must have been around 1970, had a visit to
the Virgin Islands at the invitation of the Status of Women Commission there
where, for the first time, black and white women from the three islands,
St. Thomas, St. Croix and St. John met for several days to discuss the agenda
of the women's movement. I've been four times to Hawaii which of course is no
longer foreign territory. It was at the invitation, twice the invitation of the
12:30:00University of Hawaii, once in collaboration, the invitation came jointly from
them and from the statewide Status of Women Commission and their four island
commissions which were then called Mayor's Commissions on the Status of Women. I
can't remember the year exactly, but it was after I was back in Madison after
the International Women's Year experience, but not very long after, I was
invited by the Aspen Institute in West Berlin, in fact when the invitation came
I didn't even know there was an Aspen Institute there, but there is, to be there
for a week's seminar on employment discrimination against women. That was
internationally very interesting. I think on three or four occasions I have been
12:31:00invited into Canada, once by a university and once a human rights international
organization and twice by the Status of Women National Commission in Canada.
Other than that and my little Cuban expedition I really haven't been anywhere
much outside of Dane County and Sparta. The Cuban trip had fascinations in many
ways. It was a one week trip and during a very brief interval of months really
during which U.S. citizens were allowed by the U.S. State Department to go to Cuba.
MA: When was this?
KC: This was in 1978 while I was still in Washington just at the closing days of
the International Women's Year when we were mopping up after the Houston
12:32:00conference. The Washington Press Club chartered a plane to Cuba and made plans
for a one week visit there. They had four empty seats in the plane and one of
our journalist friends who is a member of the organization, Peggy Simpson, whose
writing appears frequently in the magazine Working Women and also in many other
places, she is a newspaper person actually, knew a lot of us in the women's
movement and invited us to go along. There were four of us who were not...Norma
Metzner, the psychiatrist/psychotherapist who was housing me for the last part
of my stay in Washington; Kathy Bonk who was very active in NOW and is, in fact,
12:33:00she was the media connection person for the International Women's Year
Conference in Houston and managed to get some 1,500 journalists to go to that
conference. I don't remember who else tagged along and were a part of the group.
Peggy Simpson in fact was my roommate during that Cuba trip. Before we left we
knew that there had been a delegation of Cuban women at the Houston Conference,
so we wrote to them. They were representing the General Federation of Cuban
Women, which is a national organization. All the women in Cuba I guess
automatically belong to it. So, we wrote to them, in fact had one of our
friends, Joan Goodin, write it in Spanish, translate our wishes, saying that
some of us would be there with this particular tour and would very much like to
meet with some of the women from the Cuban Women's Federation. We travelled by
12:34:00bus to the places that were outlined for us by the Cuban government. It was
really an intriguing opportunity to see what the island looked like and to meet
with an awful lot of people. When our bus arrived in Havana for the last two or
three days of the week, we were met at the hotel by a translator from the Cuban
Women's Federation, a young woman who sought out the four of us by name.... I
guess Peggy Simpson constituted the fourth, even though she belonged to the
Press Club. The four of us were very eager to meet with them. The Cuban Women's
Federation had arranged, which we really only found out when we arrived in
Havana, two cars with drivers and a translator in each car in addition to the
12:35:00driver, so that two of us U.S. women could be in each of these little cars with
the translator and the driver. We were asked: what did we want to see, what did
we want to do? We were to tell them. Norma Metzner wanted to visit a mental
hospital and we all tagged along. That was an exciting, just a marvelous
facility, it was amazing. No one was idle. They had thousands of inmates doing
constructive things, raising food or flowers that were actually used someplace;
a carpentry place where they were building toy furniture and furniture for small
children to furnish the many childcare facilities that were around. We visited
childcare facilities and schools and whatever we wanted to. I was particularly
12:36:00eager to meet with some ordinary women in their own housing to see what kind of
housing accommodations people had and how they came by them and what they cost.
We had heard about the block meetings that go on all throughout Cuba so we
really kind of wanted to sit in on one of those. There were no holds barred,
nobody said you can't go here or there, contrary to what one is often told about
Cuba. I was also extremely impressed with the new family law code which had
recently been adopted in Cuba. I had picked up a copy of it here before I went
and had studied some other things so I wouldn't be totally ignorant. In
12:37:00preparation for adoption of the new laws governing family relations, they had
done a universal education activity. Every person, or at least above a certain
age in Cuba, read drafts and talked about and discussed in these communal
gatherings which took place where they lived so they didn't have to travel or go
anyplace for a meeting, and talked about what the changes would be, what the
implications would be, what that would mean to...There is an actual statement in
the Cuban family code now that so many women are employed outside the home that
it is only fair that men do their share in the home and that every woman not be
expected to do double duty. We asked them how this was actually working out
12:38:00because Cuba is a Latin, macho history and are men really...One after another
these women would tell us that whereas before the laws were changed their
husband would, if he helped as much as to sweep the kitchen floor he would pull
the shades so that no neighbor man would see him actually doing it. Now these
same men will do the laundry and go out with great pride and hang it out on the
line because they are doing their patriotic duty. Of course, we did observe that
men were taking youngsters to childcare facilities, nursery schools and doing
shopping and all kinds of things that in the past they hadn't done. I don't need
to dwell that long on the Cuba trip but it was a real adventure and eye opener
and one that I was really very glad to have had an opportunity to do.
MA: Your general impression of Cuba then was one of seeing a great many changes
12:39:00that were beneficial to women?
KC: That's right. Then we met in meetings with the leadership of the Women's
Federation and asked a great many questions and got a lot of information. Some
of our people were a little skeptical that we were being fed a line, but I
tended to take fairly literally what we were hearing because there was enough
evidence around to demonstrate... I knew also the philosophy from which it was
coming and one I think just works within that framework. Some of the information
we had was the high degree of prostitution which in the old days, before the
revolution, was virtually the only way rural women could get into town or women
12:40:00could support themselves and how that is virtually wiped out now. The
introduction of sewing machines which, as one of my friends pointed out to me,
Joy Simonson who was also on the trip but in a different group from ours, that
while we think of women earning a living working at sewing machines here in the
United States is not a very profitable or very great career to have, it was such
a step forward for the Cuban women and it should be viewed in that light. Also,
their literacy campaign, which other socialist countries also of course have
gone through in which anyone who could read and write almost by the age of 12 or
12:41:0015 went out into the rural areas and taught other people to read and write and
met with a great deal of resistance in some of the backwoods places, but just
were dogged about it. The literacy rate is infinitely higher than that in the
United States; it puts us in many ways to shame. It's a small country. I hadn't
realized at the time, a total population of 9 million, before any were exported
to the United States. In any case it was very exciting and I have heard, as I
have just showed you the postcard I received from some of the Cuban Federation
Women. Five or six years ago a delegation of Cuban women was here in Madison as
part of a national tour they were making and I was scheduled to meet with them.
Unfortunately, I was in the hospital, the only other time until this past year
12:42:00so I was unable to...I had one of my friends pick up a pair of earrings, which
was kind of a joke. The young woman in Cuba who was our translator lost a gold
earring while she was out with us and told us in great sorrow and shame the next
day that she had borrowed those without permission from her sister and then had
lost one and that those were earrings her sister had purchased in the United
States on a trip here at some point. When we got back from our Cuban trip Norma
Metzner and I bought, as close to that as we could remember what it looked like,
bought two pairs of gold earrings and sent them to her. Actually, we took them
to the Cuban, you didn't call it embassy but what substitutes for an embassy if
you didn't have official relations, and had them taken by pouch down so it
12:43:00didn't take a hundred years to get there. This young woman was part of the
delegation that came to Madison five or six years ago. I felt so badly to have
to miss them that I had one of my friends pick up another pair of earrings and
go to the meeting to deliver them.
MA: It's very hard to answer questions about poverty, but how did you see the
wealth of the Cuban people? Did you see major differences?
KC: No, we didn't see extremes. We didn't see anything in either the rural or
the urban areas that looked like shacks or street people or extreme poverty, nor
did we see anything that looked like extreme wealth. In fact, even moderately
12:44:00wealthy...Of course a lot of people had left. A lot of professional people and a
lot of people with money had removed themselves from Cuba. The level of living
of the people who were very proud of these new buildings in which they lived and
to which everyone had contributed in the work of building, were still very
crowded and very meager. Television in most places where they had a state
television channel, which I guess was just one channel that they have, but
comfortable and the individual residents with whom we spoke when we asked how
does this contrast with the space you had before and did you have indoor
12:45:00plumbing, and did you have this and that, this all seemed very upbeat by their standards.
MA: When you visited the Virgin Islands did you have the same kind of tour in
that you saw a lot of things or did you simply talk with the women representatives?
KC: I didn't even leave the island of St. Thomas so I have no idea what
the...There I was certainly impressed with the degrees of wealth and poverty, in
such a small place there were dramatic differences. I also discovered that a
relative of ours by the name of...somebody named Clarenbach who lived on St.
Thomas, probably still does, turned out to be a second or third cousin of my
12:46:00husband's. In any case, they had read in the local paper that I was going to be
there and had been in touch and invited me to stay with them at the close of the
conference and spend a day with them. Had I known how unpopular the name
Clarenbach is or was among any progressive kinds of people and that was the
makeup of the Status of Women, I might have gone under my maiden name instead.
They were nice enough people, this Bill and Priscilla Clarenbach. They were
people who had amassed quite a lot of money at an early age here in the United
States and had gone to St. Thomas to retire when they were 50 or thereabouts.
Like Midas, gold sticks to that man's hands, so what he had done was to buy up a
12:47:00mountain or a chunk of land and bulldoze it to death and develop it and put up
filling stations and I don't know what all, housing too, and while I was there
he was about to build what he was referring to as a "tourist trap" between the
airport and the downtown shopping area. He figured that anybody coming to St.
Thomas generally flies in, or comes by ship, and would have to go through so he
was having things to sell, ect. They lived on the highest peak in St. Thomas and
had a swimming pool and raised orchids and avocados. Just totally exploiting the
land as well as the people.
MA: That must have been very hard to experience.
12:48:00
KC: It sounds strange, "hard to experience", having maids wait on you and a
swimming pool to go into, but to do that knowing at whose expense it was being
done was ....
MA: For you to have gone on a mission that had to do with human rights the
contrast must have been dramatic.
KC: Yes, it was.
MA: Did any of the women at the conference ask you about your name?
KC: I don't believe so. I think the very fact that they didn't, suggests that
they assumed that I was or I wasn't. They probably made an assumption one way or
the other.
MA: What was the status of women, or is, 1970 was a long time ago.
KC: It is a long time ago and I really don't know what may have happened in the
Virgin Islands, although there were representatives from the Virgin Islands at
12:49:00the Houston conference so there certainly was some movement still ten years ago
and probably continues to be. An important emphasis at the meeting I attended
was this coming together of the native Black people and the sort of imported
white people. There were class as well as race distinctions that were very
apparent with efforts on the part of many...Once in a while I see this in Hawaii
too, the white houlee that have moved from the mainland, not being accepted and
making an effort to blend into the culture, etc. There are barriers, and there
12:50:00certainly were enormous barriers, I thought, in the Virgin Islands. Therefore,
the organizers of that meeting had regarded it as quite a coup to get as many of
the Black women from all three islands to come and participate and feel a part
of what was going on.
MA: Did you have fairly good participation?
KC: Yes, I thought so. This isn't even the tip of the iceberg of the kinds of
experiences that so many U.S. women have had in going to Mexico City, Copenhagen
and Nairobi. I do regret that I didn't get to any of those places.
MA: I have a friend who went to Nairobi and I've seen her slide show. It seems
absolutely wonderful.
KC: I'm sure those are experiences that one can read about and look at videos
and hear a great deal about and still never have what the actual experience does
12:51:00to you.
MA: Because of the passion. It's impossible to translate that, I think.
KC: At least we all know now that the women's movement is not a fad and is not a
creature of Ms. Magazine or a couple of kooks in NOW, but that it is, in fact, a
worldwide movement. That Robin Morgan's title "Sisterhood is Global" is a
reality and that particularly U.S. women, not just U.S. women, men too, are
really so ignorant of the rest of the world. A lot of that ignorance is being
broken down through this really worldwide women's movement. It's going to take a
long time, but at least we're headed in the right direction.
MA: Do you agree, I have heard criticisms of U.S. women that we tend to act as
12:52:00though we started the women's movement and we continue to lead the women's
movement and women who have been out of the country and seen what other women
are doing don't necessarily agree with that.
KC: I would think that is a very valid criticism that we have not heard enough
about what has been going on elsewhere so there is a chauvinism and
egocentricity and it is not unique to American women and is not unique to this
subject of the women's movement. I think that it is probably true across the
board that people in the United States tend to feel often that we are superior
and ahead of and need to be first. Maybe the devaluation of the dollar will be
12:53:00beneficial. Especially since World War II the United States has become more
arrogant than ever and so it is not surprising. I don't think people necessarily
need to be faulted because of their ignorance; they just need to be educated. I
think that's what is going on with a lot of self consciousness on the part of
the women's movement in this county to know that we didn't necessarily start
things, in fact, it doesn't take a great deal of historic knowledge to know that
the suffrage movement really got its big burst from Great Britain. Again, many
of us do know how Sweden and Denmark, it surprises some people to know how many
12:54:00radical women's groups there are in the Netherlands, Italy, Spain, France and
many of the European countries. I think also a great surprise is in the Third
World countries and the consciousness that is there and of course how far we
have to go. The report from the end of the International Women's Decade called
"Forward Looking Strategies" which is a magnificent report on the needs and
recommendations on behalf of women all around the globe, is a remarkable
educational tool in being fairly specific about what the situation is in various
situations and who is doing what about that situation. Arvonne Frasier, whose
12:55:00name has appeared earlier in one of these tapes, is now at the Hubert Humphrey
Institute for Public Policy or Public Affairs, whatever it is called, at the
University of Minnesota, and her office did a very valuable precede of that very
voluminous "Forward Looking Strategies" report. So that it's quite--and their
precede is very readable and understandable and something that is available to
anyone who wants it.
MA: That's good to know. As an older feminist, what do you see the feminist
movement doing in terms of older women? Has that been an issue that has been of
special interest to you? You mentioned earlier something about the need for
childcare but one of the problems with childcare is that the women who need the
12:56:00childcare are too busy to be lobbying for it and by the time one gets older they
no longer need it and they move on to other issues. I see, you might say the
graying of the women's movement in a sense, and do you think there are
ramifications from that? Do you think that the needs of older women are being
discussed more?
KC: Well they certainly are being discussed and addressed. The healthcare and
health insurance question, the nursing home situation, the numbers of older
people who are poor -- I think part of the pressure from the women's movement
has helped to keep the social security from being a possible source of cutting
the budget and helping to meet the deficit. Of course Older Women's League and
Gray Panthers are both among those groups that spearhead some of the concerns,
12:57:00call attention and research what the situation is. I suppose the fact that
single heads of households, unwed mothers having moved into first place as the
largest, most impoverished group in this country, has now nosed out of that
place on the totem pole. Older women, women beyond the age of 65, as the largest
category of impoverished in this country may have meant that some public policy
thrusts are now more on that category. I don't like to see this as a competition
in any case; either both categories of people, in fact, along the whole
continuum of the life span there are needs. I suppose the most oppressed
12:58:00category age-wise in this country are children, young children and I'm very
eager to have an opportunity to hear more from Donna Shalala now that she's on
campus, on that subject of meeting the needs of children. It's very hard to
understand how public officials, such as the governor of Wisconsin, can think
only of the mothers who are on welfare instead of the overwhelming number of
children who rely on that pittance for any kind of livelihood, and always behave
as though there weren't any children involved among the poor. What that bodes
for our society of the future is just too frightening even to contemplate.
12:59:00
Back to the graying of the women's movement. Not enough is being done. In a way
it's almost like displaced homemakers, rape crisis, family abuse, the grassroots
women are taking it upon themselves to move while they pressure for public
support and some changes in public policy. They are also, they or we, are also
in the business of attending to these matters. More and more women are working
out living accommodations.
MA: Jointly you mean?
KC: Yes, in some ways that are affordable and that keep people out of
institutions at least as long as they are able to find some way of being cared
13:00:00for and having companionship and living a resourceful and useful kind of
existence. I don't know, the attention to pensions, and as I've said before,
healthcare and health insurance and again, with leadership from women in the
women's health movement, preparing oneself physically by things that I don't do
of course, but exercise, proper diet, not smoking and warding off osteoporosis
and other things.
MA: The education again. You know, education is a stream throughout your life,
the importance of education, your role as an educator, it seems to me that, as I
look at the political work you've done, that's always there as a goal.
13:01:00
KC: I think that is part of the political job, and I'm not alone in thinking
that. I've been delighted in the process of these interviews for the Annenberg
course on American National Government, the number of practitioners as well as
scholars the members of Congress, political leaders, journalists who define part
of the job of the President of the United States as an educational job that any
political leader at whatever level must have a vision of where he or she wants
the country or state or whatever to be moving and be able to articulate that
vision and then be able to educate enough people so that they understand what
that's about and have some input into the whole direction.
13:02:00
MA: Do you think that NOW has an educational role, or perhaps a better question
would be, what do you see the National Organization of Women's role to be at
this time?
KC: I find it very hard to focus in just on the National Organization for Women
rather than a much broader spectrum of the women's movement, but there certainly
is an educational role that is there for every segment including NOW. The
Commissions, back at the time of the Kennedy Commission and then the subsequent
state and local Commissions on the Status of Women were all laying the ground
work and taking an important part in making possible the kind of contemporary
13:03:00women's movement that we have in this country and elsewhere through their
research, fact finding and then disseminating of information through not only
written materials but conferences, seminars, providing testimony at public
hearings. All of these things were an educational part of what was going on.
There is to be a meeting in Des Moines, Iowa a week from now that was called by
a coalition of half a dozen organizations on the agenda, the women's agenda for
the immediate future. That's going to be an educational enterprise. The whole
book, The Spirit of Houston and the forward looking strategies, these are all
educational tools. They also stimulate and goad to action and advocate.
13:04:00
MA: So it is impossible then to look at NOW in an isolated fashion, you're
saying, because it works so closely with so many other groups?
KC: It doesn't always, depending on the leadership of that organization, doesn't
always work as closely as I think it ought to. There were many, for a period of
time during this last decade, who didn't even believe in coalition work.
MA: Does the new president, the older woman?
KC: Molly Yard, I suppose within limits, but I think she kind of wants to go it
alone in some respects, for example, it is only one of two or three
organizations who believe we should immediately jump back in with the effort to
ratify the ERA, and others who say this is not the time, and there are so many
13:05:00things on the front burner that we'd better be pushing.
MA: How do you feel about?
KC: I think that until the time...I think that to invest so much woman power and
money and energy and all the other things that have to be invested, that unless
there was a reasonably good chance of rather instant passage and ratification,
that we should wait until the mood of the country and the temperament of
exchequer and of the concerns of people are more compatible. This doesn't mean
that we sit still till then but rather push on all of these many fronts with a
constant reminding, ourselves and others, that if we had an Equal Rights
13:06:00Amendment, then certain laws would be unconstitutional and certain other changes
might be more readily made. Even getting the ERA into the constitution doesn't
automatically mean that everything is going to be equal under the law. It just
means that it opens up with a standard now by which laws can be measured, that
more things will be declared passé.
MA: But of course that will also depend upon the philosophy, the political
philosophy, of the Supreme Court Justices also then.
KC: Indeed it will. Those in turn depend upon who gets elected to the presidency
and other appointing officials.
MA: Well, Kaye, this is our last session. Some questions I'd like to ask you
13:07:00that are a little less specific than some of the ones we have been talking
about. Looking back over say the last ten years, what do you see as the most
important gains that women have achieved?
KC: I don't know whether I'm limiting myself to ten years or twenty years or whatever.
MA: You can decide.
KC: I think, in general, a greater respect for woman and a greater acceptance,
what I often call credibility of women, an almost universal recognition that
women have, in general, have more potential and more ability and there is more
diversity than what was acknowledged ten or twenty years ago. I think this is
13:08:00reflected in women's self esteem, lots of barometers that one can haul out such
as women's political participation or their enrollment in, we hardly even say
non-traditional anymore when we talk about women in law school or medical
school, engineering, agriculture, and an acceptance by some of the very slow
learners on our faculty who didn't want anyone over the age of 20 or 22 in the
classroom and certainly didn't want women meddling in areas that would destroy
the prestige of a field. There still of course are sufficient bastions where
this has not yet taken hold. Then we see, really at the grassroots, in the small
13:09:00towns and farms as well as big cities, where all kinds of women at all levels of
the economy and education levels, etc., are taking themselves more seriously and
are moving in a lot of new directions. There isn't a community now that, not
only hasn't got the word, a lot of the negative violence against women but are
responding to that and are doing something about it. Communities that are
insisting that there be greater gender equity in public schools and at all
levels and teachers and parents are becoming increasingly conscious of what they
are doing to boys as well as girls with the old stereotype roles. A lot of this
13:10:00is happening everywhere in this country. That, I think is, in a very broad brush
way, what I think has happened.
Now what I am seeing in the women's movement itself, which is a plus, and is
slower to come, is a move toward a more international outlook and learning more
about what women are doing and what the women's movement, some male feminists as
well, around the globe as I may already have quoted Robin Morgen on a previous
tape saying "our ignorance in the west is frightening and incredible," our
ignorance with the rest of the world. That is beginning to become overcome and
that I think is a plus. We still have so far to go in moving women into real
13:11:00decision making, in the private sector as well as the public sector, but I think
primarily in the public sector. There are increasing efforts to move women into
a voice that is heard in foreign policy though for generations women have been
the primary movers in peace movements, but that voice is in contradiction to the
male, predominately male, I have to acknowledge, if you'll pardon the
expression, Jean Kirkpatrick and other people masquerading as women, but who
certainly don't make us proud. When I think of the organization that Bella Abzug
and Mim Kelber have started, a foreign policy council of women, and have put out
13:12:00a directory now which they have made available just within the last six months,
to all kinds of media outlets, letting them know that they no longer need to use
the excuse "But we don't know any women who are qualified" to be on Meet the
Press or to advise on this area of expertise and they have accumulated at least
the beginnings of a national directory. I have yet to see the fruits of that
labor but at least that kind of thing is happening. AAUW, the League of Women
Voters and some of these old line organizations had co-sponsored for the last
four or five years a big event in Washington annually to train women to be more
confident in the knowledge that they already have so that women are able to
13:13:00speak out and say "Yes, I am an expert on this and I can speak to the Central
American situation or the US - Soviet affairs with the same authority that the
men who are being called on can speak. We've a long way to go but at least there
is recognition of the need for it and there is some organization in motion. It
is going to be a long time I suppose before we see any like equity of women with
men in cabinet level positions or in the national legislature or other places
where some of this can express itself.
MA: Do you buy the notion that when women achieve equity in these areas, I'm
thinking particularly in foreign policy, do you think that foreign policy will
13:14:00change as a result?
KC: Yes. Yes I do. I have no question about that. I know that many people do not
and they immediately point to some of the women who have led nations, Indira
Gandi, Golda Meir, Margaret Thatcher, and find that these are not necessarily
more humane or more gentle. I believe, as many other people do, that at this
stage of the world's development with respect to gender equity, the only women
who are going to get anywhere, and this is true in the private economy as well
as in public life, are those who imitate the growing accepted morass and it's
going to take time until there is, what is the expression --massive numbers
13:15:00before we will see the kinds of differences in policies. I think that one has to
look for example at a place like Sweden where the leadership has been feminist,
not necessarily female and see what enormous differences there are in public
policy or, we can even look at the handful of women who are in our own Congress.
Certainly far from anything equitable, 5%, 25 women in the House of
Representative out of 435 and still that little handful in their women's caucus
has had impact on public policy through the Congress. When we look at County
Boards and City Councils where the numbers and percentages of women, and School
Boards, these more local level places, we can see the impact of the presence.
13:16:00Now I don't believe that all women, I make a very firm distinction between
"feminist" and "female" because we have all kinds of women in our own
legislature. Some of the leadership of women in our Wisconsin Legislature,
anti-feminist... Unless people make that distinction they can again say that
having women in decision making isn't going to matter. Critical mass: that is
the word I was looking for, until we are a "critical mass."
MA: Looking at the other side of my question, are there areas in the last maybe
13:17:00five to ten years would be fairly accurate time span, where you see declines for
women, particularly with the current administration?
KC: Sure. The failure of the federal administration to provide...you can hardly
think of a subject area in which the Regan administration hasn't cut back and
this has to do with health care and it has to do with housing. The shameful
situation of homeless people in this country is a direct result of the failure
of the federal government to continue building housing and they unseat people
with a gentrification, whatever that word means, I'm not sure, and then provide
no alternative. The horrible things that Mayor Koch is doing in New York which
13:18:00is rounding up all those people from the streets and putting them in mental
institutions or wherever as if that was any kind of a solution to this problem.
Violence against women has, I don't know if it has actually increased or if the
consciousness and reporting and court action, etc., has made it more visible but
certainly violence has not subsided or lessened at all. You can't separate that,
any of these things, the increasing poverty of women, women heads of households,
the epidemic of teenage unwed pregnancies; I think are all part and parcel of
the militarization of this whole society which still, as a matter of policy at
13:19:00least, relies on violence as a way of settling differences. With the enormous
military budget, institutions of higher learning and private production in this
country is so focused on military expenditures and one is considered disloyal
even to question whether universities should be engaging in military research or
whether the CIA should be around. The secrecy in government has certainly
increased in the last decade and more, which is the antipathy to a democratic
society. Civil rights are in enormous question, the right to privacy, gay
bashing which is perfectly acceptable in many circles. It is less acceptable
13:20:00these days to be anti-Semitic and to be as overtly racist, people are supposed
to be a little more subtle now, that is considered to be polite, but they can
continue to be as racist as ever. One can't separate sex based discrimination
whether it's race, religion, life style, previous condition of servitude, the
whole alien registration kinds of things. We're really in a very bad way. I
think any feminist who keeps her eyes solely on stereotypes of male-female
without looking at all of the rest of the environment which encourages put
downs. If you put down any category then you are kind of willing to put down the
13:21:00next category. We had the great joy of interviewing Barbara Jordan on one of the
tapes for the American Government course for the lesson on civil liberties and
we asked her especially about the separation of church and state and some of the
impact of some of the religious right wing zealots on politics. She made the
point that intolerance, a person who is intolerant of other peoples' religious
views finds it very easy to be intolerant of any other kinds of views,
political, social or whatever and I agree with that. I think the most
fundamental right from which spring a whole lot of other first amendment rights
at least, is freedom of conscience. There is no way to control somebody else's
13:22:00conscience but unless we are allowed to think the way we happen to think and
then express that in speech, or the way we relate to other people or assembly or
the right to petition or criticize or complain and that's to me what a
democratic society is all about and we are a long, far cry from one.
MA: Do you think that women who have become feminists, do you think the process
of becoming a feminist then opens women's eyes to these other issues? Do you
think it's a first, could perhaps be a first step?
KC: I'm sure it could be a first step and I think at the same time many people
come to feminism from having a concern with some of these other things and then
seeing the interrelationship.
13:23:00
MA: So then one way or another you do see the interrelationship.
KC: I do, but I think also that it has to sometimes be pointed out very
concretely to help people get the...I know that over the years my eyes have been
opened when somebody has pointed out to me concretely and I could I suppose
trace at least 50 of my last 67 years with moments of epiphany or click, or
whatever, when somebody has called my attention, I may have mentioned that I had
never thought of reproductive control as a political issue until Pauli Murray at
our first NOW national board meeting made the point that unless a woman
controlled if and when she was to become a mother than all of these other
freedoms were of certainly less consequence. I just had never...I had privately
13:24:00thought that it was nobody's business but the individual's whether they became
pregnant and had an abortion or gave birth or whatever. I hadn't thought of it
as having a political implication until she pointed it out.
MA: You mentioned that also in respect to gay/lesbian rights, that it was a
process also.
KC: Equal rights means equal rights...and probably a great many more. Violence I
may have mentioned that the first time anyone called my attention to rape as a
political question, Xandra Kayden, I see that she is in one of the footnotes in
the text we are using for American Government, she is a political scientist but
I knew her when we were planning the International Feminist Planning Conference
on the Lesley College campus back in 1973. She was one of the people who was
13:25:00very instrumental in planning that. She telephoned me when she was doing some
position papers for George McGovern during his presidential candidacy and was
asking my advice on something and in the course of the conversation said "I
think the next big push for the women's movement is going to be on the topic of
rape." Never crossed my mind until then but I had to mull that for awhile.
MA: As an example, how is rape a political issue, how does she describe rape as
a political issue?
KC: I don't know what her description is but it was going to be a big push
to...well to do what we actually have done, to get the laws changed so that a
woman is not on trial and that there is some credibility and that the
13:26:00educational and sensitizing experience for police and the judiciary and hospital
people and even the establishment of a victim/witness helpers, ombudspeople in
the court situation, all of these things have grown out of the recognition that
we were not handling rape situations in humane and useful affirmative ways.
MA: Do you see the expansion of rape to include date rape and marital rape as a
result of that also?
KC: Sure, that has evolved as the... that happens in every kind of issue really,
the more we get into it the more we see what needs to be done. Sometimes when I
look at the National Plan of Action that was agreed upon at Houston ten years
13:27:00ago and realized that not a single one of those 25 umbrella issue areas can be
laid to rest, but the level at which we are doing things under those major
headings has become much more sophisticated, much deeper and also are on the
national agenda, not just the feminists, not just women's groups but state
legislature and county boards, city councils and the congress itself are now
paying attention, they don't always handle it well, but nevertheless these are
issues that are recognized as important social issues. Which is another part of
the response I suppose to your question of what pluses and what minuses.
13:28:00
MA: Yes, definitely. When you look at young women today, what do you think is
the major feminist issue? They may not know or be able to articulate what
feminist issue is for them or they may not think there is one, but do you see
major issues that are going to emerge for them? It's hard to imagine in college,
they seem to feel they have it all --it's already been done, the world is open
for them....
KC: Of course the whole juggling of home and family, we have not progressed very
far with respect to childcare and sharing within the home. I think women are
going to remain in the workforce, in the paid labor force in numbers equivalent
13:29:00to men in the workforce. I don't know how far we're going to get in changing the
expectations of women and men in, for example, defining success or setting
goals. I've thought about this for many, many years that when people say or when
I think that even supermoms who juggle the works can very rarely expect to
attain the levels of acclaim or even of satisfaction in a job career situation
that they could have attained if they had not had children or had household
13:30:00responsibilities. Then I wonder to myself why do we have these levels of
achievement as the goals, why do we as a society say this person is a star or is
particularly special? I'm sure that is part of the reason some of the men are
reluctant to deflect themselves from their career aspirations, much as they
would like to have more time parenting or doing leisure things with their family
or avoiding the stress of heart attacks and all the rest by not having their
nose so close to the grindstone. It's kind of the heat is on from many sources
to do that so I don't know if it's the achieving society or what it is. It isn't
13:31:00always a matter of stockpiling more money but it is to be somebody in your field.
MA: And it isn't nearly as important to raise healthy children?
KC: Well it becomes important too, as long as somebody else is doing it. I can
see this in the eyes of men who want to send their children to the best schools
and the best summer camps, and make sure that they are healthy and well rounded
and have many skills and as long as papa is paying the bills...And that's
different from...And sometimes even close friends and relatives wonder about a
man who, and there are a lot of men who are family people and are close to their
13:32:00own children and don't see household chores as "woman's work."
MA: And your husband was one of them.
KC: That's right. And yet, such people, I don't know if anyone ever mumbled this
about Hank but I'm sure such people often are thought of as well maybe not the
achievers and maybe didn't have it on the ball or they would have...
MA: It does appear that in our society to be a big achiever not only do you need
to devote all of your time to it, you also need the support of a person behind you.
KC: That's right. How that gets changed...I know people I knew who well we
13:33:00shouldn't change it, we won't advance, we won't have the newer inventions and
discoveries. It takes medical researchers who are that devoted to what they are doing.
MA: That's an interesting debate.
Taking this to your personal life, when you look back, clearly you made
sacrifices for home and family in terms of time. Would you have done that any
differently knowing what you know now? You certainly could have achieved more.
KC: Yes, I certainly could. I guess I'm a little ambivalent about that. Many
times over the years I've thought I wouldn't want to have traded my parenting
role for national presidency of something or other and I still maintain that, at
13:34:00least for me. I think being a parent is good for adults. Now maybe there are
substitutes that people can put in their life that will also make them more
sensitive as human beings and more able to generalize about educational needs
and healthcare needs and a lot of other things. Some of the most self-centered
people I know are either unmarried or childless or both and I feel badly
sometimes that they haven't had the experience which of necessity forces...I
13:35:00don't think that some people are just born to be parents, but there are things
that you learn to do. Maybe I have just rationalized the pleasure I have...Oh,
having done this and having invested a great deal of myself into this role I
must tell myself yes, I enjoyed it! Who is to say to what extent I am rationalizing?
MA: What have you learned from your children?
KC: I don't know how to sum it up in a sentence or two. Once again I tend to
think in specifics rather than overall. I remember an occasion at our supper
13:36:00table when David was six or seven I suppose because we had moved to Madison by
then, when we were setting certain ground rules I don't have any idea what the
conversation was, it might have had to do with bed time or eating vegetables or
something but his question was "By what right can parents tell children what
they may or may not do?" It was a real philosophic question and started all
kinds of wheels going because it is a very good question, by what right or what
authority, I mean parents do not own children, this is another unique human
being and while we have certain responsibilities for health and safety, how far
does that go and what are the lines. Multiply that by 365 days of the year for
13:37:00how many years and three children and I think I was learning things all the
time, things that I had to think about that I might never have thought about.
MA: Because they are each unique individuals bringing a different perspective to
the world.
KC: I think you learn to receive as well as to give by having children. My
mother used to try to teach me how to be a gracious receiver, and she herself
certainly was one, but things are different when kids want to do something for
you and you know that their resources are limited and yet to put yourself in
those shoes and how much pleasure you get out of being the giver then you should
allow other people that pleasure. I suppose also from children you learn a
13:38:00little bit about their whole generation and other things that are affecting
them, and find out what the schools are teaching and how they are teaching it.
MA: Did your children grow up with basically the same political beliefs as you?
Certainly at some point in time children do have the same beliefs as their
parents but then sometimes they move in entirely different political directions.
KC: I would say that our children, all three of them, have essentially the same
outlook. Janet is not very politically active or much of a political
participant, she votes and she contributes to political campaigns, but I don't
know what kind of an analysis she would do of a public policy, although I've
13:39:00been known to underestimate her also on some of those scores. I think David's
politics are closest to mine and Hank's and Hank and I had very similar basic
outlooks on things. Whenever we would fill out a questionnaire from our Congress
member or whatever, we did them separately and had one line for "W" and one for
"H" once in a while there would be one particular issue on which we would have a
yes and a no but for the most part -- in fact that was one of our initial
attractions to each other I think 41 years ago. Sarah is not quite as much of a
civil libertarian as David and I are. I remember David and Sarah having a debate
13:40:00on the helmets for motorcyclists which David thought was an invasion of privacy,
if people wanted to knock their heads off a motorcycle and Sarah's view was it's
a social cost when they do that, the police and medical and all the rest and
therefore some of these safety regulations, even though they do invade privacy,
seat belts, etc. that they unbalance, she goes in the other direction. Still,
they are both thoughtful and don't accept... they have a heathy skepticism and
certainly interested in what's going on and take part in what's going on.
13:41:00
MA: Did your feminism have an influence on their lives, do you think?
KC: I'm sure that the way we lived in our own household certainly had a...that's
just what they expected and the way they lived. Neither of my gals is a gung ho,
rebel rousing, street corner feminist and yet both of them seem to be very proud
of some of the things that I have done and I don't think they disagree with my
stand on feminist issues and probably agree with them. I suppose in that sense
they do have....
MA: Do you see in their generation more of a taking for granted of the rights
13:42:00that they have that your generation had to fight for?
KC: Sarah had to go through a lot of these struggles herself. She started when
she was in law school at Boalt Hall at Berkeley. The women students were feeling
very put down by...she helped to organize the first women's group there and she
has helped to organize a women attorney's group in her county and frequently is
asked to address status of women conferences and other things. I think she is
very mindful that the struggle still goes on. She is mindful of it in the law
firm that employed her, she never brought a discrimination suit, but she was
aware that the legal secretary, who was female, was being paid about as much as
13:43:00Sarah who was an attorney and that the difference between what she was being
paid and what the male attorneys were being paid, in spite of the fact that she
was a good lawyer and brought business in, etc., so she knows that those issues
are not won. While she doesn't handle a lot of discrimination cases, she is also
very conscious of racism and she is, as I've told you, bilingual. A lot of her
clients are poor people and a lot are Spanish speaking, so she is aware of all
kinds of ongoing things. Janet graduated from the Ag School here and worked in a
rural area in upstate New York and is, not only comfortable in rural and small
settings, but again is mindful of a lot of distinctions. I guess I don't care
13:44:00whether they pay dues to NOW or something else as long as they are aware of
social justice and of being a plus in their own community and being kind to
friends and neighbors. All three of my kids are extremely generous with friends
and other things. From the standpoint of character, which I don't know if I
separate from political outlook, I guess I really don't, they all please me.
MA: I think you've just given a very good example of the many forms that social
concern can take.
If you were going to start the life of a social activist over again, and of
13:45:00course you didn't know that you were beginning the life of a social activist at
the time I'm sure, but knowing all of the things that you know now, are there
things that you would have done differently, major things in terms of personal
direction, political allegiances?
KC: I suppose there were a lot of things and yet I have never planned ahead,
I've said that before, so that to plan a whole lifetime now in the next five
minutes is going to be a strain. I'm wondering about myself though as I look
13:46:00back, that I never really entertained the option of not marrying. It was
just...I never really thought about it in one way or the other, but in looking
back I realize that I always made the assumption of whom would I marry and when,
but not would I marry. I suppose the same thing is true of having children
although I must say that in my pre-married days I would fantasize about life
ahead, I never could picture myself with girl children, I suppose because I grew
up with three brothers and was a real tomboy and did things with them all the
time. I just couldn't imagine myself until I actually had a daughter, ever being
the mother of a girl. Of course now I feel sorry for people who don't have at
13:47:00least children, if they have more than one, one of each gender. Because I've
learned different things from my girl children than I've learned... maybe I've
just learned something different from each of three individuals perhaps
irrespective of gender but I think not. I think there are special growing up
things that girls experience that boys don't and vice versa. So those were other
questions. It took me until well into my forties before I asked myself, why
didn't you ever think about going to law school? I still don't know why I never
thought of it and I have been sorry that I haven't had legal training, even to
do just what I have done.
MA: The work that you do keeps taking you into that area doesn't it?
13:48:00
KC: That's right, so some of us had to be self-trained, not that I by any means
understand the law. It took feminists who were not even trained in the law to do
some digging into the sex-based discrimination that was embodied in the law in
some of the early days, by early days I mean before women and the law was
sneaked into some of the first law school curriculum. On the other hand, that in
itself has been part of the excitement of my life and of my participation in the
feminist movement. There were so many areas of life that I knew nothing about
and that I had to learn about. Days when you don't learn something can be a
13:49:00drag. This brings me of course to one of the pluses of my employment here at the
university, that my work has been pretty well self-defined and has changed over
the years. I get into an awful rut I've discovered about myself if I'm doing the
same thing more than once or twice and consequently I have always been eager for
a new experience or a slightly different experience and then I find a way to
say, to legitimatize abandoning something I'm already doing and moving into
something else. So I have had the opportunity, even though I've been in one
career slot for a long, long time, to have a lot of new experiences and a lot of
learning experiences. Then of course, I don't know how I would have ever had the
13:50:00opportunity to meet the unbelievable numbers of absolutely wonderful women that
I have had the opportunity not only to meet but to really get to know, that the
Status of Women experience and all of the subsequent involvements.
MA: You wouldn't change any of that it sounds like.
KC: I don't know. People used to needle me about applying for jobs in Washington
whenever there was a vacancy that looked like the kind of thing, the executive
director of something in the women's organization or in the Federal government
itself, I'd get phone calls and you know, apply, come, do this. I didn't for a
couple of reasons, one had to do with family and not wanting to move people
around, and secondly, I am kind of a small town person and the occasions when I
13:51:00lived, we lived for eight years in the New York area and I've lived in
St. Louis for four years and thought about Los Angeles for the summer we were
there, and I'm just not a big city dweller from choice. This community is just
simply big enough to suit me. Those were two reason that I didn't want to be in
Washington for any, although I loved the two experiences that I had there with
the War Production Board back in the 40's and with International Women's Year in
the 70's.
13:52:00
MA: Kay, you were talking about never having applied for a job that you simply
wait until they are offered to you. Do you want to continue on that vein?
KC: Well, I don't know what that says about me, in fact, I have turned down
things even that people have offered to me when I would liked to have done it
and I don't think it is fear of failure, I don't know what it is. I had friends
13:53:00in college who used to comment that my whole family, my brothers and I, weren't
ambitious in the sense of wanting to amount to something, not that any of us
were lazy.
MA: Yet you have a Ph.D. in Political Science which most of us would consider
quite an achievement in itself. That's a level of ambition there that we can't deny.
KC: Of course, actually I suppose when I made the decision I was working in
Washington for the War Production Board and had a master's degree and realized
during that several year period that I had never been a real student and had
never .... things came very easily to me, less so at the university than in high
13:54:00school of course, I could get by with B+'s and finally by my junior year I had
learned how to write a final exam so that I could get A's, but I never immersed
myself in the library or felt it essential that I had actually read all of these
books instead of just an excerpt in a textbook or whatever. That kind of hunger
really only came to me after I was away from school for a couple years. I'd been
in school continuously from the age of 2 till the age of 21 when I had my
masters degree so my return to graduate school was less with the idea, I want to
get a Ph.D. because then I can have more job opportunities, or because it would
13:55:00look good behind my name, but I wanted to really feel that I had learned
something and then I did it rather in a hurry, at least by a lot of standards
because returning to Wisconsin instead of going to any of the other schools that
offered me fellowships, I knew that I would have fewer trials and errors, I knew
what people to avoid. I really hand-picked the instructors and the courses I
wanted during the course work I had to take and then wrote my thesis on a
subject of my choice, and I know a lot of graduate students have to get so many
clearances even on their subjects, much less how they go about doing it. Then,
as I've told you before, my advice from Bill Ebenstein and some of my favorite
13:56:00professors was do it and get it over with. You're not going to set the world on
fire with your thesis and you can hang around for eight years doing it or you
can get it done now. You will really start the real learning process when you
begin teaching. That only made sense to me after I really began teaching in my
first job at Purdue where I realized that while I thought I knew this stuff from
A to Z you have to know it at a totally different level in order to purvey it to
others and to know which of it they are getting and what they are not getting
and why they are not getting it. So, I had that kind of advice but I wasn't
dying for a Ph.D. for any other reason than that series of reasons. I've never
flaunted it, I don't, in fact it embarrasses me when I see calling cards from
13:57:00some of my friends with Ph.D. after their name, I think "Why did they do that,
why did they have to do that?" My children think it's kind of nice when they
introduce me to somebody I've never met before, they will say "This is my
mother, Dr. Clarenbach." I will occasionally use my...I have it now on airline
tickets; I use Doctor and find that I get a lot less shabby treatment by smart
asses at the ticket window and other places. It always annoys me that I get
nicer treatment. I've had the same treatment when I go into a store. If I go in
my Saturday grubbies I can stand in line to be waited on by a lot of clerks or
if I go in gussied up and looking like a lady who has money they just can't wait
13:58:00to be nice enough to you. There is so much of that classism throughout this
society. That is of course what happens when you put doctor on your airline ticket.
MA: How interesting.
KC: Anyway, I don't know what got all of this started.
MA: We were talking about if you were going to do it over what you would have
done differently. You began I think with a comment that I think is very
generationally, that a lot of women can relate to not even knowing whether you
would have married and had children since that of course wasn't something one
thought about not doing at that time. Of course if you hadn't then it would have been...
KC: And had I the road not taken, had I taken the Bryn Mawr job instead of the
13:59:00Purdue job a whole lot of things would have been different and who is to know.
MA: And there are always those turns in the road and we make decisions accordingly.
KC: I made decisions not to go, I've mentioned this before, to the three
International meetings during the International Women's Year.
MA: You made the decision not to go to the International meetings?
KC: Yes, Mexico, Copenhagen and Nyrobi and probably if I had that to do over
again.... And again, I think it was something of the same thing that makes me
hesitate to aspire, had something to do with my not going to those meetings.
14:00:00Another reason of course that I didn't go to those international meetings was
the expense. Maybe that's something else I would do differently, spend a little
bit more money.
MA: You certainly encourage your children to do that.
KC: Of course my mother encouraged me to do that too and I didn't do much of it.
MA: As I look back on all of our interviews and what you've talked about with
your birth family and then your marriage family, it seems to me that all parts
of life have always been held with near equal importance to your parents and to
you as you were raising the children so that not only career but health and
sports and political activities and family and friends have all been important
14:01:00and maybe what you're saying is that maybe you've just been taking care of
yourself in all of those areas. Were you to charge ahead in any one particular
area it would have meant giving up some of the others.
KC: Of course I do, or used to a lot in a lot of talks I gave, talk about the
importance of balance in one's life, balance in all of those areas and I do
believe that. I know one thing I would have done differently if I had an
opportunity to redo it and that is to have more of a social life, more
interactions with friends, good friends. I think I was a much more sociable
person than my husband and enjoyed events more than he did and of course his
14:02:00illness put the kibosh on a lot of things. When we moved to Madison in 1960 I
was 39. I was the same age then that my Sarah is today. I had great dreams of
glory, of being able to play golf and go swimming and seeing a lot of old
friends and then Hank's economic situation, employment situation, is really what
moved me back into the workforce. That and the fact that Edgewood called me and
then the University Extension called me. I might not have said yes except that
we needed a few bucks. Anyway, I never did get to play golf.
14:03:00
MA: You might have expanded your social life at that time much more?
KC: That's right, so that by the time I was home from work and then with three
kids, who were school age and one who was preschool and we couldn't even afford
to pay a cleaning lady for that first couple of years, so my weekends were just
filled with routine household kinds of things. We bought, as I've said before,
season tickets to the plays and things and then found that we just weren't
getting to them so we stopped doing that. By the time that financially things
were looking up, then Hank's illness set in and he just didn't want anyone to
see him eat or tremor so our social life minimized from what was not great to
14:04:00virtually nil.
MA: How many years?
KC: He had 17 years of Parkinson's disease and for the last 10 or 12 he was
totally unable to work so I was the sole bread winner which is another reason I
didn't go to a lot of meetings was that I didn't want to leave him by himself
for any length of time.
MA: That makes a big difference.
KC: Now that I think I've got a little money stashed away, again it's not enough
to worry the Dow Jones at all, I figure I could have spent the $3,000 to go to
Copenhagen and, you know, who would care.
MA: And now the question that you're asking yourself is should I retire? It will
14:05:00be interesting to see how you answer that.
KC: That's right, and more days than not I say "Yes, I think I should" but I
still figure I shouldn't rush into a decision because once that's made it's
made. It cannot be revoked. I'm feeling better now than I was feeling certainly
last July and August when I was sick as a horse. I guess that was one of the
things my father used to impress upon us was don't ever make an important
decision when you're tired or sick.
MA: Very good advice.
KC: And I seem to be a little of both, I'm sick and tired of being sick and
tired so I'm postponing the decision.
MA: My last question has to do with various activities that you've been involved
14:06:00with. Can you identify any one that makes you the proudest when you look back on
your various achievements and activities?
KC: No I really can't. There are times when I think the Wisconsin Governor's
Commission on the Status of Women which did so much ground breaking that had
national ramifications and the way in which that whole Commission functioned was
one of the things. Then I think no, starting NOW, much as we may have had a
tiger by the tail, but at that moment in history was an important step.
MA: Of course historians look at that and they say "Yes indeed, Kay Clarenbach's
14:07:00greatest work was that she was instrumental in the formation of NOW." In part,
that's why I'm asking you the questions.
KC: I think the Status of Women Commissions, without them we would never have
had NOW, and I don't mean just because of the event where we got together, but
all the groundwork that had been laid over those several years made it possible
for NOW to...and then for it to catch on as quickly as it did. I think some of
the things I did here in Wisconsin with respect to continuing education for
women was very important, not only on the Madison campus, but then through the
channel of our Status of Women Commission we were able to encourage every
campus, we didn't have a unified system at that time, but we had meetings on the
14:08:00campuses of all the state colleges and the private institutions in the state and
got the word out to them about adult learners and particularly women and the
wasted brain power and all of the things that go with that.
I don't know at what stage of my life I learned that life is not a popularity
contest. I only articulated that to myself and anyone who wanted to hear it, you
know, 20 years ago. I imagine I grew up knowing that because I don't remember
ever having my parents ask each other or themselves or any of us "But what will
people say? But what will people think?", or "Will your friends like you if you
14:09:00do this?" Those were never questions that were even implied much less asked, but
rather "Can you live with yourself if you do this?" "Or do you think that's a
wise thing to do?" My mother did scare me when I was a little kid by persuading
me that Jesus was watching me at all times and whether she could see me or not,
Jesus was probably on my case. That used to stay my hand when I was a little
youngster and kept me in line.
MA: But then, once you discovered that that wasn't the case, then you were free?
KC: I don't know if I was free. I think by that time I had internalized what I'm
supposed to not do so I didn't even need Jesus to watch me.
MA: You had your own control mechanisms?
KC: I think to do that which was popularly accepted was not a...and of course
14:10:00both of my parents did things all the time that were not popularly accepted,
they did them because they were socially useful or just or whatever.
MA: What kind of work have you enjoyed the most? You've done one-to-one with the
people in the Continuing Education program, you've taught....
KC: I think I have liked writing speeches and then delivering them. I have loved
doing that. I have 16 tons of manuscripts! I think I would probably like to
write something more than that. A lot of people keep needling me, why don't I
write some of my experiences, whatever, and the same thing that keeps me from
doing a lot of other things keeps me from doing that. Because I say to myself
14:11:00"Well now, who would be interested in this? Who, beside maybe my own kids, would
like to have a little clearer record of some of these things?" Because I do, I
love to write. I haven't done a lot of speaking lately but I used to do as many
30 major addresses in a year and never ran out of steam and never delivered the
same one twice. Audiences sometimes thought it was the same one, but I never
used a speech a second time. Lots of times I would snip and paste. Not only was
each audience a little bit different, sometimes a lot different, but also my
view of what I said last...I never could use notes in a class a second time. I
14:12:00would keep notes from an outline of a lecture or whatever thinking "Aha, I'll
haul this out again next semester." I'd haul it out next semester and I wouldn't
have the slightest idea of what I had in mind and I thought I don't really look
at it that way now, I look at it.... And again, to an audience, these nuances
may have been unrecognized but to me it made a difference.
MA: Which probably has something to do with how much you love the process of
writing and delivering, whether it be a speech or a lecture, that it was
constantly new and exciting for you.
KC: I did almost all of my speech writing at home, on my own time. In the five
months that you were able. I would sit at my picnic table where I could enjoy
the fresh air and the sunshine and watching the birds while I wrote, and then I
14:13:00wasn't interrupted by seeing a pile of dirty clothes or something that might
need doing.
MA: How do you write? What is your process? Do you put it straight on a computer
for example?
KC: No, I don't type at all, ever since I lied to the Ethical Society and told
them I couldn't type, I have subsequently made myself an honest woman and now I
can't type.
MA: So we're talking all longhand here?
KC: Yes, with a number 1 dark pencil on a yellow pad. I can outline a 15 or 20
page speech in about two inches at the top of it, and I can't start writing
until I know what I want to do, what main ideas I want to convey and then I
always want to have some colorful, illustrative, antidotal material, otherwise
14:14:00it gets too boring to the listeners. I love words and I love turning a phrase
and until my eyes betrayed me, crossword puzzles were one of my favorite
relaxations before bedtime. I loved to do crossword puzzles and did a lot of
them up at the cottage on rainy days. I guess I do like words and I like the
turn of a phrase and of course my husband loved to read anything that I had ever
written. I told you he was my... I don't know why I ever relied on this because
he thought anything I wrote was just absolutely wonderful and he would persuade
me that it was and then each time he would say "I think this is the best thing
you've ever written!" He also corrected my spelling. He was quite a grammarian
14:15:00and a speller. I don't know why Jefferson City schools were any better than
Sparta schools, but...
MA: You know that's a very important thing that you just mentioned, that you
have such confidence, you may not aspire to high political positions, but you
have a great deal of confidence in what you do. You family was supportive and
then your husband, there was always somebody there saying "You're doing very
well, keep going" as opposed to "You really shouldn't be doing this, you should
get home and take care of the kids."
KC: There were some years when my neighbors finally called it to my attention, I
think I've told you this, that I'd get out of the car, after a day's work here,
lugging a briefcase, which I knew I was going to open after the kids were in
14:16:00bed, and they would tell me they could hear me from the car up to the front door
--a sigh of fatigue and I was fatigued. After everyone was in bed then I would
sit down to do my writing or whatever else I had brought home.
MA: You have incredible discipline.
KC: I used to have but I have less so now.
MA: You're entitled!
KC: That's what I keep telling myself and that's why I worry about retiring,
that I might get into my tip-back chair in the living room and never emerge.
MA: Where's Kay Clarenbach? Oh, watching soap operas.
KC: I haven't even connected my downstairs television so if it's something I
really want to watch I have to walk all the way upstairs. Sometimes I put a
music tape in and sometimes I don't even do that.
MA: Is there anything else that you would like to say at this point in the interview?
14:17:00
KC: No, except that I have enjoyed this opportunity to reminisce and to relive a
lot of this. You've remarked about what a memory I have for events and names,
but it's the experience. I have mentioned this, it must be similar to
psychoanalysis, the whole setting has just brought these things back to mind and
it has been good to do.
MA: It has been very good for me also. I've enjoyed it very much.
KC: Do you know what's going to happen to either the tapes or the transcript?
MA: Not specifically but I will get that information.
KC: Gerta reminds me that I'm supposed to lay claim to them and to say it is my
14:18:00property and that if other people want to look at it they have to get my
permission. I don't know what the process is or who is protecting what from whom.
MA: I will find out specifically. It's my understanding that you can put any
limitations you choose on the information that we have here. It can remain in
the archives and be opened up like personal papers in 20 years, it can be used now.
KC: I think I've been very careful about not saying unkind things about people
who might deserve it.
MA: Yes, you're a very tactful woman.
KC: I can think of a whole battery of people on this campus....
MA: Whose names you haven't even mentioned.
KC: That's right, but will be on this campus too. People who are the problem
instead of part of the solution. Therefore, I can't think of who might...I don't
14:19:00even think the FBI would get any good information from this than they already have.